ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06680245MMCUpdated Nov 8, 2024

Effect of Mitomycin-C on the Outcomes of Patients Receiving Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implantation Surgery

A Phase 3 interventional study of Mitomycin c in Glaucoma, sponsored by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-08.

Sponsored by St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to determine if the intraoperative application of Mitomycin-C can enhance the outcomes of Ahmed Glaucoma Valve (AGV) implantation in treating refractory glaucoma. This study is conducted among adult patients diagnosed with refractory glaucoma, a condition characterized by uncontrolled intraocular pressure despite the use of maximum tolerated medical therapy and previous surgical interventions. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does intraoperative Mitomycin-C reduce postoperative intraocular pressure more effectively than surgery without it? Does Mitomycin-C reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications such as hypertensive phases?

Researchers will compare the experimental group receiving Mitomycin-C during AGV implantation to the control group undergoing AGV implantation without Mitomycin-C to see if the treatment leads to lower intraocular pressure and fewer surgical complications.

Participants will:

  • Undergo baseline assessment including eye examination and measurement of intraocular pressure.
  • Be randomly assigned to receive either the Mitomycin-C treatment or no intervention during their scheduled AGV implantation surgery.
  • Attend follow-up visits at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months post-surgery to assess intraocular pressure, visual acuity, and any postoperative complications.
02

Conditions studied

  • Glaucoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Refractory Glaucoma
  • Intraocular Pressure
  • Ahmed Glaucoma Valve
  • Mitomycin-C
  • Glaucoma Surgery
03

In context

Glaucoma

1,844 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 233 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 144 is above the median of 65 across 1,296 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton is the lead sponsor of 143 studies on the registry; 33 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of primary open angle glaucoma (OAG); including ocular hypertension, pigmentary dispersion syndrome and pseudoexfoliation syndrome
  • Participant must be over 18 years of age
  • IOP > 16mmHg on at least two consecutive occasions separated by one month
  • Two sighted eyes with visual acuity of 20/200 or better
  • Informed consent from patient

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of secondary OAG (aside from pigmentary and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma) or narrow angle glaucoma
  • Previous incisional glaucoma surgery
  • Incisional glaucoma surgery scheduled within 1 year of intervention
  • Corneal disease affecting visualization of anterior chamber of the eye
  • Treatment or plan to treat with topical or systemic steroids
  • Previous laser treatments (selective laser trabeculoplasty or Argon laser trabeculoplasty)
  • Other eye disorders or surgical procedures (ie retinal detachment) that may influence the results of glaucoma surgery.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
144 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mitomycin-C Treatment

    The intervention aims to assess the efficacy of Mitomycin-C in preventing postoperative hypertensive phases by inhibiting fibroblast proliferation around the surgical site. Patients in this arm will receive a 0.2 mg/mL Mitomycin-C injection into the sclera during Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation surgery. The total volume of the injection will be 1 mL, administered once intraoperatively.

    Drug: Mitomycin c

  • No intervention
    Control

    Patients in this arm will undergo the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation surgery without the addition of Mitomycin-C. This group serves as a control to evaluate the effects of the Ahmed Valve alone in managing intraocular pressure in patients with refractory glaucoma. Postoperative care remains consistent with the experimental group, involving the same regimen of topical antibiotics and steroids.

Interventions

  • Patients needing Ahmed valve implants to control intraocular pressures will be eligible. Eligible patients who consent will be randomized to receive either mitomycin-C or no intervention during implant surgery. Screening visits occur one week before surgery to assess eligibility and take baseline measurements (visual acuity, IOP, anterior chamber reaction). On surgery day, patients register at SJHH King Campus and undergo randomization. IOP is measured using a tonopen in the OR. An experienced glaucoma specialist performs the surgery, injecting 0.2 mg/ml mitomycin-C into the sclera for the experimental group, while the control group receives no intervention. The area is irrigated with 40mL balanced salt solution before implant insertion. Post-operative care includes topical antibiotics and steroids for six weeks, with follow-ups at 1 and 2 weeks, and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months to monitor visual acuity, IOP, anterior chamber reaction, complications, and additional glaucoma medications.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Intraocular Pressure assessed using the Goldmann applanation tonometer

    The percentage decrease in intraocular pressure (IOP) from baseline will be calculated and compared between the two groups from baseline to 1-year follow-up. It will be measured using the Goldmann applanation tonometer and performed at approximately the same time of the day to account for diurnal variation. Two measurements will be averaged if the difference is less or equal to 2mmHg. If the difference is greater than 2mmHg, then three measurements will be taken and the median will be recorded. The baseline IOP will be the average of three different IOP values taken at different times of the day on at least two separate days within a period of a month. In this study, the baseline IOP will be the average IOP of previous IOP measurement and the day of surgery.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Glaucoma Medications assessed by reviewing of patient medication records

    Changes in the number of glaucoma medications need per patient in each group will be compared using observations and by reviewing patient medication records from baseline to 1-year follow-up. This outcome will assess whether the intervention affects the number of prescribed glaucoma medications for the patients.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up visit

  2. Visual Acuity assessed using the Snellen chart.

    Changes in visual acuity from baseline to 1-year follow-up will be measured using the Snellen chart. This outcome will assess whether the intervention affects the overall visual function of the patients.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up visit

  3. Anterior Chamber Inflammation assessed using the Slit-lamp examination

    The anterior chamber inflammation at every post-operative visit will be compared to assess any complications during the surgery. This will be measured using the slit-lamp examination.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up visit

  4. Progression to Surgical Therapy measured using clinical evaluation and surgical records.

    The progression to surgical therapy in each group will be compared from baseline to 1-year follow-up.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1-year follow-up visit

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Weinreb RN, Aung T, Medeiros FA. The pathophysiology and treatment of glaucoma: a review. JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1901-11. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3192. PubMed 24825645 ↗
  • Quigley HA. Glaucoma. Lancet. 2011 Apr 16;377(9774):1367-77. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61423-7. Epub 2011 Mar 30. PubMed 21453963 ↗
  • Margolis KL, Rich EC. Open-angle glaucoma. Prim Care. 1989 Mar;16(1):197-209. PubMed 2649902 ↗
  • Sharts-Hopko NC, Glynn-Milley C. Primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Nurs. 2009 Feb;109(2):40-7; quiz 48. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000345434.37734.ee. PubMed 19299999 ↗
  • Alasbali T, Alghamdi AA, Khandekar R. Outcomes of Ahmed valve surgery for refractory glaucoma in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. Int J Ophthalmol. 2015 Jun 18;8(3):560-4. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2015.03.22. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26086008 ↗
  • Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Bengtsson B, Hussein M; Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Oct;120(10):1268-79. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.10.1268. PubMed 12365904 ↗
  • Riva I, Roberti G, Oddone F, Konstas AG, Quaranta L. Ahmed glaucoma valve implant: surgical technique and complications. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Feb 17;11:357-367. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S104220. eCollection 2017. PubMed 28255226 ↗
  • Kurnaz E, Kubaloglu A, Yilmaz Y, Koytak A, Ozertrk Y. The effect of adjunctive mitomycin C in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan - Feb 2005;15(1):27-31. doi: 10.5301/EJO.2008.210. PubMed 28221428 ↗
  • Luzu J, Baudouin C, Hamard P. The role of Ahmed glaucoma valve in the management of refractory glaucoma: Long-term outcomes and complications. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep;31(5):2383-2389. doi: 10.1177/1120672120968733. Epub 2020 Nov 25. PubMed 33238768 ↗
  • Amoozgar B, Lin SC, Han Y, Kuo J. A role for antimetabolites in glaucoma tube surgery: current evidence and future directions. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Mar;27(2):164-9. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000244. PubMed 26720778 ↗
  • Cui QN, Hsia YC, Lin SC, Stamper RL, Rose-Nussbaumer J, Mehta N, Porco TC, Naseri A, Han Y. Effect of mitomycin c and 5-flurouracil adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Mar;45(2):128-134. doi: 10.1111/ceo.12811. Epub 2016 Sep 1. PubMed 27490793 ↗
  • Costa VP, Azuara-Blanco A, Netland PA, Lesk MR, Arcieri ES. Efficacy and safety of adjunctive mitomycin C during Ahmed Glaucoma Valve implantation: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology. 2004 Jun;111(6):1071-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2003.09.037. PubMed 15177955 ↗
  • Kook MS, Yoon J, Kim J, Lee MS. Clinical results of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucoma with adjunctive mitomycin C. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 2000 Mar-Apr;31(2):100-6. PubMed 10743919 ↗
  • Tien M., Yip L., Wong E.P.Y., Yong V., Wong H.T. & Lim B.A. (2013). The effect of adjuvant mitomycin C in ahmed glaucoma valve surgery for refractory glaucoma. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 54(15), no pagination. Retrieved from http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=reference&D=emed14&NEWS=N&AN=628682336.
  • Kurnaz E, Kubaloglu A, Yilmaz Y, Koytak A, Ozerturk Y. The effect of adjunctive Mitomycin C in Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2005 Jan-Feb;15(1):27-31. PubMed 15751236 ↗
  • Bikbov MM, Khusnitdinov II. The Results of the Use of Ahmed Valve in Refractory Glaucoma Surgery. J Curr Glaucoma Pract. 2015 Sep-Dec;9(3):86-91. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10008-1191. Epub 2016 Feb 2. PubMed 26997843 ↗
  • Alvarado JA, Hollander DA, Juster RP, Lee LC. Ahmed valve implantation with adjunctive mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil: long-term outcomes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Aug;146(2):276-284. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 Jun 6. PubMed 18538300 ↗
  • Park Y, Cho KJ. Posterior segment complications of Ahmed valve implantation. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb 15;22(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12886-022-02297-y. PubMed 35168587 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 8, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06680245
Responsible party
Enitan Sogbesan (Doctor, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 8, 2024
Start date
Dec 1, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 8, 2024

Study contacts

Sharan Bains
Contact
bainss@mcmaster.ca
905-522-1155 ext. 38505

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Mitomycin

Start the discussion