CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03184545Updated Oct 7, 2026

Comparing the Outcome of Electrical Stimulation and Physical Therapy in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

A Phase 3 interventional study of EMS and Physical therapy in Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Northwell Health. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Northwell Health · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2017; still recruiting 9 years 2 months later.
Updated Oct 7, 2026Primary completion movedStudy completion movedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
92
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of study is to evaluate the efficacy of the electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) device in patients with patellofemoral pain known as anterior knee pain. Usual treatment for it is physical therapy (PT). We want to evaluate and see if adding the electrical muscle stimulation will fasten the recovery and improved outcome in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Half of participants will receive EMS and PT while other half will receive PT only.

Read the detailed description

The patellofemoral pain syndrome also known as anterior knee pain is a common entity in young athletic population. In patellofemoral knee syndrome, one of the theory is that the vastus medialis obliquus muscle is weak. To strengthen the muscle, physical therapy exercises are commonly used. This study evaluates addition of the electrical muscle stimulation device.The electrical muscle stimulation device "Flex MT Plus" (Electrostim Medical Services Inc. Tampa, FL) is a FDA approved device and has been used in knee for other conditions like treating for weakness associated with knee injuries or after knee surgeries. It has shown to improve the outcomes in above mentioned conditions. Its efficacy has been tested in patellofemoral pain syndrome but in smaller sample size. We intend to test it in larger sample size patient population.

Bily et al (2008) (reference #1) published their results on patellofemoral pain syndrome comparing EMS +PT to PT only and found that overall significant improvement in outcome score in all patients but when compared between the groups there was no difference. But there sample size was 19 patients in each group. Small sample size was one of the limitation of their study. We intend to collect 46 patients in each group to find significant difference based on power analysis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Keywords

  • anterior knee pain
03

In context

Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

295 studies on the registry are indexed under Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome; 75 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 92 is above the median of 45 across 242 interventional studies indexed under Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome.

Browse Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Northwell Health is the lead sponsor of 463 studies on the registry; 109 are open to participants now.

Of its 40 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Bilateral/unilateral anterior knee pain for more than 3 moths
  • Age of patient 18 to 40 years
  • At least 3 of the 4 following criteria present: pain associated with prolonged sitting with knees bend, pain with going downstairs, kneeling and squatting or sports activities
  • No h/o injury
  • No h/o surgery to the knee

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • H/o patellar dislocation or subluxation
  • Associated bursitis, tendinitis in periarticular area
  • Ligamentous problems
  • Intra-articular pathology
  • Pregnancy (patient reported pregnancy, in case of doubt patient will be referred to their OBG/GYN physician to exclude the pregnancy)
  • H/o knee surgery
  • Oral or intraarticular administration of steroid medication with in last 3 months
  • Patients with implanted devices like pacemaker
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
92 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EMS and PT

    Group 1: Electrical Muscle stimulation (EMS) and Physical therapy (PT).

    Device: EMS · Other: Physical therapy

  • Active comparator
    Only PT

    Group 2: Only Physical therapy (PT).

    Other: Physical therapy

Interventions

  • DeviceEMS

    The EMS device Flex MT Plus (Electrostim Medical Services Inc. Tampa, FL) is a neuromuscular stimulator. It is approved by the FDA. The Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) applied to vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) muscle for 20 minutes, 3 times daily and it would be 5 times a week for 12 weeks at 40 Hz. The pulse duration will be 0.26ms, at 5 seconds on and 10 seconds off.

  • OtherPhysical therapy

    Standard physical therapy exercises

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Kujala patellofemoral score.

    Assessment will be done at each visit (pre-treatment, post-start treatment 3 weeks,, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 12 months) based on Kujala patellofemoral score. The Kujala score assesses following points: Limp, support, walking, stairs, squatting,running, jumping, prolong sitting with knee flexed,pain,swelling,abnormal painful kneecap movements, atrophy of thigh and flexion deficiency. Repeated measures linear regression models will be used to compare the two treatment arms with respect to knee function, pain score, and muscle strength from baseline to 12 months. Total duration of study is two years. We intend finish enrolling 92 patients by the end of one year after start of study. But each patient will be followed for total 12 months period. If any patient enrolled at 1 year mark after start of study , he will be followed for one year.

    Time frame: 2 years. Total duration of study is two years. But each patient will be followed for total 12 months after enrollment. If any patient enrolled at 1 year mark after start of study , he will be followed for one year. So total duration of study is 2 years.

  2. Visual analog pain scale (VAS) pain scale during activities of life

    VAS scale of 1-10 will be used to evaluate knee pain. 1 being mild and 10 being worst.

    Time frame: 2 years

  3. Isometric strength measurement of knee

    Isometric strength will be measured using dynamo-meter.

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary outcome measure would be how many return to sports activity.

    Secondary outcome assessment will be to see how many in EMS+PT group and how many in PT group returned to their previous activity level of sports without any pain after completion of treatment.

    Time frame: 2 years

  2. At what point of time they returned to their sports activity

    It will be also noted and compared between the groups at what time period after the start of treatment they returned to their regular sports activities. We hypothesize that EMS group might return early.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • New York Bone and Joint Specialists
    New York, New York 10019, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bily W, Trimmel L, Modlin M, Kaider A, Kern H. Training program and additional electric muscle stimulation for patellofemoral pain syndrome: a pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Jul;89(7):1230-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.048. PubMed 18586125 ↗
  • Callaghan MJ, Oldham JA, Winstanley J. A comparison of two types of electrical stimulation of the quadriceps in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. A pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2001 Dec;15(6):637-46. doi: 10.1191/0269215501cr457oa. PubMed 11777094 ↗
  • Avramidis K, Strike PW, Taylor PN, Swain ID. Effectiveness of electric stimulation of the vastus medialis muscle in the rehabilitation of patients after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Dec;84(12):1850-3. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00429-5. PubMed 14669193 ↗
  • Callaghan MJ, Oldham JA. Electric muscle stimulation of the quadriceps in the treatment of patellofemoral pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jun;85(6):956-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.07.021. PubMed 15179650 ↗
  • Kuru T, Yaliman A, Dereli EE. Comparison of efficiency of Kinesio(R) taping and electrical stimulation in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2012;46(5):385-92. doi: 10.3944/aott.2012.2682. PubMed 23268824 ↗
  • Garcia FR, Azevedo FM, Alves N, Carvalho AC, Padovani CR, Negrao Filho RF. Effects of electrical stimulation of vastus medialis obliquus muscle in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: an electromyographic analysis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2010 Nov-Dec;14(6):477-82. English, Portuguese. PubMed 21340241 ↗
  • Witvrouw E, Werner S, Mikkelsen C, Van Tiggelen D, Vanden Berghe L, Cerulli G. Clinical classification of patellofemoral pain syndrome: guidelines for non-operative treatment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Mar;13(2):122-30. doi: 10.1007/s00167-004-0577-6. Epub 2005 Feb 10. PubMed 15703965 ↗
  • Avraham F, Aviv S, Ya'akobi P, Faran H, Fisher Z, Goldman Y, Neeman G, Carmeli E. The efficacy of treatment of different intervention programs for patellofemoral pain syndrome--a single blinded randomized clinical trial. Pilot study. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007 Aug 24;7:1256-62. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.167. PubMed 17721640 ↗
  • Chiu JK, Wong YM, Yung PS, Ng GY. The effects of quadriceps strengthening on pain, function, and patellofemoral joint contact area in persons with patellofemoral pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Feb;91(2):98-106. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e318228c505. PubMed 22248804 ↗
  • Rixe JA, Glick JE, Brady J, Olympia RP. A review of the management of patellofemoral pain syndrome. Phys Sportsmed. 2013 Sep;41(3):19-28. doi: 10.3810/psm.2013.09.2023. PubMed 24113699 ↗
  • Peng HT, Song CY. Predictors of treatment response to strengthening and stretching exercises for patellofemoral pain: An examination of patellar alignment. Knee. 2015 Dec;22(6):494-8. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 10. PubMed 26254693 ↗
  • Van Der Heijden RA, Lankhorst NE, Van Linschoten R, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Van Middelkoop M. Exercise for treating patellofemoral pain syndrome: an abridged version of Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2016 Feb;52(1):110-33. Epub 2015 Jul 9. PubMed 26158920 ↗
  • Selhorst M, Rice W, Degenhart T, Jackowski M, Tatman M. Evaluation of a treatment algorithm for patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: a pilot study. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Apr;10(2):178-88. PubMed 25883866 ↗
  • Alba-Martin P, Gallego-Izquierdo T, Plaza-Manzano G, Romero-Franco N, Nunez-Nagy S, Pecos-Martin D. Effectiveness of therapeutic physical exercise in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jul;27(7):2387-90. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2387. Epub 2015 Jul 22. PubMed 26311988 ↗
  • Giles LS, Webster KE, McClelland JA, Cook J. Atrophy of the Quadriceps Is Not Isolated to the Vastus Medialis Oblique in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2015 Aug;45(8):613-9. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2015.5852. Epub 2015 Jun 25. PubMed 26110547 ↗
  • Giles LS, Webster KE, McClelland JA, Cook J. Does quadriceps atrophy exist in individuals with patellofemoral pain? A systematic literature review with meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Nov;43(11):766-76. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2013.4833. Epub 2013 Sep 9. PubMed 24175596 ↗
  • Servodio Iammarrone C, Cadossi M, Sambri A, Grosso E, Corrado B, Servodio Iammarrone F. Is there a role of pulsed electromagnetic fields in management of patellofemoral pain syndrome? Randomized controlled study at one year follow-up. Bioelectromagnetics. 2016 Feb;37(2):81-8. doi: 10.1002/bem.21953. Epub 2016 Jan 12. PubMed 26756278 ↗
  • Ramazzina I, Pogliacomi F, Bertuletti S, Costantino C. Long term effect of selective muscle strengthening in athletes with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Biomed. 2016 Apr 15;87 Suppl 1:60-8. PubMed 27104322 ↗
  • Chang WD, Huang WS, Lai PT. Muscle Activation of Vastus Medialis Oblique and Vastus Lateralis in Sling-Based Exercises in Patients with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome: A Cross-Over Study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:740315. doi: 10.1155/2015/740315. Epub 2015 Oct 4. PubMed 26504480 ↗
  • Fagan V, Delahunt E. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: a review on the associated neuromuscular deficits and current treatment options. Br J Sports Med. 2008 Oct;42(10):789-95. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2008.046623. Epub 2008 Apr 18. PubMed 18424487 ↗
  • Crossley KM, Callaghan MJ, van Linschoten R. Patellofemoral pain. BMJ. 2015 Nov 4;351:h3939. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h3939. No abstract available. PubMed 26537829 ↗
  • Hott A, Liavaag S, Juel NG, Brox JI. Study protocol: a randomised controlled trial comparing the long term effects of isolated hip strengthening, quadriceps-based training and free physical activity for patellofemoral pain syndrome (anterior knee pain). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Feb 25;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0493-6. PubMed 25879452 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No patient data will be shared.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 2026→Jun 2028
Oct 7, 2026
Study completion
Jun 2027→Jun 2029
Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    Primary completion Jun 2026→Jun 2028
    Study completion Jun 2027→Jun 2029
    + 4 other changes: index terms, identifiers, verification date and references

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03184545
Lead sponsor
Northwell Health
Responsible party
Leon Popovitz (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Northwell Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 12, 2017
Start date
Jul 24, 2017
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

Leon Popovitz, MD
Contact
orthodoc205@gmail.com
2127594553
Rupesh Tarwala, MD
Contact
dr.rupesh@gmail.com
2132915282
Leon Popovitz, MD
principal investigator · Northwell Health

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion