CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06769022MOVEUpdated Jun 11, 2026

Exercise Adherence and Cognitive Decline

An interventional study of Goal Setting and Exercise Intensity Intervention in Cognitive Decline, sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 45 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-11.

Sponsored by University of Colorado, Boulder · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
45 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to conduct a small-scale test of a goals-based program to help people to exercise more and learn what people like or don't like about the procedures. This program is being designed for individuals aged 45-65 from the Black community. Low levels of physical activity are related to health problems such as heart disease, diabetes, and cognitive decline. People of color are more negatively impacted by these conditions and have also historically been underrepresented by research seeking to increase physical activity. The investigators have developed this goals-based exercise promotion program with the help of a Black-led community-based organization (The Gyedi Project) and a Community Advisory Board made up of stakeholders in the Black community, and now the investigators are conducting a trial of its feasibility and acceptability.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Decline

Keywords

  • Goals
  • Exercise Intensity
  • Goal Difficulty
  • Cognitive Decline
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,843 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,100 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 65 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Colorado, Boulder is the lead sponsor of 86 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • \<3 incorrect responses on the Pfeiffer Mental Status Questionnaire
  • Ages 45-65.
  • Consent to be randomized to condition.
  • Planning to remain in the Denver metro area for the next two months
  • Identify as Black or African American

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently physically active (i.e., >90 min/week of moderate PA or >40 min/week of vigorous PA consistently for the past 6 months).
  • On antipsychotic medications or currently under treatment for any serious psychiatric disorder, including Alzheimer's or dementia
  • Answers "yes" to 1 or more of the 7 questions of the PAR-Q+
  • Blood pressure at baseline or before exercise is greater than 140/90
  • Blood pressure >210/90 mmHg (for men) or >190/90 mmHg (for women) immediately after exercise
  • Inability to walk 3 blocks without chest pain, shortness of breath, or light headedness.
  • Inability to climb 2 flights of stairs without chest pain, shortness of breath, or light headedness.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Moderate Intensity Exercise, Basic Goal Difficulty

    Participants are assigned to exercise at a moderate intensity and create basic goals.

    Behavioral: Goal Setting and Exercise Intensity Intervention

  • Experimental
    Moderate Intensity Exercise, Challenging Goal Difficulty

    Participants are assigned to exercise at a moderate intensity and create challenging goals.

    Behavioral: Goal Setting and Exercise Intensity Intervention

  • Experimental
    Vigorous Intensity Exercise, Basic Goal Difficulty

    Participants are assigned to exercise at a vigorous intensity and create basic goals.

    Behavioral: Goal Setting and Exercise Intensity Intervention

  • Experimental
    Vigorous Intensity Exercise, Challenging Goal Difficulty

    Participants are assigned to exercise at a vigorous intensity and create challenging goals.

    Behavioral: Goal Setting and Exercise Intensity Intervention

Interventions

  • BehavioralGoal Setting and Exercise Intensity Intervention

    Participants' goal-setting and exercise intensity are manipulated based on group assignment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood Pressure

    Blood pressure of all participants is collected before intervention

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  2. Activity Levels

    Exercise Intensity (PAR). Answers are direct (ex. how many hours active) and not scaled. Information is requested for the week and the past 3 months.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  3. Sleep levels

    Exercise Intensity (PAR). Answers are direct (ex. how many hours did you sleep) and are not scaled. Information is requested for the past 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  4. Physical Activity Recall

    Exercise Intensity (PAR). Answers are direct (ex. how many hours did you sleep) and are not scaled. Information is requested for the past 7 days.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  5. Identity

    Multidimensional Black Identity Scale to collect information on identity. Questions are about personal identity relating to the Black community on a scale of 1-7, 1 being strongly disagree and 7 being strongly agree. Higher scores indicate a stronger agreement with that dimension of Black identity. Scores are summed as subscales and averaged to obtain an average score.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Exercise Behavior

    CHAMPS. The survey collects quantitative data looking at the approximate total hours per week spent doing various activities, both physical and social.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  7. Exercise Behavior

    L-Cat. Single question that asks about frequency/rigor of physical activity, with six potential answers ranging from no physical activity to daily physical activity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  8. Theoretical Mediators of Exercise Behavior

    Intrinsic Motivation Inventory. Questions relate to how participants think or feel about physical activity, with answers ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Broader scores are broken up into subscales; final subscale scores are summed and averaged. Higher scores indicate higher agreement with that subscale.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 12 (~1 month after baseline), Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  9. Theoretical Mediators of Exercise Behavior

    Self-Efficacy. 9 questions about confidence in exercise on scale of 1 (disagree strongly) to 7 (agree strongly). Higher scores indicate higher perceived confidence in doing that activity. Total scores are summed.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 12 (~1 month after baseline), Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  10. Theoretical Mediators of Exercise Behavior

    Exercise Intention Survey. Scored on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) to indicate level of agreement to statements related to intention to exercise. Scores are summed to produce a total score. Higher scores indicate stronger intention to exercise, lower scores indicate weaker intention.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 12 (~1 month after baseline), Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  11. Theoretical Mediators of Exercise Behavior

    Exercise Identity Score. Scored on a Likert scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) to indicate level of agreement to statements related to attitudes towards exercise. Scores are summed and averaged to provide an overall score. Higher scores indicate a positive attitude towards exercise, lower scores less favorable attitude.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 12 (~1 month after baseline), Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  12. Heart Rate Variability

    Heart Rate Variability is measured using chest strap monitor.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  13. Heart Rate

    HR is measured using chest strap monitor.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visits 1-14 (all visits)

  14. Physical Performance

    Short Physical Performance Battery. Physical performance measured with repeated chair stands, three balance tests (side-by-side, semi-tandem, tandem), timed walking.

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  15. Ventilatory Threshold

    Talk Test. Graded treadmill test where intensity is increased at intervals to determine participant's ventilatory threshold.

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. Perceived Exertion

    A single-item measure from Borg (1973) was used to assess participants' rate of perceived exertion (RPE) during the exercise bout. Participants were asked to rate the average intensity of exercise \[at that moment/during the past ten minutes\] on a 25-point scale ranging from 6 (no exertion at all) to 20 (maximal exertion).

    Time frame: Visit 2-13 (~2 visits/week)

  17. Pain Levels

    A single item measure from Borg (1998) was used to assess participants' pain levels during the exercise bout. Participants were asked to indicate how much pain they felt \[at that moment/during the past ten minutes\] on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 (nothing at all) to 10 (excruciating).

    Time frame: Visit 2-13 (~2 visits/week)

  18. Affective Valence

    The Feeling Scale, a single-item measure from Hardy and Rejeski (1989), was used to assess participants' affective valence during the exercise bout. Participants were asked to indicate how they felt \[at that moment/during the past ten minutes\] on an 11-point scale ranging from -5 (very bad) to +5 (very good).

    Time frame: Visit 2-13 (~2 visits/week)

  19. Affective Arousal

    The Felt Arousal Scale, a single-item measure from Svebak and Murgatroyd (1985), was used to assess participants' affective arousal during the exercise bout. Participants were asked to indicate how "worked-up" they felt \[at that moment/during the past ten minutes\] on a 6-point scale ranging from 1 (low arousal) to 6 (high arousal).

    Time frame: Visit 2-13 (~2 visits/week)

  20. Enjoyment

    A single item measure from Gillman and Bryan (2015) was used to assess participants' enjoyment levels during the exercise bout. Participants were asked to indicate how enjoyable exercise was \[at that moment/during the past ten minutes\] on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (no enjoyment at all) to 5 (a great deal of enjoyment).

    Time frame: Visit 2-13 (~2 visits/week)

  21. Exercise Check-In

    Three short questions assessing if the participant planned to engage in exercise and how many minutes of moderate (0-120) and vigorous (0-60) exercise they engaged in

    Time frame: Daily between visit 13 and 14 (~1 month)

  22. Study Feedback

    An investigator led interview to pilot study participants' experience of the intervention and suggestions for improvement

    Time frame: Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  23. Exercise Benefits and Barriers

    A 10 item scale assessing perceived benefits of and barriers to exercise

    Time frame: Baseline, Visit 12 (~1 month after baseline), Visit 14 (~2 months after baseline)

  24. Anthropometrics

    Height, weight, waist circumference, and hip circumference will be measured

    Time frame: Baseline

  25. Exercise Aligned with Black Identity

    Assessment of the extent to which 7 common exercises are aligned with Black identity

    Time frame: Baseline

  26. Mental Status

    Pfeiffer Mental Status. Assessment of cognitive deficits at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline

  27. Diet

    Nutrition Data System for Research (NDSR) 24-Hour Dietary Recall. Interviewer administered recall developed by the University of Minnesota Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC).

    Time frame: Baseline

  28. Diet

    NCI's Eating at America's Table Study (EATS) Fruit \& Vegetable All-Day Screener174 NCI's Eating at America's Table Study (EATS) Fruit \& Vegetable All-Day Screener174 NCI's Eating at America's Table Study (EATS) Fruit \& Vegetable All-Day Screener. A short dietary assessment instrument for measuring fruit and vegetable intake over the past month.

    Time frame: Baseline

  29. Physical Activity

    Godin Survey. This survey measures time spent in moderate, strenuous or light activity and has been modified to include time spent sitting over a typical 7 day period. Scores are summed and a range is used to quantify how active/sedentary a participant is.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Demographics

    Survey includes sex assigned at birth, gender identity, sexual orientation, age, detailed race/ethnicity, and SES

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Aurora Center for Active Adults
    Aurora, Colorado 80011, United States
  • University of Colorado at Boulder
    Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States
  • Hiawatha Davis Jr. Recreation Center
    Denver, Colorado 80207, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06769022
Lead sponsor
University of Colorado, Boulder
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Angela Bryan (PI, University of Colorado, Boulder) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 10, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jul 7, 2025
Completion
Jul 7, 2025
Last update
Jun 11, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion