CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06528600Updated Jul 30, 2024

Comparative Study of Two Hyaluronic Acid Formulation in the Management of Knee Osteoarthritis

An interventional study of Hymovis ONE and Monovisc in Osteoarthritis, Knee, sponsored by Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a.. Completed at 19 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-30.

Sponsored by Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2020, registered May 2024).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
350
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of a single injection of Hymovis ONE®, a sodium hyaluronate formulation, to Monovisc™, another sodium hyaluronate formulation, for the treatment of pain from osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients who have not responded to non-pharmacological therapies or analgesic regimens. This study consists of a 2-week period for screening, one baseline treatment visit, and a 26- week evaluation phase. Subjects will be randomized to receive a single intra-articular (IA) injection of either Hymovis ONE® or Monovisc™ into the knee using an 18-20 gauge needle.

Read the detailed description

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, non-inferiority study to assess the efficacy and safety of a single injection of Hymovis ONE® for the relief of pain in subjects with OA of the knee by establishing its non-inferiority to Monovisc™.

The entire study will last approximately 19 months. Patients will participate in the study for approximately 28 weeks (from screening to the last visit).

The study is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of a single injection of Hymovis ONE® to a single injection of Monovisc™. Both products are high molecular weight HA preparations, specifically sodium hyaluronate from bacterial fermentation, supplied sterile as a single dose of 4 ml in a 5 ml syringe.

Subjects will undergo an evaluation consisting of a thorough discussion of medical history, demographics, followed by a physical examination and vital signs (blood pressure and heart rate) measurement.

The evaluation of their activity level through the Tegner activity level scale, a graduated list of ADLs, recreation, and competitive sports will be performed. The patient is asked to select the level of participation that best describes their current level of activity through an Investigator's interview. The Tegner activity level scale is filled in by Investigator.

In this study, one single IA injection of Hymovis ONE® or Monovisc™ will be performed at the investigational site, under the tight supervision of an experienced treating specialist. Therefore, there are no expected risks of misuse in the administration of the investigational products according to treatment schedule defined in the study protocol. Furthermore, the use of only one IA injection should further contribute to limit the risk of adverse effects. Therefore, it is expected that benefits from participation in this study will outweigh the potential risks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Knee
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 583 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 350 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a. is the lead sponsor of 30 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Female and male subjects ≥ 40 and ≤ 75 years of age
  2. Body mass index (BMI) ≥20 and \<35 kg/m2
  3. Tegner score ≥3
  4. Subjects with primary knee OA of the medial or lateral femorotibial compartment with symptoms at screening and for at least 3 months prior to screening according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria and who have not responded to conservative non-pharmacologic treatment or simple analgesic regimens
  5. Subjects with Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) radiological grade 2 or 3 in the target knee
  6. Subjects with at least one X-Ray image of the target knee taken at screening or within 6 months prior to the screening.
  7. Subjects with OA pain intensity meeting the criteria below:

    • Subjects demonstrating at both the screening (V0) and the baseline (V1) visit, pain intensity in the target knee of 2 - 3 and in the contralateral knee 0 as measured by the WOMAC LK3.1 A1 Pain subscale (walking on a flat surface)
  8. Willingness to discontinue oral and topical analgesics including NSAIDs and accept "rescue" paracetamol as the only medicine for joint pain prior to the injection and throughout the study. "Rescue" medication will be discontinued 24 hours before any study visit
  9. Subjects able to understand and willing and able to comply with study procedures
  10. Subjects able to provide informed consent
  11. If female of childbearing potential, must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and agree to use a reliable form of contraception throughout the study*.

Note: To be considered of non-childbearing potential, females must be surgically sterile or postmenopausal for at least 1 year.

*Highly effective birth control methods include: combined hormonal contraception containing estrogen and progestogen) associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, intravaginal, transdermal); progestogen-only hormonal contraception associated with inhibition of ovulation (oral, injectable, implantable); intrauterine device (IUD); intrauterine ormone-releasing system (IUS); bilateral tubal occlusion; vasectomised partner; sexual abstinence.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to perform a 50-foot walk test
  2. Subjects with secondary (post-traumatic) knee OA of the target joint
  3. Subjects with K-L radiological grade 1 or 4 in the target knee
  4. Subjects with known X-ray findings of acute fractures, severe loss of bone density, avascular necrosis, and /or severe bone or joint deformity in the target knee
  5. Clinically apparent tense effusion of the target knee on examination (determined by either a positive bulge sign or ballottement of the patella (patellar tap))
  6. Subjects with osteonecrosis of either knee
  7. Subjects with a history of knee joint replacement or arthroplasty of the target knee
  8. Subjects with a history of arthroscopy of the target knee in the past 6 months
  9. Subjects with a history of osteotomy or surgery of the target or contralateral knee and any other weight-bearing joint that would have interfered with knee assessment
  10. Subjects with acute, recurrent synovitis, or any inflammatory conditions in the target knee
  11. Subjects with any significant injury to the target knee in the last 6 months (as per Investigator judgment)
  12. Subjects with any musculoskeletal condition affecting the target knee that would impair the proper assessment of the

    Investigational Medical Device (IMD) performance in the target knee as assessed by the Investigator such as:

    1. severe varus/valgus deformity (>15°)
    2. predominantly patellofemoral pain syndrome
  13. Subjects with health condition associated with pain which may interfere with study variables evaluation
  14. Subjects with a known history or present evidence of conditions which may affect the target knee assessments, like rheumatic disease, lupus arthropathy, infective or metabolic joint diseases; recurrent clinical chondrocalcinosis; crystal arthropathies; osteoarticular pathologies differing from arthrosis; acromegaly; haemochromatosis; Wilson's disease; primary osteochondromatosis; heritable disorders; collagen gene mutations
  15. Subjects with gout or calcium pyrophosphate (pseudogout) diseases of the target knee with flare-ups within 6 months prior to screening
  16. Subjects with fibromyalgia, pes anserine bursitis, lumbar radiculopathy and/or neurogenic or vascular claudication
  17. Subject with significant anterior knee pain due to the diagnosed isolated patellar-femoral syndrome or chondromalacia in the target knee
  18. Subjects with symptomatic OA of the hips, spine or ankle that interferes with the evaluation of the target knee
  19. Subjects with venous or lymphatic stasis in the relevant limb
  20. Subjects with a history of the following treatments:

    1. IA corticosteroids in any joints in the past 3 months
    2. Systemic (both oral and parenteral) and topical corticosteroids at the target knee in the past 30 and 90 days, respectively
    3. Topical anti-inflammatory agents and analgesics applied at the target knee in the past 48 hours
    4. Viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid or joint-lavage in the target knee in the past 6 months
    5. Physical therapy started in the past 3 months in the target knee. Subjects having started a physical therapy from more than 3 months can take part in the study
    6. Change in the dosage of symptomatic slow-acting supplements for OA such as glucosamine, chondroitin sulfate, diacerhein, or other supplements such as avocado or soya extracts, etc. in the last month
    7. Chronic or recurrent use of narcotic analgesics
  21. Subjects with a history of chronic or recurrent use of NSAIDs/analgesics/narcotics because of diseases different from OA of the target knee
  22. Subjects treated with agents which alter the perception of pain such as hypnotics, muscle relaxants, anxiolytics if the intake has started less than 8 days before screening
  23. Subjects with a history of recurrent severe allergic or immune-mediated reactions or other immune disorders
  24. Subjects with vascular insufficiency of lower limbs or peripheral neuropathy severe enough to interfere
  25. Subjects with active liver disease
  26. Subjects with any clinically significant laboratory values which, based on investigator judgment and subject clinical history, may affect study evaluation
  27. Subjects who currently use heparin or anti-vitamin K (e. g. crystalline warfarin) anticoagulant therapy
  28. Subjects with infections, wounds, bruising, disease or trauma in the area of the injection site or joint
  29. Subjects with suspected or known history of hypersensitivity to paracetamol, lidocaine, hyaluronic acid or to hyaluronate preparations or gram-positive bacterial proteins
  30. Subjects with any surgical procedures scheduled in the next 6 months
  31. Subjects who have participated in a clinical study or investigation in the last 3 months
  32. Pregnant or lactating women, and women of childbearing potential unwilling to use adequate contraception and conduct a pregnancy test at screening.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
350 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Hymovis One

    Treatment with 4 mL of Hymovis ONE® in the Intra-articular space

    Device: Hymovis ONE

  • Active comparator
    Monovisc

    Treatment with 4 mL of Monovisc™ in the Intra-articular space

    Device: Monovisc

Interventions

  • DeviceHymovis ONE

    Single injection of Hymovis ONE®, a sodium hyaluronate formulation, for the treatment of pain from osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients who have not responded to non-pharmacological therapies or analgesic regimens

  • DeviceMonovisc

    Single injection of Monovisc™ a sodium hyaluronate formulation, for the treatment of pain from osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients who have not responded to non-pharmacological therapies or analgesic regimens

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain relief compared to baseline

    Change From Baseline (CFB) in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) LK3.1 A1 Pain subscale (walking on a flat surface) score

    Time frame: week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient respons to treatment

    "Patient Success" is defined by OMERACT-OARSI criteria: (1) improvement in pain or physical function ≥50% and an absolute change ≥20; or (2) improvement of ≥20% with an absolute change of≥ 10 in at least two of the following three categories: pain, physical function, and patient's global assessment

    Time frame: Week 12 and 26

  2. Pain relief compared to baseline

    Change from Baseline (CFB) in the Pain subscale in WOMAC LK3.1

    Time frame: Week 26

  3. Joint Stiffness compared to baseline

    Change from Baseline (CFB) in the WOMAC LK3.1 Stiffness

    Time frame: Week 26

  4. Joint Function compared to baseline

    Change from Baseline (CFB) in the WOMAC LK3.1 Function

    Time frame: Week 26

  5. Patient quality of life

    Evaluation through SF-12 questionnaire

    Time frame: Weeks 4,12 and 26

  6. Patient Global Assessment (PGA)

    Evaluation of disease severity measured by patient using a 0-100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as a Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Weeks 4,12 and 26

  7. Clinical Observer Global Assessment (COGA)

    Evaluation of disease severity measured by clinician using a 0-100 Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as a Change From Baseline

    Time frame: Weeks 4,12 and 26

  8. Rescue paracetamol use

    evaluation of paracetamol consumption during the study duration through a patient diary

    Time frame: up to 26 weeks

  9. Safety of the treatment. Number of patient with treatment related adverse events

    Safety evaluation by tracking the number of adverse events correlated to treatment at each visit

    Time frame: up to 26 weeks

07

Study locations

19 sites
  • Fondazione Poliambulanza , Istituto Ospedaliero UO di Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Brescia, BS 25124, Italy
  • ASST Valcamonica U.O.C. Ortopedia
    Esine, BS 25040, Italy
  • A.O.R.N. S. Anna e S. Sebastiano U.O.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Caserta, CE 81100, Italy
  • U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia Casa di Cura
    Maddaloni, CE 81024, Italy
  • A.O. Ospedale Santa Croce e Carle S.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Cuneo, CN 12100, Italy
  • Ospedale S. Maria Borgo Val di Taro - AUSL Parma U.O. Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Borgo Val Di Taro, PR 43043, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma U.O. Clinica Ortopedica
    Parma, PR 43126, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia U.O.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Pavia, PV 27100, Italy
  • Policlinico universitario Campus Biomedico
    Roma, RO 00128, Italy
  • Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita Fatebenefratelli - Isola Tiberina U.O.C. di Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Roma, RO 00186, Italy
  • Ospedale Santo Spirito in Sassia - ASL Roma 1 Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Roma, RO 00193, Italy
  • A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza - Presidio CTO (Centro Traumatologico Ortopedico) S.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia 1 U
    Torino, TO 10126, Italy
  • AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino -Ospedale Molinette S.C. Medicina Fisica e Riabilitazione U Dip. Ortopedia Traumatologia e Riabilitazione
    Torino, TO 10126, Italy
  • Presidio Sanitario Ospedale Cottolengo Ortopedia
    Torino, TO 10126, Italy
  • Azienda ULSS 2 Marca Trevigiana - Ospedale di Conegliano U.O.C. Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Conegliano, TV 31015, Italy
  • A.O. Ospedale Cardarelli I Ortopedia
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • AOU Federico II Napoli UOC Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • P.O. Ospedale del Mare ASL 1 Napoli U.O.C. Ortopedia
    Napoli, 80131, Italy
  • A.O.U. " Maggiore della Carità" S.C. di Ortopedia e Traumatologia
    Novara, 28100, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06528600
Lead sponsor
Fidia Farmaceutici s.p.a.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 30, 2024
Start date
Sep 16, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 15, 2024
Completion
Jun 15, 2024
Last update
Jul 30, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion