ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07905586Updated Oct 29, 2026

Feasibility of Resisted Expiratory Muscle Training for Females Assigned at Birth With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Pilot Study

An interventional study of Pelvic floor muscle training and Expiratory muscle strength training in Stress Urinary Incontinence, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 79 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-29.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 29, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
24
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 79 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized pilot study is to determine whether adding expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) to standard pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is feasible and may help improve stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in females assigned at birth, ages 18 to 79. SUI is urine leakage that occurs during activities such as coughing, sneezing, laughing, or exercising.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Can participants complete the combined exercise program, and is it acceptable to them?

Does adding EMST to PFMT lead to greater improvements in urinary leakage symptoms and participants' perceived improvement compared with PFMT alone?

Does adding EMST improve breathing muscle strength and pelvic floor muscle activity?

Researchers will enroll 24 participants and randomly assign them to one of two groups:

Group 1: Standard physical therapy, including pelvic floor muscle training.

Group 2: The same physical therapy and pelvic floor muscle training, with the addition of expiratory muscle strength training.

Both groups will receive six weeks of supervised physical therapy, with one session each week. Participants will attend seven study visits over approximately seven weeks, including an initial assessment and six treatment visits.

Participants will:

Complete questionnaires about urinary leakage symptoms and perceived improvement.

Have their breathing muscle strength measured using a test that measures how strongly they can breathe out.

Have pelvic floor muscle activity measured using a surface electromyography (sEMG) sensor.

Perform prescribed home exercises and record their exercise completion in a log.

Participants in both groups will practice pelvic floor muscle exercises at home. Participants in the combined-treatment group will also use a device that provides resistance when breathing out. They will perform five sets of five breaths daily, with resistance based on their measured breathing muscle strength.

Researchers will assess whether participants complete the study visits, follow the home exercise program, complete the study measures, and report satisfaction with the program. They will also monitor any unwanted effects related to the exercises or assessments.

The study will explore whether adding EMST to PFMT may improve urinary leakage symptoms, breathing muscle strength, and pelvic floor muscle activity. Participants may experience improvements, but benefits are not guaranteed. The results will help researchers determine whether a larger study is needed to better evaluate this combined treatment for stress urinary incontinence.

Read the detailed description

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the involuntary leakage of urine during activities that increase pressure within the abdomen, such as coughing, sneezing, laughing, or exercising. Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) is a recommended conservative treatment for SUI. However, treatment outcomes vary, and some individuals have difficulty identifying and correctly contracting their pelvic floor muscles.

The pelvic floor muscles work in coordination with the diaphragm, abdominal wall, and respiratory muscles to regulate pressure within the abdomen. Research has demonstrated coordinated pelvic floor muscle activity during forced expiration, coughing, and other tasks that increase abdominal pressure. Maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), a measure of expiratory muscle strength, has also been associated with SUI severity. These findings suggest that respiratory muscle function may be relevant to urinary continence.

Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) involves breathing out against resistance using a specialized device. This training may improve expiratory muscle strength and promote coordinated activation of the respiratory and pelvic floor muscles. Although EMST has been studied in other rehabilitation populations, its feasibility and potential effects when combined with PFMT for SUI have not been adequately established.

This pilot randomized controlled study will evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of adding EMST to standard PFMT and estimate preliminary effects on urinary incontinence symptoms, expiratory muscle strength, and pelvic floor muscle activity. The study will also examine relationships between changes in physiological measures and changes in urinary incontinence symptoms. Findings will inform the design of a future, adequately powered randomized controlled trial.

Study Design and Procedures

This study uses a single-site, parallel-group randomized controlled feasibility design. A total of 24 eligible participants will be enrolled and assigned to one of two treatment groups, with 12 participants planned for each group. Participants will complete seven study visits over approximately seven weeks: one baseline assessment followed by six weekly supervised physical therapy sessions.

At the baseline visit, a licensed physical therapist with pelvic health training will conduct a physical therapy evaluation. Participants will complete questionnaires and undergo measurements of expiratory muscle strength and pelvic floor muscle activity. Both groups will receive standardized education about the role of the pelvic floor muscles and bladder in urinary continence.

Participants will complete assessments at baseline (Visit 1), midpoint (Visit 4), and after the intervention (Visit 7). The Global Rating of Change (GROC) questionnaire will be administered at the final visit. Exercise adherence will be monitored using home exercise logs.

Treatment Groups Group 1: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training: Participants will receive standard physical therapy care, including supervised PFMT once weekly for six weeks. A licensed physical therapist with pelvic health training will provide individualized instruction and progress exercises according to the treatment plan.

Participants will complete a home PFMT program consisting initially of five sets of five submaximal repetitions daily. Exercises will progress during the six supervised sessions, with repetitions increasing to as many as 100 per day in gravity-dependent positions, as prescribed by the treating physical therapist.

Group 2: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Plus Expiratory Muscle Strength Training:

Participants will receive the same supervised physical therapy and PFMT program as Group 1, with the addition of EMST.

EMST will be performed using a calibrated expiratory resistance device. The initial training resistance will be set at 50% of the participant's measured MEP. Participants will perform five sets of five breaths daily as part of their home exercise program. The treating physical therapist will provide instruction on device use and exercise technique. Training intensity will be maintained or progressed according to participant tolerance and the therapist's assessment of safe performance.

Participants in both groups will receive verbal and written instructions for their home exercises and will record exercise completion in a log.

Physiological Assessments:

Maximal Expiratory Pressure: MEP will be measured to characterize expiratory muscle strength and establish the initial resistance for EMST in the combined-treatment group. MEP will be assessed at baseline, midpoint, and after the intervention.

Pelvic Floor Muscle Activity: Pelvic floor muscle activity will be measured using surface electromyography (sEMG) with a vaginal surface sensor. Measurements will be collected during standardized tasks, including quiet breathing, forced expiration, coughing, and maximal voluntary contractions. Assessments will occur at baseline, midpoint, and after the intervention.

The physiological assessments will be used to estimate changes in expiratory muscle strength and pelvic floor muscle activation over the intervention period.

Clinical Assessments:Urinary incontinence symptoms will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF). This self-report questionnaire will be completed at baseline, midpoint, and after the intervention.

Participants will also complete the GROC at the final visit to describe their perceived change over the course of treatment.

A participant satisfaction questionnaire will be used to assess acceptability. Exercise logs and study records will be used to evaluate adherence, visit completion, and retention.

Feasibility and Safety Monitoring:The primary purpose of this pilot study is to determine whether the combined PFMT and EMST intervention can be implemented as planned and whether participants can complete the study procedures and home exercise program.

Feasibility will be evaluated using recruitment and eligibility information, participant retention, adherence to prescribed home exercises, completion of outcome assessments, and participant satisfaction. Intervention-related adverse events will also be recorded and summarized.

The study team will monitor participants during supervised sessions for symptoms such as pain, dizziness, or excessive fatigue. Exercise intensity will be maintained or reduced if participants cannot complete the prescribed exercises safely and with appropriate technique. Supervised procedures will be stopped if concerning symptoms occur. Participants will be instructed to stop home exercises if they experience significant pain, dizziness, or other unexpected adverse effects and to contact the study team before resuming.

Potential risks include mild muscle soreness or fatigue, temporary dizziness during MEP testing, discomfort during insertion or removal of the vaginal sEMG sensor, and minor irritation, bleeding, or infection associated with sensor placement. Participants may also experience emotional discomfort related to discussing urinary symptoms or undergoing pelvic floor assessment. The study team will use established safety procedures and protect participant confidentiality.

Statistical Analysis

The planned sample of 24 participants, with 12 participants per group, is intended for a pilot feasibility study and preliminary estimation of treatment effects. The study is not designed to establish definitive treatment efficacy.

Feasibility outcomes, including eligibility, retention, adherence, outcome assessment completion, participant satisfaction, and adverse events, will be summarized using appropriate descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals.

Linear mixed-effects models will be used to estimate changes in clinical outcomes over time. Models will include treatment group, time, and the group-by-time interaction, with baseline variables included as covariates. Similar models will evaluate changes in MEP and sEMG amplitude.

Participants will also be classified as responders based on a change of 2.52 points on the ICIQ-UI SF, the published minimal clinically important difference specified in the protocol. The proportion of responders in each group will be summarized, and an odds ratio will be calculated to compare responder rates.

Exploratory correlation analyses will examine relationships between physiological and clinical changes. These analyses will assess associations between changes in MEP and ICIQ-UI SF scores, changes in sEMG amplitude and ICIQ-UI SF scores, changes in MEP and GROC scores, and changes in sEMG amplitude and GROC scores. Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients will be selected according to the distribution of the data.

Linear mixed-effects models will accommodate incomplete repeated outcome measurements under the assumption that data are missing at random.

Expected Contribution

This study will provide preliminary information about the feasibility, acceptability, and potential clinical and physiological effects of adding EMST to standard PFMT for SUI. Results will help estimate treatment effects, variability, adherence, and outcome completion rates to support the planning of a future larger randomized controlled trial. The study may also help clarify whether changes in expiratory muscle strength and pelvic floor muscle activity are associated with changes in urinary incontinence symptoms.

02

Conditions studied

  • Stress Urinary Incontinence

Keywords

  • stress urinary incontinence
  • pelvic floor muscle training
  • expiratory muscle strength training
  • pelvic floor rehabilitation
  • physical therapy
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence, Stress

651 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence, Stress; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 24 is below the median of 68 across 506 interventional studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence, Stress.

Browse Urinary Incontinence, Stress studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 393 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Of its 45 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 21 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 79 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female assigned at birth, 18-79 years of age

Self-reported stress urinary incontinence for greater than 3 months

International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) score >6

Able to understand the study procedures and provide

English language proficiency

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Males assigned at birth

Individuals \<18 or >80 years old

Current pregnancy or planning to become pregnant during the study period

Pelvic, abdominal, esophageal, or head/neck surgery within the previous 6 months

Healing rib fractures

Neurologic conditions

Active urinary tract infection

Current participation in supervised pelvic floor muscle training outside of the study

Inability to safely perform maximal expiratory efforts

to expiratory muscle strength training (EMST), including presence of untreated or uncontrolled hypertension, unstable heart conditions, history of spontaneous pneumothorax, active hemoptysis, history of ruptured eardrum or active ear conditions, history of high intraocular pressure including glaucoma and retinal disease, elevated intracranial pressure, severe , or healing rib fractures

History of lung surgery

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
24 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Pelvic floor muscle training

    Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT): Participants will be instructed in a home exercise program of PFMT at 5 sets of 5 submaximal repetitions daily. Through the 6 intervention sessions, exercise repetitions will increase to up to 100 per day in gravity dependent positions.

    Other: Pelvic floor muscle training

  • Experimental
    Pelvic floor muscle training + expiratory training

    Expiratory Muscle Strength Training (EMST): Participants will use a calibrated expiratory resistance device at 50% of MEP, 5 sets of 5 breaths daily. PFMT: Participants will be instructed in a home exercise program of PFMT at 5 sets of 5 submaximal repetitions daily. Through the 6 intervention sessions, exercise repetitions will increase to up to 100 per day in gravity dependent positions.

    Other: Pelvic floor muscle training · Other: Expiratory muscle strength training

Interventions

  • OtherPelvic floor muscle training

    PFMT: Participants will be instructed in a home exercise program of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) at 5 sets of 5 submaximal repetitions daily. Through the 6 intervention sessions, exercise repetitions will increase to up to 100 per day in gravity dependent positions.

  • OtherExpiratory muscle strength training

    EMST: Participants will use a calibrated expiratory resistance device at 50% of MEP, 5 sets of 5 breaths daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attrition

    Attrition will be assessed as a feasibility outcome to evaluate participant retention throughout the study. Attrition will be defined as the proportion of enrolled participants who discontinue study participation before completing the final study visit (Visit 7). The attrition rate will be calculated by dividing the number of participants who withdraw or discontinue participation before study completion by the total number of participants enrolled, multiplied by 100. The number and percentage of participants who complete the study will also be reported. Reasons for withdrawal or discontinuation will be documented when available. Attrition and retention rates will be summarized descriptively using counts, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals to evaluate the feasibility of participant retention in the study.

    Time frame: This is a post measure after completion of the 7 week study.

  2. Eligibility rates

    Eligibility rate will be assessed as a feasibility outcome to evaluate the proportion of individuals screened who meet the study's eligibility criteria. The eligibility rate will be calculated by dividing the number of individuals determined to be eligible by the total number of individuals screened and multiplying by 100. Eligibility will be determined based on the study's prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria, including an ICIQ-UI SF score of at least 6. The number and percentage of individuals who are eligible and ineligible will be summarized descriptively. Reasons for ineligibility will be documented when available. The eligibility rate will be reported as a percentage with a 95% confidence interval to evaluate the feasibility of identifying an appropriate study population.

    Time frame: This is a post measure after completion of the 7 week study.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global rating of change

    The Global Rating of Change (GROC) is a patient-reported measure used to assess participants' perceived overall change in symptoms following the intervention. At the final study visit, participants will rate how their urinary incontinence symptoms have changed compared with their status before beginning the intervention. Responses will be recorded using a 7-point ordinal scale ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse), with a score of 4 indicating no change. Lower scores indicate greater perceived improvement, whereas higher scores indicate greater perceived worsening. The GROC will be administered at Visit 7 and used to characterize participants' overall perceptions of treatment-related change.

    Time frame: at visit 7 which is 6 weeks after baseline.

  2. Maximum expiratory pressure

    Maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) is an objective measure of respiratory muscle strength that assesses the maximum pressure generated during a forceful expiration against an occluded airway. MEP will be measured using a respiratory pressure manometer and expressed in centimeters of water (cm H₂O). Participants will be seated and instructed to inhale maximally, followed by a forceful, sustained exhalation into the manometer mouthpiece. Measurements will be repeated according to a standardized testing protocol, with adequate rest between attempts to minimize fatigue. The highest acceptable and reproducible pressure value will be recorded for analysis. Higher MEP values indicate greater expiratory pressure-generating capacity and are used to characterize respiratory muscle strength at baseline and assess changes following the intervention. MEP will be measured at Visits 1, 4, and 7.

    Time frame: at visit 4 which is 3 weeks after baseline.

  3. Maximum expiratory pressure

    Maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) is an objective measure of respiratory muscle strength that assesses the maximum pressure generated during a forceful expiration against an occluded airway. MEP will be measured using a respiratory pressure manometer and expressed in centimeters of water (cm H₂O). Participants will be seated and instructed to inhale maximally, followed by a forceful, sustained exhalation into the manometer mouthpiece. Measurements will be repeated according to a standardized testing protocol, with adequate rest between attempts to minimize fatigue. The highest acceptable and reproducible pressure value will be recorded for analysis. Higher MEP values indicate greater expiratory pressure-generating capacity and are used to characterize respiratory muscle strength at baseline and assess changes following the intervention. MEP will be measured at Visits 1, 4, and 7.

    Time frame: at visit 7 which is 6 weeks after baseline

  4. surface EMG

    Pelvic floor muscle activity will be assessed using vaginal surface electromyography (sEMG) with an intravaginal sensor to measure the amplitude of electrical activity generated during pelvic floor muscle contractions. A trained, licensed physical therapist with pelvic health training will position the vaginal sensor according to the device manufacturer's instructions. Participants will be instructed to perform a maxiumal and submaximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction, and the sEMG system will record the resulting electrical activity. Amplitude will be expressed in microvolts (µV), with higher values generally indicating greater recorded electrical activity during contraction. Measurements will be obtained using a standardized testing protocol at Visits 1, 4, and 7 to characterize pelvic floor muscle activation and explore changes following the intervention.

    Time frame: at visit 4 which is 3 weeks after baseline

  5. surface EMG

    Pelvic floor muscle activity will be assessed using vaginal surface electromyography (sEMG) with an intravaginal sensor to measure the amplitude of electrical activity generated during pelvic floor muscle contractions. A trained, licensed physical therapist with pelvic health training will position the vaginal sensor according to the device manufacturer's instructions. Participants will be instructed to perform a maxiumal and submaximal voluntary pelvic floor muscle contraction, and the sEMG system will record the resulting electrical activity. Amplitude will be expressed in microvolts (µV), with higher values generally indicating greater recorded electrical activity during contraction. Measurements will be obtained using a standardized testing protocol at Visits 1, 4, and 7 to characterize pelvic floor muscle activation and explore changes following the intervention.

    Time frame: at visit 7 which is 4 weeks after baseline

  6. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) is a validated, self-administered questionnaire used to assess the frequency, amount, and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. The questionnaire consists of three scored items addressing the frequency of urinary leakage, the amount of urine typically leaked, and the degree to which urinary leakage interferes with everyday life. An additional unscored item asks participants to identify situations in which leakage occurs. Responses are scored on a scale from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity and greater impact of urinary incontinence. The total score is calculated by summing the three scored items. The instrument will be completed independently by participants on paper and scored manually.

    Time frame: Baseline after consent; a score <6 will exclude from inclusion in the study.

  7. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) is a validated, self-administered questionnaire used to assess the frequency, amount, and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. The questionnaire consists of three scored items addressing the frequency of urinary leakage, the amount of urine typically leaked, and the degree to which urinary leakage interferes with everyday life. An additional unscored item asks participants to identify situations in which leakage occurs. Responses are scored on a scale from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity and greater impact of urinary incontinence. The total score is calculated by summing the three scored items. The instrument will be completed independently by participants on paper and scored manually.

    Time frame: at visit 4 which is 3 weeks after baseline.

  8. International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form

    The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) is a validated, self-administered questionnaire used to assess the frequency, amount, and impact of urinary incontinence on quality of life. The questionnaire consists of three scored items addressing the frequency of urinary leakage, the amount of urine typically leaked, and the degree to which urinary leakage interferes with everyday life. An additional unscored item asks participants to identify situations in which leakage occurs. Responses are scored on a scale from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity and greater impact of urinary incontinence. The total score is calculated by summing the three scored items. The instrument will be completed independently by participants on paper and scored manually.

    Time frame: at visit 7 which is 6 weeks after baseline.

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Barbosa-Silva J, Zanello SC, Jorge CH, Driusso P. Do young women have an accurate perception about their pelvic floor muscle contraction? An agreement study about self-perception and physical evaluation of the pelvic muscles contraction by the PERFECT scheme. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2024 Oct;40:411-416. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.054. Epub 2024 Apr 28. PubMed 39593617 ↗
  • Laciuga H, Rosenbek JC, Davenport PW, Sapienza CM. Functional outcomes associated with expiratory muscle strength training: narrative review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(4):535-46. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2013.03.0076. PubMed 25144167 ↗
  • Abidi S, Ghram A, Ghroubi S, Ahmaidi S, Elleuch MH, Girard O, Papasavvas T, Laukkanen J, Ben Saad H, Knechtle B, Weiss K, Chlif M. Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Physical Function and Respiratory Muscle Strength in Incontinent Women: A Comparative Study between Urinary Incontinent and Apparently Healthy Women. J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 10;11(24):7344. doi: 10.3390/jcm11247344. PubMed 36555959 ↗
  • Aljuraifani R, Stafford RE, Hall LM, van den Hoorn W, Hodges PW. Task-specific differences in respiration-related activation of deep and superficial pelvic floor muscles. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2019 May 1;126(5):1343-1351. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00704.2018. Epub 2019 Mar 14. PubMed 30870081 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Jun 2028, 17 months later.

Of 225 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Urinary Incontinence, Stress, half reached primary completion within 19 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 43. This study's planned 17 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 266 studies reached it within 19 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 43.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 23, 2026
First posted
Oct 29, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
Last update
Oct 29, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 29, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07905586
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 29, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 29, 2026

Study contacts

Nicole Dugan, DPT
Contact
nicole.dugan@jefferson.edu
1-215-512-5140
Patricia Crane, DPT, DSc
Contact
trish.crane@jefferson.edu
1-215-828-5275

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion