ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06529692Mi-SPAUpdated Sep 15, 2026

Michigan Split-belt Treadmill Training Program to Improve Long-Term Knee Biomechanics After ACL Reconstruction

An interventional study of Placebo Split-Belt Training and Split-Belt Training in ACL, Anterior Cruciate Ligament and ACL Injury, sponsored by University of Michigan. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 45 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by University of Michigan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 11 studies in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries by University of Michigan — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries · University of Michigan.

Planned enrollment
10th of 10
9 · median 31
Started
2025
the only one that year
No phase
9 of 11
1 open now
Registered
10th of 11
by date

Among the 11 studies in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries by University of Michigan, this one is the 10th largest by planned enrollment of the 10 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2025, is one of 9 with no phase, and was the 10th registered.

By phase

11 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study9 · 1 open
Observational1 · 0 open
Phase 21 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2009; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2025.

What they test

Size and results

Median enrollment 31 across the 10 interventional studies, 13 across the 1 observational. Of the 10 that completed or were terminated, 4 (40%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 11 studies in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries by University of Michigan, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The goal of this study is to gather pilot data to help inform a future clinical trial. As such, the investigators will employ a randomized clinical trial design, but data will only be collected on 9 total subjects. Nine subjects will be randomized to 2 split-belt intervention groups (one group where early stance loading is trained and the other where midstance loading is trained) and a placebo group.

The goal of this study is to explore the adaptations in knee loading from a 6-week split-belt training intervention.

The investigators' main question for this aim is:

  1. Does knee loading, measured by the sagittal plane knee moment, change to a greater extent in the split-belt treadmill training groups compared to the placebo group?
  2. Are there differences in training-related knee loading changes between individuals trained in the early stance vs. midstance loading split-belt training?
Read the detailed description

It is commonplace for individuals after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction to shift mechanical demands away from their surgical knee and limb. This manifests as diminished knee moments and vertical ground reaction forces in the ACL limb during everyday tasks (e.g., walking, running, standing, landing, etc.) and persists for as long as 2.5 years after surgery. This pattern of underloading is considered maladaptive, as it has been linked to re-injury and biological markers that are consistent with the development of post-traumatic osteoarthritis that affects over 50% of knees 10-20 years after surgical reconstruction.

Split-belt treadmill training is a gait retraining approach where treadmill belt speeds are decoupled (i.e., one belt is set to move at a faster or slower speed than the other belt) during walking. Split-belt training is based on well-established motor learning principles, such as error-based learning and variability of practice which can lead to locomotor adaptations. In healthy individuals, split-belt treadmill walking significantly increases (from baseline) knee moment impulses in the limb on the slow belt than on the fast belt during the braking and propulsive phases of gait. Split-belt treadmill training has also shown promise in individuals with neurological deficits, resulting in significant improvements in gait biomechanics after training.

To explore the adaptations in loading from a 6-week split-belt training intervention, the investigators will conduct a pilot randomized clinical trial design, but data will only be collected on 9 total subjects. Nine subjects will be randomized to one of 3 groups: 1) early stance split-belt treadmill training, 2) mid-stance split-belt treadmill training, or 3) placebo split-belt treadmill training. The primary outcome, sagittal plane knee moment, will be examined before, midway, \& after the 6-weeks of training. Other outcomes, vertical ground reaction force, knee joint contact force, and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, will be measured at the same timepoints. Medial and lateral knee cartilage thickness are additional outcomes that will only be assessed before and after training.

03

Conditions studied

  • ACL
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament
  • ACL Injury

Keywords

  • Biomechanics
  • Knee Loading
  • Split-Belt Treadmill
  • Asymmetric Walking
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • aged 14-45 years
  • suffered an acute, complete ACL rupture as confirmed by MRI and physical exam
  • have undergone ACL reconstruction w autograft within the past 10 months
  • willingness to participate in testing and follow-up as outlined in the protocol
  • English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • inability to provide written
  • female subjects who are pregnant or are planning to become pregnant (self-reported)
  • previous ACL injury
  • previous surgery to either knee
  • bony fracture accompanying ACL injury
  • patients who experienced a knee dislocation
  • patients who had their ACL reconstructed with an allograft
  • patients who underwent a multi-ligamentous and/or staged ACL reconstruction
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
9 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early Stance Training

    This study arm will complete 6-weeks of a split-belt treadmill training program. The program will require participants to walk on a split-belt treadmill 2 times a week for 20 minutes with the ACL leg walking at 150-170% of 1.1 m/s and the Non-ACL leg walking at 1.1 m/s.

    Behavioral: Split-Belt Training

  • Experimental
    Mid-Stance Training

    This study arm will complete 6-weeks of a split-belt treadmill training program. The program will require participants to walk on a split-belt treadmill 2 times a week for 20 minutes with the ACL leg walking at 30-50% of 1.1 m/s and the Non-ACL leg walking at 1.1 m/s.

    Behavioral: Split-Belt Training

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo Split-Belt Training

    This study arm will complete 6-weeks of a split-belt treadmill training program. The program will require participants to walk on a split-belt treadmill 2 times a week for 20 minutes with the ACL leg walking at a speed that is 10% different from 1.1 m/s and the Non-ACL leg walking at 1.1 m/s.

    Behavioral: Placebo Split-Belt Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralPlacebo Split-Belt Training

    Walking on a split-belt treadmill in which the belt under the ACL leg will move at a speed that is minimally slower than the other belt.

  • BehavioralSplit-Belt Training

    Walking on a split-belt treadmill in which the treadmill belt under the ACL leg will move at a speed faster or slower than the belt under the Non-ACL leg.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. ACL Leg Sagittal Plane Knee Moment

    Peak Sagittal Plane Knee Moment recorded during walking gait

    Time frame: Before training, midway through training (3 weeks), & after training (6 weeks)

Other outcomes

  1. Non-ACL Leg Sagittal Plane Knee Moment

    Peak Sagittal Plane Knee Moment recorded from the Non-ACL leg during walking gait

    Time frame: Before Training, midway through training (3 weeks), & after training (6 weeks)

  2. ACL Leg Vertical Ground Reaction Force

    Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force recorded from the ACL leg during walking gait

    Time frame: Before Training, midway through training (3 weeks), & after training (6 weeks)

  3. Non-ACL Leg Vertical Ground Reaction Force

    Peak Vertical Ground Reaction Force recorded from the Non-ACL leg during walking gait

    Time frame: Before Training, midway through training (3 weeks), & after training (6 weeks)

  4. ACL Leg Internal Knee Joint Contact Force

    Internal knee joint reaction force for the ACL limb estimated using musculoskeletal modeling

    Time frame: Before Training, midway through training (3 weeks), & after training (6 weeks)

  5. Non-ACL Leg Internal Knee Joint Contact Force

    Internal knee joint reaction force for the Non-ACL limb estimated using musculoskeletal modeling

    Time frame: Before Training, midway through training (3 weeks), & after training (6 weeks)

  6. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)

    The KOOS score is a percentage from 0-100, with 0 representing extreme knee problems and 100 representing no knee problems. A higher score indicates fewer knee issues, while a lower score indicates more.

    Time frame: Before Training, midway through training (3 weeks), & after training (6 weeks)

  7. Medial Cartilage Thickness

    Thickness of the cartilage from the medial femoral trochlea measured using ultrasound

    Time frame: Before (0 weeks) & after training (6 weeks)

  8. Lateral Cartilage Thickness

    Thickness of the cartilage from the lateral femoral trochlea measured using ultrasound

    Time frame: Before (0 weeks) & after training (6 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified data will be made publicly available via Deep Blue Data which is managed by the University of Michigan.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: We will strive to release data to the repository as rapidly as it is possible to analyze experiments and publish results. Data used in publications will be released at the time of publication.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 16 months after the start.

Of 277 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 286 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 70.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 26, 2024
First posted
Jul 31, 2024
StartActual
Aug 13, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06529692
Responsible party
Riann Palmieri-Smith (Professor, University of Michigan) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2024
Start date
Aug 13, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

Alexa Johnson, PhD
Contact
akjohns@umich.edu
734-615-1297
Riann M Palmieri-Smith, PhD, ATC
Contact
riannp@umich.edu
734-615-3154
Riann M Palmieri-Smith, PhD, ATC
principal investigator · University of Michigan
Chandramouli Krishnan, PT, PhD
principal investigator · University of Michigan

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion