A Phase 3 interventional study of NPH insulin 50 IU/mL eye drops and 0.5% methylcellulose eye drops (placebo) in Keratoconus, Cornea Disease and Eye Diseases, sponsored by University of Campinas, Brazil. Terminated at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 14 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.
Sponsored by University of Campinas, Brazil · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment
Enrollment closed before the planned 36 eyes were reached because of the limited number of eligible patients and the long recruitment period (July 2024 to December 2025); 20 eyes of 19 participants were enrolled.
The cornea plays a fundamental role in vision, being a complex tissue essential for ocular health. In ophthalmological practice, there are situations such as corneal crosslinking, where damage to the corneal epithelium occurs. Crosslinking is a surgical procedure aimed at strengthening collagen bonds in the corneal stroma to prevent the progression of keratoconus, through the application of topical riboflavin followed by ultraviolet (UV-A) radiation. To enhance the effectiveness of riboflavin and UV-A radiation, the corneal epithelium needs to be removed, which can cause postoperative pain and discomfort, as well as increase the risk of complications such as infections, scarring, corneal opacities, perforations, and recurrent epithelial erosions. Several growth factors play a role in epithelial healing, and the discovery of insulin in the tear film and the presence of insulin and Insulin-Like Growth Factor (IGF-1) receptors in the cornea has raised the hypothesis that insulin may modulate the cornea's wound healing response. Since then, topical insulin has been used for various ocular pathologies, including dry eye disease, persistent epithelial defects, and neurotrophic ulcers. Based on this knowledge, studies have been developed, and promising results regarding the use of insulin in corneal healing have been reported, providing a scientific foundation for the realization of this project.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of insulin eye drops at a concentration of 50 IU/ml on epithelial healing in non-diabetic patients undergoing epithelial debridement for corneal crosslinking. To this end, a randomized, double-masked clinical trial was conducted with two groups, one being the control group, in which researchers compared the epithelial healing rate in mm²/h between the insulin group and the placebo group, as the primary outcome. Patients diagnosed with keratoconus and with an indication for the crosslinking procedure were invited to participate.
The study was designed to assess and quantify the impact of topical insulin on epithelial defect closure in patients undergoing crosslinking, compared to placebo.
Patients from the Keratoconus Clinic of the Hospital de Clínicas, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil, with a diagnosis of keratoconus and an indication for corneal crosslinking were evaluated with visual acuity, refraction, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, Goldmann applanation tonometry, corneal specular microscopy (EM-3000, Tomey) for endothelial cell count, and corneal tomography (Pentacam HR, Oculus).
Eligible patients who signed the informed consent form (with the legal guardian also signing for participants younger than 18 years) underwent crosslinking. After the procedure, participants were allocated to two groups (insulin and placebo) by block randomization with blocks of four, stratified by sex. The random sequence was generated at random.org/lists and concealed in sealed opaque envelopes prepared by an independent assistant. Envelopes were opened sequentially at enrollment by investigators who did not take part in outcome assessment. One participant underwent crosslinking in both eyes, which were allocated to different groups; the eye was the unit of analysis.
Crosslinking was standardized for all participants and performed by third-year ophthalmology residents supervised by attending physicians. Central 8.0-mm epithelial debridement was performed with an optical zone marker of the same diameter: 30% alcohol was applied within the marker for 10 seconds and dried with an ophthalmic sponge, and the epithelium was removed with a corneal scarifier spatula. Riboflavin 0.1% (400 mOsm) in a hydroxypropyl methylcellulose vehicle was used, with UVA irradiation at 9 mW/cm² for 10 minutes (fluence 5.4 J/cm²) using the Eyelink Crosslink device (Eyetec, São Carlos, Brazil). At the end of the procedure, the size and shape of the debrided area were checked with the 8.0-mm marker, and participants whose debridement did not meet this standard were excluded.
The insulin group received NPH insulin 50 IU/mL eye drops (Eye Pharma, São Paulo, Brazil) four times daily, and the placebo group received 0.5% methylcellulose eye drops (Eye Pharma), the vehicle of the insulin formulation, four times daily, until complete epithelial healing. The bottles were identical and were labeled on the prescription as "compounded eye drops". Participants and outcome assessors were masked to group allocation. Both groups received moxifloxacin 5 mg/mL every 6 hours (Oftalmox; Geolab), prednisolone acetate 10 mg/mL every 6 hours (Ster; União Química), 0.15% sodium hyaluronate every 4 hours (Hyabak; Laboratoires Théa) and a silicone hydrogel bandage contact lens (Air Optix plus HydraGlyde; Alcon) until complete epithelial healing. Moxifloxacin and the study eye drops were then discontinued, and prednisolone was tapered weekly until one month after the procedure.
Crosslinking was always performed on Tuesdays, and assessments took place 18, 42 and 66 hours after the procedure (postoperative days 1 to 3). If epithelialization was incomplete at 66 hours, a further visit was scheduled on postoperative day 6 and every 48 hours thereafter until complete epithelialization. At each visit, the epithelial defect was photographed with the Keratograph 5M (OCULUS) and slit-lamp biomicroscopy was performed. The defect area was measured with ImageJ software by an investigator masked to allocation and reviewed independently by a second masked investigator. Complete epithelial healing was defined as the absence of an epithelial defect after fluorescein instillation on Keratograph 5M images, confirmed by two examiners on slit-lamp examination.
The primary outcome is the corneal epithelialization rate (mm²/h). Secondary outcomes are time to complete epithelialization and adverse events, in addition to endothelial cell density. Later follow-up visits took place at 30 and 60 days after crosslinking.
313 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 40 across 205 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconus.
Browse Keratoconus studies →University of Campinas, Brazil is the lead sponsor of 168 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
The criteria were revised on the registry on Nov 5, 2026. See what changed
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
NPH insulin 50 IU/mL eye drops (Eye Pharma, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), one drop four times daily until complete corneal epithelialization, added to the standard postoperative regimen.
Drug: NPH insulin 50 IU/mL eye drops
0.5% methylcellulose eye drops (Eye Pharma, São Paulo, SP, Brazil), the vehicle of the insulin formulation, one drop four times daily until complete corneal epithelialization, added to the standard postoperative regimen.
Drug: 0.5% methylcellulose eye drops (placebo)
Drug page: Insulin
Insulin eye drops in the postoperative prescription for corneal crosslinking
Also known as: Insulin
Placebo eye drops of 0.5% Methylcellulose in the postoperative prescription for corneal crosslinking
Also known as: Placebo
Corneal Epithelial Healing Rate
Rate of corneal re-epithelialization (mm²/h), calculated as the epithelial defect area at the first postoperative assessment (18 hours) divided by the time elapsed until complete epithelialization. Defect area measured on Keratograph 5M (OCULUS) images with ImageJ software by masked investigators.
Time frame: From crosslinking until complete epithelialization, assessed at 18, 42 and 66 hours, on day 6 and every 48 hours thereafter.
Endothelial cell count
Endothelial cell count loss in each group, if any
Time frame: 60 days
Incidence of corneal haze
Incidence of corneal haze in each group.
Time frame: 60 days.
Time to complete epithelialization
Time (hours) from crosslinking to the first assessment at which complete epithelial closure was documented (absence of an epithelial defect after fluorescein instillation on Keratograph 5M images, confirmed on slit-lamp examination). Closure could only be ascertained at scheduled visits.
Time frame: From crosslinking until complete epithelialization.
Adverse events
Number of eyes with ocular adverse events (e.g., infectious keratitis, sterile infiltrates, persistent epithelial defect, allergic reaction to study eye drops) recorded at each study visit.
Time frame: From crosslinking until the end of follow-up.
Epithelial Defect Area
Area of the corneal epithelial defect (mm²) measured on Keratograph 5M images with ImageJ software.
Time frame: 18, 42 and 66 hours after crosslinking.
Plan to share: Yes — The de-identified dataset analyzed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Enrollment closed before the planned 36 eyes were reached because of the limited number of eligible patients and the long recruitment period (July 2024 to December 2025); 20 eyes of 19 participants were enrolled.
Enrollment closed before the planned 36 eyes were reached because of the limited number of eligible patients and the long recruitment period (July 2024 to December 2025); 20 eyes of 19 participants were enrolled.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Insulin
University of Campinas, Brazil →