CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06709703Updated Nov 29, 2024

Kinematic Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty - a Double-blind Randomised Controlled Trial Between Robotic and Caliper-based Techniques

An interventional study of Kinematic aligned total knee replacement in Arthritis, Arthritis (Knee) and Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Université de Sherbrooke. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-29.

Sponsored by Université de Sherbrooke · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Knee replacement surgery is a surgery designed to treat severe arthritis of the knee. However, as many as 20% of patients are not satisfied with the results of their surgery. To place the knee replacement in correct position, the kinematic alignment method, which tries to reproduce the patient normal anatomy, has shown promise in improving the satisfaction after knee replacement surgery. It is not known if using a robotic arm to assist in surgery is better than the traditional method when trying to recreate kinematic alignment.

The goal of this study is to learn if robotic assisted surgery is better than traditional method for knee replacement done using kinematic alignment. The main questions the study tries to answer are:

  1. Do the radiographs of kinematic knee replacement surgeries done with robotic assistance show better alignment than radiographs of kinematic knee replacements done with the traditional method?
  2. Does robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement give better function to patients than traditional knee replacement done with kinematic alignment?
  3. Does robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement decrease pain, improve knee movement and improve knee stability better than traditional knee replacement done with kinematic alignment?
  4. Are there more complications with robotic assisted kinematic knee replacement in comparison to traditional kinematic knee replacement?
  5. How long long does it take a surgeon to become good a performing a kinematic knee replacement using robotic assistance? Researchers will compare knee replacements done using a robotic to make the bone cuts, and compare it to the usual method using guides and manual instruments. All the knee replacements will be done using the kinematic alignment and with the same type of knee replacement prothesis.

Participants will:

  • Have a knee replacement done with the kinematic alignment technique by an experienced surgeon, with or without robotic assistance during the surgery.
  • Visit the clinic before surgery, six weeks after surgery, three months, six months, twelve months and twenty-four months after the surgery.
  • Fill questionnaire, have their knee examined and have radiographs of their knee done at each visit.
02

Conditions studied

  • Arthritis
  • Arthritis (Knee)
  • Osteoarthritis
  • Osteoarthritis Knee Pain
  • OA
  • OA Knee
  • OA Knee Pain
  • Osteoarthritis of Knee
  • Gonarthrosis; Primary

Keywords

  • osteoarthritis
  • arthritis
  • knee osteoarthritis
  • knee OA
  • knee arthritis
  • total knee replacement
  • robotic
  • kinematic alignment
  • patient-specific surgery
03

In context

Arthritis

3,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Arthritis; 318 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 90 across 2,377 interventional studies indexed under Arthritis.

Browse Arthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Université de Sherbrooke is the lead sponsor of 289 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient aged 18 or above
  • Patient being consented for a primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
  • The primary TKA is planned to be done with kinematic alignment
  • All pre-operative alignments are included

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision TKA (including revision of unicompartimental knee arthroplasty into total knee arthroplasty with primary components). TKA being done in the setting of previous femur or tibia fracture or osteotomy are however included.
  • No available adequate pre-operative imaging
  • Patient who does want to be randomized of the two groups
  • At the discretion of the surgeon, if the patient's pathology or particular anatomy precludes the use of kinematic alignment technique, robotic surgery, or traditional instrument TKA.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Kinematic knee replacement with traditional instruments

    Patients will undergo kinematic aligned knee replacement done using traditional instruments and cut guides

    Procedure: Kinematic aligned total knee replacement

  • Experimental
    Robotic-assisted kinematic knee replacement

    Patients will undergo kinematic aligned knee replacement done using robotic assistance

    Procedure: Kinematic aligned total knee replacement

Interventions

  • ProcedureKinematic aligned total knee replacement

    Replacement of worn knee cartilage using a prosthesis. The alignment is determined according to the patient's anatomy and ligament balance.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Radiographic alignment of the knee

    Long leg anteroposterior views of both legs and lateral knee radiographs will be used to measure knee alignment and position of the knee replacement hardware. The angles measured and analyzed will be: * The hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle * Medial proximal tibia mechanical angle (MPTAm) * Lateral distal femur mechanical angle (LDTAm) * Distal femur flexion angle (DFFA) * Posterior tibial slope (PTS) Radiographic measurements will be made by a trained observer and a fellowship-train arthroplasty surgeon.

    Time frame: Pre-operative alignement and 6 months post-operative alignement.

  2. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    Patient questionnaire (42 questions) evaluating knee pain, symptoms, function, recreational activities and knee-related quality of life. The questionnaire is score over 100 points, with a higher score meaning better knee function.

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months post-operative

  3. Forgotten joint score

    A 12-questions form asking patients if they forget about their joint during activities of daily living.

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-op

  4. Joint perception question

    A single item question asking participants how they perceive their operated knee, from "like a native or natural joint" to "like a nonfunctional joint".

    Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain visual analog scale

    Pain rated on a 10 cm visual analog scale from "no pain" to "worst pain imaginable"

    Time frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6, 12, 24 months

  2. Subjective Assessment Numeric Evaluation Scale (SANE)

    Single question evaluation scale asking the patient to rate their knee function from 0 (no function) to 100 (completely normal function)

    Time frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6, 12, 24 months

  3. Knee range of motion

    Maximum passive flexion and extension measured with goniometer

    Time frame: Pre, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-op

  4. Knee stability

    Anterior drawer, posterior drawer, valgus stress, varus stress. Instability rated for each test 1 to 3 by treating surgeon.

    Time frame: Pre-op, 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months post-op

Other outcomes

  1. Intra-operative procedures

    During surgery, the knee for additional intra-operative procedures to obtain a stable knee replacement will be noted: * Need for ligamentous release - lateral release, medial release, lateral retinaculum release, posterior cruciate ligament release * Need for tibial or femoral recut

    Time frame: At the time of surgery

  2. Surgical cost

    Total cost of implants and equipment used will be calculated at the end of each surgical case.

    Time frame: At the time of surgery

  3. Surgical time

    The time from first incision to skin closure will be noted at each surgery.

    Time frame: At the time of surgery

  4. Intra-operative complications

    The incidence of intra-operative complications will be noted: * Unplanned ligament injury * Neurovascular damage * Intra-operative tibial of femoral fracture * Any other complications noted during surgery

    Time frame: At the time of surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Zhang J, Ndou WS, Ng N, Gaston P, Simpson PM, Macpherson GJ, Patton JT, Clement ND. Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved accuracy and patient reported outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2677-2695. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06464-4. Epub 2021 Feb 6. PubMed 33547914 ↗
  • Agarwal N, To K, McDonnell S, Khan W. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2020 Nov;35(11):3393-3409.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.005. Epub 2020 Mar 11. PubMed 32234326 ↗
  • Van Essen J, Stevens J, Dowsey MM, Choong PF, Babazadeh S. Kinematic alignment results in clinically similar outcomes to mechanical alignment: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee. 2023 Jan;40:24-41. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.11.001. Epub 2022 Nov 17. PubMed 36403396 ↗
  • Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, LeFevre GW, Kwasman BG. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results. Bone Joint J. 2014 Jul;96-B(7):907-13. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32812. PubMed 24986944 ↗
  • Turan K, Camurcu Y, Kezer M, Uysal Y, Kizilay YO, Ucpunar H, Temiz A. A comparison of robotic-assisted and manual techniques in restricted kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty: coronal alignment improvement with no significant clinical differences. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Nov;31(11):4673-4679. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07426-8. Epub 2023 May 10. PubMed 37165209 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Anonymous individual patient data will be shared only with a direct request to the study principal investigator.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 29, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06709703
Lead sponsor
Université de Sherbrooke
Collaborators
Hopital Charles Lemoyne
Responsible party
Samuel Larrivée (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Université de Sherbrooke) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 29, 2024
Start date
Feb 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 29, 2024

Study contacts

Samuel Larrivée, MD, MSc, FRCSC
Contact
samuel.larrivee@usherbrooke.ca
450-466-4333 ext. 2

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion