ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06652789Updated Mar 27, 2026

Efficacy of Sleep Hygiene Intervention in Elderly With Insomnia

An interventional study of Sleep hygiene in Eelderly With Sleep Disturbances, sponsored by University of Pittsburgh. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 60 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by University of Pittsburgh · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
60 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sleep disorders are common among elderly, especially among those with mental health disorders. Impaired quality of sleep, in elderly, can lead to worsening of mental and physical health too. Due to high patient to doctor ratio in India and paucity of time in busy outpatients, there is inadequate information on causes of poor sleep quality in patients and a tendency to treat poor sleep with drugs. Studies on effectiveness of sleep hygiene techniques in insomnia also tend to exclude elderly. Thus, investigators have inadequate evidence on the applicability of such interventions in the elderly. In this study it is proposed to find the efficacy of a sleep hygiene behavioural intervention on severity of insomnia in elderly with sleep disturbances.

Read the detailed description

Globally, the older population is increasing rapidly, and between 2015 and 2050, it is expected that the proportion of the world's population over 60 years will nearly double, from 12% to 22% (World Health Organization 2022).Untreated insomnia and other sleep disorders can have major health consequences (e.g., cardiovascular and metabolic disease, impaired cognitive functioning, and increased risk of psychiatric disorders, as well as an increased risk of accidents Studies have also shown that poor sleep is associated with increased risk of falls in the elderly Poor sleep quality has been shown to be associated with decline in cognitive function, impaired quality of life (QOL), excessive daytime sleepiness, fatigue, depression, increased mortality, economic burden, and possibly early institutionalization.

Insomnia is defined as "difficulty initiating sleep, difficulty maintaining sleep, morning awakening, or sleep that is chronically non-restorative or poor in quality, associated with daytime impairment such as fatigue, memory impairment, social or vocational dysfunction, or mood disturbance." There are several objective and subjective assessment tools for measuring sleep disorders, among which polysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard. Considering the time-consuming nature of PSG, associated expense and poor availability of it to most clinicians, it is generally not routinely used in the assessment of insomnia.

Studies have shown that people with insomnia engage in specific poor sleep hygiene practices, which may perpetuate insomnia. However, studies examining the effect of sleep hygiene practices on insomnia, illness severity and cognition are lacking in elderly patients. Sleep hygiene techniques can serve as a relatively inexpensive lifestyle intervention in elderly patients with insomnia. Sleep hygiene recommendations may be delivered using a variety of media and measures (print based, in person discussions, telephonic conversations, etc), resulting in increased access. In addition to being commonly used and readily available, sleep hygiene education does not necessarily require the direct involvement of a clinician and therefore can be widely disseminated, even to elderly persons or their caregivers, who may not seek medical treatment for their sleep problems.

Estimated required sample size:

n1 = 43 n2 = 43 n1 + n2 = 86

Formula used:

Where, σ - Pooled standard deviation d - Difference between 2 group means Z1-β - Z value for corresponding power Z1-α/2 - Two-sided Z value for corresponding α (1.96)

Description of Intervention The intervention will be conducted over 6 weeks, and consist of engaging patients (and caregivers) in two 60-minute face to face sessions 3 weeks apart, and twice weekly telephonic follow ups lasting for 20 minutes each during the 6-week period.

The 2 Direct face to face sessions will focus on health education about sleep. Each session will be conducted by a facilitator who has received training on the program, and will be delivered in a language that the participant is most fluent in (English/ Kannada/ Hindi/ Tamil/ Telugu). In case the participant is unable to come to the hospital for the session, the facilitator will visit the home of the patient to conduct the session (After taking consent).

  1. st face to face session (60 mins) Participants (and caregivers if available) will be informed about the study once again.

    Information will be given about lifestyles that can affect sleep positively or negatively- adequate sleep time required for health, healthy and unhealthy sleep habits Proper nutrition and fluid intake, exercise, smoking, alcohol habits and their relation to sleep will be discussed Common sleep myths will be covered briefly The consequences of poor sleep will be explained The sleep hygiene intervention will have 14 simple steps to be followed by participants- 1) Food/snacks have to be consumed at least 2 hours before bed time 2) Avoid electronic gadget usage i.e., mobile phone, laptop for at least 1 hour before bedtime 3) Go to bed only when feeling sleepy and not before 4) Using the bedroom only for sleep or sexual activity 5) Getting out of bed if unable to fall asleep 6) Avoid fluid intake 1 hour before bedtime 7) Avoid caffeine 4 hours before bedtime 8) Avoid Alcohol/Smoking 2 hours before bedtime 9) Lights should be turned off/to very dim immediately after going to bed 10) Avoid planning for next day or future activities on bed 11) Do not look at the time if the sleep is disturbed in between 12) Maintain regular sleep and wake up time with maximum of ½ hour deviation 13) Avoid noisy environment after going to bed (avoid discussion/arguments/ loud songs) 14) Avoid fasting Participants will be asked to rate their confidence level of following the above steps on a scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 10 (completely confident). If the participant's rating is below 7, they will be asked to discuss perceived barriers to following the steps, ways to overcome them and increase their confidence level to a rating of at least 7.

    Participants will be provided with a booklet containing all of the information covered in the first session.

  2. nd face to face session The session will start with participants being asked to summarize what they have learnt from the previous face to face session as well as weekly telephone calls Participants will be asked to indicate how many of the sleep hygiene techniques they were able to successfully implement since the previous session Successes and barriers faced during the previous month will be discussed. Facilitator will attempt to provide solutions for standard difficulties faced Participants will be reminded that not all recommendations may work for them. They will be encouraged to view the 6week period as an opportunity to discover approaches that will work for them personally.

Sleep hygiene techniques will be reiterated once again The session will also involve setting goals for the following 3 weeks based on performance during the previous month Twice a week telephone calls The participants will be followed up through telephonic conversation twice weekly with a gap of three to four days in between each call. Total 10 calls over 6-week period (only 1 call in the weeks where the face-to-face sessions are conducted, and this call will cover the points mentioned next under first call per week) Data Collection Tools A questionnaire including demographic characteristics and 6 standardized tools for assessment of sleep quality, depression, anxiety, cognitive status, quality of life, loneliness and pain severity will be used to collect the data for the study.

  1. Socio-demographic data sheet in elderly: Will include name, age, sex, address, religion, education, occupation, income, marital status, presence of any co-morbidities, presence of any substance use, diagnosed psychiatric illness, duration of illness, medications the patient is on, participant's co-morbidities, list of medications that the participant is on, average number of time participant wakes up to pass urine (developed by the researchers).
  2. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): The PSQI is a 19-item, self-rated questionnaire. It was developed by Buysse et al. to measure sleep quality and disturbance over the past month. It is intended to be used as a standardized sleep questionnaire in clinical settings. The 19 items are grouped into 7 components. Each of the sleep components is scored from 0 to 3, with 3 indicating the most dysfunction. The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality.
  3. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): The MoCA was designed as a rapid screening instrument for assessment of cognitive impairment. It assesses different cognitive domains: attention and concentration, executive functions, memory, language, visuoconstructional skills, conceptual thinking, calculations, and orientation.
  4. Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9): The PHQ-9 is the nine-item depression scale of the patient health questionnaire. The nine items of the PHQ-9 are based directly on the nine diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the DSM-IV. The PHQ-9 can function as a screening tool, an aid in diagnosis, and as a symptom tracking tool that can help track a patient's overall depression severity as well as track the improvement of specific symptoms with treatment.
  5. Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD 7): The GAD-7 represents an anxiety measure based on seven items which are scored from zero to three. The whole scale score can range from 0 to 21 and cut-off scores for mild, moderate and severe anxiety symptoms are 5, 10 and 15 respectively.
  6. Short form of the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: The scale consists of 3 items with response options hardly ever or never, some of the time and often. Responses to the items are summed to obtain the total scale score which ranges from 3 to 9 with higher scores indicating greater levels of loneliness (α = 0.72)
  7. WHO Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire (WHOQoL BREF): It consists of 24 items to assess perception of quality of life in four domains, including physical health, psychological, social relationships and environment, and two items on overall QOL and general health. A higher score indicated a better QOL.
  8. Visual Analogue Scale for Pain: The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain."
02

Conditions studied

  • Eelderly With Sleep Disturbances

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sleep hygiene
  • Elderly
  • sleep disturbances
03

In context

Sleep Hygiene

126 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Hygiene; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 66 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Hygiene.

Browse Sleep Hygiene studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pittsburgh is the lead sponsor of 1,419 studies on the registry; 168 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (44%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Elderly patients
  • Age 60 years and above
  • With self-reported sleep disturbances, scoring >5 on PSQI
  • Who speak and understand one of English/ Kannada/ Hindi/ Tamil/ Telugu

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • With delirium
  • With terminal medical illness
  • Parkinsons disease, dementia
  • Patients with severe mental illness
  • Clinically diagnosed obstructive sleep apnea
  • Patients who fulfil ICD-10 criteria for Alcohol Dependence syndrome
  • Patients who are on medications that interfere with sleep like hypnotics, anxiolytics, stimulants
  • Patients who are on anti-depressants and antipsychotics
  • Patients with restless leg syndrome.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sleep hygiene teaching

    The intervention will be conducted over 6 weeks, and consist of engaging patients (and caregivers) in two 60-minute face to face sessions 3 weeks apart, and twice weekly telephonic follow ups lasting for 20 minutes each during the 6-week period. The 2 Direct face to face sessions will focus on health education about sleep. Each session will be conducted by a facilitator who has received training on the program, and will be delivered in a language that the participant is most fluent in (English/ Kannada/ Hindi/ Tamil/ Telugu). In case the participant is unable to come to the hospital for the session, the facilitator will visit the home of the patient to conduct the session (After taking consent)

    Behavioral: Sleep hygiene

Interventions

  • BehavioralSleep hygiene

    The intervention will be conducted over 6 weeks, and consist of engaging patients (and caregivers) in two 60-minute face to face sessions 3 weeks apart, and twice weekly telephonic follow ups lasting for 20 minutes each during the 6-week period. The 2 Direct face to face sessions in local language will focus on health education about sleep. (After taking consent) 1. st session (60 mins) Information will be given about lifestyles that can affect sleep positively or negatively- adequate sleep time required for health, healthy and unhealthy sleep habits 2. nd session Participants will be asked to indicate how many of the sleep hygiene techniques they were able to successfully implement since the previous session Successes and barriers will be discussed. provide solutions for standard difficulties faced Twice a week telephone calls. The participants will be followed up through telephonic conversation twice weekly with a gap of three to four days in between each call.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Statistically significant change in PSQI score

    Pre-and -post assessment by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).. The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline and after one month

Secondary outcomes

  1. Statistically significant change in PSQI score (Sustainability)

    Pre-and -post assessment by Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI).. The sleep component scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 21 with the higher total score (referred to as global score) indicating worse sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline and after three month

  2. Changes of pertinent measures

    measures on the actigraphy device at 1 month movement over time to assess sleep and wakefulness

    Time frame: Baseline and after one month

  3. Changes of pertinent measures (sustainability)

    measures on the actigraphy device at 3 months movement over time to assess sleep and wakefulness

    Time frame: Baseline and after three months

  4. Statistically significant change in cognitive impairment measured by The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA )

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA ) measures will be applied to measure cognive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment that's scored on a scale of 0 to 30 points. The total score is calculated by adding up the points from each task. A higher score indicates better cognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline and after one months

  5. Statistically significant change cognitive impairment (sustainability)

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA ) measures will be applied to measure cognive impairment. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment that's scored on a scale of 0 to 30 points. The total score is calculated by adding up the points from each task. A higher score indicates better cognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline and after three months

  6. Statistically significant change in quality of life (WHO-QoL BREF score)

    WHO Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire (WHOQoL BREF): It consists of 24 items to assess perception of quality of life . A higher score indicated a better QOL.

    Time frame: Baseline and after one month

  7. Statistically significant change in quality of life (WHO-QoL BREF score) (Sustainability)

    WHO Quality of Life Brief Questionnaire (WHOQoL BREF): It consists of 24 items to assess perception of quality of life . A higher score indicated a better QOL.

    Time frame: Baseline and after three month

  8. Statistically significant change in pain

    Visual Analogue Scale for Pain: The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain".

    Time frame: Baseline and after one month

  9. Statistically significant change in pain (sustainability)

    Visual Analogue Scale for Pain: The visual analog scale (VAS) is a validated, subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. Scores are recorded by making a handwritten mark on a 10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain".

    Time frame: Baseline and after three month

  10. Statistically significant change in Loneliness

    Short form of the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: The scale consists of 3 items with response options hardly ever or never, some of the time and often. Responses to the items are summed to obtain the total scale score which ranges from 3 to 9 with higher scores indicating greater levels of loneliness

    Time frame: Baseline and after one month

  11. Statistically significant change in Loneliness (Sustainability)

    Short form of the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: The scale consists of 3 items with response options hardly ever or never, some of the time and often. Responses to the items are summed to obtain the total scale score which ranges from 3 to 9 with higher scores indicating greater levels of loneliness

    Time frame: Baseline and after three month

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data collected during the trial as well as protocol will be shared on request at 1 years after results are published.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: One year after publication of the study

Access criteria: The study should be ethically approved and scientifically sound.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06652789
Responsible party
Vishwajit Nimgaonkar, MD PhD (Pofessor of psychiatry and Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2024
Start date
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Triptish Bhatia, PhD
Contact
bhatiatriptish@yahoo.co.in
09910107210
Vishwajit L Nimgaonkar, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pittburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion