ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06706414NT-NOAUpdated Oct 21, 2026

NT-NOA - Novel Treatment of Some Men With Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Denosumab (Prolia) and Letrozole (Aromatase Inhibitors) in Infertility, Male, sponsored by Martin Blomberg Jensen. Completed at 1 site in Denmark. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Martin Blomberg Jensen · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 21, 2026Now CompletedPrimary completion moved+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
16
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This clinical interventional study aims to assess whether treatment with denosumab in combination with letrozole can improve sperm production in infertile men with non-obstructive azoospermia selected by serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) as a positive predictive biomarker.

Read the detailed description

Infertility is a health issue worldwide with more than 15% of couples experiencing infertility. Male factors contribute in 50% of all cases and is the sole cause in 30% of all infertile couples . Treatment options for the male infertility are limited and only specific conditions like varicocele and hypogonadotropic hypogonadism can be effectively treated with surgery and hormonal stimulation, respectively. However, for the remaining 90% of infertile men, no treatment options exist. Instead, their female partners must undergo fertility treatment.

Men with the most pronounced impairment of semen quality, men with azoospermia, have no sperm in the ejaculate and are classically divided into obstructive azoospermia (OA) and non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), with the ladder being the most common. These men needs to have surgery performed for sperm retrieval with either testicular sperm aspiration (TESA), testicular sperm extraction (TESE) or micro testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) in order to have a chance of becoming biological fathers. The chance of successful sperm retrieval in men with OA is close to 100%, whereas men with NOA have a significantly lower chance with only around 10-40% being successful. This is due to the vast difference in etiology between men with OA and NOA. Even with a successful surgical intervention only half of the cases will result in a live birth, leaving the majority of men with NOA no chance of becoming biological fathers. Therefore, novel treatment options for even a minor sub-group of these men are warranted.

RANKL is a ligand for the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa beta (RANK), and their pathway plays a prominent role in the regulation of bone metabolism. The binding of RANKL to RANK on osteoclast precursors induces osteoclast maturation and activation, thereby stimulating bone resorption, and regulates cell cycle i.e., proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a secreted decoy receptor that controls RANKL-RANK interaction by binding RANKL and inhibits activation of RANK and preventing osteoclast differentiation and activation.

Denosumab, a drug used in millions of patients worldwide under trade names Prolia® and Xgeva®, inhibits the RANKL pathway and is used to treat osteoporosis and bone metastases. The drug's mechanism of action inhibits RANKL and thus inhibits bone resorption through reduced osteoclast activation. This reduces the loss of bone mineral density (BMD), which reduces the risk of bone loss and thereby the risk of fracture and osteoporosis. Denosumab has been shown in several clinical studies to be a safe and effective drug in both women and men and has been in clinical use in both sexes for many years. As Denosumab has a teratogenic effect, pharmacokinetic studies in both monkeys and healthy men were performed before approval of the drug as a treatment for osteoporosis in men. These studies showed that Denosumab concentration in semen does not pose a risk to the fetus during sexual intercourse with the pregnant woman and therefore is safe to use for the suggested infertility indication as there is no risk of fetal transmission.

The investigators have also shown that RANKL also influences germ cell apoptosis, differentiation, and proliferation in mice and humans. This indicates that the RANKL system could be a potential direct regulator of spermatogenesis, and thus highlighting that the drug Denosumab, a RANKL inhibitor, commonly used to treat osteoporosis, may be used for medical treatment of men with decreased sperm production. The effects of denosumab in vitro were supported by a pilot intervention study in 12 infertile men, which showed that denosumab either had a highly beneficial or detrimental effect on sperm production. This implies that only a sub-group of infertile men should be offered this treatment and these men should be identified by, preferably, a simple and accessible biomarker.

Therefore, the investigators are currently conducting two randomized clinical trials "First In Treating Infertility (FITMI)" and "Novel Approach for Oligospermia (NAPO) to explore whether denosumab can improve semen quality in infertile men selected by serum AMH, but already have sperm concentration between 2 mio/mL - 20 mio/mL (FITMI) and 0.01 mio/mL - 2 mio/mL (NAPO). These are both important studies, but still leaves out men with no sperm in the ejaculate, azoospermic patients. Therefore, there is a need for a trial adressing these patients for a potential novel treatment option.

NT-NOA is a single-center, sponsor-investigator-initiated, interventional trial, Following successful completion of screening procedures, subjects will all receive denosumab 60 mg s.c. and Letrozole oral tablet 2.5 mg once daily. Participants will all initiate letrozole treatment 14 days prior to the denosumab injection and will continue until the TESE procedure. The study will be carried out at the Division of Translational Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark.

The investigators believe it is of clinical relevance to treat 10 patients with denosumab in combination with letrozole for 1 of them to achieve sperm production, however, it is difficult to estimate. Ideally 50% of the treated participants will have sperm suitable for ART post intervention. By including 16 patients, there will be sufficient power to determine if combination therapy with denosumab and letrozole induces a clinically relevant effect on spermatogenesis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility, Male

Browse trials for

03

In context

Infertility, Male

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility, Male; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 16 is below the median of 80 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Infertility, Male.

Browse Infertility, Male studies →

Lead sponsor

Martin Blomberg Jensen is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Infertile men ≥ 18 years and \< 60 years of age with azoospermia with normal semen volume (> 0.9 mL) verified by minimum 2 semen samples.
  • No identifiable cause of obstruction.
  • Testis size (Prader Orchidometer) ≤ 15 mL on both sides in patients where no prior TESE is available
  • Serum AMH levels ≥5 pmol/L.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic diseases, defined as diagnosis where signs, symptoms, and treatment imply an expected long duration and lack of a cure, such as diabetes mellitus, metabolism disorders, osteoporosis, colitis, etc.
  • Chromosome anomalies e.g. Klinefelter Syndrome, XX male
  • AZFa/b/c microdeletions besides b2/b3 og gr/gr
  • Detected CFTR mutation
  • Men with current or previous , or at potential risk of testicular cancer after baseline examination and ultrasound will be excluded
  • Men with hypocalcemia at baseline, defined as albumin corrected calcium \< 2.17 mmol/L or total calcium \< 2.14 mmol/L
  • Serum vitamin D (25OHD) levels \< 25 nmol/L
  • estimated (eGFR) \< 60 mL/min/1,73 m2
  • Insufficient dental status
  • to latex, Denosumab, or to any of the (acetic acid, sodium hydroxide, Sorbitol (E420), Polysorbate 20) will be excluded.
  • Serum Inhibin B \< 5 pg/mL
  • Androgen replacement therapy
  • Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism
  • ≥ 35 kg/m2
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
16 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Denosumab

    Subcutaneous injection with 60 mg Denosumab once

    Drug: Denosumab (Prolia) · Drug: Letrozole (Aromatase Inhibitors)

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sperm in the semen sample or TESE on day 90

    Finding of sperm in the semen sample (day 80) or TESE (day 90), that subsequently will be compared with prior TESE if available.

    Time frame: Day 80 (semen sample) and 90 (TESE) after inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. The change in expression of proliferation (KI-67, PCNA) and apoptosis (cPARP, TUNEL assay) markers in TESE tissue at day 90 compared to prior TESE if available

    TESE

    Time frame: Day 90 after inclusion

  2. The number of participants with sperm in the ejaculate (sperm pr. milliliter) assessed by semen samples delivered on day 14

    Semen sample

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  3. The number of participants with sperm in the ejaculate (sperm pr. milliliter) assessed by semen samples delivered on day 80

    Semen sample

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

  4. The number of pregnancies achieved by sperm from the ejaculate or by TESE

    Survey

    Time frame: Day 180 after inclusion

  5. The change in serum levels of reproductive hormones (FSH, LH, AMH, Inhibin B og INSL3) on day 14

    Serum sample

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  6. The change in serum levels of reproductive hormones (FSH, LH, AMH, Inhibin B og INSL3) on day 80

    Serum sample

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

  7. The change in serum levels of sex steroids (Testosterone, Estradiol and SHBG) on day 14

    Serum sample

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  8. The change in serum levels of sex steroids (Testosterone, Estradiol and SHBG) on day 80

    Serum sample

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

  9. The change in seminal fluid levels of reproductive hormones (AMH, Inhibin B, INSL3) on day 14

    Seminal fluid

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  10. The change in seminal fluid levels of reproductive hormones (AMH, Inhibin B, INSL3) on day 80

    Seminal fluid

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

  11. The change in the endocrine gonadal function (Inhibin B/FSH ratio, Testosterone/LH ratio and AMH/testosterone ratio) on day 14

    Serum sample

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  12. The change in the endocrine gonadal function (Inhibin B/FSH ratio, Testosterone/LH ratio and AMH/testosterone ratio) on day 80

    Serum sample

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

Other outcomes

  1. The change in seminal fluid levels of RANKL, OPG, AMH and Inhibin B on day 14

    Seminal fluid

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  2. The change in seminal fluid levels of RANKL, OPG, AMH and Inhibin B on day 80

    Seminal fluid

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

  3. The change in serum levels of minerals (calcium, phosphate, magnesium, zink, bikarbonate, citrate) on day 14

    Serum

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  4. The change in serum levels of minerals (calcium, phosphate, magnesium, zink, bikarbonate, citrate) on day 80

    Serum

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

  5. The change in seminal fluid levels of minerals (calcium, phosphate, magnesium, zink, bikarbonate, citrate) on day 14

    Seminal fluid

    Time frame: Day 14 after inclusion

  6. The change in seminal fluid levels of minerals (calcium, phosphate, magnesium, zink, bikarbonate, citrate) on day 80

    Seminal fluid

    Time frame: Day 80 after inclusion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital
    Herlev, 2730, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Huynh AL, Baker ST, Stewardson AJ, Johnson DF. Denosumab-associated hypocalcaemia: incidence, severity and patient characteristics in a tertiary hospital setting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Nov;25(11):1274-1278. doi: 10.1002/pds.4045. Epub 2016 Jun 3. PubMed 27255807 ↗
  • Skakkebaek NE, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Main KM. Testicular dysgenesis syndrome: an increasingly common developmental disorder with environmental aspects. Hum Reprod. 2001 May;16(5):972-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.972. PubMed 11331648 ↗
  • Toulis KA, Anastasilakis AD. Increased risk of serious infections in women with osteopenia or osteoporosis treated with denosumab. Osteoporos Int. 2010 Nov;21(11):1963-4. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1145-1. Epub 2009 Dec 15. No abstract available. PubMed 20012939 ↗
  • Anastasilakis AD, Toulis KA, Goulis DG, Polyzos SA, Delaroudis S, Giomisi A, Terpos E. Efficacy and safety of denosumab in postmenopausal women with osteopenia or osteoporosis: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Horm Metab Res. 2009 Oct;41(10):721-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1224109. Epub 2009 Jun 17. PubMed 19536731 ↗
  • Bone HG, Chapurlat R, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Czerwinski E, Krieg MA, Mellstrom D, Radominski SC, Reginster JY, Resch H, Ivorra JA, Roux C, Vittinghoff E, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Bradley MN, Franchimont N, Geller ML, Wagman RB, Cummings SR, Papapoulos S. The effect of three or six years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the FREEDOM extension. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013 Nov;98(11):4483-92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-1597. Epub 2013 Aug 26. PubMed 23979955 ↗
  • Lamy O, Stoll D, Aubry-Rozier B, Rodriguez EG. Stopping Denosumab. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019 Feb;17(1):8-15. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00502-4. PubMed 30659428 ↗
  • Uebelhart B, Rizzoli R, Ferrari SL. Retrospective evaluation of serum CTX levels after denosumab discontinuation in patients with or without prior exposure to bisphosphonates. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Sep;28(9):2701-2705. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4080-6. Epub 2017 May 24. PubMed 28540505 ↗
  • Bekker PJ, Holloway DL, Rasmussen AS, Murphy R, Martin SW, Leese PT, Holmes GB, Dunstan CR, DePaoli AM. A single-dose placebo-controlled study of AMG 162, a fully human monoclonal antibody to RANKL, in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Jul;19(7):1059-66. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.040305. Epub 2004 Mar 1. PubMed 15176987 ↗
  • Blomberg Jensen M, Andreassen CH, Jorgensen A, Nielsen JE, Juel Mortensen L, Boisen IM, Schwarz P, Toppari J, Baron R, Lanske B, Juul A. RANKL regulates male reproductive function. Nat Commun. 2021 Apr 23;12(1):2450. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22734-8. PubMed 33893301 ↗
  • Bussiere JL, Pyrah I, Boyce R, Branstetter D, Loomis M, Andrews-Cleavenger D, Farman C, Elliott G, Chellman G. Reproductive toxicity of denosumab in cynomolgus monkeys. Reprod Toxicol. 2013 Dec;42:27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.07.018. Epub 2013 Jul 22. PubMed 23886817 ↗
  • Sohn W, Lee E, Kankam MK, Egbuna O, Moffat G, Bussiere J, Padhi D, Ng E, Kumar S, Slatter JG. An open-label study in healthy men to evaluate the risk of seminal fluid transmission of denosumab to pregnant partners. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;81(2):362-9. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12798. Epub 2015 Dec 5. PubMed 26447647 ↗
  • Boonen S, Adachi JD, Man Z, Cummings SR, Lippuner K, Torring O, Gallagher JC, Farrerons J, Wang A, Franchimont N, San Martin J, Grauer A, McClung M. Treatment with denosumab reduces the incidence of new vertebral and hip fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jun;96(6):1727-36. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2784. Epub 2011 Mar 16. PubMed 21411557 ↗
  • Papapoulos S, Chapurlat R, Libanati C, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Czerwinski E, Krieg MA, Man Z, Mellstrom D, Radominski SC, Reginster JY, Resch H, Roman Ivorra JA, Roux C, Vittinghoff E, Austin M, Daizadeh N, Bradley MN, Grauer A, Cummings SR, Bone HG. Five years of denosumab exposure in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: results from the first two years of the FREEDOM extension. J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Mar;27(3):694-701. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1479. PubMed 22113951 ↗
  • Polyzos SA, Singhellakis PN, Naot D, Adamidou F, Malandrinou FC, Anastasilakis AD, Polymerou V, Kita M. Denosumab treatment for juvenile Paget's disease: results from two adult patients with osteoprotegerin deficiency ("Balkan" mutation in the TNFRSF11B gene). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014 Mar;99(3):703-7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3762. Epub 2014 Jan 16. PubMed 24433001 ↗
  • Schwarz P, Rasmussen AQ, Kvist TM, Andersen UB, Jorgensen NR. Paget's disease of the bone after treatment with Denosumab: a case report. Bone. 2012 May;50(5):1023-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.01.020. PubMed 22586699 ↗
  • Anastasilakis AD, Toulis KA, Polyzos SA, Terpos E. RANKL inhibition for the management of patients with benign metabolic bone disorders. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009 Aug;18(8):1085-102. doi: 10.1517/13543780903048929. PubMed 19558335 ↗
  • Makras P, Polyzos SA, Papatheodorou A, Kokkoris P, Chatzifotiadis D, Anastasilakis AD. Parathyroid hormone changes following denosumab treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2013 Oct;79(4):499-503. doi: 10.1111/cen.12188. Epub 2013 Apr 1. PubMed 23452098 ↗
  • Anastasilakis AD, Toulis KA, Polyzos SA, Anastasilakis CD, Makras P. Long-term treatment of osteoporosis: safety and efficacy appraisal of denosumab. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2012;8:295-306. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S24239. Epub 2012 Jun 19. PubMed 22767993 ↗
  • Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493. Epub 2009 Aug 11. PubMed 19671655 ↗
  • Kwiecinski GG, Petrie GI, DeLuca HF. Vitamin D is necessary for reproductive functions of the male rat. J Nutr. 1989 May;119(5):741-4. doi: 10.1093/jn/119.5.741. PubMed 2723823 ↗
  • Uhland AM, Kwiecinski GG, DeLuca HF. Normalization of serum calcium restores fertility in vitamin D-deficient male rats. J Nutr. 1992 Jun;122(6):1338-44. doi: 10.1093/jn/122.6.1338. PubMed 1588451 ↗
  • Blomberg Jensen M. Vitamin D and male reproduction. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 Mar;10(3):175-86. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.262. Epub 2014 Jan 14. PubMed 24419359 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it moved

Ran from Mar 2025 to primary completion in Apr 2026, 13 months.

Primary completion moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Aug 2026 → Apr 2026, on Oct 21, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 19, 2024
First posted
Nov 26, 2024
StartActual
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2026was Aug 2026
CompletionActual
Aug 15, 2026
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Active, not recruiting→Completed
changed Oct 21, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 2026→Apr 30, 2026 (actual)
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Active, not recruiting→Completed
    Primary completion Aug 2026→Apr 30, 2026 (now actual)
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06706414
Lead sponsor
Martin Blomberg Jensen
Responsible party
Martin Blomberg Jensen (Head of Research Department Endocrinology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Herlev) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 26, 2024
Start date
Mar 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2026
Completion
Aug 15, 2026
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Christian F.S. Jensen, MD, PhD.
principal investigator · Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Denosumab · Letrozole

Start the discussion