ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06620198RAUL-ProjectUpdated Sep 18, 2026

Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Therapy in Patients With Guillain-Barré Syndrome

A Phase 4 interventional study of Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Active Rehabilitation with Feedback and Exercise Gaming and Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Passive Mobilization without Feedback in Guillain Barré Syndrome, sponsored by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-18.

Sponsored by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
62
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Guillain-Barré Syndrome is an immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy, with around 100,000 new cases reported worldwide annually.

The aim of this double-blind randomized controlled trial with a SHAM control group is to evaluate the effects of robot-assisted therapy, integrated with conventional therapy, on upper limb motor recovery in patients with GBS.

Read the detailed description

Guillain-Barré Syndrome is a leading cause of acute flaccid paralysis, presenting with limb weakness and hyporeflexia or areflexia. Guillain-Barré Syndrome is an immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy, with around 100,000 new cases reported worldwide annually. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a robot-assisted rehabilitation treatment for upper limb motor recovery in patients with Guillain-Barré Syndrome. A double-blind randomized trial will be conducted, where the experimental group will undergo actual robotic rehabilitation sessions, while the control group will perform sessions in which the robot will carry out simple mobilization, comparable to traditional interventions. This approach will help maintain participant blinding. Patients will be evaluated before and after treatment, and with two follow-up assessments 60 and 90 days after therapy initiation. Evaluations will include muscle recruitment and autonomy in daily living activities.

02

Conditions studied

  • Guillain Barré Syndrome

Keywords

  • Polyradiculopathy
  • Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyradiculoneuropathy
  • Polyradiculoneuropathy
  • Exoskeleton device
  • Robotic Rehabilitation
03

In context

Guillain-Barre Syndrome

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Guillain-Barre Syndrome; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 62 is above the median of 50 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Guillain-Barre Syndrome.

Browse Guillain-Barre Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of Guillan-Barré Syndrome;
  2. UL motor impairment (0-4 in the Medical Research Council scale);
  3. sub-acute phase (until 180 days);
  4. Patients able to maintain the sitting position.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Concomitant neurological, orthopedic, metabolic, and oncological diseases;
  2. Cognitive impairment assessed with the (score under 24 points);
  3. Visual deficit;
  4. Hearing disorders.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
62 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active-assisted therapy with an upper limb robotic exoskeleton

    Patients will receive upper limb neurorehabilitation training using a robotic exoskeleton administered by the therapist. The assistance provided by the device is adjusted based on the maximum force (as a percentage of the upper limb's weight) the robot needs to exert to assist the patient's movements. The computer-robot interface is designed to offer various exergames that require specific upper limb movements. All movements performed by the patient using the exoskeleton will provide immediate audiovisual feedback on the computer screen. The training will consist of 20 sessions, with five 45-minute sessions per week.

    Device: Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Active Rehabilitation with Feedback and Exercise Gaming

  • Active comparator
    Passive mobilization with an upper limb robotic exoskeleton

    Patients will undergo a neurorehabilitation intervention with a SHAM treatment under the guidance of the experimental therapist.

    Device: Armeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Passive Mobilization without Feedback

Interventions

  • DeviceArmeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Active Rehabilitation with Feedback and Exercise Gaming

    Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minutes each with an exoskeleton for upper limb rehabilitation. The assistance provided by the device is adjusted based on the maximum force (as a percentage of the upper limb's weight) the robot needs to exert to assist the patient's movements. Each session will include exercises designed to improve the range of motion (ROM) of the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and enhance hand coordination. The training parameters, such as difficulty level, duration, and visual stimuli, will be adjusted based on the patient's residual abilities. The selected exercises may involve movements of a single joint along one axis, combined movements of a single joint around 2 or 3 axes, selective exercises for the opening and closing hand, or multi-joint exercises. All exercises will be realized with audiovisual feedback.

  • DeviceArmeo® Power 2 Exoskeleton - Passive Mobilization without Feedback

    Patients will undergo 20 session of 45 minute of a neurorehabilitation intervention with a SHAM treatment under the guidance of the experimental therapist. This will involve passive mobilization using the exoskeleton for the upper limb, without any audiovisual feedback. They will not realize any active movement during the training.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale for Upper Extremity (FMAUE)

    THE FMAUE will be used to assess the change in the motor and sensory functions of the upper limb. The FMAUE included five domains: motor functioning, sensitivity, coordination, range of motion and pain. The score ranging from 0 to 66 points, a higher score corresponds to a better function of the upper limb.

    Time frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

Secondary outcomes

  1. The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)

    The SF-36 will be used to assess the change in health-related quality of life. The SF-36 is organized into 8 different domains that are divided into physical components (Physical functioning, limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain and general perceptions of health status) and mental components (Social functioning, general mental health, limitations due to emotional problems and vitality). Each of the 8 domain scores, added together, is linearly transformed on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 equals negative health and 100 equals positive health.

    Time frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

  2. modified Barthel Index (mBI)

    The mBI will be used to assess the change in the autonomy of patients during their activities of daily living. This scale has a score ranging from 0 to 100 points, a higher score corresponds to a better performance in the activities of daily living.

    Time frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

  3. ABILHAND

    The ABILHAND will be used to assess manual dexterity. The ABILHAND is a questionnaire-based assessment tool that measures the difficulty a patient perceives in using their hands to perform manual operations and activities in daily living. It assesses upper limb functionality. It has nonlinear logit values ranging from 1.72 to -2.18.

    Time frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

  4. The Medical Research Council scale (MRC)

    The MRC will be used to assess muscle strength. The score ranges from 0 to 5 where 0 equals no muscle recruitment and 5 normal muscle force.

    Time frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

  5. The nine hole peg test (NHPG).

    The NHPG will be used to assess fine manual dexterity. The NHPT consists of a square board with 9 pegs. At one end of the board are holes to insert the pegs, and at the other end is a shallow round plate to store the extracted pegs. The NHPT is administered by asking the patient to take the pegs from a container, one by one, and insert them into the holes on the board, as quickly as possible.

    Time frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

  6. Grip strength

    Grip strength will be assessed using a manual digital dynamometer. The maximum strength of the whole hand will be recorded for three times without feedback (with the patient sitting with his back to the monitor).

    Time frame: Baseline (t0); 30 days (t1); 60 days (t2); 90 days (t3).

Other outcomes

  1. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    MMSE is a widely used psychometric tool in clinical settings to assess cognitive function. It is employed to detect cognitive impairments, monitor the progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease, and evaluate the severity of cognitive decline. The test consists of a series of questions and tasks that assess various cognitive domains, including orientation in time and space, memory, attention, language, and the ability to follow simple commands.

    Time frame: T0 (Baseline)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol

Time frame: 2024/10/01

Access criteria: on resonable request to the study\' PI

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Oct 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 24 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 26, 2024
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
StartActual
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Oct 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2027
Last update
Sep 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06620198
Lead sponsor
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 1, 2024
Start date
Oct 1, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 18, 2026

Study contacts

Alex Martino Cinnera, PhD
study chair · IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Diego Piatti, BSc
study chair · IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Laura Casagrande Conti, MSc
study director · IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
Martina D Arienzo, BSc
study director · IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion