ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06762353Updated Jan 7, 2025

SPIC Frequency After Surgical Treatment of Peri-implantitis

An interventional study of 3-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) and 6-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) in Peri-Implantitis, sponsored by University of Turin, Italy. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-01-07.

Sponsored by University of Turin, Italy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
152
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The leading hypothesis behind this study is that a 3-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC) recalls after surgical therapy of implants affected by severe peri-implantitis yields better results when compared to a 6-month frequency. Thus, the primary aim of this randomized clinical trial is to compare 2 different frequencies of SPIC recalls (3 and 6 months) after surgical treatment of severe peri-implantitis in terms of treatment success (absence of implant loss, probing pocket depth (PPD) ≤ 5 mm at all aspects, bleeding on deep probing ≤1 site/implant, no suppuration at all aspects, bone loss \<0.5 mm) at early follow-up (1-year) and implant survival at the 5-year examination. Secondarily, this randomized clinical trial aims to assess the effects of the 2 different frequencies over clinical attachment levels around remaining teeth.

02

Conditions studied

  • Peri-Implantitis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Peri-Implantitis

313 studies on the registry are indexed under Peri-Implantitis; 85 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 152 is above the median of 40 across 191 interventional studies indexed under Peri-Implantitis.

Browse Peri-Implantitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Turin, Italy is the lead sponsor of 213 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Any patient aged 18 years or more, who has at least one implant affected by severe peri-implantitis, and able to sign an informed consent form will be potentially eligible for this trial. Severe peri-implantitis will be defined as the presence of a peri-implant probing pocket depth [PPD] ≥ 6 mm in at least 1 site of the implant, bleeding and/or suppuration on deep probing [dBoP and/or dSoP, respectively] and radiographically documented marginal bone loss > 3 mm (Carcuac et al. 2016; Romandini et al. 2022) on implants in function by at least 12-months. In the absence of baseline radiographs, implants had to present a bone level >3 mm (Romandini et al. 2021b).

Patients fulfilling the above-mentioned inclusion criteria will not be included in the study if they appear to be unable to attend the study-related procedures (including the long-term follow-up visits) or if one or more of the following systemic or local exclusion criteria are detected during the enrolment phase.

Systemic primary exclusion criteria:

  • systemic diseases (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes mellitus) or chronic use of medications (e.g. corticosteroids, bisphosphonates) likely to influence the outcome of therapy or which contraindicates the study procedures;
  • smoking >10 cigarettes;
  • pregnant or nursing women.

Local primary exclusion criteria:

  • history of peri-implantitis treatment on the eligible implants in the previous 6 months;
  • hopeless implants (>80% of bone loss/level).

A secondary inclusion criterion will be applied 1-month after surgery:

- absence of peri-implant abscess on the implants to be included.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
152 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    3-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

    SPIC provided at a 3-month frequency starting from the 1-month re-evaluation after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

    Procedure: 3-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

  • Active comparator
    6-month frequency of supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

    SPIC provided at a 6-month frequency starting from the 1-month re-evaluation after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

    Procedure: 6-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

Interventions

  • Procedure3-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

    SPIC including update on smoking status, evaluation of the patient's adherence to self-performed oral hygiene procedures, full-mouth supra-gingival instrumentation around teeth, repeated sub-gingival instrumentation on sites presenting a PPD \>4 mm with BoP/SoP or a PPD≥6 mm, supra-marginal instrumentation around implants, using an erythritol air abrasive system and interdental brushes, sub-marginal instrumentation on implants with BoP after deep probing by an erythritol air abrasive system and/or ultrasonic scaler provided at a 3-month frequency after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

  • Procedure6-month supportive peri-implant care (SPIC)

    SPIC including update on smoking status, evaluation of the patient's adherence to self-performed oral hygiene procedures, full-mouth supra-gingival instrumentation around teeth, repeated sub-gingival instrumentation on sites presenting a PPD \>4 mm with BoP/SoP or a PPD≥6 mm, supra-marginal instrumentation around implants, using an erythritol air abrasive system and interdental brushes, sub-marginal instrumentation on implants with BoP after deep probing by an erythritol air abrasive system and/or ultrasonic scaler provided at a 6-month frequency after surgical treatment of peri-implantitis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment success - criterion 1 (yes/no)

    Absence of implant loss, probing pocket depth ≤ 5 mm at all aspects, deep bleeding/suppuration on probing ≤1 site/implant, bone loss \<0.5 mm

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Implant loss (yes/no)

    Implant removed, or mobile, or radiographic evidence of complete loss of osseointegration.

    Time frame: 5 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Implant loss (yes/no)

    Implant removed, or mobile, or radiographic evidence of complete loss of osseointegration.

    Time frame: 1 and 3 years

  2. Treatment success - criterion 1

    Absence of implant loss, probing pocket depth ≤ 5 mm at all aspects, deep bleeding/suppuration on probing ≤1 site/implant, bone loss \<0.5 mm

    Time frame: 3 and 5 years

  3. Treatment success - criterion 2 (yes/no)

    Absence of: implant loss, bone loss \>1 mm and surgical re-treatments.

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 5 years

  4. Plaque presence (yes/no)

    Presence of plaque (binary - presence/absence in at least 1 site)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  5. Plaque extent

    Plaque extent (continuous - number of sites per implant: 0-6 sites)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  6. Probing pocket depth (mm)

    Probing pocket depth (continuous - assessed at the deepest site per implant)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  7. Bleeding on deep probing (yes/no)

    Bleeding on deep probing (binary - presence/absence in at least 1 site)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  8. Soft-tissue level margin (mm)

    Peri-implant soft-tissue margin level from a constant fixed reference point (continuous - greatest implant level increase among the 6 sites)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  9. Keratinised mucosa height (mm)

    Keratinized mucosa height (continuous - midbuccal aspect)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  10. Bleeding on superficial probing

    Bleeding on superficial circumferential probing (categorical - highest implant level value: 0=no sBoP, 1= isolated bleeding spots; 2=confluent red line on margin; 3=heavy or profuse bleeding)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  11. Suppuration (yes/no)

    Suppuration on deep probing (binary - presence/absence in at least 1 site).

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  12. Modified Bleeding Index

    Modified Bleeding Index after profound probing (categorical - highest implant level value: 0=no dBoP; 1=isolated bleeding spots; 2=confluent red line on margin; 3=heavy or profuse bleeding)

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  13. Radiographic outcomes

    Taking into account the worst site-specific (between mesial and distal) change: bone level change, bone gain \>0.5 mm, bone loss \>0.5 mm.

    Time frame: 1, 3 and 5 years

  14. Patient- and clinician- esthetic appreciation

    Assessment on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) of both patient- and clinician- esthetic appreciation and overall patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years

  15. Total SPIC duration (months)

    Total supportive peri-implant care duration in months , number of sub-marginal re-instrumentations at study implants during SPIC appointments, compliance to SPIC regimen, number of surgical retreatments, and rate of adverse events

    Time frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years

  16. Number of sub-marginal re-instrumentations at study implants

    Number of sub-marginal re-instrumentations at study implants during SPIC appointments

    Time frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years

  17. Compliance to SPIC regimen (yes/no)

    Compliance to SPIC regimen according to patient randomisation

    Time frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years

  18. Number of surgical retreatments

    Number of surgical retreatments performed on the study implant during the study time

    Time frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years

  19. Rate of adverse events

    Rate of adverse events occurred during the study time, both dependent and independent of the study procedures

    Time frame: Assessed at 1, 3 and 5 years

  20. Full-mouth plaque score (0-100)

    A full-mouth periodontal examination around the remaining dentition (6 sites per tooth/implant) will be performed assessing plaque (presence/absence)

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 5 years

  21. Full-mouth bleeding score (0-100)

    A full-mouth periodontal examination around the remaining dentition (6 sites per tooth/implant) will be performed assessing Bleeding on Probing (presence/absence),

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 5 years

  22. Clinical attachment level around remaining teeth

    Probing pocket depth (PPD) and recession (REC) (negative values when the CEJ is located subgingivally, positive otherwise). Clinical attachment levels (CAL) will be calculated by summing PPD and REC values for each site. Patient-level incidence of clinical attachment loss \>2 mm around teeth will be evaluated as a further outcome.

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 5 years

  23. Chairside aMMP-8 assay (positive/negative)

    Chairside active matrix metalloprotease-8 (aMMP-8) assay will be conducted at the study implant site. Positivity will be determined using a threshold value of ≥20 ng/mL.

    Time frame: 1, 3, and 5 years

  24. Molecular analysis in the peri-implant crevicular fluid

    Cytokines expressed in the peri-implant crevicular fluid will be monitored as additional outcomes to study the mechanistic interplays involved in the potential different clinical response between groups.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1, 3 and 5 years

  25. Microbiological analysis

    Shotgun metagenomics will be used to monitor the microbiological profile associated to the clinical condition.

    Time frame: 1 month, 6 months, 1, 3, and 5 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2025; primary completion for Sep 2031, 79 months later.

Of 117 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Peri-Implantitis, half reached primary completion within 26 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 79 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 124 studies reached it within 26 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 9, 2024
First posted
Jan 7, 2025
StartEst.
Jan 20, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 15, 2031
CompletionEst.
Sep 15, 2031
Last update
Jan 7, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06762353
Collaborators
Ege University
Responsible party
Giacomo Baima (Co-Principal Investigator (together with Mario Romandini), University of Turin, Italy) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 7, 2025
Start date
Jan 20, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2031 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 15, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 7, 2025

Study contacts

Giacomo Baima, PhD
Contact
giacomo.baima@unito.it
011 6331546
Mario Romandini
Contact
mario.romandini@gmail.com

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion