CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06670638Updated Nov 12, 2025

Development of a Novel Endoscopic Index and Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Clinical Trials in Participants With Permanent Ileostomy

An observational study in Crohns Disease, sponsored by Alimentiv Inc.. Recruiting at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-12.

Sponsored by Alimentiv Inc. · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To date, patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) and permanent ileostomies have been excluded from clinical trials for new treatments. To allow this patient population to be included in clinical trials, outcome and measurement tools are needed. This study aims to develop a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) and Endoscopic Index (EI) for patients with Crohn's Disease (CD) and permanent ileostomy. The study will enroll about 50 participants and collect videos of endoscopies that are done as part of standard of care. The videos will be centrally read to identify features that represent a broad range of inflammation and will be used to develop the EI. Participants will also be asked to participate in interviews, to understand the symptoms and impacts that are most important to participants for the development of a PRO.

02

Conditions studied

  • Crohns Disease

Browse trials for

03

In context

Crohn Disease

1,880 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 162 across 608 observational studies indexed under Crohn Disease.

Browse Crohn Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Alimentiv Inc. is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Approximately 50 participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled in the study. The study population will ideally include approximately equal distributions of participants with disease activity categorized by a central reader as normal, mild, moderate, and severe, according to the VAS assessment. It is not possible to predetermine the number of participants with specific disease activity levels. The distribution of inflammatory disease activity across the study population will be monitored on an ongoing basis and recruitment strategies may be reviewed for opportunities to help maintain a balanced distribution. No more than 10 asymptomatic participants will be enrolled.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adults (age ≥ 18 years) with a diagnosis of CD treated surgically with subtotal colectomy/proctocolectomy end ileostomy at least 12 months prior to the scheduled endoscopy procedure.
  2. Planning to have an ileoscopy procedure scheduled as part of routine medical care.
  3. Be proficient in the English language (ie, ability to read, write, speak, and understand English well enough to take part in the interview process without the aid of an interpreter).
  4. Able and willing to participate fully in all aspects of this study.
  5. Written informed consent must be obtained and documented.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. End or loop colostomy, end ileostomy for UC, continent ileostomy, ileal pouch anal anastomosis, end ileostomy with mucous fistula, double barrel ileostomy, urostomy, loop ostomy, or any type of end ileostomy not considered permanent at the time of enrolment (with no intent to restore continuity).
  2. Peristomal skin complications such as pyoderma gangrenosum, abscess, or any other severe peristomal skin inflammation.
  3. Stomal stenosis obviating ileoscopy, known small bowel stricture, major stoma prolapse, symptomatic parastomal hernia, parastomal hernia with subcutaneous loops of small bowel within the hernia, stoma in a crease/poorly fitting applicable resulting in severe peristomal skin irritation, or retracted stoma that prevents endoscopic evaluation.
  4. Any actively draining fistula (eg, peristomal or peri-anal).
  5. Evidence of a known small bowel stricture on cross-sectional imaging or inability to pass an endoscope within the past 6 months.
  6. Known active Clostridoides difficile or other enteric infection.
  7. Short bowel syndrome.
  8. Predominant symptom(s) arising from a retained rectal stump.
  9. Serious underlying disease other than CD that in the opinion of the investigator may interfere with the participant's ability to participate fully in the study procedures or provide nonconfounded descriptions of their CD and ostomy symptom experiences during the interview.
  10. Prior enrolment in the current study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Develop a PRO instrument for patients with Crohn's Disease and Permanent Ileostomy

    Concept elicitation interviews focusing on the symptoms and impacts relevant to patients with CD and permanent ileostomy will be conducted and used to develop a PRO. Cognitive interviews will subsequently be conducted to determine respondent comprehension and relevance of the items.

    Time frame: through study completion, and average of 1 year

  2. Evaluate the intrarater reliability of 100-mm VAS.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the VAS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks

  3. Evaluate the intrarater reliability of RAM identified items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos for items identified during a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks

  4. Evaluate the intrarater reliability of Rutgeerts score and its component items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the Rutgeerts Score, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks

  5. Evaluate the intrarater reliability of CDEIS and its component items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the CDEIS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks

  6. Evaluate the intrarater reliability of SES-CD and its component items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the SES-CD, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Intrarater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline and 2 weeks

  7. Evaluate the interrater reliability of 100-mm VAS.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the VAS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline

  8. Evaluate the interrater reliability of RAM identified items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos for items identified during a RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline

  9. Evaluate the interrater reliability of Rutgeerts score and its component items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the Rutgeerts score, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline

  10. Evaluate the interrater reliability of CDEIS and its component items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the CDEIS, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline

  11. Evaluate the interrater reliability of SES-CD and its component items.

    Central readers will score endoscopy videos using the SES-CD, on 2 separate occasions at least 2 weeks apart. Interrater reliability will be quantified using ICC, which are equivalent to weighted Kappa statistics in the case of ordinal data.

    Time frame: At baseline

  12. Develop a novel index using a multiple regression approach with the dependent variables being the VAS and candidate independent variables including items having at least moderate interrater reliability.

    A prototype index will be created using the VAS for global assessment of severity as the dependent criterion. Prospective validation of the endoscopic index will be performed in a future initiative outside of the scope of this study.

    Time frame: through study completion, and average of 1 year

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Mayo Clinic- Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
    Recruiting
  • Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    • Catherine Larson · Contact · larsenc@ccf.org
    • Florian Rieder · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • McMaster University Medical Centre
    Hamilton, Ontario L6S 0E2, Canada
    Recruiting
  • LHSC - University Campus
    London, Ontario L6S 0E2, Canada
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06670638
Lead sponsor
Alimentiv Inc.
Collaborators
University of Western Ontario, Canada, The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, The Cleveland Clinic, OPEN Health (Pharmerit)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 1, 2024
Start date
Jun 19, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 12, 2025

Study contacts

Ana Olteanu
Contact
ana.olteanu@alimentiv.com
416-704-7734
Robyn Garrels-Lierman
Contact
robyn.garrels@alimentiv.com
642-204-2047
Florian Rieder
principal investigator · The Cleveland Clinic
Vipul Jairath
principal investigator · Western University, Canada

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion