CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06483217Updated Jul 17, 2024

Optimal Injection Interval for Intra-Detrusor Botulinum Toxin

An interventional study of Patient-directed follow up in Overactive Bladder, Urinary Urgency and Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-17.

Sponsored by Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if patients deciding their own follow up times can increase the effectiveness of botulinum toxin (BTX or "Botox") injection for overactive bladder (OAB). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the time between repeat injections differ from the 6-month standard when it is based on patient symptoms alone?
  • Does symptom control or patient satisfaction change when patients control their own follow up times?

Participants will undergo standard botulinum toxin injection into the bladder for OAB treatment and will then be randomly assigned to follow up either at a standard 6-month interval or whenever they feel their symptoms return.

Read the detailed description

Overactive bladder (OAB) is defined by symptoms of urinary urgency, frequency, or nocturia with or without incontinence in the absence of urinary tract infection or other attributable pathology. This disease affects up to 40% of women in the United States and can have a significant impact on quality of life. It is expected to increase in prevalence with the aging US population. There are a wide variety of treatment options for OAB which range from fluid management and lifestyle modifications (first line therapy), pelvic floor physical therapy and oral medications (second line therapy), and procedural interventions such as neuromodulation or intravesical botulinum toxin (BTX-A) injections (third line therapy).

BTX-A is a potent neurotoxin derived from the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium botulinum that inhibits presynaptic release of acetylcholine from motor neurons at the neuromuscular junction to induce flaccid paralysis of musculature. It has also been found to affect sensory responses of nerve afferent nerve fibers and likely has a complex multifactorial effect on the release of excitatory neurotransmitters. Because of this, injection of BTX-A into the detrusor muscle of the bladder has become a highly effective treatment option for OAB, first approved by the FDA in January 2013. Prior studies have demonstrated superior efficacy of intravesical BTX-A injections compared to anticholinergic medication and a greater reduction in urge urinary incontinence episodes than sacral neuromodulation.

The effect of intravesical BTX-A is temporary due to turnover of presynaptic molecules. Typical chemodenervation of muscular tissue lasts 3 to 6 months based on histologic evidence, however this does not translate directly to duration of OAB symptom control given the gradual nature of neurotransmitter repletion. The largest prior trial of intravesical BTX-A demonstrated a median interval of 350 days between first and second injection, but other studies have shown a wide range of duration from 5 to 15 months. The current FDA recommendation for repeat injection is to be "considered when the clinical effect from the previous injection has diminished" with a median interval in their double-blinded placebo-controlled studies of 169 days.

Despite this recommendation, there is a wide variety in practice patterns for repeat injections, including the use of a "one size fits all" approach with standardized repeat injections at 6-month intervals. Combined with varying rates of tolerability and treatment failure, this has resulted in inconsistent data on continuation and dropout rates for repeat injections, with reported continuation rates of 20-60% in different studies. Additionally, no prior studies have reported whether repeat injection intervals have been provider- or patient-determined, nor with data on patient satisfaction ratings. Further studies are needed to better delineate optimal injection interval as well as incorporate data on what methods lead to the highest patient satisfaction and symptom control.

The purpose of this study is to ascertain the optimal time interval to repeat injection will be when it is purely patient directed based on symptomatology. Investigators will also evaluate patient satisfaction with this approach compared to standardized repeat injection interval of six months. This has the potential to change the way OAB is managed by allowing patients to control the interval to repeat injection in a safe and controlled manner. Investigators hypothesize that a patient-centered approach to repeating BTX-A injections will be similar to the standard FDA 6-month interval while leading to higher patient satisfaction and continuation rates without compromising safety or efficacy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Overactive Bladder
  • Urinary Urgency
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Urge Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

  • intradetrusor botulinum toxin
  • intravesical botox
  • intradetrusor botox
  • bladder chemodenervation
  • botox
  • chemodenervation
  • overactive bladder
  • urge urinary incontinence
  • intravesical botulinum toxin
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

1,363 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 228 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 66 across 1,011 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans is the lead sponsor of 70 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Of its 7 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 1 (14%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of overactive bladder, detrusor overactivity, urinary urgency, urinary frequency, nocturnal polyuria, or urge urinary incontinence
  • pursuing treatment with intravesical botulinum toxin injections

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-OAB diagnosis such as pelvic pain or interstitial cystitis
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of care

    Standard 6 month post-operative follow up interval for repeat injection

  • Experimental
    Patient-directed follow up

    Post-operative follow up interval for repeat injection decided by patient based on OAB symptomatology (3-12 months)

    Behavioral: Patient-directed follow up

Interventions

  • BehavioralPatient-directed follow up

    Patients will be instructed to follow up for repeat injection based on bladder symptomatology at their own self-determined time interval.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Injection interval

    time to repeat injection (days)

    Time frame: Days from initial injection to repeat injection, up to 365 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction

    Scores from the Surgical Satisfaction Questionnaire (SSQ-8), which contains 8 questions on satisfaction with a likert scale rating of 1-5. Higher scores indicate higher patient satisfaction.

    Time frame: 1-2 weeks post-injection

  2. Symptom Control

    Scores from the Overactive Bladder Assessment Tool (OAB-Q), which contains 5 questions on symptoms and 5 questions on quality of life with a likert scale rating of 0-5. Higher scores on the symptom section indicate WORSE overactive bladder symptoms and higher scores on the quality of life section indicate higher levels of bother/WORSE quality of life.

    Time frame: baseline scores immediately pre-injection, post-treatment scores 1-2 weeks post-injection

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Louisiana State University Health Science Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
    • Zachary Selzler, MD · Contact · zselzl@lsuhsc.edu · 504-568-2383
    • Zachary Selzler, MD · Sub investigator
    • Lisa Peacock, MD · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Haylen BT, de Ridder D, Freeman RM, Swift SE, Berghmans B, Lee J, Monga A, Petri E, Rizk DE, Sand PK, Schaer GN. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for female pelvic floor dysfunction. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Jan;21(1):5-26. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0976-9. Epub 2009 Nov 25. PubMed 19937315 ↗
  • de Groat WC, Yoshimura N. Afferent nerve regulation of bladder function in health and disease. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009;(194):91-138. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-79090-7_4. PubMed 19655106 ↗
  • Amundsen CL, Richter HE, Menefee SA, Komesu YM, Arya LA, Gregory WT, Myers DL, Zyczynski HM, Vasavada S, Nolen TL, Wallace D, Meikle SF. OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Sacral Neuromodulation on Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Oct 4;316(13):1366-1374. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.14617. PubMed 27701661 ↗
  • Amundsen CL, Komesu YM, Chermansky C, Gregory WT, Myers DL, Honeycutt EF, Vasavada SP, Nguyen JN, Wilson TS, Harvie HS, Wallace D; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Two-Year Outcomes of Sacral Neuromodulation Versus OnabotulinumtoxinA for Refractory Urgency Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Trial. Eur Urol. 2018 Jul;74(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.02.011. Epub 2018 Feb 24. PubMed 29482936 ↗
  • Granese R, Adile G, Gugliotta G, Cucinella G, Saitta S, Adile B. Botox((R)) for idiopathic overactive bladder: efficacy, duration and safety. Effectiveness of subsequent injection. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Oct;286(4):923-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2349-8. Epub 2012 May 24. PubMed 22622849 ↗
  • Dowson C, Watkins J, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Sahai A. Repeated botulinum toxin type A injections for refractory overactive bladder: medium-term outcomes, safety profile, and discontinuation rates. Eur Urol. 2012 Apr;61(4):834-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.12.011. Epub 2011 Dec 13. PubMed 22204745 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 17, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06483217
Lead sponsor
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans
Responsible party
Zachary S Selzler, MD (Zachary Selzler MD, Urogynecology Fellow, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center in New Orleans) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 3, 2024
Start date
Jul 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 17, 2024

Study contacts

Zachary Selzler, MD
Contact
zselzl@lsuhsc.edu
504-568-2383
Lisa Peacock, MD
principal investigator · Louisiana State University Health Science Center - New Orleans

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion