CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06652750CIED-CAREUpdated Nov 21, 2024

Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of 5G Cloud Follow-up for Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices

An interventional study of Routine Management and 5G Cloud Follow-up in Sick Sinus Syndrome, Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree and Heart Failure, sponsored by The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu. Recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-21.

Sponsored by The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
688
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Objective: This clinical study employs a prospective, paired, self-controlled, non-inferiority, multicenter research design to assess the safety and efficacy of utilizing 5G cloud follow-up for CIED in parameters monitoring and remote programming post-implantation.

Participants will:

undergo regular clinic follow-up visits in accordance with the guidelines undergo routine in-office follow-up and 5G cloud follow-up during each regular clinic visit

Read the detailed description

Background: Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) include pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacemakers and defibrillators, implantable cardiac event recorders (ICM), and implantable cardiovascular monitors. They are mainly used for the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of bradycardia, tachycardia, and heart failure (HF). There are currently two main methods of follow-up: routine in-office follow-up and remote monitoring (RM). Routine in-office follow-up is the most commonly used method in China, whereby professional doctors and/or manufacturer engineers conduct follow-ups under the guidance of physicians. Remote monitoring (RM) allows patients to be remotely monitored at home or elsewhere when a communication network is available, receiving periodic alerts related to the patient. Remote monitoring (RM) can provide timely and accurate CIED data and information, promptly alerting clinical doctors to any issues. However, a drawback is that patients still need to visit the hospital for device parameter adjustments, so it only partially fulfills the functions of routine in-office follow-up. Of note, in the past three years, some domestic clinical centers in China have begun exploring the application of 5G cloud follow-up remote programming (5G Cloud Follow Up) in various patient follow-up scenarios. With the comprehensive deployment of 5G networks in China, central hospitals with specialized device programmers can establish one-to-one or one-to-many regional collaborative cloud follow-up systems with primary hospitals lacking follow-up technician through 5G networks. CIED patients only need to visit nearby primary hospitals to complete regular device follow-ups. Currently, excellent research results have been obtained in the quality control of the CIED follow-ups of a single provincial medical consortium system mainly consisting of major implantation centers. However, there is still a lack of verification results for 5G cloud follow-up remote programming in a medical consortium (MC) model covering various administrative regions in China and different levels of primary hospitals. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of using 5G cloud follow-up remote programming in different administrative regions and levels of primary hospitals in China with routine in-office follow-ups.

Objective:

This clinical study employs a prospective, paired, self-controlled, non-inferiority, multicenter research design to assess the safety and efficacy of utilizing 5G cloud follow-up for CIED in parameters monitoring and remote programming post-implantation.

Participants will:

undergo regular clinic follow-up visits in accordance with the guidelines undergo routine in-office follow-up and 5G cloud follow-up during each regular clinic visit

02

Conditions studied

  • Sick Sinus Syndrome
  • Atrioventricular Block, Second and Third Degree
  • Heart Failure

Keywords

  • pacemaker
  • implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • follow up
  • remote programming
  • in-office follow-up
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years, gender unspecified;
  2. Patients who have not undergone their first clinic follow-up after the implantation of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED); Note: In this study, CIED includes pacemakers, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P) and defibrillators (CRT-D), excluding implantable cardiac event recorders (ICM) and implantable cardiovascular monitors.
  3. Willing to participate in this clinical study and have signed the informed consent form in writing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion Criteria:

If meeting any of the following, the individual cannot be included:

  1. Life expectancy \< 1 year.
  2. Inability to cooperate with treatment or follow-up, such as having mental illness.
  3. Participated in other clinical studies within 30 days before enrollment. Other situations that the researcher deems unsuitable for inclusion.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
688 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    5G cloud follow-up & Routine follow-up

    CIED patients undergo both 5G cloud follow-up and routine in-office follow-up during each visit.

    Other: Routine Management · Device: 5G Cloud Follow-up

Interventions

  • OtherRoutine Management

    Conducting routine in-office follow-up for CIED paitents

  • Device5G Cloud Follow-up

    This study employed a 5G-cloud follow-up platform, a research tool that allows a device specialist to test, and program CIEDs in real-time from a remote location via an internet connection or mobile wireless network. Consistent with of the 5G remote support terminal externally connected to the programmer, a PAD was installed with a 5G-cloud follow-up app. The onsite medical staff began the cloud follow-up session by contacting the remote device specialist via video call. The connection to the CIED was made by the medical staff through the use of a standard programmer. He was in charge of turning on the programmer and applying the programmer wand to the patient's device. After an initial introduction, communication was established and continued via the wand connection. The remote device specialist logged into the 5G-cloud follow-up app with two-step verification. The remote device specialist then had complete control of the programmer to check and reprogram the device as needed.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parameter Measurement Consistency

    Subjects underwent in-office follow-up and 5G cloud follow-up to test battery parameters (battery voltage, battery current, and magnet frequency) and lead parameters (amplitude, pacing threshold, and impedance) in the immediate postoperative period, prior to discharge from the hospital, and within 1 month of implantation, within 1 to 3 months of implantation, at 6 months of implantation, and at 12 months of implantation, respectively. The consistency of each parameter measured at both follow-up modalities was analyzed at the end of the trial by regression fitting equations and Pearson correlation coefficients.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parameter Measurement Time

    During each follow-up, all subjects undergo separate routine in-office follow-ups and 5G cloud follow-ups. The time taken from the beginning of device interrogation to the completion of parameter testing is recorded for each follow-up.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  2. Program Completion Rate

    Evaluation Approach: Participants undergo both in-person clinic follow-up and 5G cloud follow-up during each appointment. Researchers will evaluate and programe the device in accordance with the current guidelines. The assessment of program completion will be conducted through the Program Control Completion Assessment Form. Completion Criteria: If all parameter reprogramming statuses are indicated as "Yes", the program control session will be deemed as complete. In cases where any program control completion status is marked as "No", the session's program control will be considered incomplete. Program Completion Rate is calculated as follows: the number of successful programming / the total number of programming

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

  3. adverse events

    Subjects are observed and recorded at any time during the study process after enrollment. Summarize the occurrence of adverse events and calculate the rate of adverse events. Participants will be continuously monitored and documented during each follow-up session. The adverse event is defined according to the "Guidelines for Reporting Adverse Events and Device Defects" in the present study. Investigators will record and summarize the occurrence of adverse events and determine the rate of adverse event incidence. The rate of adverse event is calculated as the number of participants occurring adverse event/ the total number of the participants.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year

06

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510120, China
    Recruiting
  • The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu
    Chengdu, Sichuan 610000, China
    • Yan Luo, master of medicine · Contact · luoyan31566@163.com · 8618090809034
    • Lin Cai, master of medicine · Contact
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Xiong S, Qin S, Tong L, Long Y, Luo Y, Feng Q, Peng X, Jiang M, Xiong F, Li J, Zhang Y, Zhang Z, Liu H, Cai L. The clinical use of remote parameter testing during cardiac implantable electronic devices implantation procedures: a single center, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 22;11:1364940. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1364940. eCollection 2024. PubMed 38586175 ↗
  • Xiong S, Li J, Tong L, Hou J, Yang S, Qi L, Chen X, Luo Y, Zhang Z, Liu H, Cai L. Realtime Remote Programming in Patients Carrying Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices Requiring Emergent Reprogramming. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 16;9:871425. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.871425. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35651905 ↗
  • Tong L, Xiong S, Hou J, Li J, Qin S, Zhang Y, Yang S, Qi L, Chen X, Luo Y, Zhang Z, Deng H, Liu H, Cai L. Cloud Follow-Up in Patients With Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: A Single-Region Study in China. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 9;9:864398. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.864398. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35615564 ↗
  • Tong L, Long Y, Xiong S, Li J, Huang W, Liu H, Cai L. Application of Postoperative Remote Follow-Up of CIED Based on the 5G Cloud Technology Support Platform in Areas With Underdeveloped Medical Resources. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jun 17;9:894345. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.894345. eCollection 2022. PubMed 35783847 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The datasets in the study might be available upon reasonable request.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06652750
Lead sponsor
The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu
Responsible party
Lin Cai (Professor of Department of Cardiology, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 22, 2024
Start date
Nov 13, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 21, 2024

Study contacts

Lin Cai, master of medicine
Contact
clin63@yeah.net
8619980510703
Shiqiang Xiong, Doctor of Medicine(M.D.)
Contact
xionglliu@163.com
8615377510703

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion