ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06511752Updated Jun 10, 2026

Educational Support Group Program for Bilingual and Spanish-speaking Carepartners and People With Progressive Aphasia

An Early Phase 1 interventional study of Psychosocial educational, support group and implementation of strategies in Alzheimer Disease, Dementia and Primary Progressive Aphasia, sponsored by University of Texas at Austin. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by University of Texas at Austin · Early Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 5 months later.
Phase
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
120
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The current study aims to examine the benefits of an education/support group program for individuals with progressive aphasia (caused by various etiologies, diagnoses) and their carepartners. The current study utilizes pre-, post-treatment, and follow-up assessments to measure effects of a psychoeducational support group and an implementation/communication skills training phase on measures of psychosocial function, communicative effectiveness and speech/language function. Analysis of study-specific surveys and semi-structured interviews will provide qualitative data regarding outcomes. Before beginning the education and support group, focus groups will be run in order to set priorities for the themes to be included in the education program. Participants will join via tele-based means if preferred and these participants may reside in the United States, or internationally including Mexico and Spain.

Read the detailed description

Two educational/support group routes will be offered:

  1. Progressive aphasia (PA) educational/support group or
  2. Caregiver educational support group with an implementation phase (including their partner with PA).

The caregiver educational support group path will be delivered in two phases, whereas the PA educational support group path will only consist of the first phase. The first phase of the caregiver educational support group will focus on the educational support group and the second phase will consist of implementation and practice of strategies with feedback provided by the clinician.

The educational/support groups (Routes 1 and 2) will include opportunities for discussion of issues related to language-led dementia or progressive aphasia (e.g., coping with changes in cognition and language, use of strategies for effective communication) and education regarding the disorder provided by relevant experts (e.g., speech-language pathologists, licensed professional counselors), separately for carepartners and individuals with progressive aphasia.

The implementation phase (Route 2, only) will allow for practice of strategies and skills learned in the first phase.

The total amount of time participants will be involved in the study will be 9 months, inclusive of follow-up.

Phase 1. Timeline for the support group portion of the study: Participants will complete pre-treatment measures during a period of 1-2 weeks prior to their first meeting. After four months of twice monthly meetings, post-treatment measures will be completed within 1-2 weeks of treatment completion. Follow-up evaluation will take place at 3-months post-treatment.

Phase 2. Timeline for the implementation/dyad training portion of the study: Post-treatment assessment from Phase 1 will serve as pre-treatment assessment for Phase 2. Treatment sessions will be held once weekly for 4 weeks, and post-treatment assessment will be completed within 1-2 weeks of phase 2 treatment completion. Follow-up evaluation will take place at 3-months post-treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alzheimer Disease
  • Dementia
  • Primary Progressive Aphasia
  • Aphasia
  • Progressive Aphasia
  • Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease

Keywords

  • bilingual
  • Spanish
  • Castellano
  • multicultural
  • multilingual
03

In context

Alzheimer Disease

3,965 studies on the registry are indexed under Alzheimer Disease; 926 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is above the median of 70 across 3,019 interventional studies indexed under Alzheimer Disease.

Browse Alzheimer Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Texas at Austin is the lead sponsor of 328 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Of its 10 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 5 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

All participants must:

  • speak Spanish and/or English (although participants may speak other languages in addition to Spanish and/or English)
  • identify as Hispanic and/or Latinx,
  • or their spouse/family member with PA identifies as Hispanic and/or Latinx
  • see and hear well enough to participate
  • have access to a computer or mobile device with video capability
  • have an internet connection

Additional inclusion criteria for PA/ language-led dementia support group participants:

  • Individuals with PA:
  • Has a diagnosis of PA, or language-led dementia, and aphasia is one of the primary causes of difficulty with activities of daily living
  • Aware of language difficulties and willing to discuss them
  • Able to actively engage in group discussion and complete activities with minimal support
  • Able to regularly attend meetings
  • Willing to follow the rules of the support group for interacting with others respectfully

Additional inclusion criteria for care partner support group plus implementation phase participants:

  • Individuals with PA:
  • Diagnosis of aphasia or dementia that is progressive in nature, and aphasia is one of the primary causes of difficulty with activities of daily living
  • Have some ability to communicate and understand communication in order to participate in training sessions
  • Are functionally able to engage in training sessions (e.g., able to maintain some attention, minimal challenging behavior that would cause disruption)
  • Have a care partner who also consents to participating in the project
  • Care partners:
  • Self-identification as a caregiver of an individual with a diagnosis of PA or language-led dementia
  • Willing to discuss caregiving for individuals with PA/ language-led dementia
  • Able to regularly attend meetings
  • Willing to follow the rules of the support group for interacting with others respectfully

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Beyond the inclusion criteria included above, no additional exclusion criteria apply
05

Study design

Phase
Early Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Treatment Condition

    Support group meetings and strategy practice

    Behavioral: Psychosocial educational, support group and implementation of strategies

Interventions

  • BehavioralPsychosocial educational, support group and implementation of strategies

    Psychosocial educational, support group and implementation of strategies

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Treatment/Acceptability Survey

    In-house Acceptability and Perception of Change Survey

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Acceptability Measure

    Acceptability scale for healthcare interventions (the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability based questionnaire; Sekhon et al., 2022)

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  2. % participants who complete intervention, % sessions completed

    Adherence/receipt of intervention, 0-100, greater better

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  3. % completion of homework

    Engagement, 0-100, greater better

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  4. Retention

    Number of dropouts, reasons for dropout (related to intervention or not), and overall, retention rate at final assessment and follow-up; 80% is successful at the final post-treatment assessment and 80% is successful at the 2-month follow-up, 0-100, greater better

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  5. Aphasia Impact Questionnaire

    Aphasia impact, Higher score indicates poorer quality of life (worse) Range of scores for each question: 0-4 Total 0-84

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  6. Mini-Mental State Exam

    Cognitive screener, 0-30, greater better

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  7. Quick Aphasia Battery

    Aphasia severity, 0-10, greater better

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  8. Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale- 39

    Quality of life, greater score is better, 0-195

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  9. Progressive Aphasia Severity Scale (PASS)

    Aphasia severity, higher score = worse, 0-3

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  10. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory

    Neuropsychiatric status, higher score = worse, 0-36

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  11. Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR)

    Dementia Rating, higher score = worse, 0-3

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  12. Quality of the Caregiver Patient Relationship (QCPR)

    Quality of life, higher scores is better,14-70

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  13. Dementia Quality of Life

    Quality of life, higher score is better, 28-112

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  14. Geriatric Depression Scale

    Depression, higher score is worse, 0-15

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  15. Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale

    Dementia Knowledge, higher score is better, 0-60

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  16. Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale

    Depression, higher score is worse, 0- 60

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  17. Cuestionario de Salud 36-Item Short Form Survey Instrument

    General health, higher score is better, 0-100

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  18. General Anxiety Disorder-7

    Anxiety, higher score is worse, 0-21

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  19. The Duke University Religion Index

    Religion Index

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  20. Familism Scale

    Familism Scale, higher score= greater religiosity, 1-15 considering all subscales

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  21. Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans

    Acculturation, higher score is better, 20-124

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  22. Adult Carer Quality of Life Questionnaire

    Quality of Life, higher score is better, 0 -105

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  23. Brief COPE

    Coping strategies, higher score is better, 0-6

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  24. Brief Assessment Scale for Caregivers

    Coping strategies, higher score = worse, -28-28

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  25. Zarit Burden Interview

    Burden, higher score = worse, 0-88

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  26. Perceived Stress Scale

    Stress level, higher = worse, 0-40

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  27. Devereux Adult Resilience Scale

    Resilience

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

  28. Dementia Management Strategies Scale (Tan et al., 2013)

    Dementia management, higher score= higher frequency of action, subscales 8-55

    Time frame: Baseline, Immediately following treatment, Follow-up at 3-months post-treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06511752
Collaborators
The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration
Responsible party
Stephanie Grasso (Assistant Professor, University of Texas at Austin) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 22, 2024
Start date
May 21, 2024
Primary completion
May 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Stephanie M Grasso, PhD
Contact
smgrasso@austin.utexas.edu
6268648957

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion