An interventional study of Clinical Practice Guideline-adherent Care and Usual Care in Patellofemoral Pain, sponsored by Sara Gorczynski, PT, DPT. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-06.
Sponsored by Sara Gorczynski, PT, DPT · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The overall goal of this multisite, randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of a Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG)-adherent physical therapy approach to patellofemoral pain (PFP) management among military Service members. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare the CPG-adherent physical therapy intervention to usual physical therapy care in the Military Health System.
Participants will: 1) be randomized to receive CPG-adherent care or usual care for PFP management; 2) attend physical therapy corresponding to their group assignment; and 3) complete patient-reported outcome measures at baseline and 6-weeks and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-randomization.
Knee injuries are among the most common musculoskeletal injuries affecting military personnel, accounting for 22% of limited duty profiles and an average of 53 limited duty days per injury in 2017 alone. Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is the most prevalent knee injury affecting Service members but has historically been considered an innocuous and self-limiting condition despite its high rate of persistence. Physical therapy is often the first line-of-defense for PFP management. Published data support the notion that adherence to evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) improves outcomes 1) for patients, via greater improvements in pain and disability; 2) for providers, by supporting clinical decision making and practice efficiency; and 3) for healthcare systems, by reducing length of treatment, resource utilization, and costs. In 2019, the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) published its first CPG for PFP management to better enable physical therapists to make evidence-based treatment decisions; however, there is limited evidence regarding the effectiveness of a collective, standardized CPG-adherent approach in clinical care. To evaluate whether patients with PFP who receive CPG-adherent care demonstrate superior outcomes as compared to patients receiving the current usual care, we will compare: (1) CPG-adherent care (intervention arm), wherein physical therapy care is provided according to the CPG "Decision Tree" recommendations for PFP management, to (2) Usual Care (UC; comparator arm), wherein care decisions are made by non-research physical therapists in alignment with current organizational and clinical practice standards in the Military Health System (MHS). This multisite, single-blind randomized controlled trial will include 440 active-duty Service members with PFP across four major MHS physical therapy facilities (i.e., Naval Medical Center San Diego, Naval Hospital Camp Pendleton, Brooke Army Medical Center, and Womack Army Medical Center). The sample will include Service members from the Army, Navy, and Marines, as well as both conventional and special operations forces. The co-primary outcomes include changes in two CPG-recommended outcome measures [Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)]. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline; 6-weeks post-randomization; and 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-randomization (primary endpoint: 3-months). Secondary outcomes will include between-group differences in confidence with completing duty-related tasks and 12-month analgesic medication prescription and PFP-specific medical resource utilization. An exploratory analysis will seek to determine the predictors and mediators of clinical benefit from physical therapy care for Service members with PFP. Baseline and follow-up assessments will be administered remotely to maximize participant reach and retention. The intervention of interest, CPG-adherent care, is designed to be clinically feasible, with high potential for clinician adoption, which may improve care quality and patient outcomes for Service members with PFP. Long-term, findings from this study have the potential to improve patient care for PFP and other musculoskeletal injury conditions across the MHS by demonstrating the feasibility and positive impact of CPG-adherent care, particularly in terms of improving clinical outcomes and resource utilization and reducing unwanted variability in rehabilitation.
295 studies on the registry are indexed under Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome; 75 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 440 is above the median of 45 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.
Browse Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome studies →This is the only study on the registry with Sara Gorczynski, PT, DPT as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participants randomized to receive CPG-adherent care will first receive a comprehensive clinical examination following the PFP CPG Decision Tree guidelines. Their treatment plan of care will correspond to any and all impairment subcategories, as defined by the PFP CPG.
Other: Clinical Practice Guideline-adherent Care
All participants randomized to the UC group will receive routine physical therapy evaluations and treatments in the outpatient physical therapy clinics at each participating military treatment facility, at the discretion of the staff physical therapist.
Other: Usual Care
Clinical examination procedures will be used to identify all appropriate impairment subcategories (Overuse/Overload without Other Impairment, PFP with Movement Coordination Deficits, PFP with Muscle Performance Deficits, PFP with Mobility Impairments) and create a subcategory-specific or multimodal (for patients classified to \>1 subcategory) plan of care. Research physical therapists will target all applicable impairment subcategories using the corresponding CPG-recommended interventions, all of which are recommended for use as part of standard-of-care physical therapy practice. The duration and length of care will not be prespecified or standardized across participants to allow flexibility pending participant's care needs and schedule (e.g., vacation, short-term TDY status); however, research PTs will be trained to target providing no more than 10-12 visits over no more than 6-8 weeks to promote generalizability of the CPG-adherent intervention.
Also known as: CPG-adherent Care
Usual physical therapy care will be provided by a licensed outpatient staff physical therapist who is not associated with the research team. The outpatient physical therapists will not treat participants in the CPG-adherent group and will be free to treat their participants based on their current personal and organizational clinical practice standards. The research team will neither influence nor restrict the evaluations conducted or interventions provided.
Also known as: Usual physical therapy care
Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS)
The AKPS is a CPG-recommended, 13-item questionnaire assessing knee function in people with PFP, with items differentially weighted for a maximum score of 100 and higher scores indicating better function.
Time frame: 6-weeks, 3-months (primary endpoint), 6-months, and 12-months post-randomization
Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
The 11-point NPRS is a CPG-recommended measure of pain intensity in which patients rate their pain ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).24-26 Average pain intensity in the past week will be assessed as part of the 3-item PEG, which includes 1-item each regarding average pain intensity, pain interference with enjoyment of life, and impact of pain on general activity.
Time frame: 6-weeks, 3-months (primary endpoint), 6-months, and 12-months post-randomization
Perceived Duty-related Confidence
Perceived confidence with completing duty-related activities will be evaluated using four questions assessing confidence with and perceived ability to perform military-related tasks, two of which are pulled from the Military Orthopedics Tracking Injuries and Outcomes Network (MOTION) Readiness Rehab questionnaire.
Time frame: 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months post-randomization
12-month Healthcare Utilization
We will use individual electronic health record reviews alongside readily available EHR data elements indexed within Military Health System databases to determine the type and frequency of services received related to knee care during the 12 months following randomization. All medical resource utilization data will be identified and categorized using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) Level 1 current procedural terminology (CPT) 4 and 2 codes, International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes, Medical Expense and Performance Reporting System (MEPRS) codes, and/or Health Insurance Privacy Authorization Act (HIPAA) taxonomy numbers. The categories that will be compared include: 1) visits to specialist clinics (e.g., sports medicine, orthopedists, physiatrists, pain management) and other health care providers, 2) diagnostic tests (e.g., x-rays, magnetic resonance imaging), and 3) surgical procedures.
Time frame: 12-months post-randomization
12-month Analgesic Prescription
Medication prescription will be queried using the Pharmacy Data Transaction Service. All medications prescribed to each patient during the 12-month follow-up period (beginning with randomization) will be reviewed. For those identified as analgesics, details such as product name, therapeutic and generic classes, number of days' supply, fill date, and dosage will be extracted to characterize the total number of unique analgesic prescriptions, total days' supply, and days to last prescription during the surveillance period.
Time frame: 12-months post-randomization
Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag Assessment Tool - 10-item (OSPRO-YF)
The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Assessment Tool is a multidimensional psychological assessment tool that has been used to identify psychological phenotypes associated with pain-related health outcomes (e.g., functional disability, sleep disturbance, catastrophizing). The OSPRO-YF can accurately estimate patient scores on a variety of validated, full-length outcome measures assessing pain-related psychological function (e.g., Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Self-efficacy Questionnaire) and identify whether scores reflect a "yellow flag" (i.e., surpass prognostic thresholds for development of disability after musculoskeletal pain onset).
Time frame: 6-weeks and 3-months post-randomization
Global Rating of Change (GROC)
Global Rating of Change (GROC) is a one-item, 15-point scale, that provides information about self-perceived improvement in a patient ranging from -7 (a very great deal worse) to +7 (a very great deal better) with 0 in the middle (about the same). Scores of +4 and +5 are indicative of moderate changes in status, while +6 and +7 are indicative of a large change in a person's status.
Time frame: 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months post-randomization
Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Tests (CATs)
The Physical Function and Pain Interference CATs will be included, which are intended for clinicians and researchers in various disciplines who are interested in measuring physical, mental, and social health among individuals with various chronic conditions. All PROMIS® scores are reported on a T-score metric, where T-score of 50 aligns with the general population mean (standard deviation: 10). Higher scores indicate more of the domain being assessed.
Time frame: 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months post-randomization
Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire
The Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ)49 is designed to assess sensitivity to pain by asking participants to rate the pain intensity they would imagine experiencing in everyday pain-inducing scenarios. It includes 17 items rated from 0-10, where a score of '10' indicates the most painful sensation. The total score is calculated by summing each item with the exceptions of 5, 9, and 13 (as these situations do not reflect painful situations). The PSQ is a validated outcome measure that is predictive of sensitivity to experimental pain thresholds for mechanical, heat, and cold pain.
Time frame: 6-weeks, 3-months, 6-months, and 12-months post-randomization
Plan to share: Yes — The final trial dataset will be made available to the research community upon request to and review by the Leadership Team. Data sharing agreements will be established to document the conditions for research use, privacy and confidentiality standards at the recipient site, and prohibitions for manipulating data for the purposes of identifying individuals. The final trial dataset will include all coded participant data (i.e., data that is de-identified by use of a unique study identification variable, with removal or modification of all identifiers). Individual-level data will include all screening information, baseline measures, intervention information, and primary and secondary outcomes. All SAS datasets will be supplied via secure transfer with the study protocol and data documentation (procedures used to collect the data, details about codes, variable definitions, variable field location, and type of variable).
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.