ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06550609Updated Feb 26, 2025

Treatment of Bolivian L Braziliensis Mucosal Leishmaniasis With Inhaled Pentamidine Plus Oral Miltefosine

A Phase 2 interventional study of Miltefosine Oral Capsule in Mucosal Leishmaniasis, sponsored by Fundacion Nacional de Dermatologia. Recruiting at 1 site in Bolivia. Open to participants aged 12 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-26.

Sponsored by Fundacion Nacional de Dermatologia · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2025; still recruiting 1 year 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a phase 2 study of the combination of inhaled-pentamidine plus oral miltefosine for Bolivian mucosal leishmaniasis.

Read the detailed description

The 3 major forms of leishmaniasis are visceral, cutaneous, and mucosal disease. Of these, mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) arguably poses the most difficult therapeutic problem. Although visceral disease (VL) occurs in perhaps 300,000 persons a year and is rapidly fatal since TH1 immunity is lacking, visceral disease is well-treated by drugs. Whereras cutaneous disease (CL) is the most prevalent major form occurring in perhaps 1,000,000 persons a year, TH1 Immunity is present and CL self-resolves in 3-18 months.

CL is treated to speed healing of the cutaneous lesion and, for certain species, to try to prevent dissemination of parasites to the oro-nasal mucosa resulting in mucosal leishmaniasis .

Mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) is estimated to occur as a late sequella in approximately 3% of L braziliensis CL. If there are approximately 130,000 cases per year of L braziliensis cutaneous disease, and 3% of these are succeeded by ML, the approximately 4,000 yearly cases of L braziliensis ML makes ML far less common than VL or CL. However, and in spite of more TH1 immunity than cutaneous disease, self-cure of ML is so rare as to be reportable. The patient with ML experiences inexorable erosion of the cartilage of the nose, pharynx, palate, and larynx. ML has been difficult to treat with classical agents (a cure rate of approximately 71%) Thus, of the 3 common forms of leishmaniasis, ML is the form that combines disease severity with poor response to chemotherapy.

Mucosal disease is perhaps the most chemotherapeutically challenging presentation of the leishmaniases. Unlike cutaneous disease, ML results in significant medical morbidity leading to marked psycho-social difficulty, and even mortality. Unlike visceral disease which although mortal quickly responds to therapy, ML is difficult to cure and relapses are common.

Drug combinations are now accepted approaches for many infectious diseases. Since 2 drugs already have the disadvantages of increased cost and potential increased toxicity, use of non-parenteral agents is an important consideration for any proposed combination. As the only recognized oral antileishmanial agent, miltefosine is the drug on which antileishmanial combinations have been based for visceral disease and for cutaneous disease [thermotherapy plus miltefosine: Soto personal communication].

The goal for a miltefosine-based combination for ML would be to raise the ML miltefosine cure rate for "mild" nasal disease to >90% and to raise the miltefosine cure rate for anatomically extensive disease to >58%. Inhaled pentamidine is a non-parenteral agent which in our pilot study was very successful for mild disease (86% cure) but unsuccessful for moderate or severe disease. The combination of oral miltefosine and inhaled pentamidine is a completely non-parenteral regimen that should lead to >90% cure of mild ML disease and could lead to an improved cure rate of moderate-severe disease. Although two drugs will be administered, adverse events should not be additive because miltefosine does not affect the respiratory tract and inhaled pentamidine is minimally absorbed.

This proof-of-concept phase 2 trial will enroll 20 moderate-to-severe ML patients. The primary endpoint is the cure rate for moderate-severe patients in comparison to literature values for miltefosine alone. If mild ML patients present, up to 10 will also be enrolled. The secondary endpoint is demonstrating that the cure rate for mild disease is 90%-100%.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mucosal Leishmaniasis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Leishmaniasis
  • Mucosal leishmaniasis
  • Miltefosine
  • Pentamidine
  • Combined therapy
03

In context

Leishmaniasis

185 studies on the registry are indexed under Leishmaniasis; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 79 across 134 interventional studies indexed under Leishmaniasis.

Browse Leishmaniasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundacion Nacional de Dermatologia is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Gender: Male or female
  • Age: >12 yrs of age
  • Weight: > 45 kg
  • Consent: Prior to any investigations
  • Mucosal disease: Involvement of the nares, nasal mucosa, palate, pharynx, larynx according to the ENT specialist.
  • Parasitology: Parasitological confirmation of the lesion (s) will be made by visualization of Leishmania, culture of Leishmania, or molecular identification of Leishmania (PCR) from the biopsy or aspirate of the lesion (s); or a positive Leishmanin skin test plus a scar characteristic of cutaneous leishmaniasis, plus the epidemiologic antecedent of living now or in the past, in an endemic area.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment for leishmaniasis: No specific or putatively specific therapy (Sb, pentamidine, amphotericin B, miltefosine, imidazoles, allopurinol) in the last 12 months. Patients may have been previously treated with the agents under investigation---miltefosine, pentamidine---if that treatment ended more than 12 months ago and the disease has not diminished in the last 6 months.
  • Other diseases: Concomitant diseases by history that would be likely in the PI's opinion to interact, either positively or negatively, with treatment.
  • Laboratory : Values of complete blood count, liver function (AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase), renal function (creatinine, BUN), pancreatic function (lipase), or uric acid beyond 1.5 x Normal Range and that in the PI's opinion would be clinically meaningful.
  • EKG: Clinically significant abnormalities.
  • Contraception: Women of childbearing age are required to practice reproductive contraception for 5 months after initiating therapy: abstinence or effective contraception defined as 2 forms of contraception [a barrier method (diaphragm, condom, or cervical cap with spermicidal foam, gel, or cream) plus a 2nd barrier method or hormonal contraceptive or intrauterine device] from day 1 through 5 months post therapy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Subjects treated

    Miltefosine TID for 28 days Inhaled pentamidine 300 mg on days 1,3,5,8,10,12,15,17,19,22

    Drug: Miltefosine Oral Capsule

Interventions

  • Miltefosine 3 pill per day during 28 days AND pentamidine inhaled 300 mg / d during 10 dosis

    Also known as: Pentamidine isethionate inhaled

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy

    Clinical Score.Qualification compromise in five places (nose skin, nose mucosa, mouh-palate mucosa, pharynx and larynx usind four signs ( erythema, inflamation, infiltration and ulceration) with this scale: 0= absen5t, 1=mild, 2= moderate and 3= severe. Maximun score: 60

    Time frame: 25 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    as Measured by the Number of Adverse Drug Reactions. Physical examination data will be listed at screening and at follow up time points. For laboratory data, the values that are below the lower limit or above the upper limit of the normal reference range will be flagged. Those values or changes in values, which are identified as being clinically significant, will be flagged and summarized separately. For physical examination data, any clinically relevant changes

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hospital de Clinicas
    La Paz, La Paz Department 00000, Bolivia
    • Sandra Encinas, MD · Contact · 76764100
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cincura C, de Lima CMF, Machado PRL, Oliveira-Filho J, Glesby MJ, Lessa MM, Carvalho EM. Mucosal leishmaniasis: A Retrospective Study of 327 Cases from an Endemic Area of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Sep;97(3):761-766. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0349. Epub 2017 Jul 19. PubMed 28722607 ↗
  • Piccica M, Lagi F, Bartoloni A, Zammarchi L. Efficacy and safety of pentamidine isethionate for tegumentary and visceral human leishmaniasis: a systematic review. J Travel Med. 2021 Aug 27;28(6):taab065. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taab065. PubMed 33890115 ↗
  • Soto J, Toledo J, Valda L, Balderrama M, Rea I, Parra R, Ardiles J, Soto P, Gomez A, Molleda F, Fuentelsaz C, Anders G, Sindermann H, Engel J, Berman J. Treatment of Bolivian mucosal leishmaniasis with miltefosine. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 1;44(3):350-6. doi: 10.1086/510588. Epub 2006 Dec 27. PubMed 17205440 ↗
  • Aronson N, Herwaldt BL, Libman M, Pearson R, Lopez-Velez R, Weina P, Carvalho E, Ephros M, Jeronimo S, Magill A. Diagnosis and Treatment of Leishmaniasis: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jan 11;96(1):24-45. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-84256. Epub 2016 Dec 7. No abstract available. PubMed 27927991 ↗
  • Carvalho JP, Silva SN, Freire ML, Alves LL, Souza CSA, Cota G. The cure rate after different treatments for mucosal leishmaniasis in the Americas: A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022 Nov 17;16(11):e0010931. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010931. eCollection 2022 Nov. PubMed 36395328 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 26, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06550609
Lead sponsor
Fundacion Nacional de Dermatologia
Responsible party
Jaime Soto (Principal Investigator, Fundacion Nacional de Dermatologia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2024
Start date
Feb 4, 2025
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 26, 2025

Study contacts

jaime soto, MD
Contact
Jasm.dlb@gmail.com
75648894
Paula Soto, MD
Contact
dra.paula.dermalaser@gmail.com
75648893

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Miltefosine

Start the discussion