CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05380531PPAP C-SectionUpdated Sep 10, 2026

Personalized Perioperative Analgesia Platform (PPAP) for Cesarean Section

An interventional study of Preoperative Genotyping in Cesarean Section Complications and Opioid Use, sponsored by Senthil Sadhasivam. Recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Senthil Sadhasivam · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
700
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this collaborative CTSA (Clinical and Translational Science Award) application is to develop an innovative perioperative precision analgesia platform (PPAP) to improve analgesia and reduce serious immediate and long-term adverse outcomes of perioperative opioids in breastfeeding mothers and their infants

Read the detailed description

The approach includes 1) development and implementation of an innovative PPAP infrastructure at participating CTSA hubs (Aim 1) and 2) to improve analgesia and reduce serious immediate and long-term adverse outcomes of perioperative opioids and precision dosing in nursing mothers and infants (Aim 2).

SPECIFIC AIMS: The purpose of this collaborative CTSA application is to develop an innovative perioperative precision analgesia platform (PPAP) to improve analgesia and reduce serious immediate and long-term adverse outcomes of perioperative opioids in

Aim 1. Develop and implement a perioperative precision analgesia platform (PPAP) by linking genomics to opioid metabolism, Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation (CPIC) guidelines, precision dosing, clinical safety, and personalizing analgesia

Aim 2. Evaluate utility of PPAP in nursing mothers and their newborns following Cesarean Section The investigators hypothesize that CYP2D6 and other (ABCB1, and OPRM1) variants will explain clinical and pharmacokinetic variations of oxycodone, and PPAP implementation will reduce adverse effects in mothers and infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cesarean Section Complications
  • Opioid Use

Keywords

  • Opioid Exposure
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Adult women (>18 yr) All races American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA) physical status: 1 to 3 undergoing elective Cesarean section that are willing to receive in-patient opioids.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Health conditions including uncontrolled diabetes (gestational or pre-existing) or hypertension (pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, or chronic)
  2. Any history of opioid misuse before or during pregnancy-per self-report and clinical notes
  3. Preoperative severe pain and opioid use/misuse, allergy to oxycodone
  4. Allergy to oxycodone
  5. Significant neurological disorders, liver and renal diseases
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
700 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mother undergoing planned Cesarean section

    Mother subject will have genotyping blood draw performed at the time of controlled delivery (CD). Blood samples and breast milk samples will also be taken during the oxycodone dosing schedule.

    Diagnostic Test: Preoperative Genotyping

  • Experimental
    Infant

    Infant subject will have genotyping blood draw performed only at the time of controlled delivery (CD)

    Diagnostic Test: Preoperative Genotyping

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPreoperative Genotyping

    Genotype based risk prediction and personalized pain management

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Look at genetic factors predisposing patients to immediate postoperative opioid-adverse effects Respiratory Depression (RD) and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    The investigators will look at specific CYP2D6, ABCB1, FAAH, OPRM1, and COMT variants to find correlations with patients who experience RD and PONV in the immediate post-surgical period (4 days) in the hospital

    Time frame: Immediately post-surgery during hospital stay

  2. Look at genetic factors predisposing patients to immediate postoperative opioid-adverse effects Respiratory Depression (RD) and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV)

    The investigators will look at specific CYP2D6, ABCB1, FAAH, OPRM1, and COMT variants to find correlations with patients who experience RD and PONV in the post-surgical period at home up to 1-year

    Time frame: At home up to 1 year post-surgery

  3. Look at genetic factors predisposing patients to inadequate surgical pain relief with oxycodone

    The investigators will look at specific CYP2D6, ABCB1, FAAH, OPRM1, and COMT variants to find correlations with patients who experience poor pain relief in the immediate post-surgical period (4 days) in the hospital. Poor pain relief will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), which runs on a 0-10 scale; 0 being no pain at all, 10 being the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: Immediately post-surgery during hospital stay

  4. Look at genetic factors predisposing patients to inadequate surgical pain relief with oxycodone

    The investigators will look at specific CYP2D6, ABCB1, FAAH, OPRM1, and COMT variants to find correlations with patients who experience poor pain relief in the post-surgical period at home up to 1-year. Poor pain relief will be measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), which runs on a 0-10 scale; 0 being no pain at all, 10 being the worst pain imaginable.

    Time frame: At home up to 1 year post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Look at the impact of CYP2D6 variants on oxycodone's clinical dosing in patients to see if specific variants correlate with a need for lower or higher doses of analgesic.

    The investigators will look at CYP2D6 variants to find correlations in oxycodone's PK sampling and the need for dose adjustments that lead to desired clinical outcomes in women undergoing a cesarean section and their infant.

    Time frame: Pre-operative to post-operative day 2

Other outcomes

  1. Look at OPRM1 epigenetics and OPRM1, FAAH, GCH1, DRD2 variants to find correlations with chronic persistent surgical pain (CPSP) up to 1-year post-surgery

    Patients will be asked to complete psychological questionnaires post-surgery to assess psycho-psychological factors that may correlate with CPSP. CPSP is defined as pain that develops after a surgical procedure and lasts at least 3 months and significantly affects health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Post-operative up to 1-year

  2. Look at OPRM1 epigenetics and OPRM1, FAAH, GCH1, DRD2 variants to find correlations with opioid dependence (OD) up to 1-year post-surgery

    Patients will be asked to complete psychological questionnaires post-surgery to assess psycho-psychological factors that may correlate with opioid dependence (OD). OD will be determined using the validated Sophia Observation Withdrawal Symptoms Scale (SOS). The SOS is based on a 15-point scale.

    Time frame: Post-operative up to 1-year

  3. Look at OPRM1 epigenetics and OPRM1, FAAH, GCH1, DRD2 variants to find correlations with opioid dependence (OD) up to 1-year post-surgery

    Patients will be asked to complete psychological questionnaires post-surgery to assess psycho-psychological factors that may correlate with opioid dependence (OD). OD will be determined using the Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS). The COWS is based on a scale with a minimum score of 5 and maximum score of 48; 5-12 = mild, 13-24 = moderate, 25-36 = moderately severe, more than 36 = severe withdrawal

    Time frame: Post-operative up to 1-year

06

Study locations

3 of 4 sites recruiting
  • Riley Children's Hospital- Clinics / Labor and Delivery Unit
    Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States
    • David M. Haas, MD · Contact · dahaas@iu.edu · 317-880-3960
    • Jill Wallace, CIP · Contact · jilawall@iu.edu · 317-278-2311
    • David M. Haas, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Washington University Hospital
    St Louis, Missouri 63110, United States
    Recruiting
  • UPMC Magee Women's Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
    Not yet recruiting
  • University of Pittsburgh
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260, United States
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No current IPD sharing plan anticipated

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05380531
Lead sponsor
Senthil Sadhasivam
Collaborators
National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Responsible party
Senthil Sadhasivam (Professor, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
May 19, 2022
Start date
Dec 5, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, MD, MPH
Contact
sadhasivams@upmc.edu
4126472994
Dayana Alsamsam, MPH
Contact
alsamsamd@upmc.edu
Senthilkumar Sadhasivam, MD, MPH
principal investigator · University of Pittsburgh

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion