CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06467175ALICAUpdated Jan 21, 2026

The Benefits of Long-read High-throughput Genomic Sequencing for the Causal Diagnosis of Cerebellar Ataxias

An interventional study of blood sampling for high molecular weight DNA extraction in Cerebellar Ataxias, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-21.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
210
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cerebellar ataxias are a group of rare neurological disorders that are clinically and genetically heterogeneous, with several hundred genes and diseases known to date. Over the last decade, their diagnosis has been revolutionised by the development of high-throughput sequencing technologies such as exome/genome sequencing (ES/GS), making it possible to obtain a molecular diagnosis in a growing number of patients. However, almost 40% of patients remain without a molecular diagnosis, raising questions about the limitations of sequencing technologies based on a technique known as short-read. One limitation of short-read is its poor ability to detect repeated motif expansions, a frequent mechanism in neurology and associated with more than thirty neurogenetic diseases. Although tools for analysing ES/GS data have gradually been developed in response to this problem, their effectiveness and reliability remain moderate. To date, the gold standard for detecting these expansions remains targeted approaches such as PCR and Southern blot, which are long, tedious and costly processes that require an independent search for each expansion, forcing clinicians to select expansions and limiting diagnostic yield. In addition, there are diseases associated with expansions so rare that no French laboratory offers a diagnostic test.

The recent development of long fragment genome sequencing (long-read - lrGS) could provide a solution to all these problems. These technologies are based on a sequencing process during which DNA is preserved in the form of large molecules of several tens of thousands of bases. Regions of the genome containing expansions can therefore be studied directly in their entirety, avoiding the difficulties of reconstruction from small fragments, which is the case in short-read sequencing. In addition, lrGS can characterize the size of repeated motifs and thus detect any causal expansion in an individual in a single analysis.

A number of recently published studies, particularly in neurology, have demonstrated the ability of lrGS to detect pathologies with known expansions (SCA36, C9ORF72), but also to discover new ones and thus explain the molecular basis of rare pathologies (SCA27b, NOTCH2NLC). Although these sequencing technologies have been around for a number of years, access is still restricted to research work and is limited by their higher cost.

Their value as a second-line diagnostic tool has yet to be demonstrated. The investigators propose to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of Oxford Nanopore lrGS in duo or trio (patients + 1 or 2 first-degree relatives) in patients with cerebellar ataxia without molecular diagnosis after short-read GS. This will be the first study to transfer this lrGS technique to the second line, in real-life conditions, for the causal genetic diagnosis of cerebellar ataxia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebellar Ataxias

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Index case with progressive cerebellar ataxia of familial form (> 1 1st or 2nd degree relative affected) or sporadic form (onset of symptoms before age 50)
  • Index case having undergone srGS and not having obtained a molecular diagnosis, whose srGS data are available for reanalysis.
  • Ability to understand and sign consent by the index case and his/her relative(s) (up to a maximum of 2)
  • Sample may be taken from the index case and at least one affected or healthy* first-degree relative (parent, sibling) * Healthy relatives must be older than the patient to avoid conducting a presymptomatic test in subjects who consider themselves to be healthy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Index case or relative(s) not affiliated to national health insurance;
  • Index case and his/her parents presenting a condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would contraindicate the subject's participation in the study.
  • Person under legal protection (curatorship, guardianship)
  • Person subject to a measure of legal protection
  • Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding women
  • An adult who is unable to give consent
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
210 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    cax index with 1 to 2 relatives

    Biological: blood sampling for high molecular weight DNA extraction

Interventions

  • Biologicalblood sampling for high molecular weight DNA extraction

    2 EDTA tubes will be taken for the index case, and the DNA will be extracted for sequencing into long-fragments and short-fragments. 1 EDTA tube will be taken for each relative.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Identification of a causal genetic variant (class 4 or 5 variant - ACMG classification) that may explain the patients' symptoms.

    Time frame: Through study completion, on average of 18 months

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
07

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06467175
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Dijon
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 20, 2024
Start date
Dec 11, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 21, 2026

Study contacts

Quentin THOMAS
Contact
quentin.thomas@chu-dijon.fr
0380295313 ext. +33

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion