An interventional study of Intensive Crisis Intervention (ICI) and Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Unit (APIU) in Suicide, Suicidal Ideation and Suicide, Attempted, sponsored by Jennifer Hughes. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-21.
Sponsored by Jennifer Hughes · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The study's purpose is to improve the clinical management of severe crises experienced by youth with psychiatric disorders by examining a brief, evidence-based alternative to inpatient psychiatric care.
The objective of this study is to refine and test Intensive Crisis Intervention (ICI), a brief, evidence-based treatment that incorporates Family Therapy/Parent Training, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Motivational Interviewing to target family functioning in reducing adolescent suicidal behavior. The project's main goal is to examine feasibility, acceptability, research implementation procedures, and preliminary effectiveness of ICI using a mixed-methods approach. The investigators will utilize the extensive catchment area of Nationwide Children's Hospital Behavioral Health (NCH-BH) to complete this work. NCH-BH has a Youth Crisis Stabilization Unit (YCSU) in which ICI can be implemented and compared with outcomes from a traditional adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit (Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Unit [APIU]).
In Year 1, the investigators will further develop and refine an intervention implementation guide, including a formalized treatment manual, training and supervision protocols, and data collection processes. They will then pilot test implementation of ICI with 20 adolescents divided across the study age range of 12-17 years, 20 parents, and 16 providers. After refinement of ICI based on findings from the pilot, the investigators will recruit, assess and randomly assign 60 youth with suicidal ideation and/or behavior who are eligible for admission to both the YCSU and APIU to the YCSU (n=30) or APIU (n=30).
The central hypothesis is that ICI will be acceptable to families and show greater improvements in the investigators' proposed mechanism of change, family functioning, compared with results of traditional inpatient treatment, assessing outcomes at discharge, 30-day, and 3-month follow-up. The investigators have the following three specific aims:
Specific Aim 1: To develop, refine and pilot test ICI, including the ICI treatment manual, training, and supervision protocols, for youth with suicidal ideation and/or behavior, and to evaluate whether the proposed research implementation procedures are feasible and acceptable to adolescents, parents, and providers.
Specific Aim 2: To conduct a small randomized controlled trial to examine preliminary acceptability and effectiveness of the ICI intervention on the basis of primary outcomes (consumer satisfaction, family functioning) and secondary outcomes (suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, emergency department (ED)/inpatient admission, hopelessness, and therapeutic alliance).
Hypothesis 2a: ICI will result in higher consumer satisfaction compared to traditional inpatient treatment.
Hypothesis 2b: ICI will result in greater improvements in family functioning at discharge, 30-days, and 3-month follow-up compared to improvements made after traditional inpatient treatment.
Hypothesis 2c: ICI will result in lower rates of suicidal ideation, attempts, ED/inpatient admissions, lower hopelessness scores, and higher ratings of therapeutic alliance compared to traditional inpatient treatment.
Specific Aim 3: To identify barriers to and facilitators of implementation and sustainability of ICI using qualitative interviews and surveys with families, and clinical and organizational stakeholders.
During the RCT phase, there may be situations where the enrolled patient participant does not receive the randomized treatment due to clinical or hospital system factors. Example situations could include, but are not limited to:
Patient/parent participants will remain enrolled in the study and complete study measures and follow-up visits even if they do not receive their randomized treatment. Given the anticipated challenges with participants receiving the randomized condition we have planned the following analytic strategies:
Upon informed consent and baseline completion, participants will be randomized per protocol. Randomization outcome will be documented and conveyed to the clinical team. Study staff, via chart review, will monitor the participant's referral status and whether the participant is referred and successfully transferred to the randomized unit (i.e., APIU or YCSU). If a participant's referral status is changed for any reasons (e.g., due to waitlists or due to additional clinical information that changes the recommendation), study staff will document this change and the reason for change. Study staff will then categorize participant's intervention status as follows:
569 studies on the registry are indexed under Suicidal Ideation; 203 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 213 is above the median of 80 across 469 interventional studies indexed under Suicidal Ideation.
Browse Suicidal Ideation studies →Jennifer Hughes is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Compared within Suicidal Ideation, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Suicide. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
YCSU clinicians, PCD staff, and NCH-BH leaders will be invited to participate based on their roles in the system-of-care.
Patient participant was transferred to either YCSU or APIU according to randomization
Behavioral: Intensive Crisis Intervention (ICI) · Behavioral: Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Unit (APIU)
Patient participant transferred to a non-randomized unit, either YCSU or APIU, due to clinical or hospital system factors.
Behavioral: Intensive Crisis Intervention (ICI) · Behavioral: Adolescent Psychiatric Inpatient Unit (APIU)
Patient participant was discharged without receiving either intervention due to clinical factors
ICI is a brief (Average Length of Stay \[ALOS\]: M±SD=4.5±1.4 days), intensive family-centered, skills-based alternative to traditional inpatient psychiatric care. Adolescents participate in 2-3 individual sessions and 1-2 family sessions daily. Based on the cognitive-behavioral model of suicidality, ICI emphasizes that learned, maladaptive cognitive, behavioral, and affective responses to stressors contributing to suicidal behavior can be changed. Master's-level clinicians facilitate this process by engaging adolescents and their families in developing more effective coping skills when faced with potential triggers to suicidal crises.
Also known as: ICI
APIU provides comprehensive assessment and treatment services to children and adolescents with significant psychiatric difficulties and to their families using a multidisciplinary approach. Symptoms and behaviors that led to admission are targeted through a milieu-based model of care and therapeutic group programming. The multidisciplinary treatment team includes a child and adolescent psychiatrist, often in collaboration with an advanced practice provider, psychologist, psychiatric nursing staff including trained mental health specialists, behavioral healthcare clinicians, care managers, rehabilitative care staff, teachers, and parent partners. Average length of stay is 9-11 days. An individualized treatment plan is developed by the entire treatment team, including the patient and caregivers, and includes initial planning for discharge with the primary treatment goal being stabilization of acute psychiatric symptoms. Programming is based on a trauma-informed biopsychosocial approach.
Also known as: APIU
Youth's perspective on the value of services received on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is an 8-item, easily scored and administered measurement that is designed to measure client satisfaction with services. The CSQ-8 uses a 4-point Likert scale. Scores are summed across items once. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction. The items for the CSQ-8 were selected on the basis of ratings by mental health professionals of items that could be related to client satisfaction and by subsequent factor analysis. The CSQ-8 is unidimensional, yielding a homogeneous estimate of general satisfaction with services. The CSQ-8 has been extensively studied, and while it is not necessarily a measure of a client's perceptions of gain from treatment or outcome, it does elicit the client's perspective on the value of services received.
Time frame: Post-discharge (day of discharge or as soon as possible after intervention ends)
Parent's perspective on the value of services received on the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) is an 8-item, easily scored and administered measurement that is designed to measure client satisfaction with services. The CSQ-8 uses a 4-point Likert scale. Scores are summed across items once. Items 2, 4, 5, and 8 are reverse scored. Total scores range from 8 to 32, with the higher number indicating greater satisfaction. The items for the CSQ-8 were selected on the basis of ratings by mental health professionals of items that could be related to client satisfaction and by subsequent factor analysis. The CSQ-8 is unidimensional, yielding a homogeneous estimate of general satisfaction with services. The CSQ-8 has been extensively studied, and while it is not necessarily a measure of a client's perceptions of gain from treatment or outcome, it does elicit the client's perspective on the value of services received.
Time frame: Post-discharge (day of discharge or as soon as possible after intervention ends)
Change from baseline in family functioning on the Systemic Clinical Outcome and Routine Evaluation - 15 (SCORE-15) at post-discharge, 30 days, and 3 month follow-ups
The SCORE-15 is a self-report measure of family functioning and has been proved to be a reliable and valid index of therapeutic change. The SCORE-15 has 15 Likert scale items (5-point scale; 1=Describes us very well; 5=Describes us not at all), and six separate indicators, three of them qualitative.
Time frame: Baseline, post-discharge (day of discharge or as soon as possible after intervention ends), 30 days, 3 months
Change from baseline in suicidal ideation and behavior on the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at 30 days and 3 months
The C-SSRS is a validated, semi-structured interview that assesses both suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation (yes/no, frequency), with flexible time points and multiple informants depending on administrator purpose and need.
Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 3 months
Suicidal behavior and intent on the Pierce Suicide Intent Scale (SIS) based on most recent attempt reported on the C-SSRS at baseline for Pilot Phase only
The SIS is a questionnaire that assesses behavior and circumstances surrounding the suicide attempt, including plans, preparation, communicative elements, and concept of lethality of the chosen method.
Time frame: Based on most recent attempt from C-SSRS at baseline for Pilot Phase only
Change from baseline in acute care services for suicidality on a modified version of the Services Assessment for Children and Adolescents (SACA) at 30 days and 3 months
The SACA is a questionnaire completed with parents that asks questions related to any treatment or help the child participant has received for emotional, behavioral, or drug or alcohol problems at baseline. The SACA is then updated at 30 day and 3 month follow-ups to assess for any change in mental health service utilization since last visit.
Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 3 months
Change from baseline in hopelessness on the Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) at 30 days and 3 months
The Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS) examines an individual's thoughts and beliefs about the future. The 20 true-false items measure three major aspects of hopelessness: feelings about the future, loss of motivation, and expectations. Scores on the BHS range from 0 to 20, with higher total scores indicating greater hopelessness. The hopelessness construct is highly correlated with measures of depression, suicidal intent, and ideation
Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 3 months
Change from baseline in psychiatric symptoms and functioning on the DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure at 30 days and 3 months
The DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure assesses mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. This child-rated version of the measure consists of 25 questions that assess 12 psychiatric domains, including depression, anger, irritability, mania, anxiety, somatic symptoms, inattention, suicidal ideation/attempt, psychosis, sleep disturbance, repetitive thoughts and behaviors, and substance use. Each item asks the child, age 11-17, or parent/caregiver to rate how much (or how often) the child has been bothered by the specific symptom during the past 2 weeks. The measure was found to be clinically useful and had good test-retest reliability. Nineteen of the items are rated on a 5-point scale (0=none or not at all; 1=slight or rare, less than a day or two; 2=mild or several days; 3=moderate or more than half the days; and 4=severe or nearly every day). The suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and substance abuse items are each rated on a "Yes or No" scale.
Time frame: Baseline, 30 days, 3 months
Youth's report of change from baseline in anxiety and depression on the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale, Short Version (RCADS-25) at post-discharge, 30 days, and 3 months
The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) is a 25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and low mood. The scale has two subscales (Total Anxiety and Total Depression) and an overall score. Both the anxiety and depression subscales have strong relation to anxiety and depression diagnostic groups. All items assess the frequency of symptoms and are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1=Never; 4=Always). The child self-report scale can be used by children and adolescents between the ages of 8 to 18.
Time frame: Baseline, post-discharge (day of discharge or as soon as possible after intervention ends), 30 days, 3 months
Parent's report on youth's change from baseline in anxiety and depression on the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale, Short Version (RCADS-25) at post-discharge, 30 days, and 3 months
The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) is a 25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and low mood. The scale has two subscales (Total Anxiety and Total Depression) and an overall score. Both the anxiety and depression subscales have strong relation to anxiety and depression diagnostic groups. All items assess the frequency of symptoms and are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (1=Never; 4=Always). A parent (or caregiver) version is available to rate a child or adolescent's level of anxiety and depressive symptoms based on personal observations.
Time frame: Baseline, post-discharge (day of discharge or as soon as possible after intervention ends), 30 days, 3 months
Therapeutic alliance reported on the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) at post-discharge
The Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised (WAI-SR) is a 12-item measure for the assessment of the therapeutic alliance. The WAI-SR captures three key alliance aspects: (a) agreement on the tasks of therapy, (b) agreement on the goals of therapy and (c) development of an affective bond. The WAI-SR uses a 5-point Likert Scale (1=Seldom; 5=Always).
Time frame: Post-discharge (day of discharge or as soon as possible after intervention ends)
Adherence to therapy intervention on the Therapist Behavior Rating Scale - Competence (TBRS-C)
The Therapist Behavior Rating scale is an adherence process coding instrument designed to identify core therapeutic techniques and behaviors in facilitating multidimensional family therapy. This study uses just the 4-item Competence subscale of the measure to rate the therapy adherence. The instrument uses a 7-point Likert scale (1=Not at all; 7=Extensively).
Time frame: Through study completion
Adherence to therapy intervention on the Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS)
The Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS) is an observer-rated measure of cognitive behavioral therapy treatment fidelity. The instrument uses a 7-point Likert scale (0=Poor; 6=Excellent) for 11 therapy skill-specific items, with 7 additional items of varying scales and 2 text fill-in items to rate overall treatment.
Time frame: Through study completion
Adherence to therapy intervention on the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) scale
The Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) coding instrument is an observer-rated measure of motivational interviewing treatment fidelity. The MITI includes 4 global score items using a 5-point rating scale and 10 behavior count items. Global scores range from a minimum of "1" and a maximum of "5." Higher scores on the global scores and higher behavior counts indicate greater fidelity to the motivational interviewing treatment.
Time frame: Through study completion
Hospital staff participants' reports on intervention acceptability on the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) is a widely used 4-item measure that can be administered to a wide range of stakeholders to determine the extent to which they believe an intervention is acceptable. The measure uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely disagree; 5=Completely agree).
Time frame: Month 14 or 31 of study, dependent on study phase and staff role in study
Hospital staff participants' reports on intervention appropriateness on the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a widely used 4-item measure that can be administered to a wide range of stakeholders to determine the extent to which they believe an intervention is appropriate. The measure uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely disagree; 5=Completely agree).
Time frame: Month 14 or 31 of study, dependent on study phase and staff role in study
Hospital staff participants' reports on intervention feasibility on the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM)
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) is a widely used 4-item measure that can be administered to a wide range of stakeholders to determine the extent to which they believe an intervention is feasible. The measure uses a 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely disagree; 5=Completely agree).
Time frame: Month 14 or 31 of study, dependent on study phase and staff role in study
Plan to share: Yes — Data will be made available through the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA) system.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan
Time frame: The investigators will follow NIMH guidelines for dissemination of study data and related materials.
Access criteria: To be provided.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Jennifer Hughes