An observational study in Polytrauma Patients, sponsored by Assiut University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-17.
Sponsored by Assiut University · Observational
This study aims to assess the efficacy of RTS and GCS in predicating the mortality among multiple trauma patients admitted to emergency departments at Assiut university hospital.Which score is better in predicting mortality in polytrauma patients Revised Trauma Score (RTS) or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of with Multiple Trauma?
Trauma is a serious global health problem. Globally around 5.8 million people deaths were estimated from injuries in 2004. These deaths accounted for 10% of the world's mortality[1]. It is the fifth leading cause ofsignificant, disability and sixth leading cause of death[2]. More than 90% of the world's injury deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries[3]. Injury deaths in Egypt accounted for 8% and the eighth leading cause of death in 2010[4]. There was an increase in the number of hospitalization due to trauma. In Upper Egypt, trauma cases increased from 19,869 up to 32,699 with death rate 1.2/100 cases per year throughout the period from 2002 to 2009.In multiple trauma patient management, time is crucial. Early intervention has consistently been shown to reduce mortality and morbidity[5]. Prompt and effective care [6]. These scores either measure the alteration in patient's physiology; Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and Revised Trauma Score (RTS) or anatomy; Injury Severity Score (ISS)[7]. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is one of the most commonly used trauma scores and is a good predictor of the outcome. The GCS is primarily utilized to evaluate the level of consciousness impairment in patients, achieved through the assessment of ocular, motor, and verbal response[8].The Revised Trauma Score (RTS) are considered the most practical and effective [9].The RTS stands out because it can be quickly calculated using a patient's initial clinical status and vital signs at presentation, making it particularly useful during the critical "golden hour" after arrival[10]
139 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Trauma; 32 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 200 across 84 observational studies indexed under Multiple Trauma.
Browse Multiple Trauma studies →Assiut University is the lead sponsor of 5,078 studies on the registry; 2,178 are open to participants now.
Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
multiple trauma patients admitted to Emergency department. The Berlin definition defines polytrauma as a life-threatening injury involving at least 2 bodily regions (each with an AIS ≥3) as well as at least one positive physiologic parameter. The physiologic parameters include the elderly (age ≥70 years), low systolic blood pressure, Glasgow coma score ≤8, coagulopathy, and acidosis[17].
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
polytrauma patients
mortality rate
to identify the trauma-related mortality rate among patients
Time frame: 30 day
Admission
Associated risk factors that affect multiple trauma patient's outcome. Outcome of patients :(death/survival) with 30 day of admission , hospital stay, and ICU admission
Time frame: 30days
No study locations are listed for this record.
Start is estimated for Jan 2025; primary completion for Dec 2025, 11 months later.
Of 30 observational studies under Multiple Trauma, half reached primary completion within 22 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 11 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.