CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06591962Updated Sep 19, 2024

The Comparison of Biopsychosocial Characteristics with and Without Diabetes Mellitus

An observational study in Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Sep 2023; still recruiting 3 years later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As it is a chronic disease, the lifelong disease duration and treatment process affect individuals with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) biologically, psychologically, and socially by causing them to experience fatigue, increased stress, and life burden. Individuals with T2DM experience many psychosocial conditions leading to anxiety and depression as well as physical and functional effects. It has been reported that the fear of diabetic complications plays a vital role in depression, while individuals with diabetes with anxiety are more prone to depression. In addition, increased treatment cost burden has been reported among the psychological factors contributing to anxiety and depression in individuals with DM. One study reported that fatigue is commonly associated with increased anxiety, depression, and sleep problems in individuals with DM. A sedentary lifestyle in these individuals is noteworthy and has also been shown to be a contributing factor to depression.

In addition to improving diabetic complications due to the disease, reducing depressive states and improving the psychosocial status of individuals may positively affect diabetes and reduce the symptoms and complications of T2DM. It has also been reported that increasing the self-efficacy of individuals with diabetes may positively impact the treatment. Based on this information, it is clear that there is a need for physical and psychosocial evaluation of individuals with T2DM in disease management. Therefore, determination of the biopsychosocial effects of individuals with T2DM in improving disease-specific findings and quality of life of individuals with T2DM to reflect positively on disease management processes is necessary for holistic management in treating these individuals. However, studies in this field are insufficient. This study aimed to compare individuals with and without T2DM biopsychosocial characteristics.

The BETY-Biopsychosocial Questionnaire, which assesses the biopsychosocial status of individuals with rheumatism, has no validity in individuals with T2DM. Since the patient population and other scales to be used are common, it was considered to carry out the validity, reliability, and responsiveness study of this scale within the scope of this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetes Mellitus

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • biopsychosocial model
  • BETY-BQ
  • validity and reliability
  • anxiety
  • depression
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus

10,925 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus; 1,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is below the median of 233 across 2,220 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 983 studies on the registry; 212 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of individuals who come to the university hospital for routine controls.

Eligibility criteria

Individuals with Diabetes Mellitus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being T2 DM
  • To be between 18-65 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a diagnosis of autoimmune monogenic or drug-associated diabetes,
  • Lack of consent of the participants,
  • Frailty (Clinical Frailty Score; if greater than 3),
  • Stroke, heart failure (NYHA stage 3 and above), unstable lung and cardiovascular diseases

Individuals without Diabetes Mellitus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Not having T2DM (other individuals followed up at Hacettepe University -
  • Department of Internal Medicine)
  • To be between 18-65 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a diagnosis of autoimmune monogenic or drug-associated diabetes,
  • Lack of consent of the participants,
  • Frailty (Clinical Frailty Score; if greater than 3),
  • Stroke, heart failure (NYHA stage 3 and above), unstable lung and cardiovascular diseases
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus

    Individuals with diabetes mellitus admitted to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital. A questionnaire will be applied for diabetes mellitus.

    Other: Questionnaire application for diabetes mellitus

  • Individuals without a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus

    Individuals without diabetes mellitus admitted to the internal medicine outpatient clinic of a university hospital. A questionnaire will be applied for without diabetes mellitus.

    Other: Questionnaire application for without diabetes mellitus

Interventions

  • OtherQuestionnaire application for diabetes mellitus

    Scales will be applied to individuals diagnosed with diabetes mellitus

  • OtherQuestionnaire application for without diabetes mellitus

    Scales will be applied to individuals diagnosed without diabetes mellitus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. BETY-Biopsychosocial Questionnaire

    The biopsychosocial status of the individual is assessed with questions about pain, functionality, mood, sociability, sexuality, and sleep status. Each question consists of 30 items scored between 0-120 as '0 (never), 1 (yes rarely), 2 (yes sometimes), 3 (yes often), 4 (yes always)'. A high score indicates poor biopsychosocial status.

    Time frame: Three months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS)

    HADS consists of 14 items, 7 of which assess anxiety, and the other 7 determine depression. Each item is scored between 0-3, and the total is scored between 0-21. High scores indicate poor anxiety and depression levels.

    Time frame: Three months

  2. Turkish version of the Multidimensional Diabetes Questionnaire

    The questionnaire consists of 3 sections, 7 sub-dimensions, and 41 items. Each section is evaluated separately; there is no total score for the scale. Section 1 focuses on the perception of diabetes and social support. It includes 16 items measured using a 7-point Likert-type scale. Section 2 evaluates the level of supportive and non-supportive behaviors of the diabetic spouse or caregiver towards self-care activities, using a 7-point Likert-type scale with 12 items. Section 3 assesses the perception of individual self-efficacy and outcome expectancy regarding managing the disease with 13 items measured on a Likert-type scale. High scores in perceived self-efficacy and outcome indicate a high level of expectation.

    Time frame: Three months

  3. Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities

    The study participants were asked to report the frequency of their self-care activities, such as diet, exercise, blood glucose testing, foot care, and smoking, over the past seven days. They used a number line to indicate the number of days (between 0-7) for each activity, and smoking, they used a scale of 0 for nonsmokers and 1 for smokers, with an additional measure for the amount of cigarettes smoked. A higher score indicates a higher level of self-care activity.

    Time frame: Three months

  4. Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)

    The Health Assessment Questionnaire evaluates the functionality of the individual using eight parameters and 20 items. The parameters are classified as dressing, standing, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, grasping, and other activities. Each item is scored as 0 (without any difficulty), 1 (with some difficulty), 2 (with a lot of difficulty), and 3 (unable to do at all). The total score is between 0-3, with a high score indicating low functionality.

    Time frame: Three months

  5. General Health Questionnaire (Euro QoL-5D)

    The scale consists of 2 subsections. The first part, the EQ-5D-Index, consists of five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The answers given to each dimension have three options; "no problem," "moderate problem," and "extreme problem." Index value results vary between "-0.59" and "1" points. "0" indicates death, and "1" indicates total health. Negative values indicate unconsciousness and bed dependency. The second part of the scale is the vertical visual analog scale (EQ-VAS), Which evaluates the subjective health perception of the individual between 0 and 100. Marked as the best health you can imagine and the worst health you can imagine.

    Time frame: Three months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hacettepe University
    Ankara, Altındağ 06100, Turkey
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Will not be shared to protect the data of individuals

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06591962
Lead sponsor
Hacettepe University
Responsible party
Orkun Tüfekçi (Principal Investigator, PT, PhD(c), Hacettepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 19, 2024
Start date
Sep 20, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 20, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Orkun Tüfekçi, PT, PhD(c)
Contact
orkuntf@gmail.com
5319502648

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion