CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06711302REPAIRUpdated Jul 10, 2025

Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Efficacy in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

An interventional study of Sham RIC and Remote Ischemic Conditioning treatment instrument in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Cerebrovascular Disorders and Brain Diseases, sponsored by Beijing Tiantan Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-07-10.

Sponsored by Beijing Tiantan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Several recent large-scale clinical trials aimed at improving subarachnoid hemorrhage(SAH) outcomes have concluded with negative results, failing to enhance the prognosis for these patients. Consequently, there is an urgent demand for novel treatment strategies and approaches to address the challenges posed by SAH.

Remote ischemic conditioning(RIC) has gained considerable attention in the treatment of stroke, particularly ischemic stroke, with numerous studies demonstrating its potential to enhance neurological outcomes compared to conventional treatments alone.RIC for the treatment of SAH is an investigative strategy in its initial stages. The neuroprotective effects of RIC, particularly its potential to preserve cranial nerve function and ameliorate neurological deficits, confer significant value in the treatment of SAH patients.

The precise manner in which SAH patients may benefit from RIC treatment, and the mechanisms by which it improves neurological function, remain to be fully understood. Consequently, randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate the efficacy of RIC in this patient population and to delineate the optimal therapeutic protocols for its application.

Based on the above discussion, this study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of RIC in the treatment of SAH.

02

Conditions studied

  • Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Cerebrovascular Disorders
  • Brain Diseases
  • Stroke
  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Vascular Diseases
  • Nervous System Diseases
03

In context

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

509 studies on the registry are indexed under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage; 124 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 500 is above the median of 52 across 263 interventional studies indexed under Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Browse Subarachnoid Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Tiantan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 465 studies on the registry; 282 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage confirmed by imaging examination (diagnosed by computed tomography and confirmation of an intracranial aneurysm by CT angiography or digital subtraction angiography);
  2. The Hunt-Hess grade is 2-3 at admission;
  3. Onset of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage ≤72 hours;
  4. The responsible aneurysm has been treated by endovascular interventional therapy;
  5. 18≤ age ≤80 years old;
  6. Informed consent must be obtained from participants or legally authorized representatives.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with other intracerebral hemorrhage or other types of subarachnoid hemorrhage;
  2. Previous neurological deficits (mRS Score ≥1) or psychiatric disorders that can confound neurological or functional assessments;
  3. With severe comorbidities and a life expectancy of less than 90 days;
  4. Refractory hypertension (Systolic blood pressure> 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure >110 mmHg);
  5. Contraindications of RIC: severe soft tissue injury of the lower limbs, etc;
  6. Concurrent participation in another protocol investigating a different experimental therapy;
  7. Any condition that the investigator believes may increase the patient's risk.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham group

    Guideline-based therapy+Sham RIC is given twice a day with 60mmHg pressure.

    Device: Sham RIC

  • Experimental
    RIC Group

    Guideline-based therapy+RIC RIC is given twice a day with 200mmHg pressure.

    Device: Remote Ischemic Conditioning treatment instrument

Interventions

  • DeviceSham RIC

    Remote Ischemic Conditioning is given twice a day with 60mmHg pressure.

  • DeviceRemote Ischemic Conditioning treatment instrument

    Remote Ischemic Conditioning is given twice a day with 200mmHg pressure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of mRS (0-2)

    Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 90±7 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of mRS (0-1)

    Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 90±7 days

  2. mRS Score as ordinal variable

    Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 7±1 days

  3. mRS Score as ordinal variable

    Modified Rankin Scale, mRS; min:0, max:6; A smaller score indicates a better prognosis.

    Time frame: 30±7 days

  4. Cognitive function score as ordinal variable

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA. The total score is 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.

    Time frame: 7±1 days

  5. The complete blood count

    up to 30 days

    Time frame: During hospitalization

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Jin T, Niu H, Liu L, Yin Y, Zhao W, Feng X, Xu L, Hess DC, Liu A, Ji X. Remote ischaemic conditioning for efficacy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (REPAIR): protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):e101350. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101350. PubMed 40789732 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified participant data and study materials will be accessible.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06711302
Lead sponsor
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2024
Start date
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 10, 2025

Study contacts

Aihua Liu, Doctor
Contact
liuaihuadoctor@ccmu.edu.cn
+8615901398688

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion