ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT06688370TouxpetitUpdated Dec 23, 2025Results posted

The Performance and Safety of Petit Drill in the French Paediatric Population: a Post-market Clinical Follow-up Study

An observational study in Sore-throat and Cough, sponsored by Pierre Fabre Medicament. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 6 Months to 6 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-23.

Primary conditionCoughRegistry: PharyngitisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pharyngitis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Cough
Why
  1. The registry often attaches Pharyngitis to studies about something else, and this study's title and listed conditions do not name it.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Cough.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Pierre Fabre Medicament (part of Pierre Fabre) · Observational

Why this study was terminated
Due to difficulty in recruiting patients, the Sponsor decided to prematurely stop the study
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12
Ages
6 Months to 6 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Demulcent or soothing substance is the currently recommended option to alleviate throat irritation associated to cough and sore throat in children under 6 years. The intended benefit to the patient of Petit Drill is to calm throat irritation (sore throat) associated to dry cough in infants starting at 6 months of age and in children up to 6 years of age. This intended benefit sustained by the properties of the formula is recognized and promoted by the World Health Organization, health authorities and current textbooks to have a positive impact on patient management for the targeted population (infant / child).

This study aimed at assessing the performance of the syrup in real-life context, in children presenting throat irritation associated with dry cough to support the conclusion of clinical evaluation report.

Read the detailed description

Pediatric patients were recruited by pharmacist in community settings, who briefly presented the clinical investigation to the parent who purchases Petit Drill for his/her child.

The pharmacist provided the interested parent with the study information note and transferred the parent's name and contact details to the clinical investigation centre. The parent was then contacted to take part in the remote inclusion visit with a site investigator, scheduled on the same day of Petit Drill delivery. During the inclusion visit, once consent has been signed, the investigator verified eligibility criteria, and collected baseline data.

The follow-up periods lasted as long as the child received the syrup, but it should not exceed 3 days and 3 nights. The parent completed daily questionnaires and recorded the child's syrup intake in a secure mobile application designed for patient reported outcomes (PROs).

Of note, due to the premature discontinuation of the study, all statistical analyses initially planned in the Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) were not conducted. All study outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Therefore, results presented hereafter are limited to few study outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • Sore-throat
  • Cough

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • dry cough
  • Petit Drill
  • throat irritation
  • sore throat
03

In context

Cough Reclassified

427 studies on the registry are indexed under Cough; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 12 is below the median of 100 across 95 observational studies indexed under Cough.

Browse Cough studies →

Lead sponsor

Pierre Fabre Medicament is the lead sponsor of 73 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Compared within Cough, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pharyngitis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 6 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pediatric population presented with acute dry cough

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Boys or girls, 6 months to 6 years of age;
  • With one of his/her parents/legal guardian purchases Petit Drill in a participating pharmacy in accordance with recommendations for use (regarding age and type of cough);
  • For infants between 6 months and 12 months of age - a confirmed prescription from a treating physician;
  • With an acute dry cough lasting less than 48 hours
  • With a score ≥ 3 at least for 3 of the 5 items of PCQ, (based on assessment of the night before inclusion);
  • For whom child-minding will allow to respect the recommended daily doses of Petit Drill during the 3 day-treatment;
  • With a parent/legal guardian having a smartphone allowing using the ePRO App. NursTrial®;
  • With a parent/legal guardian able to understand and to complete to the questionnaires in timely manner;
  • With parent(s)/legal guardian who provide their signed for the child's enrolment in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presenting with one of the following conditions: Chronic respiratory illness such as asthma, recurrent wheezing associated to viral infections and bronchitis or lower respiratory infections, such as bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia or angina, otitis, or sinusitis or persistent cough lasting more than 3 weeks, whatever the etiology or gastrointestinal pathology, involving vomiting, nausea, or diarrhoea.
  • With ongoing use of paracetamol, and/or homeopathic products against cough.
  • Having had treatment, antibiotics, antihistaminic or any cough medication (such as, but not limited to, Phytoxil, Arkotoux) in the previous 15 days since inclusion.
  • With a brother/sister already included in the present clinical investigation (If several children are eligible in the same household, only one will be enrolled at random).
  • Enrolled in another clinical trial or being in a period of exclusion from a previous clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Petit Drill

    Participants who received treatment with the syrup (at least once) as long as necessary from D1 to D3, according to parent's judgement.

    Device: Petit Drill

Interventions

  • DevicePetit Drill

    Day 1: 2-4 doses, including one of the daily doses taken at bedtime. Days 2 and 3: 3 to 4 doses, including one of the daily doses taken at bedtime.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in the Pediatric Cough Questionnaire (PCQ) Total Score - Percentage of Children With a 3-point Decrease From Baseline After up to 3-day Treatment With Petit Drill

    Percentage of children with a 3 point-decrease (minimal clinical significance) of the Pediatric Cough Questionnaire (PCQ) total score from baseline after up to 3 day-treatment with Petit Drill. PCQ refers to a past night recall of 5 questions, each scored from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Extremely" using a 6-point Likert scale. PCQ Total score consists of the sum of each score and ranges from 0 to 25.

    Time frame: up to 3 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Petit Drill Adherence

    Average number of times Petit Drill is administered in each 24-hour period

    Time frame: Day 1, day 2 and day 3

  2. Parent's Satisfaction With Petit Drill

    Satisfaction is assessed using a study specific questionnaire. Responses measured using Likert scales. Not validated Questionnaire; 6 questions with different way to answers. Of note, parents were not considered enrolled but did contribute to this assessment.

    Time frame: Day 3

  3. Petit Drill Safety

    Number of participants with adverse events and adverse device effects coded by using the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) of the version 24.1 of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) dictionary.

    Time frame: 3 days

07

Results

Posted Dec 23, 2025
Limitations and caveats
The main limitation of this study is the very small number of patients included and analyzed (12 patients in the safety analysis; 7 in performance), because the study had been stopped prematurely due to major recruitment difficulties.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePetit Drill
Started12
Completed7
Not completed5
Withdrew: Discontinued the treatment1
Withdrew: Prohibited treatment taken4

Outcome measures

PrimaryChanges in the Pediatric Cough Questionnaire (PCQ) Total Score - Percentage of Children With a 3-point Decrease From Baseline After up to 3-day Treatment With Petit Drill

Percentage of children with a 3 point-decrease (minimal clinical significance) of the Pediatric Cough Questionnaire (PCQ) total score from baseline after up to 3 day-treatment with Petit Drill. PCQ refers to a past night recall of 5 questions, each scored from 0 "Not at all" to 5 "Extremely" using a 6-point Likert scale. PCQ Total score consists of the sum of each score and ranges from 0 to 25.

Time frame:
up to 3 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Changes in the Pediatric Cough Questionnaire (PCQ) Total Score - Percentage of Children With a 3-point Decrease From Baseline After up to 3-day Treatment With Petit Drill
ParticipantsPetit Drill
Changes in the Pediatric Cough Questionnaire (PCQ) Total Score - Percentage of Children With a 3-point Decrease From Baseline After up to 3-day Treatment With Petit Drill7
SecondaryPetit Drill Adherence

Average number of times Petit Drill is administered in each 24-hour period

Time frame:
Day 1, day 2 and day 3
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Petit Drill Adherence
ParticipantsPetit Drill
At least 1 day with 3 doses6
1 day with 4 doses1
less than 3 doses received at all days5
SecondaryParent's Satisfaction With Petit Drill

Satisfaction is assessed using a study specific questionnaire. Responses measured using Likert scales. Not validated Questionnaire; 6 questions with different way to answers. Of note, parents were not considered enrolled but did contribute to this assessment.

Time frame:
Day 3
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Parent's Satisfaction With Petit Drill
ParticipantsPetit Drill
Quality of therapeutic management: excellent2
Quality of therapeutic management: good5
Quality of therapeutic management: fair1
Quality of therapeutic management: poor1
Response to the child's needs: almost all were met2
Response to the child's needs: most were met4
Response to the child's needs: only few were met3
Response to the child's needs: none were met0
Willingness to recommend the syrup: yes generally2
Willingness to recommend the syrup: yes definitely5
Willingness to recommend the syrup: no2
Satisfaction with information from Instruction For Use (IFU) to use treatment: quite dissatisfied0
Satisfaction with information from IFU to use treatment: indifferent or mildly dissatisfied0
Satisfaction with information from IFU to use treatment: mostly satisfied6
Satisfaction with information from IFU to use treatment: very satisfied3
Ease of syrup use: yes generally2
Ease of syrup use: yes definitely7
Ease of syrup use: no0
Feeling that the child enjoyed the syrup taste: yes generally2
Feeling that the child enjoyed the syrup taste: yes definitely7
Feeling that the child enjoyed the syrup taste: no0
SecondaryPetit Drill Safety

Number of participants with adverse events and adverse device effects coded by using the System Organ Class (SOC) and Preferred Term (PT) of the version 24.1 of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) dictionary.

Time frame:
3 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Petit Drill Safety
ParticipantsPetit Drill
Adverse events4
Serious adverse events0
Adverse device effect related to procedures1
Adverse device effect related to device deficiency1
Adverse event leading to permanent discontinuation1

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected over days D1, D2, D3, D4. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Petit Drill0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)4/12 (33.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPetit Drill
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/12
Oropharyngeal painRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/12
TonsilitisRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/12
UnderdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/12
Device use errorInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/12
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/12
FatigueGeneral disorders1/12

Baseline characteristics

Full Analysis Set (FAS) population: the analysis population consists of patients who were included in this clinical investigation after fulfilling all eligibility criteria.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(year)Petit Drill
Mean3.1 ± 1.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Petit Drill
Female7
Male5
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Petit Drill
Rank of sibling
Rank of sibling(Participants)Petit Drill
Single child3
First4
Second2
Third2
Fourth1
Description of study population (home region)
Description of study population (home region)(Participants)Petit Drill
Bourgogne Franche-Comté1
Centre-Val de Loire1
Grand Est3
Hauts-de-France2
Nouvelle-Aquitaine3
Occitanie2
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Cen Experimental
    Dijon, 21000, France
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2024 to primary completion in Nov 2024, 7 months.

Results were first posted in Dec 2025, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2024
First posted
Nov 14, 2024
StartActual
Mar 14, 2024
Primary completionActual
Nov 7, 2024
CompletionActual
Nov 7, 2024
Results first posted
Dec 23, 2025
Last update
Dec 23, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06688370
Collaborators
CEN Biotech
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 14, 2024
Start date
Mar 14, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 7, 2024
Completion
Nov 7, 2024
Results posted
Dec 23, 2025
Last update
Dec 23, 2025

Study contacts

VINCENT ALQUIER
principal investigator · Pharmacist
GUY DUTAU
study chair · pediatrician pulmologist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion