ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04298255ROSIUpdated Sep 17, 2026

Experimental Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI) to Treat Infertile Couples

An interventional study of Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI) and Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization in Infertility, Male, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2020; still recruiting 6 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to evaluate if special types of cells called round spermatids can be gathered from men with non-obstructive azoospermia and used (in absence of elongated spermatids and spermatozoa) to reliably and effectively create pregnancy with a procedure called Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI). This process is similar to In Vitro Fertilization, or 'IVF'. In addition, this study wants to test the safety of ROSI and see what effects (good and bad) it has on embryo created from this method.

Read the detailed description

Azoospermia is defined as the absence of sperm in the ejaculate. Around 1% of general population suffers from azoospermia. Men who were rendered infertile due to a non-obstructive azoospermia, who have been subjected to Testicular Sperm Extraction (TESE) surgery and found to be lacking elongated spermatids or spermatozoa, are commonly advised to consider utilizing a sperm donor or apply for adoption. It is reported that \~30% of men with non-obstructive azoospermia lack elongated spermatids and spermatozoa but may still produce round spermatids (less mature form of haploid germ cells) in their testicles. Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI) technology to fertilize oocytes is not a brand-new technology, however, it is plagued with notoriously low efficiency. Despite this limitation, it has been reported that most of these patients still desire to have the ROSI procedure instead of applying directly for other options, i.e. sperm donation or adoption.

High failure rate of traditional ROSI has been attributed to a few potential causes:

  1. Incorrect selection of round spermatids (to distinguish from diploid spermatogonia cells)
  2. Using round spermatids that were already in the process of degeneration
  3. Incomplete imprinting in the round spermatid
  4. Incomplete activation of oocytes Recently Tanaka and colleagues in Japan established a new ROSI method and reported over 90 babies born via this method1. They described a new method of round spermatid selection and oocyte activation using NEPA21 super electroporator (10 minutes prior to round spermatid injection).

Babies born from this new ROSI method in Japan have been evaluated for developmental and cognitive differences for 2 years1. Babies conceived with ROSI were found to have a shorter gestation times, and lower body weight at 12 and 18 months when compared to their naturally conceived counterparts, but also showed an increased birth weight and showed no body weight differences at 24 months of age. No diseases resulting from genetic anomalies have been reported thus far, but the relatively small sample sizes present in the literature needs to be tested in larger cohorts. Therefore, this effective ROSI method should still be considered as an "experimental fertility treatment".

02

Conditions studied

  • Infertility, Male

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • IVF
  • Fertility
03

In context

Infertility, Male

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Infertility, Male; 65 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 80 across 187 interventional studies indexed under Infertility, Male.

Browse Infertility, Male studies →

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,351 studies on the registry; 201 are open to participants now.

Of its 332 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 251 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males with no elongated spermatids or spermatozoa present but with round spermatids present on TESE (Testicular Sperm Extraction)
  • Male diagnosed with non-obstructive Azoospermia
  • Male partner ≥18
  • Female partner greater than 18 years of age and less than 38 years of age or Anti Mullerian Hormone (AMH) greater than 2 ng/ml.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males with obstructive azoospermia
  • Males with presence an adequate number of elongated spermatids or spermatozoa
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ROSI only

    Option 1: injecting extracted round spermatids (less mature form of haploid germ cells than elongated spermatid or spermatozoon) from male partner into the harvested egg of a female partner

    Other: Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)

  • Experimental
    Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

    Option 2: Harvested eggs from the female partner will be separated in two groups, with one group being fertilized with round spermatids and the other group fertilized with donor sperm

    Other: Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

Interventions

  • OtherRound Spermatid Injection (ROSI)

    In Vitro Fertilization using Round Spermatid Injection (ROSI)

  • OtherHalf ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

    Half ROSI-half Sperm Donor Fertilization

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fertility rate

    Egg fertilization comparison between the groups undergoing the procedure with spermatids only vs spermatids and donor sperms.This fertilization process will be recorded by EmbryoScope under supervision of dedicated clinical embryologist.All the process will be followed and documented according to America Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines. All the process will be followed and documented according to American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines.

    Time frame: Day 1 after round spermatid injection

Secondary outcomes

  1. Blastocyst formation

    Blastocyst comparison between the groups undergoing the procedure with spermatids only vs spermatids and donor sperms.Embryo grow and blastocyst formation will be recorded by EmbryoScope under supervision of dedicated clinical embryologist.All the process will be followed and documented according to American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines.

    Time frame: Day 3 to 5 after round spermatid injection

  2. Aneuploidy rate

    Aneuploidy comparison and evaluation of abnormality between the groups undergoing the procedure with spermatids only vs spermatids and donor sperms. Aneuploidy will be tested using polymerase chain reaction amplification (PCR) based Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses. All the process will be followed and documented according to American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines.

    Time frame: Day 3 to 5 after round spermatid injection

  3. Chemical Pregnancy with Positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG)

    Pregnancy Rate between the groups undergoing the procedure with spermatids only vs spermatids and donor sperms. Blood test to measure beta-hCG (chemical pregnancy) and follows by Ultrasound (clinical pregnancy). All the process will be followed and documented according to American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines.

    Time frame: Post Fertilization 4 Weeks and onwards

  4. Live Birth Rate

    Live Birth comparison between the groups undergoing the procedure with spermatids only vs spermatids and donor sperms. Pregnancy will be followed as high risk and health of born children will be evaluated by a dedicated neonatologist/Pediatrician. All the process will be followed and documented according to American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines.

    Time frame: Post Pregnancy Full Term Average 39 to 40 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Carolinas Fertility Institute (CFI)
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
    Recruiting
    • Tamer Yalcinkaya, MD · Principal investigator
    • Hooman Sadri, MD, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Banafsheh Nikmehr, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Anuradha Devineni, MD, MS · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tanaka A, Suzuki K, Nagayoshi M, Tanaka A, Takemoto Y, Watanabe S, Takeda S, Irahara M, Kuji N, Yamagata Z, Yanagimachi R. Ninety babies born after round spermatid injection into oocytes: survey of their development from fertilization to 2 years of age. Fertil Steril. 2018 Aug;110(3):443-451. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.033. PubMed 30098696 ↗
  • Tanaka A, Nagayoshi M, Takemoto Y, Tanaka I, Kusunoki H, Watanabe S, Kuroda K, Takeda S, Ito M, Yanagimachi R. Fourteen babies born after round spermatid injection into human oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 24;112(47):14629-34. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517466112. Epub 2015 Nov 2. PubMed 26575628 ↗
  • Bradshaw AW, Nikmehr B, Halicigil C, Stogner-Underwood K, Sadri-Ardekani H. Optimum identification of round spermatid in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: A commentary. Andrology. 2021 Nov;9(6):1817-1818. doi: 10.1111/andr.13113. Epub 2021 Oct 14. No abstract available. PubMed 34618410 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual Participant Data will be available to research teams of Carolinas Fertility Institute and Wake Forest University. It will not be shared with others. Data will be available in the form of electronic charts at the Carolinas Fertility Institute, and limited hard copies at the Wake Forest University Urology Department.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04298255
Collaborators
Carolinas Fertility Institute (CFI), Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM), Wake Forest Department of Urology
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 6, 2020
Start date
Aug 24, 2020
Primary completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Karla M Oliver
Contact
kaoliver@wakehealth.edu
336-713-3123
Hooman Sadri, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine (WFIRM)
Hooman Sadri, MD, PhD
study director · Wake Forest University Health Sciences

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion