ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06749496Updated Nov 4, 2026Results posted

Evaluation of Delefilcon A and Senofilcon A Daily Disposable Toric Soft Contact Lenses Over One Week of Wear

An interventional study of Test Lens and Control Lens in Astigmatism, sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.. Completed at 12 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 39 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. (part of Johnson & Johnson) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
134
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 39 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective, multi-site, 4-visit, bilateral, dispensing, randomized, controlled, double-masked, 2x2 crossover study to evaluate subjective comfort, overall opinion and end of day comfort following wear of two different contact lenses.

02

Conditions studied

  • Astigmatism

Browse trials for

03

In context

Astigmatism

417 studies on the registry are indexed under Astigmatism; 50 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 134 is above the median of 55 across 325 interventional studies indexed under Astigmatism.

Browse Astigmatism studies →

Lead sponsor

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 221 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 111 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 103 (93%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 39 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Potential subjects must satisfy all of the following criteria to be enrolled in the study:

The subject must:

  1. Read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
  2. Appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
  3. Be between 18 and 39 (inclusive) years of age at the time of screening.
  4. By self-report, habitually wear soft contact lenses in both eyes in a daily reusable or daily disposable wear modality (i.e., not extended wear modality). Habitual wear is defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day, for a minimum of 2 days per week during the past four weeks.
  5. Possess a wearable pair of spectacles that provide correction for distance vision.
  6. In both eyes, have refractive error suitable for correction with the range of toric contact lens powers available in this study:

    6.1 Sphere powers (DS) -1.50 through -4.00 (inclusive) in 0.25 steps 6.2 Cylinder powers (DC) -0.75 and -1.25 6.3 Axes (°) 170, 180, 10, 80, 90 and 100

  7. Have best corrected monocular distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye.

Potential subjects who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from participating in the study:

The subject must not:

  1. Be currently pregnant or lactating.
  2. Be diabetic.
  3. Be currently using any ocular medications or have any ocular infection of any type.
  4. By self-report, have any ocular or systemic disease, allergies, infection, or use of medication that might contraindicate or interfere with contact lens wear, or otherwise compromise study endpoints, including infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis), contagious disease (e.g., [HIV]), disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, Sjögren's syndrome), or history of serious mental illness or seizures. See section 9.1 for additional details regarding excluded systemic medications.
  5. Have habitually worn rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses, orthokeratology lenses, or hybrid lenses (e.g., SynergEyes, SoftPerm) within the past 6 months.
  6. Be currently wearing monovision or multifocal contact lenses.
  7. Be currently wearing lenses in an extended wear modality.
  8. Have a history of strabismus or amblyopia.
  9. Be an employee (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician) or immediate family member of an employee (including partner, child, parent, grandparent, grandchild or sibling of the employee or their spouse) of the clinical site.
  10. Have participated in a contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 7 days prior to study enrollment.
  11. Have (grade 3 or higher on the FDA grading scale) slit lamp findings (e.g., corneal edema, neovascularization or staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection) or other corneal or ocular disease or abnormalities that contraindicate contact lens wear or may otherwise compromise study endpoints (including entropion, ectropion, chalazia, recurrent styes, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions, aphakia, moderate or above corneal distortion, herpetic keratitis).
  12. Have fluctuations in vision due to clinically significant dry eye or other ocular conditions.
  13. Have had or have planned (within the study period) any ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, iridotomy, retinal laser photocoagulation, etc.).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
134 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test/Control

    Eligible subjects will be randomized into the Test/Control sequence, to wear each study lens (Test lens and Control lens) in a daily disposable modality for approximately one week with a washout period of one week between study lens wear periods.

    Device: Test Lens · Device: Control Lens

  • Experimental
    Control/Test

    Eligible subjects will be randomized into the Control/Test sequence, to wear each study lens (Control lens and Test lens) in a daily disposable modality for approximately one week with a washout period of one week between study lens wear periods.

    Device: Test Lens · Device: Control Lens

Interventions

  • DeviceTest Lens

    ACUVUE® OASYS MAX 1-Day for ASTIGMATISM (AOM1DfA).

  • DeviceControl Lens

    Alcon DAILIES TOTAL1® for Astigmatism Contact Lenses (DT1fA).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Long Lasting Comfort

    Long lasting comfort, with respect to contact lens wear, was assessed using the individual questionnaire item: 'I could wear these contact lenses comfortably for as long as I wanted to'. This item utilized an agreement scale of, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. Long lasting comfort was assessed after 1-week of lens wear. Subjects' responses to this questionnaire item were dichotomized as Y=1 if a subject responds Strongly Agree or Agree and Y=0, otherwise. The difference in percentage of subjects that agree or strongly agree (Y=1) to the long lasting comfort was analyzed. The percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the Test lens was compared to the percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the control lens.

    Time frame: 1-week Follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Opinion

    Overall opinion, with respect to the study contact lenses, was evaluated using the individual questionnaire item 'Considering your experience with the study contact lenses, which statement best describes your overall opinion of these contact lenses?'. This item utilized an excellence scale of, 1: Poor, 2: Fair, 3: Good, 4: Very Good and 5: Excellent. Overall opinion was assessed after 1-week of lens wear. Subjects' responses to this questionnaire item were dichotomized as Y=1 if a subject responds Excellent or Very good and Y=0, otherwise. The difference in percentage of subjects that agree or strongly agree (Y=1) to the long lasting comfort was analyzed. The percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the Test lens was compared to the percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the control lens.

    Time frame: 1-Week Follow-up

  2. Comfort at the End of the Day

    Comfort at the end of the day, with respect to contact lens wear, was assessed using the individual questionnaire 'These lenses were very comfortable at the end of the day'. This item utilized an agreement scale of, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. Comfort at the end of the day was assessed after 1-week of lens wear. Subjects' responses to this questionnaire item were dichotomized as Y=1 if a subject responds Strongly Agree or Agree and Y=0, otherwise. The difference in percentage of subjects that agree or strongly agree (Y=1) to the long lasting comfort was analyzed. The percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the Test lens was compared to the percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the control lens.

    Time frame: 1-Week Follow-up

07

Results

Posted May 22, 2026

Participant flow

Period 1
Participant flow — Period 1
MilestoneTest (Senofilcon A)/Control (Delefilcon A)Control (Delefilcon A)/Test (Senofilcon A)
Started6370
Completed6370
Not completed00
Period 2
Participant flow — Period 2
MilestoneTest (Senofilcon A)/Control (Delefilcon A)Control (Delefilcon A)/Test (Senofilcon A)
Started6370
Completed6370
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryLong Lasting Comfort

Long lasting comfort, with respect to contact lens wear, was assessed using the individual questionnaire item: 'I could wear these contact lenses comfortably for as long as I wanted to'. This item utilized an agreement scale of, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. Long lasting comfort was assessed after 1-week of lens wear. Subjects' responses to this questionnaire item were dichotomized as Y=1 if a subject responds Strongly Agree or Agree and Y=0, otherwise. The difference in percentage of subjects that agree or strongly agree (Y=1) to the long lasting comfort was analyzed. The percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the Test lens was compared to the percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the control lens.

Time frame:
1-week Follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Long Lasting Comfort
ParticipantsTest (Senofilcon)Control (Delefilcon A)
Strongly Agree or Agree (Y=1)10062
Strongly Disagree, Disagree or Neither Agree nor Disagree (Y=0)3371
Statistical analysis
  • Test (Senofilcon) vs Control (Delefilcon A) · Generalized Linear Mixed Model · p = <0.001 (one-sided p-value was reported) · Difference in percentage: 32.4 · 95% CI 19.5 to 45.3difference in percentage was calculated as Test - Control
SecondaryOverall Opinion

Overall opinion, with respect to the study contact lenses, was evaluated using the individual questionnaire item 'Considering your experience with the study contact lenses, which statement best describes your overall opinion of these contact lenses?'. This item utilized an excellence scale of, 1: Poor, 2: Fair, 3: Good, 4: Very Good and 5: Excellent. Overall opinion was assessed after 1-week of lens wear. Subjects' responses to this questionnaire item were dichotomized as Y=1 if a subject responds Excellent or Very good and Y=0, otherwise. The difference in percentage of subjects that agree or strongly agree (Y=1) to the long lasting comfort was analyzed. The percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the Test lens was compared to the percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the control lens.

Time frame:
1-Week Follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Overall Opinion
ParticipantsTest (Senofilcon A)Control (Delefilcon A)
Excellent or Very Good (Y=1)9652
Good, Fair or Poor (Y=0)3781
Statistical analysis
  • Test (Senofilcon A) vs Control (Delefilcon A) · Generalized linear Mixed Model · p = =0.0119 (one-sided p-value was reported) · Difference in percentage: 19.3 · 95% CI 2.6 to 36.0difference in percentage was calculated as Test - Control
SecondaryComfort at the End of the Day

Comfort at the end of the day, with respect to contact lens wear, was assessed using the individual questionnaire 'These lenses were very comfortable at the end of the day'. This item utilized an agreement scale of, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. Comfort at the end of the day was assessed after 1-week of lens wear. Subjects' responses to this questionnaire item were dichotomized as Y=1 if a subject responds Strongly Agree or Agree and Y=0, otherwise. The difference in percentage of subjects that agree or strongly agree (Y=1) to the long lasting comfort was analyzed. The percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the Test lens was compared to the percentage of subjects with Y=1 in the control lens.

Time frame:
1-Week Follow-up
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Comfort at the End of the Day
ParticipantsTest (Senofilcon A)Control (Delefilcon A)
Strongly Agree or Agree (Y=1)9760
Strongly Disagree, Disagree or Neither Agree nor Disagree (Y=0)3673
Statistical analysis
  • Test (Senofilcon A) vs Control (Delefilcon A) · Generalized Linear Mixed Model · p = <0.0001 (one-sided p-value was reported) · Difference in percentage: 29.8 · 95% CI 17.3 to 42.3Mean difference in percentage was calculated as Test - Control

Adverse events

Collected over Throughout the duration of the study; approximately 3 weeks per subject.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Test (Senofilcon A)0/133 (0%)0/133 (0%)0/133 (0%)
Control (Delefilcon A)0/133 (0%)0/133 (0%)0/133 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

All subjects dispensed at least one study contact lens.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Overall Reporting Group
Mean30.4 ± 5.79
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Overall Reporting Group
Female88
Male45
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Overall Reporting Group
American Indian or Alaska Native1
Asian3
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Black or African American7
White118
More than one race3
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Overall Reporting Group
United States133
08

Study locations

12 sites
  • Stam & Associates Eye Care
    Jacksonville, Florida 32256, United States
  • Omega Vision Center
    Longwood, Florida 32779, United States
  • Maitland Vision Center - North Orlando Ave
    Maitland, Florida 32751, United States
  • Kannarr Eye Care - 101 North Broadway
    Pittsburg, Kansas 66762, United States
  • Birmingham Vision Care
    Bloomfield Hills, Michigan 48301, United States
  • Complete Eye Care of Medina
    Medina, Minnesota 55340, United States
  • Sacco Eye Group
    Vestal, New York 13850, United States
  • Procare Vision Centers
    Granville, Ohio 43023, United States
  • Professional Vision Care Inc. - Westerville
    Westerville, Ohio 43081, United States
  • Optometry Group, PLLC
    Memphis, Tennessee 38111, United States
  • Tyler Eye Associates
    Tyler, Texas 75703, United States
  • Botetourt Eyecare, LLC
    Salem, Virginia 24153, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Johnson \& Johnson Medical Device Companies have an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu

Data sharing details ↗ · yoda.yale.edu

10

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
2 updates, last Nov 4, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Sep 28, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06749496
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 27, 2024
Start date
Jan 7, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2025
Completion
Mar 20, 2025
Results posted
May 22, 2026
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. Clinical Trial
study director · Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion