ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06546579SCRAPEUpdated Aug 9, 2024

Sensitivity of Self-collected Skin Sampling for Scabies: a Pilot Study

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Skin sampling in Scabies, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-08-09.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this cross-sectional diagnostic study, healthy adults aged 18 and older with suspected, clinical, or confirmed scabies will be recruited. The objective is to determine if the sensitivity of self-collected skin samples for scabies diagnosis is non-inferior to professional sampling, and compare the sensitivity and specificity of the polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR) versus microscopy.

Read the detailed description

Scabies infestations have significantly increased globally in the last 10-20 years, including a threefold rise in the Netherlands over the past decade. Diagnosing scabies is challenging due to varied symptoms and low sensitivity of current microscopic methods. New diagnostic techniques like PCR, which offer higher sensitivity, are being investigated. The feasibility of self-collected skin samples is being explored to reduce the burden on healthcare services and address issues like autonomy, stigma, and privacy.

In this cross-sectional diagnostic study, healthy adults aged 18 and older with suspected, clinical, or confirmed scabies will be included. Primary endpoint is the sensitivity of self-collected versus professional skin samples for diagnosing scabies. Secondary endpoints include sensitivity of skin scrapings and swabs, and the sensitivity and specificity of PCR versus microscopy.

Participants will self-collect skin samples during a standard care visit. The process may be slightly sensitive but not painful. There are no direct benefits beyond standard care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Scabies

Browse trials for

03

In context

Scabies

51 studies on the registry are indexed under Scabies; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 144 is below the median of 183 across 41 interventional studies indexed under Scabies.

Browse Scabies studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 986 studies on the registry; 136 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years or older
  • Have either suspected scabies, clinical scabies or confirmed scabies (see table 1)
  • Providing (IC)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals not speaking or understanding the Dutch or English language.
  • Individuals who have been diagnosed with scabies in the last six weeks and had started treatment.
  • Individuals who have used ivermectin for other diagnoses than scabies in the last six weeks.
  • Individuals younger than 18 years.
  • Individuals with conditions (see appendix A).
  • Any other condition, finding or situation which, in the opinion of the investigator, may significantly increase the risk to the individual because of participation in the study, affect the ability of the individual to participate in the study or impair interpretation of the study data.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
144 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    All participants will be asked to perform self-sampling and irrespective of the result will receive current standard-of-care from their health care provider for their suspected scabies.

    Diagnostic Test: Skin sampling

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testSkin sampling

    All individuals will self-collect skin samples and swabs and fill in a questionnaire. Subsequently, all individuals will see a professional. The professional will collect skin samples and swabs as well.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The sensitivity of self-collected skin samples for diagnosing scabies

    The proportion of self-collected samples collected at the enrolment visit that are tested positive, divided by the total number of participants adjudged retrospectively to have had scabies at their enrolment visit, based on a composite clinical diagnosis.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

  2. The sensitivity of professionally-collected skin samples for diagnosing scabies

    The proportion of professionally-collected samples collected at the enrolment visit that are tested positive, divided by the total number of participants adjudged retrospectively to have had scabies at their enrolment visit, based on a composite clinical diagnosis.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

Secondary outcomes

  1. The sensitivity of skin scrapings for diagnosing scabies

    The proportion of skin scrapings at their enrolment visit (whether professionally or self-collected) that are tested positive by PCR, divided by the total number of participants adjudged retrospectively to have had scabies at baseline, based on a composite clinical diagnosis.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

  2. The sensitivity of skin swabs for diagnosing scabies

    The proportion of skin swabs at their enrolment visit (whether professionally or self-collected) that are tested positive by PCR, divided by the total number of participants adjudged retrospectively to have had scabies at baseline, based on a composite clinical diagnosis.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

  3. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR on skin scraping for diagnosing active scabies infection

    The proportion of participants adjudged to have had scabies at their enrolment visit (based on a retrospective composite clinical diagnosis), whose skin scraping at their enrolment visit (whether professionally or self-collected) are tested positive for scabies by PCR, and the proportion of participants adjudged retrospectively to have not had scabies at their enrolment visit whose skin scrapings are tested negative for scabies by PCR.

    Time frame: through study completion

  4. The sensitivity and specificity of microscopy on skin scraping for diagnosing active scabies infection

    The proportion of participants adjudged to have had scabies at their enrolment visit (based on a retrospective composite clinical diagnosis), whose skin scraping at their enrolment visit (whether professionally or self-collected) are tested positive for scabies by microscopy, and the proportion of participants adjudged retrospectively to have not had scabies at their enrolment visit whose skin scrapings are tested negative\* for scabies by microscopy.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

Other outcomes

  1. Proportion of participants whose self-sampling location is judged appropriate

    Assessed by a professional at T=0 \[adequate/non-adequate\]

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

  2. Motivation for self-collection of skin samples for scabies diagnostics

    Motivation is assessed by items on the questionnaire related to the motivation for self-collection of skin samples for scabies diagnostics, along with the associated facilitators and barriers.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

  3. Demographic, clinical and epidemiological factors which influence the sensitivity of self-collected skin samples for scabies diagnosis.

    Age, gender, highest level of education, signs/symptoms, living situation, skin color. source of transmission and transmission mode.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Aug 2024; primary completion for Jun 2025, 10 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 26, 2024
First posted
Aug 9, 2024
StartEst.
Aug 21, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 2025
Last update
Aug 9, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06546579
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 9, 2024
Start date
Aug 21, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 9, 2024

Study contacts

Matthew MC McCall, PhD
Contact
matthew.mccall@radboudumc.nl
024 361 1111 ext. +31
Saskia C van der Boor, PhD
Contact
saskia.vanderboor@radboudumc.nl
024 361 1111 ext. +31

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion