ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07075770CMES_ADUpdated Jan 13, 2026

Novel Personalized Non Invasive Combined Magnetic and Electrical Stimulation of the DMN in Mild AD Patients

An interventional study of Combined iTBS-tACS and iTBS-sham tACS in Alzheimer Disease, sponsored by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia. Recruiting at 2 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-13.

Sponsored by I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Jul 2025).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is increasingly recognized as a disorder marked by early synaptic dysfunction and disrupted brain network connectivity, beyond the traditional focus on amyloid pathology. Synaptic plasticity (crucial for learning and memory) is compromised in AD and represents a promising therapeutic target. In particular, alterations in the Default Mode Network (DMN), especially in regions like the precuneus, suggest that restoring connectivity and enhancing plasticity may improve cognitive outcomes. This project proposes a novel, precision-delivered non-invasive brain stimulation protocol that combines repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) over the DMN. The intervention will be evaluated through cognitive testing, blood-based biomarkers, MRI and TMS-EEG, alongside immersive virtual environments to assess sensorimotor and cognitive function. This approach aims to test neuromodulation strategies capable of slowing neurodegeneration and supporting early detection and rehabilitation in AD.

Read the detailed description

Patients will be screened at trial sites for determination of eligibility to enter the study on the basis of diagnostic evaluations, according to current diagnostic criteria for probable AD, and safety assessments (vital sign complete physical and neurological examinations). The efficacy assessments (cognitive/behavioral evaluations) will be performed at Baseline before starting treatment and repeated on- treatment at Weeks 0, 12 and 24. Plasma biomarkers will be collected at baseline and at Week 12 and 24. Visit windows are ±7 days for all the scheduled visits. In case a visit is performed outside its window, subsequent visits will be performed in keeping with the original visit schedule. At each in-clinic visit (or upon early termination), AEs will be recorded, at screening, baseline, Week 12 and 24 vital signs measured, and physical and neurological examination performed.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Non Invasive Brain Stimulation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
  • Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation
  • Transcranial Electrical Stimulation
  • Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation
  • Default Mode Network
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia is the lead sponsor of 56 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with a diagnosis of AD according to IWG criteria
  • 20 > \< 28
  • Patients with CSF specific biomarker profile or with a positive Amyloid Pet Scan consistent with the presence of amyloid pathology
  • Global Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) ≤1
  • Previous decline in cognition for more than six months as documented in patient medical records
  • A caregiver available and living in the same household or interacting with the patient and available
  • Patients living at home or nursing home setting without continuous nursing care
  • General health status acceptable for a participation in a 6-month clinical trial
  • Stable pharmacological treatment for at least one month prior to screening
  • No regular intake of prohibited medications.
  • Signed by the patient. If there are any doubts that the patient is mentally capable of giving informed consent, the patient will be examined and verified to be mentally capable by an independent physician/ neurologist, prior to the initiation of any study specific procedure. Signed consent of the caregiver

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Failure to undergo screening or baseline exams
  • Hospitalization or change in chronic concomitant medications one month before the screening or during the screening period
  • Clinical, laboratory, or neuroimaging results consistent with:

    1. other primary degenerative dementia (Lewy body dementia, frontotemporal dementia, Huntington's disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, Down syndrome, etc.);
    2. other neurodegenerative conditions (Parkinson's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, etc.);
    3. orthostatic hypotension and autonomic disorders
    4. cerebrovascular disease (major infarction, a strategic infarction or multiple lacunar infarctions, extensive white matter lesions > one quarter of total white matter);
    5. other central nervous system diseases (severe traumatic brain injury, tumors, subdural hematoma, or other space-occupying processes, etc.);
    6. seizure disorder.
    7. Other infectious, metabolic, or systemic diseases affecting the central nervous system (syphilis, existing hypothyroidism, current vitamin B12 or folate deficiency, serum electrolytes outside normal limits, juvenile diabetes, etc.).
  • A current diagnosis of major depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder.
  • , advanced, or unstable disease that may interfere with primary or secondary variable assessments and may affect the assessment of the patient's clinical or mental state, or expose the patient to special risk, such as:

    1. Disability that may prevent the patient from completing all study requirements (e.g., blindness, deafness, severe language difficulties, etc.);
    2. Opioid-containing analgesics
    3. Suspected or known drug or alcohol abuse, i.e., more than about 60 g of alcohol (about 1 liter of beer or 500 ml of wine) per day, indicated by a high mean corpuscular volume (MCV) above the normal value at screening;
    4. Any condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes the patient unsuitable for inclusion
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    combined iTBS-tACS

    32 sessions of combined iTBS-tACS (5 times/week for 2 weeks -intensive phase-; 1 time/week for 22 weeks -maintenance phase-)

    Device: Combined iTBS-tACS

  • Active comparator
    iTBS-sham tACS

    32 sessions of combined iTBS-sham tACS (5 times/week for 2 weeks -intensive phase-; 1 time/week for 22 weeks -maintenance phase-)

    Device: iTBS-sham tACS

  • Placebo comparator
    sham iTBS- sham tACS

    32 sessions of sham iTBS- sham tACS (5 times/week for 2 weeks -intensive phase-; 1 time/week for 22 weeks -maintenance phase-)

    Device: sham iTBS- sham tACS

Interventions

  • DeviceCombined iTBS-tACS

    The iTBS-tACS will be applied over the precuneus and last for 190 s, with the tACS electrode positioned on the scalp and the iTBS coil positioned just above it. The iTBS protocol will consist of 600 pulses, delivered in 20 trains of 10 bursts with an interval of 8 seconds between each train. Each burst consists of three pulses at 50Hz, repeated at 5Hz. The total duration will therefore be 190 seconds. iTBS and tACS will be synchronized using a BrainTrigger and SIGNAL Software so that both stimulations will start simultaneously

  • DeviceiTBS-sham tACS

    The iTBS-tACS will be applied over the precuneus and last for 190 s, with the tACS electrode positioned on the scalp and the iTBS coil positioned just above it. The iTBS protocol will consist of 600 pulses, delivered in 20 trains of 10 bursts with an interval of 8 seconds between each train. Each burst consists of three pulses at 50Hz, repeated at 5Hz. The total duration will therefore be 190 seconds. For the tACS sham condition, the electric current will not be applied, but there will be a 2 s 1 mA ramp up and 2 s 1 mA ramp down, to give the participant real stimulation feelings.

  • Devicesham iTBS- sham tACS

    The iTBS-tACS will be applied over the precuneus and last for 190 s, with the tACS electrode positioned on the scalp and the iTBS coil positioned just above it. The iTBS protocol will consist of 600 pulses, delivered in 20 trains of 10 bursts with an interval of 8 seconds between each train. Each burst consists of three pulses at 50Hz, repeated at 5Hz. The total duration will therefore be 190 seconds. For the iTBS sham condition, stimulation was delivered with the coil angled at 90°, with only the edge of the coil resting on the scalp.. For the tACS sham condition, the electric current will not be applied, but there will be a 2 s 1 mA ramp up and 2 s 1 mA ramp down, to give the participant real stimulation feelings.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. integrated Alzheimer Disease Rating Scale (iADRS)

    The iADRS is an integrated assessment of cognition and daily function from the 13-item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog13) and Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL), measuring global disease severity across the Alzheimer disease continuum as a single summary score. The iADRS is validated and captures clinical progression from MCI due to Alzheimer disease through moderate dementia due to Alzheimer disease, and treatment effects have been demonstrated across MCI and Alzheimer disease with mild dementia. The possible scores on the iADRS range from 0 to 144 (lower scores indicate greater impairment).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study - Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) score.

    The ADCS-ADL includes 23 items that were derived from a larger set of items describing performance of activities of daily living.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  2. Alzheimer Disease Cooperative Study-Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-iADL).

    A standardized clinical scale used to assess an individual's ability to perform complex daily tasks.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to week 24.

  3. Change in the Clinical Dementia Rating scale Sum of Boxes (CDR-SoB) score.

    The CDR-SoB is a 5-point scale used to characterize six domains of cognitive and functional performance in AD and related dementias: Memory, Orientation, Judgment \& Problem Solving, Community Affairs, Home \& Hobbies, and Personal Care.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  4. Change in the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Cognitive Scale (ADAS-Cog13) score.

    The ADAS-Cog13 assesses the level of cognitive function in Alzheimer's Disease. The ADAS-Cog13 consists of items from the following areas chosen for their sensitivity to Alzheimer's Disease: language; memory; praxis executive functions and orientation.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  5. Change in the Neuropsychiatric Personal Inventory (NPI) score.

    The NPI scale assesses behavioral disturbances in dementia. The NPI is a reliable and valid scale measuring the following behavioral areas: delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behavior, night time behaviors, and eating disorders. The score range is from 0 to 144 with the higher score meaning more severe behavioural disturbances.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  6. Change in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score.

    The MMSE is a brief, widely used valid, and reliable assessment of cognitive impairment. This 30-point questionnaire is used to screen and estimate the severity of cognitive impairment in addition to being used to follow the course of cognitive change over time. The test assesses orientation, attention and calculation, recall, language, repetition, and ability to follow complex commands. The score range is from 0 to 30, with lower score meaning greater cognitive impairment.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  7. Change in the Montreal Overall Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score.

    The MoCA is a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment, scored from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive functions.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  8. Change in Face-Name Association Task (FNAT) score.

    The FNAT is a cross-modal memory test where participants learn and recall pairs of unfamiliar faces and common first names. In this study, only face-name pairs were used (no occupations). The score reflects the number of correctly recalled names, with higher scores indicating better associative memory.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  9. Change in Apathy Motivation index (AMI) score.

    The AMI scores range from 0 to 4 for each item, with higher scores indicating greater levels of apathy. The total score is calculated by averaging item scores across its subscales.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  10. Change in the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score.

    The FAB is a brief battery of six neuropsychological tasks designed to assess frontal lobe function.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

Other outcomes

  1. Change in cortical activity

    From TMS-EEG recording it is possible to analyze oscillatory activity of the stimulated brain area. Monitoring the frequency band during time after TMS-pulse we calculate Time-frequency Wavelets and from there the TMS-related spectral perturbation (TRSP) as output of the frequency bands (Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta, Gamma) expressed.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  2. Change in the cortical connectivity

    Monitoring how TMS-induced EEG activity spreads from the stimulated area to the other areas, it is possible to assess the effective connectivity that area has with a widespread of network connected. So we calculate the source reconstruction, coherence between different areas and other connectivity indexes in the cortical oscillatory domain, i.e. Phase-locking Value (PLV) and Phase-amplitude coupling (PAC).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  3. Change in Virtual Reality task performance.

    The motor task will be assessed using the Gait Real-time Analysis Interactive Lab (GRAIL) system and a certified VR headset, measuring kinematic variables (walking speed in m/s and joint trajectories in degrees) and performance metrics (number of targets hit and reaction time in ms) under dual-task conditions.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  4. Changes in the blood-based biomarkers

    Plasma concentrations of Aβ42, Aβ40, P-tau217, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), neurogranin, SNAP25 will be quantified using Single Molecule Array (Simoa) assays and reported in pg/mL.

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

  5. Changes on MRI markers of regional gray matter atrophy and functional connectivity

    Will measure changes in brain structure, tissue integrity, and atrophy, as well as changes in brain activity and blood flow using resting-state functional MRI (fRMI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL).

    Time frame: Change from baseline to the end of treatment at week 24.

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation
    Rome, Italy 00179, Italy
    Recruiting
    • Giacomo Koch, Prof · Contactg.koch@hsantalucia.it · +390651501181
    • Sonia Bonnì, PhD · Sub investigator
    • Francesco Di Lorenzo · Sub investigator
  • I.R.C.C.S. Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo
    Messina, Sicily 98124, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chou HY, Chen SC, Yen TH, Han HM. Effect of a Virtual Reality-Based Exercise Program on Fatigue in Hospitalized Taiwanese End-Stage Renal Disease Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. Clin Nurs Res. 2020 Jul;29(6):368-374. doi: 10.1177/1054773818788511. Epub 2018 Jul 15. PubMed 30009636 ↗
  • Blennow K, Zetterberg H. Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: current status and prospects for the future. J Intern Med. 2018 Dec;284(6):643-663. doi: 10.1111/joim.12816. Epub 2018 Aug 19. PubMed 30051512 ↗
  • Fox MD, Halko MA, Eldaief MC, Pascual-Leone A. Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 1;62(4):2232-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.035. Epub 2012 Mar 19. PubMed 22465297 ↗
  • Gili T, Cercignani M, Serra L, Perri R, Giove F, Maraviglia B, Caltagirone C, Bozzali M. Regional brain atrophy and functional disconnection across Alzheimer's disease evolution. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Jan;82(1):58-66. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2009.199935. Epub 2010 Jul 16. PubMed 20639384 ↗
  • Koch G, Casula EP, Bonni S, Borghi I, Assogna M, Minei M, Pellicciari MC, Motta C, D'Acunto A, Porrazzini F, Maiella M, Ferrari C, Caltagirone C, Santarnecchi E, Bozzali M, Martorana A. Precuneus magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, sham-controlled trial. Brain. 2022 Nov 21;145(11):3776-3786. doi: 10.1093/brain/awac285. PubMed 36281767 ↗
  • Koch G, Bonni S, Pellicciari MC, Casula EP, Mancini M, Esposito R, Ponzo V, Picazio S, Di Lorenzo F, Serra L, Motta C, Maiella M, Marra C, Cercignani M, Martorana A, Caltagirone C, Bozzali M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the precuneus enhances memory and neural activity in prodromal Alzheimer's disease. Neuroimage. 2018 Apr 1;169:302-311. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.048. Epub 2017 Dec 19. PubMed 29277405 ↗
  • Hu Y, Kirmess KM, Meyer MR, Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Siegel BA, Whitmer RA, Apgar C, Hanna L, Kanekiyo M, Kaplow J, Koyama A, Verbel D, Holubasch MS, Knapik SS, Connor J, Contois JH, Jackson EN, Harpstrite SE, Bateman RJ, Holtzman DM, Verghese PB, Fogelman I, Braunstein JB, Yarasheski KE, West T. Assessment of a Plasma Amyloid Probability Score to Estimate Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography Findings Among Adults With Cognitive Impairment. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e228392. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8392. PubMed 35446396 ↗
  • Bonni S, Esposito R, Mencarelli L, Di Lorenzo F, Ricci F, Di Iulio F, Savastano E, Candeo F, De Masi F, Coletta A, Vinci AC, Ferraresi M, Mancini M, Casula EP, Borghi I, Spampinato DA, Maiella M, Cinnera AM, Assogna M, Bruno M, Nocilli M, Ferrara M, Russo M, Tagliamonte NL, Ferrari C, Bertino S, Calabro RS, Maggio MG, De Luca R, Burrascano R, Gjonaj E, Mirabile A, De Pasquale P, d'Avella A, Quartarone A, Koch G. Personalized non-invasive combined magnetic and electrical stimulation of the default mode network in mild AD patients (CMES-AD): a multicentric randomized sham-controlled trial protocol. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2026 Jul 21. doi: 10.1186/s13195-026-02145-x. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42482244 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07075770
Lead sponsor
I.R.C.C.S. Fondazione Santa Lucia
Collaborators
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 20, 2025
Start date
Jan 1, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 13, 2026

Study contacts

Giacomo Koch, Prof
Contact
g.koch@hsantlucia.it
+390651501181
Giacomo Koch, Prof.
principal investigator · IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion