ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT06811194PRIMEUpdated Feb 6, 2025

PRIor Myocardial Infarction Identification on Electrocardiogram

An observational study in Prior Myocardial Infarction, sponsored by The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 35 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-06.

Sponsored by The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Feb 2026, 8 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12,000
Ages
35 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Abstract Background: Chronic myocardial infarction (MI) is a serious cardiovascular disease associated with high mortality rates, making early diagnosis and timely intervention essential for improving patient outcomes. However, some patients may present without clear symptoms or relevant medical histories, complicating the diagnostic process. Currently, diagnosis predominantly relies on electrocardiograms (ECGs) and imaging tests. Although cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is regarded as the gold standard, its high cost and complexity hinder its clinical application. Consequently, there is an urgent need for new ECG diagnostic criteria to mitigate the risks of misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses.

Objective: This study aims to explore new diagnostic criteria to enhance the accuracy of ECG diagnoses for chronic MI.

Methods: This research is a prospective, multicenter cohort study designed to assess the impact of newly developed ECG diagnostic criteria on the accuracy of chronic myocardial infarction (MI) diagnoses. The study spans a 60-month period, including a 12-month patient enrollment phase. Participants will comprise individuals aged 35 to 85 who meet the inclusion criteria: those diagnosed with chronic myocardial infarction via ECG, those with a definitive history of MI (≥3 months), or individuals clinically suspected of having coronary artery disease with at least two coronary risk factors. Data collection will include clinical symptoms, signs, ECG findings, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings, the latter serving as a primary endpoint. Follow-up will focus on changes in patients' symptoms and ECG assessments. Statistical analysis software will be employed to evaluate the influence of the new diagnostic criteria on rates of missed and misdiagnosis.

Read the detailed description

Abstract Background: Chronic myocardial infarction (MI) is a serious cardiovascular disease associated with high mortality rates, making early diagnosis and timely intervention essential for improving patient outcomes. However, some patients may present without clear symptoms or relevant medical histories, complicating the diagnostic process. Currently, diagnosis predominantly relies on electrocardiograms (ECGs) and imaging tests. Although cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is regarded as the gold standard, its high cost and complexity hinder its clinical application. Consequently, there is an urgent need for new ECG diagnostic criteria to mitigate the risks of misdiagnosis and missed diagnoses.

Objective: This study aims to explore new diagnostic criteria to enhance the accuracy of ECG diagnoses for chronic MI.

Methods: This research is a prospective, multicenter cohort study designed to assess the impact of newly developed ECG diagnostic criteria on the accuracy of chronic myocardial infarction (MI) diagnoses. The study spans a 60-month period, including a 12-month patient enrollment phase. Participants will comprise individuals aged 35 to 85 who meet the inclusion criteria: those diagnosed with chronic myocardial infarction via ECG, those with a definitive history of MI (≥3 months), or individuals clinically suspected of having coronary artery disease with at least two coronary risk factors. Data collection will include clinical symptoms, signs, ECG findings, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) findings, the latter serving as a primary endpoint. Follow-up will focus on changes in patients' symptoms and ECG assessments. Statistical analysis software will be employed to evaluate the influence of the new diagnostic criteria on rates of missed and misdiagnosis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prior Myocardial Infarction
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,270 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 371 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12,000 is above the median of 568 across 814 observational studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

An old MI is a condition in which the patient has experienced a myocardial infarction in the past, but no acute symptoms are present at this time. This condition usually manifests as scarring of the heart muscle tissue, resulting in a partial loss of heart muscle function. Patients may experience complications such as heart failure and arrhythmia, and although the symptoms may be mild, it is still necessary to regularly monitor the function and status of the heart. Early detection and management can effectively prevent further cardiovascular events, so regular medical check-ups and following medical advice are particularly important. For patients who have had an old heart attack, lifestyle adjustments and medication are also important components of restoring and maintaining heart health

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged between 35 and 85 years.
  • Patients must meet at least one of the following conditions:

    • Diagnosis of prior MI based on (as per the fourth universal definition of MI).
    • History of prior MI (≥3 months post-MI).
    • Any clinical suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) with at least two of the following risk factors:

Male age >50 years or female age >60 years. Diabetes mellitus. Hypertension. Hypercholesterolemia requiring medication. Family history of premature CAD (first-degree relatives: male ≤55 years, female ≤65 years).

(BMI) ≥30 kg/m². History of peripheral vascular disease. History of coronary artery intervention or bypass surgery. obtained

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • \<1 year due to non-cardiovascular diseases.
  • to cardiac MRI or inability to complete the examination.
  • History of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
  • History of heart transplantation.
  • Acute MI within the past 30 days.
  • During pregnancy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
12,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Multicenter Cohort Study of Prior Myocardial Infarction

    Myocardial infarction is a disease that affects the heart muscle, leading to a reduction in its function. When a patient has experienced a myocardial infarction in the past but no longer exhibits acute symptoms, it is referred to as an old myocardial infarction. This condition is typically characterized by the scarring of heart muscle tissue, resulting in partial loss of cardiac function. Patients may develop complications such as heart failure and arrhythmias. Although the symptoms may be mild, regular monitoring of cardiac function and status is essential. Early detection and management can effectively prevent further cardiovascular events. Therefore, regular medical check-ups and adherence to medical advice are crucial. For patients with a history of myocardial infarction, lifestyle modifications and pharmacological therapy are also important components in the recovery and maintenance of cardiac health.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI.

    Primary outcome: cardiovascular death or nonfatal MI occurred during the 60-month follow-up after enrollment.

    Time frame: 60 Months after Enrollment

Secondary outcomes

  1. A composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, hospitalization for unstable angina or congestive heart failure, and late unplanned CABG.

    Secondary outcome was defined by a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, hospitalization for unstable angina or congestive heart failure, and late unplanned CABG.

    Time frame: 60 Months after Enrollment

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2025; primary completion for Feb 2026, 12 months later.

Of 296 non-industry observational studies under Myocardial Infarction, half reached primary completion within 54 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 140. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 333 studies reached it within 48 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 114.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2025
First posted
Feb 6, 2025
StartEst.
Feb 20, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Feb 20, 2026
CompletionEst.
Feb 20, 2031
Last update
Feb 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06811194
Lead sponsor
The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu
Responsible party
Hanxiong Liu (Principal Investigator, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 6, 2025
Start date
Feb 20, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Feb 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 20, 2031 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 6, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion