CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06598826Updated Sep 19, 2024

Graston Technique Versus Kinesio Taping on Myofascial Pain Syndrome After Neck Dissection Surgery

An interventional study of Graston technique (IASTM) and Kinesio taping in Post Neck Dissection Surgery, sponsored by Cairo University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by Cairo University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2024, registered Sep 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
52
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of Graston technique versus Kinesiotaping on myofascial pain syndrome after neck dissection surgery.

Read the detailed description

Fifty two patients from both genders who had cervical Myofascial pain syndrome following a neck dissection surgery participated in this Study. Their ages ranged from 30 to 50 years. They had been selected from the National Cancer Institute, Cairo University. They were assigned randomly into two groups (A) and (B), equal in number. Group (A) received Graston technique (IASTM), in addition to traditional treatment (range of motion exercises, stretching exercises and strengthening exercises) for 12 Sessions performed in a period of 4 weeks (three times weekly). While Group (B) Received kinesiotaping, in addition to traditional treatment (range of motion exercises, stretching exercises and strengthening exercises) for 8 sessions performed in a period of 4 weeks (twice weekly). Pressure pain threshold, visual analogue scale and cervical lateral flexion and rotation were measured pre and post 4 weeks of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Post Neck Dissection Surgery

Keywords

  • Graston technique (IASTM)
  • Kinesiotape
  • Myofascial pain syndrome
03

In context

Myofascial Pain Syndromes

1,136 studies on the registry are indexed under Myofascial Pain Syndromes; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 52 is below the median of 60 across 931 interventional studies indexed under Myofascial Pain Syndromes.

Browse Myofascial Pain Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Cairo University is the lead sponsor of 4,780 studies on the registry; 1,427 are open to participants now.

Of its 36 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • The subjects were selected according to the following criteria:

The patient's ages ranged from 30 to 50 years participated in this study. Both genders participated in this study. All patients had a history of MPS at UTM from 3 to 5 months. All patients had moderate to severe pain (VAS score >4). Informed consent was obtained from every patient enrolled in the trial. All patients had myofascial pain syndrome after unilateral modified radical neck dissection surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The potential participants were excluded if they meet one of the following criteria:

A wound in the affected area A cervical disk lesion Myelopathy or radiculopathy Cervical spine fracture or spondylolisthesis Rheumatoid arthritis Epilepsy or any psychological disorders Contraindications to IASTM. Contraindications to Kinesiotaping. Coagulopathy. Hemophilia or other clotting disorders.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
52 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Graston technique

    This group received Graston technique (IASTM) , in additional to traditional treatment (ROM exercise, strengthening exercise, and stretching exercise) 3 times per week for 1 month

    Device: Graston technique (IASTM)

  • Active comparator
    Kinesio taping

    Group B includes 26 patients who received Kinesiotaping, in addition to traditional treatment (ROM exercise, strengthening exercise, and stretching exercises) 2 times per week for 1 month

    Other: Kinesio taping

Interventions

  • DeviceGraston technique (IASTM)

    Group A includes 26 patients post ND who received Graston technique (IASTM) , in additional to traditional treatment (ROM exercise, strengthening exercise, and stretching exercise) for 1 month

    Also known as: Traditional treatment (ROM exercise, strengthening exercise, and stretching exercises)

  • OtherKinesio taping

    Group B includes 26 patients who received Kinesiotaping, in addition to traditional treatment (ROM exercise, strengthening exercise, and stretching exercises) for 1 month

    Also known as: Traditional treatment (ROM exercise, strengthening exercise, and stretching exercises)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Range of motion (ROM) (cervicallateralflexion)

    Universal Goniometer is a reliable instrument used to evaluate Range of motion in degrees

    Time frame: Pretreatment, post treatment ( after 4 weeks of treatment)

  2. Range of motion (ROM) (cervical rotation)

    Universal Goniometer is a reliable instrument used to evaluate Range of motion in degrees

    Time frame: Pretreatment, post treatment ( after 4 weeks of treatment)

  3. Pressure pain threshold

    Pressure Algometer with a spring is used. They maintain a peak force or pressure (KP (kilopond) = 10 N, Newton = 100 kPa (kilopascal)) until tared

    Time frame: Pretreatment, post treatment ( after 4 weeks of treatment)

  4. Assessment of pain

    Vasual Analogue Scale(VAS) is used technique for assessing pain intensity , a continuous scale with a vertical or horizontal line of 100 mm, from 0 to10, whose extremes are designated "no pain" and "worst imaginable pain" (0= no pain; 10= most painful imaginable pain).

    Time frame: Pretreatment, post treatment ( after 4 weeks of treatment)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cairo University
    Giza, Egypt
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06598826
Lead sponsor
Cairo University
Responsible party
Hasnaa Abd-Elfatah Mohamed (Physiotherapy specialist, Cairo University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
May 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 12, 2024
Completion
Jul 31, 2024
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion