ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06765642REALISEUpdated May 22, 2026

The Effect of Non-invasive Brain Stimulation rTMS on Hand Muscles in Chronic Stroke Patients.

An interventional study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke, Stroke Patients and Arm Weakness as a Consequence of Stroke, sponsored by Duke University. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-22.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2025; still recruiting 1 year 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is about using a brain stimulation technique called rTMS (Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation) to help improve hand muscles in people who had a stroke. Researchers want to understand how this device can help stroke patients use their hands better.

Read the detailed description

The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of a high-dose of a excitatory-specific patterned Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (i.e., intermittent theta-burst stimulation - iTBS) protocol as a neuromodulatory tool on the neuromotor recovery (corticospinal excitability and motor performance) in individuals with chronic stroke using either the conventional iTBS protocol (600 pulses; iTBS600) or a high dose iTBS protocols (a total of 2400 pulses) over a single spot (Focal iTBS; FiTBS2400) and 4 spots (Diffuse iTBS: DiTBS2400) on the ipsilesional hemisphere. The use of this approach aims to potentially maximize motor recovery in chronic stroke by harnessing corticospinal plasticity and modulating motor learning behavior.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stroke
  • Stroke Patients
  • Arm Weakness as a Consequence of Stroke
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Motor Learning
  • Chronic Stroke Patients
  • Chronic Stroke Survivors

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • stroke
  • arm weakness
  • arm weakness as a consequence of stroke
  • stroke patients
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation repetitive
  • motor learning
  • chronic stroke
  • chronic stroke patients
  • chronic stroke survivors
03

In context

Stroke

8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 26 is below the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.

Browse Stroke studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age >=21 years old of any race or gender
  2. First-ever ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke (neuroimaging verified) at least 3 months from stroke onset
  3. Unilateral arm weakness measured by FM-UM scale \<= 62 out of 66
  4. Inducible rest motor threshold and testing motor threshold recorded from the affected first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle from the study subject

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

  1. Bilateral strokes (infarcts and/or hematoma)
  2. Other co-existent neuromuscular disorders affecting upper extremity motor impairment.
  3. History of medically uncontrolled depression or other neuropsychiatric disorders despite medications either before or after a stroke that may affect the subject's ability to participate in the study.
  4. Uncontrolled hypertension despite medical treatment(s) at the time of randomization, defined as SBP≥185 mmHg or DBP≥110 mmHg (patient can be treated, reassessed and randomized later).
  5. Presence of any MRI/rTMS risk factors including but not limited to:

    1. an electrically, magnetically, or mechanically activated metallic or nonmetallic implant including cardiac pacemaker, intracerebral vascular clips or any other electrically sensitive support system.
    2. a non-fixed metallic part in any part of the body, including a previous metallic injury to the eye.
    3. history of seizure disorder before stroke or seizure after stroke.
    4. preexisting scalp lesion or bone defect or hemicraniectomy.
  6. Concurrent enrollment in another interventional stroke recovery study.
  7. Concerns that the subject cannot comply with study procedures and visits.
  8. Pregnant individuals
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
26 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Modalities

    All participants will undergo three non-invasive brain stimulation modalities: 1. Focal conventional iTBS over the ipsilesional motor cortex (i.e., a single bout of 600 pulses over a single spot; FiTBS600). 2. Focal high dose iTBS over the ipsilesional motor cortex (i.e. 4 bouts of 600 pulses over a single spot = 2400 pulses; FiTBS2400). 3. Diffuse high dose iTBS over the ipsilesional motor cortex (i.e. 4 bouts of 600 pulses over 4 spots: 600 pulses/spot × 4 spots = 2400 pulses; DiTBS2400)

    Diagnostic Test: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

    The use of this approach aims to potentially maximize motor recovery in chronic stroke by harnessing corticospinal plasticity and modulating motor learning behavior.

    Also known as: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To determine whether there is overall stimulation effect among three stimulation paradigms (FiTBS600; FiTBS2400; DiTBS2400) on the ipsilesional corticospinal excitability of a hand muscle.

    Each intervention session (total of 3) will consist of one format of iTBS stimulation. Before and after the intervention, single pulse TMS (spTMS) and motor sequence learning (MSL) will be used to assess the effect of the intervention on corticospinal excitability and motor performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, prior to and after intervention (Pre0 and Pre1; 45 minutes apart)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2027, 22 months after the start.

Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 22 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 17, 2024
First posted
Jan 9, 2025
StartActual
Jun 9, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 13, 2027
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2027
Last update
May 22, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06765642
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 9, 2025
Start date
Jun 9, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 13, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 22, 2026

Study contacts

Wuwei Feng, MD
Contact
wayne.feng@duke.edu
919 681 1700
Megan N Gonzalez, MS
Contact
megan.gonzalez@duke.edu
9196687597
Wayne Feng, MD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion