ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT06488989LBBAPHFUpdated Jul 5, 2024

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure

An interventional study of left bundle branch area pacing in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Heart Failure, sponsored by National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Kazakhstan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-05.

Sponsored by National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as active, not recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The relevance of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) lies in its potential as a promising treatment option for patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block. LBBP aims to restore the normal physiological activation of the heart by delivering electrical impulses to the anatomical area of the left bundle branch, which may lead to more effective and synchronized ventricular contractions. Compared to traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), this can result in a more physiological correction of dyssynchrony, improvement in left ventricular pump function, reduction in left ventricular volumes, and a decrease in mitral regurgitation. A crucial criterion is the reduction of heart failure symptoms and the enhancement of the patients quality of life.

Read the detailed description

The aim The aim of Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) research is to assess its effectiveness in improving the contractile capacity of the left ventricular myocardium. The objectives are as follows

  • To determine the optimal patient selection criteria;
  • To assess long-term outcomes;
  • To investigate safety and complications;
  • To compare selective Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP) with traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure.

Materials and Methods:

Materials: The study will include patients who were hospitalized at the National Research Cardiac Surgery Center (NRCS) in Astana, Kazakhstan. The study will be a mixed-methods approach, consisting of a retrospective component and a prospective component. The retrospective part of the study will involve the analysis of clinical and functional data of patients with left bundle branch block and heart failure. The prospective part of the study will involve the evaluation of quantitative and qualitative parameters based on transthoracic echocardiography data, the functional status of patients after LBBP implantation, and the assessment of long-term outcomes of the study, including its impact on mortality, hospitalization rates, and overall prognosis.

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 150 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
  • patients aged 18 years or older.
  • Signed informed consent and willingness to collaborate with the researchers.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patient refusal to participate in the study.

Control Group:

patients post-implantation of traditional CRT-D.

Methods:

  • Electrocardiography (ECG).
  • Transthoracic echocardiography (EchoCG).
  • 6-minute walk test.
  • NT-proBNP measurement.
  • Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L.

Scientific Novelty:

This method is distinguished by its ability to provide highly physiological synchronized myocardial stimulation by stimulating the anatomical area of the left bundle branch, offering advantages such as shortening the ventricular electrical systole.

Advantages of the Method:

  • Shortens ventricular electrical systole.
  • Expands the possibilities of cardiac pacing in heart failure patients, including those who cannot undergo traditional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) due to anatomical constraints (vascular anatomy) or other factors.
  • LBBP can be considered as an alternative resynchronization method for non-responders to traditional CRT.

Practical Significance:

The procedure is simpler (less technically complex), electrode fixation is easier, the procedure duration and fluoroscopy time are shorter, it has the ability to maintain and improve left ventricular synchrony, and a shorter learning curve. Inclusion Criteria

  1. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
  2. patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
  3. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Pregnancy.
  2. Psychic disturbances.
  3. Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data - life expectancy less than 1 year.

Anticipated amount of patients - 50. STUDY TREATMENTS AND INTERVENTIONS day 1 - admission to cardiology department, acquisition of medical history, physical examination, blood tests, ECG, transthoracic echoCG.

day 2 - additional examinations (if necessary, depend on comorbidity), preparing for interventional procedure.

day 3 - implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy device using Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

Procedure description:

LBBAP procedure was performed as previously described by Huang in 2017 and Ponnusamy in 2022. Monitoring of 12-lead ECG and intracardiac electrograms were performed utilizing WorkMate Claris electrophysiology system (Abbott, Plymouth, MN). DF-1 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead was placed into the right ventricle (RV) apex in all patients. LBBAP was performed using two types of leads and delivery catheters: C315HIS sheath with 3830 SelectSecure lead (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), and Selectra 3D with Solia S60 lead (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany). Left conduction system capture was confirmed in appliance with European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) clinical consensus statement on conduction system pacing implantation [10]. Main criteria to accept LBB area capture were: presence of terminal R-wave in lead V1; transition in QRS morphology from non-selective to selective during threshold test; short and stable V6 R-wave peak time (V6RWPT)\<80 ms in different pacing outputs; V6-V1 interpeak>33 ms; sudden increase in V1 R-wave peak time (V1RWPT)>10 ms, split of EGM during threshold test.

day 4 - chest X-ray, device pocket ultrasound, device interrogation with lead testing, ECG.

day 5 - discharge from the hospital.

A Schedule of Events representing the required testing procedures to be performed for the duration of the study is diagrammed in Appendix 1.

Prior to conducting any study-related activities, written informed consent must be signed and dated by the subject or subject's legal representative. If appropriate, assent must also be obtained prior to conducting any study-related activities.

EVALUATIONS BY VISIT Visit 1 (admission to the hospital)

  1. Review the study with the subject (subject's legal representative) and obtain written informed consent.
  2. Assign the subject a unique screening number.
  3. Record demographics data.
  4. Record medical history, including a history of congestive heart failure, diagnosis date, and prior treatments.
  5. Record concomitant medications.
  6. Perform a complete physical examination.
  7. Perform and record vital signs.
  8. Perform and record oximetry.
  9. Perform and record results of blood pressure testing.
  10. Collect blood for clinical laboratory tests (chemistry, hematology, prothrombin time, NTPROBNP).
  11. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG.
  12. Obtain a chest x-ray.
  13. Implantation of device
  14. Chest X-ray, ECG and device telemetry at 1 day after procedure
  15. Discharge from the hospital and schedule subject for Visit 2 in 3 months. Visit 2 (3 months after discharge)
  1. Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences 2. Perform abbreviated physical examination. 3. Perform and record vital signs. 4. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray. 5. NTproBNP test 6. \^ minute walk test (6MWT) 7. Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L. 8. Device telemetry. Visit 3 (6 months after discharge)
  1. Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences
  2. Perform abbreviated physical examination.
  3. Perform and record vital signs.
  4. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray.
  5. NTproBNP test
  6. 6MWT
  7. Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L.
  8. Device telemetry. Visit 4 (12 months after discharge)
  1. Record any Adverse Experiences and/or Review subject diary for adverse experiences 2. Perform abbreviated physical examination. 3. Perform and record vital signs. 4. Obtain an echocardiogram, ECG, chest X-ray. 5. NTproBNP test 6. 6MWT 7. Questionnaire-based assessments: SF-36, EQ-5D-5L. 8. Device telemetry.

STATISTICAL METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS This will be a non-randomized, prospective, single-centre, observational study. Participant characteristics and sequencing results will be summarized with descriptive statistics, including medians, averages, and standard deviations for continuous data. For categorical data, proportions with a 95% confidence interval will be calculated by the Klopper-Pearson method. Demographic, clinical and pathological characteristics will be compared using the criterion χ2 (categorical variables) and t-test/analysis of variance (continuous variables).Values of p\<0.05 will be considered significant.

DATA COLLECTION, RETENTION AND MONITORING Data Collection Instruments The Investigator will prepare and maintain adequate and accurate source documents designed to record all observations and other pertinent data for each subject treated with the study drug.

Study personnel will enter data from source documents corresponding to a subject's visit into the protocol-specific electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and paper CRF when the information corresponding to that visit is available. Subjects will not be identified by name in the study database but will be identified by a site number, subject number and initials.

For eCRFs: If a correction is required for an eCRF, the time and date stamps track the person entering or updating eCRF data and creates an electronic audit trail. For paper CRFs: If a correction is made on a CRF, the study staff member will line through the incorrect data, write in the correct data and initial and date the change.

The Investigator is responsible for all information collected on subjects enrolled in this study. All data collected during the course of this study must be reviewed and verified for completeness and accuracy by the Investigator. A copy of the CRF will remain at the Investigator's site at the completion of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
  • Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
  • Heart Failure
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices
  • Conduction System Pacing
  • Left Bundle-Branch Block

Keywords

  • heart failure
  • left bundle branch block
  • left bundle branch area pacing
  • medtronic
  • cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • kazakhstan
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1.
  2. Patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, (LVEF) less than 35%, and (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months.
  3. Written (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnancy.
  2. Psychic disturbances.
  3. Presence of a condition or abnormality that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise the safety of the patient or the quality of the data - less than 1 year.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block

    1. Male or female ≥ 18 years of age at Visit 1. 2. Patients with complete left bundle branch block, QRS duration greater than 130 ms, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 35%, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class 2-3, who have been ineffective on optimal medical therapy for at least 3 months. 3. Written informed consent (and assent when applicable) obtained from subject or subject's legal representative and ability for subject to comply with the requirements of the study.

    Device: left bundle branch area pacing

Interventions

  • Deviceleft bundle branch area pacing

    Cardiac resynchronization therapy obtained by conduction system pacing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. General complications related to implantable cardiac device

    Incidence and amount of participants with general complication (deaths, stroke, thromboembolic complications);

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  2. procedure-related complications related to implantable cardiac device

    Incidence and amount of participants with procedure-related complication (pneumothorax, pocket/wound infection, systemic infection, pocket hematoma, atrial lead dislodgement, pericardial effusion, large vein thrombosis, re-intervention for other non-LBBAP lead reasons, subclavian arteriovenous fistula after puncture)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  3. LBBAP lead-related complications complications related to implantable cardiac device

    Incidence and amount of patients with LBBAP lead-related complications (intraprocedural perforation into the left ventricle (LV) cavity , delayed perforation into the LV cavity, acute chest pain, acute ST-segment elevation in multiple leads, acute coronary syndrome, coronary vein fistula, coronary artery fistula, painful pacing/chest pain, right bundle branch injury, LBBAP lead unscrewable/trapped/damaged helix, LBBAP lead dislodgement, threshold rise to an absolute value \> 2 V, threshold rise \> 1 V from baseline, threshold rise leading to re-intervention)

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  4. shortening of QRS

    Efficacy will be evaluated by shortening of QRS duration on ECG.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  5. Improvement of left ventricle ejection fraction

    Efficacy will be evaluated by increasing of left ventricle ejection fraction, measured by transthoracic echocardiography in 4 chamber apical position by Simpson's approach.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  6. Decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic diameter

    Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic diameter measured by transthoracic echocardiography in parasternal long axis.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  7. Decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic volume

    Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-diastolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography in apical 4-chamber position

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  8. Decreasing of left ventricle end-systolic volume

    Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of left ventricle end-systolic volume measured by transthoracic echocardiography in apical 4-chamber position

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

  9. Improvement of mitral regurgitation

    Efficacy will be evaluated by decreasing of mitral regurgitation measured by transthoracic echocardiography in multiply positions

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of follow-up period at 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CF UMC
    Astana, 010000, Kazakhstan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tan JL, Lee JZ, Terrigno V, Saracco B, Saxena S, Krathen J, Hunter K, Cha YM, Russo AM. Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. CJC Open. 2021 Jun 16;3(10):1282-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.05.019. eCollection 2021 Oct. PubMed 34888508 ↗
  • Goldenberg I, Kutyifa V, Klein HU, Cannom DS, Brown MW, Dan A, Daubert JP, Estes NA 3rd, Foster E, Greenberg H, Kautzner J, Klempfner R, Kuniss M, Merkely B, Pfeffer MA, Quesada A, Viskin S, McNitt S, Polonsky B, Ghanem A, Solomon SD, Wilber D, Zareba W, Moss AJ. Survival with cardiac-resynchronization therapy in mild heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 1;370(18):1694-701. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1401426. Epub 2014 Mar 30. PubMed 24678999 ↗
  • Yu CM, Lin H, Fung WH, Zhang Q, Kong SL, Sanderson JE. Comparison of acute changes in left ventricular volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure. Am Heart J. 2003 May;145(5):E18. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(03)00071-1. PubMed 12766742 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2025, 12 months after the start.

Of 1,118 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 29 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 50. This study's planned 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 25, 2024
First posted
Jul 5, 2024
StartActual
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2026
Last update
Jul 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06488989
Lead sponsor
National Research Center for Cardiac Surgery, Kazakhstan
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 5, 2024
Start date
Jun 1, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 5, 2024

Study contacts

Yerlan Turubayev, MD
principal investigator · doctor

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion