ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06716463PREVISIONUpdated Nov 10, 2026

PREdicting Failure of Non-inVasIve Ventilatory Support Using Non-invaSIve mONitoring in Non-intubated Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure or Post-extubation Failure. The PREVISION Study

An observational study in Ventilatory Failure, Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and Weaning Failure, sponsored by Unity Health Toronto. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Unity Health Toronto · Observational

Updated Nov 10, 2026Now Active, not recruitingPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational study is to assess the potential non-invasive tools (e.g. regional ventilation, respiratory muscle response, lung mechanic's parameters) to identify the risk of failure when using high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV).

The main question, it aims to answer is:

Does abnormal regional ventilation could predict HFNC or NIV failure?

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, prospective, physiological study.

The study will enroll patient who has used either HFNC or NIV for the indications of 1. to prevent worsening acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or 2. to prevent reintubation. Once being confirmed to meet the inclusion criteria, the research team will apply the electrical impedance tomography (EIT) on the patient and start recording for 5-10 minutes as well as perform diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscle ultrasound when the patient is using HFNC or NIV. The current HFNC or NIV setting, some lung mechanic's parameters (e.g. rapid shallow breathing trial (RSBI), negative airway pressure generated during the first 100 milisecond (P0.1), end-expiratory occlusion pressure(ΔPocc) derived from NIV machine), patient's characteristic, dyspnea scores (intensive care respiratory distress observation scale, IC-RDOS; work of breathing scale; self-report of dyspnea visual analog scale, D-VAS), ICU and hospital length of stay will be also collected.

The investigator will use EIT to visualize where air goes in the patient's lung and inspiratory muscle ultrasonography (diaphragm and parasternal intercostal muscle) to visualize the muscle activities when using HFNC or NIV. EIT is a measurement often used in the ICU since it allows easy visualization and is a non-invasive technique. The sensors measure electrical current changes during inspiration and expiration and will not cause any pain or radiation concerns. The EIT belt (3-cm diameter) will be placed around the chest without causing adverse event/discomfort/pain.

The duration of study will be approximately 30 minutes. The study will be conducted one time for one enrolled patient.

HFNC or NIV (device) failure is considered as either intubation/reintubation or death, whatever has come first. It will be followed up to 7 days.

The investigators will proceed with the measurements only with agreement from the clinical team. The investigators will analyze the data collected offline with a dedicated software afterwards.

After these study procedures are completed, data will also be collected from the participant's chart and combined with relevant information from the HFNC or NIV settings and vital functions. Confidentiality will be maintained throughout the entire study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventilatory Failure
  • Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
  • Weaning Failure
  • Respiratory

Keywords

  • Electrical impedance tomography
  • High flow nasal cannula
  • Non-invasive ventilation
  • Diaphragm
  • Weaning failure
  • Post-extubation
  • Hypoxemic respiratory failure
03

In context

Hypoventilation

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypoventilation; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 74 across 28 observational studies indexed under Hypoventilation.

Browse Hypoventilation studies →

Lead sponsor

Unity Health Toronto is the lead sponsor of 447 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (20%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient who is using high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) or non-invasive ventilation (NIV) to either prevent 1. intubation in the context of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or 2. reintubation in the context of high risk group of extubation.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age of ≥ 18 years
  • Using NIV or HFNC anywhere in the hospital

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic CO2 retention
  • Neuromuscular disorder
  • Requiring home NIV (CPAP or BIPAP)
  • Tracheostomy
  • to EIT placement: pacemaker/defibrillator implantation, burns at the area of EIT placement
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in regional ventilation distribution (%)

    The primary endpoint is to assess regional ventilation distribution (%) when using HFNC or NIV to predict a device failure.

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diaphragm or parasternal intercostal muscle thickening fraction

    To assess ultrasound measurement of inspiratory muscle activity when using HFNC or NIV to predict a device failure.

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

  2. Rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) in mL/breaths/min

    To assess non-invasive respiratory - rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) derived from NIV to predict a device failure.

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

  3. Respiratory drive using negative airway pressure generated during the first 100 millisecond (P0.1)

    To assess respiratory drive - using negative airway pressure generated during the first 100 millisecond (P0.1) in cmH2O to predict device failure.

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

  4. Respiratory effort using end-expiratory airway occlusion pressure (ΔPocc)

    To assess respiratory effort using end-expiratory airway occlusion pressure (ΔPocc) in cmH2O to predict device failure

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

  5. The intensive care respiratory distress observation scale (IC-RDOS)

    To assess the level of dyspnea using intensive care respiratory distress observation scale (IC-RDOS) to predict a device failure. There is no minimum or maximum range depending on patient's heart rate, the higher score means worse outcome. When the score ≥ 2.4, it likely indicates clinically important dyspnea requiring clinical management.

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

  6. The work of breathing scale

    To assess the work of breathing scale to predict a device failure. Minimum is 3 and maximum is 12, the higher score means worse outcome. When the score \> 4, it likely indicates severe respiratory distress.

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

  7. Self-report of dyspnea visual analog scale (D-VAS)

    To assess self-report of dyspnea visual analog scale (D-VAS) to predict a device failure. Minimum is 0 and maximum is 10, the higher score means worse outcome. When the score \> 3, it likely indicates dyspnea and being used for quality of palliative care unit

    Time frame: The parameter is measured at the time of enrolment. Failure of HFNC or NIV is adjudicated at 7 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
changed Nov 10, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2025→Jun 2027
Nov 10, 2026
Study completion
Jun 2025→Jun 2027
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    Recruiting→Active, not recruiting
    Primary completion Jun 2025→Jun 2027
    Study completion Jun 2025→Jun 2027
    + 3 other changes: verification date, site details and contact details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06716463
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 4, 2024
Start date
Jan 27, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion