An observational study in Psychological Disorders and Hip Pain Chronic, sponsored by ChunBao Li. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-26.
Sponsored by ChunBao Li · Observational
Nowadays, studies related to the psychological state of patients with chronic hip pain are still limited, and there is a lack of research on the characteristics of the psychological state of patients with chronic soreness from different pain sources. The goal of this retrospective cross-sectional study was to reveal differences between the psychological states of chronic hip pain patients with different pain sources. The main question it aims to answer is whether there are differences in psychological states among hip pain patients with intra-hip pain, extra-hip pain, and intra-hip combined with extra-hip pain.
Patients with chronic hip pain who visited the hip joint specialist outpatient clinic of the PLA General Hospital were included in the study. The diagnosis was made by the same docter based on clinical and radiological examinations, with a clear diagnosis of hip disease. Patients were divided into three groups according to the source of pain: intra-articular pain group, extra-articular pain group, and intra-articular combined extra-articular pain group. Intra-articular hip pain encompasses a range of conditions, including femoral acetabular impingement (FAI) and labral damage within the hip joint. Extra-articular hip pain encompasses conditions such as trochanteric bursitis and gluteal fasciitis. Combined hip pain represents a combination of both of these etiological factors.
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Psychological and Functional Assessment
Other: Psychological and Functional Assessment
Other: Psychological and Functional Assessment
Assessment of Pain Sources: Patients are grouped based on intra-articular, extra-articular, or combined intra- and extra-articular hip pain.Psychological Assessment: Depression and anxiety are assessed using standardized questionnaires (e.g., BDI for depression, SAS for anxiety).Functional Assessment: Joint function and pain are evaluated using clinical and patient-reported outcome measures.
the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)
The BDI is a self-assessment scale that has been demonstrated to be a reliable and valid tool for evaluating depressive symptoms. The BDI comprises 21 items, each item is assigned a score on a scale of 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating a greater severity of depressive symptoms.
Time frame: 5 minutes
the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS)
The SAS is a self-assessment instrument designed to evaluate the presence and severity of anxiety symptoms. The SAS consists of 20 items, each item consisting of four statements, and each item is scored on a scale of 1 to 4. A higher score indicates a higher level of anxiety.
Time frame: 5 minutes
the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
for the assessment of the level of hip pain perceived by the patient
Time frame: 2 minutes
the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ)
for the assessment of the individual's sensitivity to pain
Time frame: 5 minutes
The Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL)
evaluate the functional activities necessitated by daily life with the hip
Time frame: 5 minutes
The Hip Outcome Score - Sport-specific subscale (HOS-SSS)
assess the capacity to perform sports activities
Time frame: 5 minutes
the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS)
assess the functional level of the hip joint
Time frame: 5 minutes
the international hip outcome tool (IHOT-12)
assess the functional level of the hip joint
Time frame: 5 minutes
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
ChunBao Li