ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06626503PRECISEUpdated Oct 7, 2026

Evaluation of Analgesia for Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children

A Phase 3 interventional study of Methadone based ERAS and Non-methadone based group in Idiopathic Scoliosis, sponsored by Senthil Sadhasivam. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Senthil Sadhasivam · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Updated Oct 7, 20262 sites addedGo to Updates ↓

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
500
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 153 studies in Scoliosis with a site in United States — 42 open to participants now, 52 under way, 2 of them phase 3. Scoliosis · United States.

Planned enrollment
2nd of 91
500 · median 58
Started
2025
with 8 others
Phase 3
3 of 153
1 open now
Primary completion
2029-01
later than 42 of 51 live
Registered
140th of 153
by date

Among the 153 studies in Scoliosis with a site in United States, this one is the 2nd largest by planned enrollment of the 91 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 9 that started in 2025, is one of 3 in phase 3, reaches primary completion later than 42 of the 51 other live ones, and was the 140th registered.

Scoliosis

660 studies on the registry are indexed under Scoliosis; 186 are open to participants now.

Browse Scoliosis studies →

Open to participants now

42 of the 153 studies in Scoliosis with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

36 more — sign in →

All 42 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 117 Scoliosis studies recruiting now, 23 (20%) set no upper age limit and 88 (75%) stop at 75 or younger; 98 take children under 18; 14 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 10 Years to 18 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 153 studies in Scoliosis with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The multicenter PRECISE Analgesia (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Analgesia for Idiopathic Scoliosis Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children) trials will a) implement and investigate the efficacy and safety of multidose methadone-based standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, and b) develop personalized ERAS protocols including precision methadone and oxycodone dosing and c) personalized analgesia for the safe and effective opioid-sparing management of surgical pain after posterior spine fusion (PSF) in children.

Read the detailed description

SPECIFIC AIMS. The multicenter PRECISE Analgesia (Prospective Randomized Evaluation of Analgesia for Idiopathic Scoliosis Spine Fusion Elective Surgery in Children) trials will a) implement and investigate the efficacy and safety of multidose methadone-based standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol, and b) develop personalized ERAS protocols including precision methadone and oxycodone dosing, and c) personalized analgesia for the safe and effective opioid-sparing management of surgical pain after posterior spine fusion (PSF) in children.

The long-term goal is to proactively improve the safety and efficacy of surgical pain control while reducing opioid AEs and the opioid epidemic burden in all children undergoing inpatient surgeries. The central hypothesis is that a standardized, multidose, methadone-based ERAS protocol will reduce acute surgical pain, overall opioid use, RD, PONV, and CPSP compared with standard-of-care short-acting opioid-based analgesia in children undergoing PSF (Aim 1). Investigators will use PK and genetic variations along with clinical factors to develop optimal intra- and post-operative methadone dosing in children to enable precision analgesia in the future (Aim 2). Finally, Investigators will identify patient profiles with genetic, epigenetic, PK, clinical, and psychological factors to predict benefit from assigned analgesia for optimal clinical outcomes (Aim 3). The expert multidisciplinary and multicenter team will enroll a total of 1000 children to conduct a randomized clinical trial for PSF (500 children 10-\<18 yrs from 4 clinical sites). In this study, specifically, Investigators will:

Aim 1. Conduct a randomized clinical trial in PSF to compare acute pain relief, opioid-sparing efficacy, and safety of standardized perioperative multidose methadone-based ERAS vs. standard-of-care non-methadone-based analgesia. Acute surgical pain, opioid needs (morphine equivalents), RD, PONV, and CPSP will be lower in methadone-based analgesia compared to short-acting opioid-based analgesia.

Aim 2. Develop precision methadone dosing based on age, CYP2B6 and ORM1 variants, and AAG. Age, CYP2B6 and ORM1 variants, AAG levels, and will explain methadone's PK variability and dose adjustments that correlate with optimal clinical outcomes among 500 children receiving methadone.

Aim 3. Identify patient profiles that predict benefits from the assigned analgesia protocol to optimize clinical outcomes. Personalized risk prediction models will be developed and validated including genetic variants (i.e., CYP2B6, CYP2D6, ABCB1, OPRM1, and FAAH), and psychological and clinical factors to predict benefit with the assigned treatments (methadone or non-methadone) for pre-specified clinical endpoints (i.e., lower acute surgical pain, RD, PONV, OD, and CPSP) in PSF.

Overall Impact: Develop actionable evidence for the efficacy of standardized, multidose, methadone-based ERAS protocols and will harness genetic, clinical, and psychological factors contributing to variability in methadone and oxycodone PK, acute surgical pain, transition to CPSP, opioid-induced PONV, RD, and dependence to develop personalized analgesia strategy and dosing for children undergoing PSF. Implementation of evidence-based standardized methadone-based ERAS pain management and individualized risk prediction will maximize acute surgical pain relief while minimizing opioid use and AEs in millions of children.

03

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Scoliosis

Browse trials for

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 10 - \< 18 years
  2. (ASA) Physical Status 1 or 2
  3. Undergoing PSF for idiopathic scoliosis
  4. Participant or legal guardian can speak and read English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant patients
  2. Methadone allergy
  3. Preoperative prolonged more than 460 msec (-30 days to 0 day)
  4. Subjects undergoing concomitant treatment with known cytochrome P450 inhibitors included in methadone labeling (i.e. macrolides (e.g. erythromycin), azole-antifungal agents (e.g. ketoconazole, voriconazole), protease inhibitors (e.g. ritonavir), fluconazole, SSRIs (e.g. sertraline, fluvoxamine)
  5. Preoperative opioid use within 30 days before surgery
  6. History of severe sleep apnea, defined as a prior sleep study demonstrating an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) greater than 10.
  7. Significant liver, kidney, neurological disease, developmental delay, or any other co-existing medical condition per discretion of the clinical investigator
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Methadone-Based ERAS Group

    The methadone-based standardized analgesia intervention arm will include standardized perioperative care and analgesia, including intraoperative intravenous methadone (1st dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg before incision; 2nd dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg administered 4 hours after the 1st dose) and postoperatively, up to 4 additional IV or oral doses of methadone (0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg) every 12 hours before discharge as part of standardized multimodal analgesia in the hospital setting.

    Drug: Methadone based ERAS

  • Active comparator
    Non-Methadone-Based Group

    The comparator standard-of-care non-methadone-based analgesia arm will include standard opioid analgesia protocol without intra- and post-operative methadone per the current site standards.

    Drug: Non-methadone based group

Interventions

  • DrugMethadone based ERAS

    Methadone intervention includes intraoperative intravenous methadone (1st dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg before incision; 2nd dose: 0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg administered 4 hours after the 1st dose) and postoperatively, up to 4 additional IV or oral doses of methadone (0.1 mg/kg up to a maximum of 5 mg) every 12 hours before discharge as part of standardized multimodal analgesia in the hospital setting.

    Also known as: Methadone Based

  • DrugNon-methadone based group

    Non-methadone intervention includes standard opioid analgesia protocol without intra- and post-operative methadone per the current site standards. Postoperative pain medication is recommended when reported pain level is considered moderate or higher (≥4 on NRS and FLACC).

    Also known as: Non-methadone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average postoperative pain scores

    Average postoperative pain scores at 48-hours timepoint using 0-10, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), in which 0=no pain at all and 10=worst pain imaginable. Outcome will be reported based on area under the curve (AUC) as mean(SD).

    Time frame: Postoperative 48 hours

  2. Total postoperative opioid use

    Number of opioids used in hospital, will be reported as mean (SD).

    Time frame: Postoperative 48 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of inpatient respiratory depression (RD)

    RD is defined as persistent oxygen desaturation (SpO2) \<90% on room air or respiratory rate \<8 breaths per minute requiring oxygen in the absence of airway obstruction. Outcome will be reported as n(%).

    Time frame: Postoperative 120-hours

  2. Incidence of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    PONV will be assessed by self-report, EMR, and medication use. Outcome will be reported as n(%).

    Time frame: Postoperative 120-hours

  3. Incidence of Inpatient Sedation

    Sedation will be assessed using the Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) and validated sedation scales extracted from the EMR. Outcome will be reported as n(%).

    Time frame: Postoperative 120-hours

  4. QTc Prolongation

    QTc prolongation is defined as \>460 msec based on 12-lead or 15-lead EKG. Outcome will be reported as n(%).

    Time frame: Postoperative 48-hours

  5. Length of Hospital Stay (LOS)

    LOS will be measured in days until hospital discharge. Outcome will be reported as mean (SD).

    Time frame: Up to 30 days

  6. Persistent opioid use

    Based on Prescription Drug Monitoring Program (PDMP) and self-report data. Outcome will be reported as n(%).

    Time frame: 1-week, 1-month, and 3-months post-surgery

  7. Presence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain (CPSP) at 3-months

    CPSP incidence will be defined using NRS pain \>3/10 and functional limitations based on Functional Disability Index (FDI). NRS Pain scale is 0=no pain at all and 10=worst pain imaginable. Outcome will be reported as n(%).

    Time frame: 3-months post-surgery

  8. Presence of Opioid Dependence (OD) at 3-months

    OD will be assessed using PROMIS and Prescription Pain Medication Misuse (PPMM) scales. Outcome will be reported as n(%).

    Time frame: 3-months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 4 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Identifiable data and specimens will be shared with the sponsor of the study. The investigators and study team will comply with all the NIH's Public Access and Data Sharing requirements including Release of Publications and Sharing of Underlying Primary Data. Release of Publications: The investigators will publish their results in open access journals for broad and free availability immediately without any embargo period. Electronic copies of publications will be deposited within four weeks of acceptance by a journal in PubMed Central with proper metadata to be made discoverable and accessible upon publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan

Time frame: Time frame is within 5-years of study completion.

Access criteria: Online collaborative tools to facilitate data sharing such as SharePoint or Xythos

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2029, 39 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 15, 2024
First posted
Oct 4, 2024
StartActual
Oct 30, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2029
Last update
Oct 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
2 sites added
Show 2 added (2 United States)
  • Riley Children's Hospital · Indianapolis, United States
  • Texas Children's Hospital · Houston, United States
Oct 7, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • UPMC Children's Hospital · Pittsburgh, United StatesContact m•••@upmc.edu · •••6283→m•••@upmc.edu · •••2748
Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    2 sites added
    Show 2 added (2 United States)
    • Riley Children's Hospital · Indianapolis, United States
    • Texas Children's Hospital · Houston, United States
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • UPMC Children's Hospital · Pittsburgh, United StatesContact m•••@upmc.edu · •••6283→m•••@upmc.edu · •••2748

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06626503
Lead sponsor
Senthil Sadhasivam
Responsible party
Senthil Sadhasivam (Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 4, 2024
Start date
Oct 30, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, MD, MPH, MBA, FASA
Contact
sadhasivams@upmc.edu
4126474484
Dayana Alsamsam, BSPS, MSc
Contact
alsamsamd@upmc.edu
Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, MD
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion