ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06551246Updated Jun 8, 2026

Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron and Combination Therapy in Children With Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Solifenacin and Mirabegron in Urinary Incontinence in Children, sponsored by University of Aarhus. Recruiting at 5 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by University of Aarhus · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2024; still recruiting 2 years 4 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
236
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 14 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective is to evaluate if (1) combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses is superior to monotherapy of solifenacin in high dose and if (2) combination therapy of mirabegron and solifenacin in low doses is superior to monotherapy of mirabegron in high dose in treatment of daytime urinary incontinence among children aged 5 to 14 years who are none complete responders to respectively monotherapy of solifenacin in low dose or monotherapy of mirabegron in low dose.

In total, 236 children diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Total pharmacological treatment period will be 18 weeks.

Read the detailed description

Background: According to International Children's Continence Society, first-line treatment of children with daytime urinary incontinence is standard urotherapy, eventually followed by pharmacotherapy of anticholinergics. The effect of medical treatment is sparsely investigated and primarily in non-randomized trials.

Objectives: The primary objective is to evaluate if (1) combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses is superior to monotherapy of solifenacin in high dose and if (2) combination therapy of mirabegron and solifenacin in low doses is superior to monotherapy of mirabegron in high dose in treatment of daytime urinary incontinence among children aged 5 to 14 years who are none complete responders to respectively monotherapy of solifenacin in low dose or monotherapy of mirabegron in low dose.

The secondary objective is to evaluate the treatment response of combination therapy of solifenacin and mirabegron in low doses, monotherapy in high dose and monotherapy in low doses as supplementary comparisons. Additionally, the secondary objective is to evaluate side effects, safety, and tolerability of the medical treatment as well as the effect of treatment on well-being and quality of life.

Study design: The BeDry study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Included children will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to one of four treatment groups. Children aged 5-14 years diagnosed with daytime urinary incontinence refractory to standard urotherapy will be randomized. Initially two groups will receive solifenacin 5 mg and two groups will receive mirabegron 25 mg. After 6 weeks, non-complete respondsers will receive add-on treatment according to their primary randomization group; group 1A will reviece solifenacin 5 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg, group 1B will receive solifenacin 5 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2A will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on mirabegron 25 mg, group 2B will receive mirabegron 25 mg and add-on solifenacin 5 mg. Total treatment period will be 18 weeks. The primary endpoint measure is treatment response assessed by change from visit 2 to end of study, according to number of wet days pr. 7 days by DryPie.

Perspectives: The trial has the potential to optimize medical treatment of children with daytime urinary incontinence, to shorten the treatment period, diminish side effects and minimized unnecessary medical expenses.

Ethics: All pharmacological side effects will be handled in accordance with the Danish legislation. No risk or unknown side effects are expected to urotherapy, medical treatment or withdrawal. No risks are expected by the clinical examination and paraclinical measurements. The therapeutic potential for future patients justifies the project to be carried out. Participation in this study will not lead to any disadvantages for the patient in their treatment. The study will be conducted in accordance with the protocol, applicable regulatory requirements according to Good Clinical Practice and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study is approved by the authorities. Significant additions or changes to the protocol may be conducted after the application for amendment is approved by the Regulatory Authority and the Ethics Committee. Information regarding the participants is protected according to the General Data Protection Regulation and the actual law. The study is registered at the research inventory of the Regions of Denmark (1-16-02-210-24) and at Aarhus University (ARG-2024-731-23829). The study is registered and authorized at CTIS (EU CT 2023-510187-13-00).

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence in Children

Keywords

  • Urinary incontinence
  • Daytime urinary incontinence
  • Overactive bladder
  • Children
  • Solifenacin
  • Mirabegron
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

983 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 180 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 236 is above the median of 66 across 739 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus is the lead sponsor of 1,300 studies on the registry; 189 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 14 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. The participants custody holder(s) must voluntarily sign and date an prior to initiation of any study specific procedures.
  2. Age 5 to 14 years (inclusive) at the time of inclusion.
  3. Overactive bladder as per International Children's Continence Society criteria
  4. At least 2 daytime urinary incontinence episodes per week
  5. Inadequate effect of at least 4 weeks urotherapy (non-pharmacological treatment)
  6. No previous treatment with solifenacin, mirabegron or bladder/sphincter botulinum toxin injections
  7. No current constipation as per ROME IV criteria or fecal incontinence (laxative treatment is accepted)
  8. Per investigator's judgment, the participant can swallow or can learn to swallow study medication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability of the patent(s) or legal guardian(s) to understand the Danish written and oral information
  2. Known or suspected to study medication
  3. Any to the use of the study medication
  4. Known urogenital anatomical abnormalities affecting lower urinary tract function
  5. Known kidney or bladder stones
  6. Known diabetes insipidus
  7. Ongoing symptomatic urinary tract infection
  8. Recurrent urinary tract infection or ongoing prophylactic antibiotic treatment
  9. Known prolongation, QTc >460 ms, or risk of QTc prolongation (hypokalaemia, exercise-induced syncope, or familial long QT syndrome)
  10. Other significant abnormalities
  11. Known hypertension
  12. ≤3 daily voiding, evaluated by 48-hour frequency-volume chart
  13. Uroflowmetry suggestive of other pathology than overactive bladder (staccato-shaped, interrupted-shaped, or plateau-shaped curve)
  14. Post-void residual >50 ml after double voiding
  15. Dipstick haematuria (≥2+ erythrocytes) or macroscopic haematuria
  16. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  17. Female subjects of
  18. Ongoing constipation according to Rome IV-criteria which is intractable to medication or fecal incontinence
  19. Inability to swallow study medication
  20. Use of any medication during study period, except permitted medication
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
236 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Solifenacin 5 mg + add-on solifenacin 5 mg

    Group 1A: Solifenacin 5 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on solifenacin 5 mg for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Solifenacin

  • Experimental
    Solifenacin 5 mg + add-on mirabegron 25 mg

    Group 1B: Solifenacin 5 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on mirabegron 25 mg for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Solifenacin · Drug: Mirabegron

  • Experimental
    Mirabegron 25 mg + ad-on mirabegron 25 mg

    Group 2A: Mirabegron 25 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on mirabegron 25 mg for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Mirabegron

  • Experimental
    Mirabegron 25 mg + add-on solifenacin 5 mg

    Group 2B: Mirabegron 25 mg for 6 weeks, and if non-complete response after 6 weeks add-on solifenacin 5 mg for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Solifenacin · Drug: Mirabegron

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment response

    Assesed by change in number of wetdays pr. 7 days by DryPie

    Time frame: From study week 6 and through study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment response

    Assesed by change in number of wetdays pr. 7 days by DryPie

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  2. Inconcintnence severity score

    Assesed by DryPie (scoring from 0 to 21, in which the higher score means severe incontinence)

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  3. Urge severity

    Quantified by Bower VAS Urgency Scheme (scoring from 0 to 10, in which the higher score means servere urge)

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  4. Maximum voided volume (ml)

    48-hour frequency-volume chart

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  5. Age standardized maximum voided volume (ml)

    Maximum voided volume as a percent of expected bladder capacity

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  6. Average voided volume (ml)

    48-hour frequency-volume chart

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  7. Miction frequency

    48-hour frequency-volume chart

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  8. Pediatric incontinence questionnaire total score

    20-item questionnaire (scoring from 0 to 4 on a Likert scale, with a total of 80 points in which the higher score, the greater impact of urinary incontinence of quality of life)

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

  9. WHO-5 total score

    5-item questionnaire (scoring from 0 to 5 on a Likert scale, with a total of 30 points in which the higher score, the greater impact of urinary incontinence of quality of life)

    Time frame: From date of randomization until study completion, an average of 18 weeks in total

07

Study locations

5 of 5 sites recruiting
  • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aalborg University Hospital
    Aalborg, Aalborg 9000, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • Søren Hagstrøm, Professor · Contactsoha@rm.dk · +45 97663374
  • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, Aarhus N 8200, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • Konstantinos Kamperis, MD, PhD · Contactkonskamp@rm.dk
    • Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD · Sub investigator
  • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent medicine, Esbjerg Hospital
    Esbjerg, Esbjerg 6700, Denmark
    Recruiting
  • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital
    Herning, Herning 7400, Denmark
    Recruiting
    • Luise Borch, MD, PhD · Contactluise.borch@rm.dk · +45 78433654
    • Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD · Principal investigator
  • Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Kolding Hospital
    Kolding, Kolding 6000, Denmark
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Svendsen AM, Hagstrom S, Thorsteinsson K, Van Batavia J, Kamperis K, Olesen AE, Borch L. Efficacy of Solifenacin, Mirabegron, and Combination Therapy in Children With Daytime Urinary Incontinence (BeDry): Protocol for a Randomized Single-Blinded Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 26;14:e63588. doi: 10.2196/63588. PubMed 40570329 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06551246
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 13, 2024
Start date
Jun 27, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Ann-Kristine Mandøe Svendsen, MD
Contact
ankrso@rm.dk
+45 78430408
Luise Borch, MD, PhD
Contact
luiseborch@rm.dk
+45 78433654
Luise Borch, MD, PhD
study director · Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Solifenacin · Mirabegron

Start the discussion