CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06529380Updated Mar 27, 2026

Deep Brain Stimulation for Severe Self-Injurious Behaviour in Children

An interventional study of DBS ON and DBS OFF in Self-Injurious Behavior and Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by The Hospital for Sick Children · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Deep Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Severe Refractory Self-Injurious Behaviour in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Trial

To evaluate the effectiveness of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens for the treatment of severe refractory, repetitive self-injurious behavior (SIB) in children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Secondary objectives are to examine the effects of DBS on subtypes of SIB through functional analysis.

Read the detailed description

The proposed study is a single-center, double-blinded, block-randomized crossover trial.

Twenty-five (25) participants will be recruited and enrolled in this trial to undergo bilateral nucleus accumbens DBS. After recovery, participants will be randomized to a 3 month block of active stimulation or the DBS will remain off. After a two week washout period, the participants will cross over to the other group. At the end of the second block, all patients will have their DBS devices activated during an open label period. All participants will have baseline assessments that will be repeated at the end of each block.

Expected study duration is 24 months.

02

Conditions studied

  • Self-Injurious Behavior
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder

Keywords

  • deep brain stimulation
  • DBS
  • ASD
  • SIB
  • nucleus accumbens
03

In context

Self-Injurious Behavior

249 studies on the registry are indexed under Self-Injurious Behavior; 92 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 25 is below the median of 66 across 212 interventional studies indexed under Self-Injurious Behavior.

Browse Self-Injurious Behavior studies →

Lead sponsor

The Hospital for Sick Children is the lead sponsor of 568 studies on the registry; 81 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 5-17 at the time of enrollment
  • DSM-5 diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • History of repetitive self-injurious behaviour, as reported by parents and documented on clinical assessment, either at the time of enrollment into the study or in prior medical records. The definition of self-injury is contextual, but requires ongoing, intermittent or continuous manifestation of self-mediated physical injury to the child.
  • Foreseeable risk of serious future self-harm.
  • Screening by study team for presence automatically reinforced self-injurious behaviour (ASIB) subtype 2 or subtype 3 based on caregiver history.
  • Failure or non-eligibility of medical therapy with ongoing repetitive self-injurious behaviours, at 6 months or more after initiation of therapy.
  • Parents or legal guardians, including caregivers, informed and able to provide written consent.
  • Able to comply with all testing, follow-up visits, and study appointments and protocols for 12 months following the end of the duration of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Substance dependence or abuse in the last 6 months, excluding caffeine and nicotine.
  • Any contraindication to MRI scanning.
  • Presence of cardiac arrhythmias, or other cardiac, respiratory, renal or endocrine conditions that may incur significant risk from a surgical procedure.
  • Pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1 (DBS ON, then OFF)

    Group 1: DBS will be switched ON in Block 1 (three months) after the initial four-week post-operative period. The DBS device will then be turned OFF for two weeks ("washout period"). The device will remain OFF in Block 2 (three months).

    Device: DBS ON · Device: DBS OFF

  • Placebo comparator
    Group 2 (DBS OFF, then ON)

    Group 2: DBS will remain OFF in Block 1 (three months) after the initial four-week post-operative period. The device will remain off for two weeks thereafter ("washout period"). DBS will be switched ON in Block 2 (three months).

    Device: DBS ON · Device: DBS OFF

Interventions

  • DeviceDBS ON

    Electrical stimulation of the nucleus accumbens.

  • DeviceDBS OFF

    DBS will remain OFF (on at 0V).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Repetitive Behaviors Scale-Revised (RBS-R)

    A 44-item questionnaire that asks parents/caregivers how often a particular behaviour is seen occurring in the participant on a scale of 0-3, as well as a summary measure of how often the repetitive behaviours occur overall on a scale of 1-100. Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 30 weeks, 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Self-injurious behaviour log

    Parent/caregiver-reported frequency of repetitive self-injurious events over a given time period (i.e. number of events per day)

    Time frame: Baseline (3 months), weekly during trial

  2. Repetitive Behaviour Questionnaire-2 (RBQ-2)

    A 20-item parent/caregiver questionnaire that measures the frequency of a child's repetitive, restricted, and sensory behaviours. Questionnaire scores can be added to give a Total Repetitive Behaviours Score, within a minimum score of 20 and a maximum score of 60 (with responses '3' and '4' combined). Higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 30 weeks, 52 weeks

  3. Self-Injurious Behavior Questionnaire (SIB-Q)

    A 25-item scale with Likert-style response options that measures self-injurious behavior among those with developmental disabilities. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 30 weeks, 52 weeks

  4. Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Questionnaire

    A parent questionnaire designed to evaluate health-related quality of life in children. Scores range from 0 to 92, with higher scores indicating poorer quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 30 weeks, 52 weeks

  5. Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) Assessment questionnaire

    A standardized, activity-based assessment designed to evaluate communication skills, social interaction, and imaginative use of materials in individuals who are suspected to have autism spectrum disorder. Classifications: * Non-spectrum: communication \<1, social interaction \<3, communication + social \<6 * Autism spectrum: communication \>2, AND social interaction \>4, AND communication + social 7-9 * Autism: communication \>3, AND social interaction \>6, AND communication + social \>10 Higher scores indicate a greater presence of behaviours associated with autism spectrum disorder.

    Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks, 30 weeks

  6. Modified Overt Aggression Scale (MOAS) questionnaire

    A brief survey of overt aggression. Scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 30 weeks, 52 weeks

  7. The Burden Scale for Family Caregivers - Short Version (BSFC-S) questionnaire

    A brief survey of parental burden of care. Scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating a greater burden.

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 16 weeks, 30 weeks, 52 weeks

  8. Functional analysis (FA) assessment

    An observation-based behavioural assessment that requires observing and quantifying how self-injurious behaviour (SIB) changes across conditions of a standardized and replicable assessment.

    Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks, 30 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The Hospital for Sick Children
    Toronto, Ontario M5G1X8, Canada
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Mithani K, Sauter S, Hagopian LP, Breitbart S, Sriharan S, Kisteroff F, Huynh M, Malik S, Thorpe KE, Huber J, Gorodetsky C, Ibrahim GM. Electrical Stimulation of the Nucleus Accumbens for Severe, Refractory Self-Injurious Behaviour in Children (EASE-SIB): protocol for a randomised double-blinded crossover trial. BMJ Open. 2026 Apr 20;16(4):e110222. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-110222. PubMed 42009381 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — De-identified data from the clinical trial will be made available upon reasonable request, subject to institutional approval and, where applicable, the execution of a Data Sharing Agreement. Requests for data access should be directed to the corresponding author.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06529380
Lead sponsor
The Hospital for Sick Children
Responsible party
George Ibrahim (Principal Investigator, The Hospital for Sick Children) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2024
Start date
Sep 11, 2024
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

George M Ibrahim, MD
Contact
george.ibrahim@sickkids.ca
416-813-7500
George M Ibrahim, MD
principal investigator · The Hospital for Sick Children

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion