ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07887464Updated Oct 21, 2026

Clinical, Functional, and Therapeutic Characterization of Women With Urinary Incontinence and Analysis of Factors Associated With Treatment Response

An observational study in Urinary Incontinence (UI), sponsored by Javier Pereira. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Javier Pereira · Observational

Updated Oct 21, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this observational retrospective study is to characterize women with urinary incontinence and to identify factors associated with their response to treatment using artificial intelligence models.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

What are the clinical, functional, and therapeutic characteristics of women with urinary incontinence? Which clinical, functional, and lifestyle factors are associated with response to treatment? Can artificial intelligence models identify patterns and factors associated with treatment response?

Researchers will analyze data from women with urinary incontinence collected during routine clinical care at a specialized pelvic floor clinic. The study will combine clinical information from medical records, measurements obtained from clinical assessment instruments, and daily-life data collected using wearable devices such as activity bracelets. Artificial intelligence and machine learning models will be applied to these data to characterize participants and identify factors associated with treatment response.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence (UI)

Keywords

  • urinary incontinence
  • Artificial inteligence
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,375 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 224 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 80 is below the median of 120 across 307 observational studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Javier Pereira as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of urinary incontinence who receive routine care at the Clínica Cobián. Participants will provide clinical, functional, therapeutic, questionnaire, and daily-life data, including information collected through wearable devices, for the development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support model.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of urinary incontinence (stress, urgency, or mixed urinary incontinence).
  • Patients attending the Clínica Cobián.
  • Willingness to participate in follow-up and complete the required patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Severe diseases or clinical conditions that, in the investigator's judgment, may interfere with participation in the study or interpretation of the results.

Neurological Disorders (Causes of Neurogenic Bladder): Conditions affecting the central or peripheral nervous system can substantially alter bladder control; therefore, urinary incontinence may not be attributable to common mechanical or functional causes, such as stress or standard urgency incontinence.

Multiple sclerosis (MS). Advanced Parkinson's disease or parkinsonian syndromes. Traumatic or medical spinal cord injuries (paraplegia or tetraplegia). Recent stroke or stroke with severe cognitive or motor sequelae. Severe diabetic autonomic neuropathy associated with detrusor hypotonia or urinary retention.

Oncological Conditions and Previous Treatments: Pelvic cancer or its treatments may permanently alter pelvic anatomy and bladder tissue function.

Active urinary tract or gynecological cancer (bladder, prostate, urethra, uterus, or cervix).

History of pelvic radiotherapy. Current chemotherapy, due to systemic effects and potential bladder toxicity (such as cyclophosphamide).

Urological and Urogynecological Conditions: Local conditions that may confound the diagnosis of common urinary incontinence or require immediate surgical treatment.

Severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP), stages III or IV according to the POP-Q classification, as it may cause obstruction or overflow incontinence.

Urogenital fistulas (vesicovaginal or urethrovaginal), in which urine leakage is anatomical and continuous.

Urethral diverticula or severe urethral stenosis. Active bladder stones or untreated low-compliance bladder.

Severe or Unstable Systemic Diseases: Conditions that may pose a risk to the participant's health or adherence to the study, or that may produce symptoms that could be confused with urinary incontinence.

Decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF), which may cause marked nocturnal polyuria and edema, interfering with voiding diaries and assessment of nocturia.

Advanced chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] \<30 mL/min/1.73 m² or requiring dialysis).

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c >8.5% or 9%), due to osmotic polyuria that may mask actual urinary frequency and urgency.

Severe psychiatric disorders or moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (e.g., Alzheimer's disease) that may prevent valid informed consent or accurate completion of assessment tools, including voiding diaries and quality-of-life questionnaires.

Recent Pelvic Surgery

Recent urogynecological or prostate surgery (generally within 6 or 12 months before screening), such as radical prostatectomy, total hysterectomy, or placement of pelvic mesh or slings, as the tissue may still be undergoing healing and remodeling.

Conditions that may make adequate follow-up by the investigators difficult. Patients who have given birth within one year before study initiation, in order to avoid the influence of recent postpartum changes on pelvic floor musculature and urinary incontinence symptoms.

Patients who underwent prepartum treatment within one year before study initiation.

Concurrent participation in other clinical studies that may interfere with the objectives of the present study.

Withdrawal Criteria

Voluntary withdrawal of informed consent at any time, without the need to provide a reason.

Failure to comply with study procedures to an extent that prevents adequate data collection.

Occurrence of clinical or personal circumstances that, in the investigator's judgment, warrant withdrawal for safety or feasibility reasons.

Decision by the principal investigator for justified reasons related to study conduct.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Women with urinary incontinence

    Women with urinary incontinence whose clinical, functional, therapeutic, and daily-life data are analyzed retrospectively. Data include information from medical records, clinical assessment instruments, and wearable devices such as activity bracelets. Artificial intelligence and machine learning models will be applied to these data to identify factors associated with treatment response.

    Other: Artificial intelligence clinical decision support model

Interventions

  • OtherArtificial intelligence clinical decision support model

    Development and evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based clinical decision support model for women with urinary incontinence. The model will integrate clinical data obtained during routine care, measurements from clinical assessment instruments, patient-reported information from questionnaires, and daily-life data collected through wearable devices. The model is intended to identify patterns and factors associated with treatment response and to provide information that may support clinicians in the assessment and management of women with urinary incontinence. The study does not assign or modify the treatment received by participants, which is provided as part of routine clinical care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Severity of urinary incontinence (ICIQ-UI SF score)

    Total score on the ICIQ-UI SF (International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire - Urinary Incontinence Short Form), range 0-21, with higher scores indicating greater severity. Treatment response will be defined as an improvement ≥2.52 points (MCID).

    Time frame: Baseline (V0) through 12 months (V0, V1 at 3 months, V2 at 6 months, V3 at 12 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overactive bladder symptoms (ICIQ-OAB)

    Score on the ICIQ-OAB questionnaire (8 items), range 0-16; higher scores indicate greater impairment.

    Time frame: V0(Day 1), V1 (3 months), V2 (6 months), V3 (12 months)

  2. Incontinence severity - Sandvik Index (ISI)

    Score on the Incontinence Severity Index (2 items), range 0-12, classified as mild/moderate/severe/very severe.

    Time frame: V0(Day 1) and V2 (6 months)

  3. Lower urinary tract symptom-specific quality of life (ICIQ-LUTSqol)

    Score on the ICIQ-LUTSqol questionnaire (19 items), range 19-76; higher scores indicate greater impairment in quality of life.

    Time frame: V0(Day 1), V1 (3 months), V2 (6 months), V3 (12 months)

  4. Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

    Single-item scale (1-4) assessing the patient's global perception of symptom severity.

    Time frame: V0 (baseline)

  5. Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)

    Single-item scale (1-7) assessing the patient's global perception of improvement relative to baseline.

    Time frame: V1 (3 months), V2 (6 months), V3 (12 months)

  6. Sexual function (FSFI)

    Female Sexual Function Index (19 items, 6 domains), range 2-36; a cutoff score ≤26.55 indicates female sexual dysfunction.

    Time frame: V0(Day 1), V1 (3 months), V2 (6 months), V3 (12 months)

  7. Pelvic floor muscle function (Oxford Scale )

    Pelvic floor muscle contraction strength will be assessed by vaginal palpation using the Oxford Scale, ranging from 0 (no contraction) to 5 (strong contraction). The outcome will be reported as the Oxford Scale score.

    Time frame: V0(Day 1) and V2 (6 months)

  8. Amount of urine loss (1-hour Pad Test, ICS)

    Standardized 1-hour pad test; objective quantification of urine loss in grams.

    Time frame: V0(Day 1) and V2 (6 months)

  9. Voiding pattern (3-day Bladder Diary)

    Voiding pattern and urinary symptoms will be assessed using a 3-day bladder diary. The recorded variables will include daytime and nighttime voiding frequency, urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours, urgency episodes, voided urine volume, fluid intake, and pad use. Results will be reported for each recorded variable using the corresponding measurement unit.

    Time frame: V0(Day 1) and V2 (6 months)

  10. Treatment satisfaction

    Proportion of patients reporting satisfaction or high satisfaction with the treatment received, assessed via a satisfaction survey.

    Time frame: V1(3 months), V2(6 months), V3 (12 months)

  11. Contextual physical activity variables (wearables)

    physycal activity via a wearable device with local storage.

    Time frame: Continuous throughout the follow-up period (minimum 7 days)

  12. Contextual sleep variables (wearables)

    sleep duration via a wearable device with local storage.

    Time frame: Continuous throughout the follow-up period (minimum 7 days)

  13. Contextual daily heart rate (wearables)

    mean daily heart ratevia a wearable device with local storage.

    Time frame: Continuous throughout the follow-up period (minimum 7 days)

  14. Pelvic floor muscle function (PERFECT protocol)

    Pelvic floor muscle function will be assessed using the PERFECT protocol, including power, endurance, number of repetitions, number of fast contractions, co-contraction, and timing. Each component will be recorded according to the standardized PERFECT protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and 6 months

  15. Bladder symptoms assessed by the ICIQ-Bladder Diary (ICIQ-BD)

    Bladder symptoms will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Bladder Diary (ICIQ-BD). The outcome will be reported according to the scoring and variables specified by the ICIQ-BD instrument.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Clínica Cobian
    A Coruña, La Coruña 15009, Spain
08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 10, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 12 months later.

Of 100 non-industry observational studies under Urinary Incontinence, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 110 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 59.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 17, 2026
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2028
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07887464
Lead sponsor
Javier Pereira
Collaborators
Universidade da Coruña, Ministry of Work and Welfare - Xunta de Galicia
Responsible party
Javier Pereira (Principal Investigator, Universidade da Coruña) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Javier P Loureiro, computer science
Contact
javier.pereira@udc.es
881 01 55 21 ext. +34

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion