ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07906860Updated Oct 30, 2026

Clinical and Biological Outcomes of BioBrace-Augmented ACL Reconstruction

An interventional study of BioBrace® Reinforced BioInductive Implant in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture, sponsored by Yonsei University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-30.

Sponsored by Yonsei University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 30, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective, single-center, single-arm observational cohort study aims to evaluate the clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic outcomes and safety of primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction augmented with the BioBrace® Reinforced BioInductive Implant. A total of 30 patients who decided to undergo BioBrace-augmented ACL reconstruction in routine clinical practice will be followed for up to 24 months postoperatively. Knee stability, graft maturation via MRI and second-look arthroscopy, patient-reported outcomes, and complications will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

The BioBrace® Reinforced BioInductive Implant is a bioresorbable scaffold composed of type I bovine collagen and poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA) microfilaments designed to provide mechanical reinforcement and facilitate tissue remodeling during graft healing. In this study, 30 skeletal mature patients receiving BioBrace-augmented primary ACL reconstruction will be evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Objective anterior and rotational stability will be measured using the KT-2000 arthrometer (side-to-side difference, SSD) and the pivot-shift test. Patient-reported outcome measures (VAS for pain, IKDC subjective score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale) will be recorded. Graft maturation will be assessed via 12-month postoperative MRI (measuring signal-to-noise quotient, SNQ, and structural integrity) and second-look arthroscopy during tibial implant removal at 24 months (using Ahn's Graft Maturation Score, GMS). Adverse events, graft failure/re-tear, and reoperation rates will be monitored throughout the 24-month follow-up period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Keywords

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
  • BioBrace
  • Bioinductive Implant
  • Graft Healing
  • KT-2000
  • Second-Look Arthroscopy
03

In context

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

523 studies on the registry are indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; 170 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 56 across 380 interventional studies indexed under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.

Browse Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Yonsei University is the lead sponsor of 1,417 studies on the registry; 240 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury confirmed by physical examination and MRI, scheduled for primary ACL reconstruction.
  2. Skeletally mature patients who are suitable for standard ACL reconstruction without physeal-sparing techniques.
  3. Patients who, during routine clinical practice prior to study enrollment, have already voluntarily decided to undergo BioBrace®-augmented primary ACL reconstruction after receiving full explanations regarding the purpose, expected benefits, risks, limitations of evidence, uncovered costs, and alternative treatment options.
  4. Patients who have received adequate explanation of the study objectives, procedures, potential risks, and benefits, and voluntarily signed written informed consent.
  5. Adults aged 19 years or older.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Revision ACL reconstruction in the affected knee.
  2. History of prior ligament reconstruction or major knee surgery in the ipsilateral knee that may significantly influence study outcomes.
  3. Contralateral knee with ACL tear, ACL deficiency, prior ACL reconstruction, or major knee surgery that may affect outcome assessment.
  4. Multi-ligament injuries requiring simultaneous ligament reconstruction other than the ACL.
  5. Requirement for concomitant major procedures that may affect clinical outcomes (e.g., osteotomy, meniscus allograft transplantation, cartilage restoration) other than standard meniscal repair or partial meniscectomy.
  6. Advanced osteoarthritis of the knee joint.
  7. Concomitant periarticular fracture of the knee requiring surgery, or a history of surgery for such fractures.
  8. Active infection, inflammatory arthritis, neuromuscular disorders, or other systemic conditions that may significantly affect tendon healing and postoperative rehabilitation.
  9. Known hypersensitivity or allergy to bovine-derived materials, polyethylene glycol, poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), or any component of the BioBrace® implant.
  10. Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
  11. Inability to adhere to the planned rehabilitation protocol or attend 24-month follow-up visits.
  12. Inability to provide voluntary written informed consent.
  13. Age younger than 19 years.
  14. Other medical or clinical conditions deemed inappropriate for participation by the principal investigator.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    2-mm subchondral drilling

    Patients undergoing primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction augmented with the BioBrace® Reinforced BioInductive Implant (5 x 250 mm). The implant is folded and incorporated alongside the prepared ACL graft, then fixed into the femoral and tibial bone tunnels. Concomitant meniscal surgery (repair or partial meniscectomy) or anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction is performed when clinically indicated.

    Device: BioBrace® Reinforced BioInductive Implant

Interventions

  • DeviceBioBrace® Reinforced BioInductive Implant

    BioBrace® Reinforced BioInductive Implant (5 x 250 mm; CONMED Corporation) is used as an augment for primary ACL reconstruction. The bioinductive scaffold is whipstitched at both ends, folded in half, positioned alongside the autograft/allograft tendon, and passed through femoral and tibial tunnels for standard fixation to reinforce early mechanical stability and facilitate graft maturation.

    Also known as: BioBrace, Bioinductive collagen-PLLA implant, BioBrace-augmented primary ACL reconstruction

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Side-to-Side Difference in Anterior Knee Laxity Measured by KT-2000 Arthrometer

    Anterior knee laxity is measured as the side-to-side difference (SSD, in millimeters) in anterior tibial translation between the injured and contralateral uninjured knee using the KT-2000 arthrometer under a 30-lb (134 N) anterior load at 30 degrees of knee flexion.

    Time frame: Up to 24 months postoperatively (assessed at preoperative baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery)

  2. Rotational Knee Stability Evaluated by Pivot-Shift Test

    Rotational knee stability evaluated by the manual pivot-shift test and graded according to International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) guidelines: Grade 0 (normal/equal), Grade 1 (glide), Grade 2 (clunk), Grade 3 (gross).

    Time frame: Up to 24 months postoperatively (assessed at preoperative baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Graft Signal-to-Noise Quotient (SNQ) on Postoperative MRI

    Graft maturation and signal intensity quantified by the signal-to-noise quotient (SNQ) on sagittal-oblique proton density-weighted fat-suppressed MRI images, calculated using the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) and background noise.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

  2. Structural Integrity and Graft Continuity on Postoperative MRI

    Evaluation of the reconstructed ACL graft structural continuity, categorized as intact, partial tear, or complete tear based on 12-month postoperative MRI findings.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

  3. Knee Pain Assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    Patient-reported pain severity measured on a Visual Analog Scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

  4. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Score

    Self-reported knee symptoms, function, and sports activities assessed using the IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form. Scores range from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

  5. Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale

    Evaluates knee function and daily activity symptoms (limp, support, locking, instability, pain, swelling, stair climbing, squatting). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better knee function.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

  6. Tegner Activity Scale

    Assesses the patient's activity and sports participation level. Scores range from 0 (sick leave or disability due to knee injury) to 10 (participation in competitive sports at national/international elite level). Higher scores indicate higher physical activity levels.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline, and 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bi AS, Hughes AJ, Savage-Elliott I, Lowe D, Meislin RJ. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Allograft Reconstruction Augmented With a Reinforced, Bioinductive Collagen Scaffold in the Setting of Multiligamentous Knee Injury. Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Jan 1;13(2):102865. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.09.034. eCollection 2024 Feb. PubMed 38435259 ↗
  • Pyrz K, Wood A, Campbell C, Brabston E, Evely T, Casp A, Momaya A. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Quadriceps Tendon Autograft: Surgical Technique Using Augmentation With a Biocomposite Scaffold. Arthrosc Tech. 2023 Nov 27;12(12):e2335-e2341. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.08.003. eCollection 2023 Dec. PubMed 38196875 ↗
  • Marks Benson E, Pyrz K, Wood A, Momaya A, Brabston E, Evely T, Casp A. Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction using Bone-Tendon-Bone Allograft: Surgical Technique Using Augmentation with Bio-Composite Scaffold. Arthrosc Tech. 2024 Jan 1;13(3):102877. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.11.005. eCollection 2024 Mar. PubMed 38584643 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — The plan to share individual participant data with other researchers has not yet been determined.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2028, 24 months later.

Of 241 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 248 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 70.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2026
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Apr 30, 2029
Last update
Oct 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 30, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 30, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07906860
Lead sponsor
Yonsei University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 30, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 30, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 30, 2026

Study contacts

Sung-Hwan Kim, M.D., Ph.D.
Contact
orthohwan@gmail.com
+82-2-2228-2180
Seung Hoon Baik, Clinical Fellow
Contact
bsh4508@gmail.com
+82-10-6691-8492

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion