An interventional study of Reach training with visual feedback in Cerebellar Ataxia, sponsored by Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.
Sponsored by Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to test for benefits of reinforcement based training paradigm versus standard practice over weeks for improving reaching movements in people with ataxia.
Damage to the cerebellum produces characteristic deficits in movement coordination, known as "ataxia." Reaching movements become curved, tremulous, and over- or undershoot targets, thus affecting nearly all activities of daily living. Sitting and standing balance becomes unsteady, and walking has a characteristic 'drunken' appearance with lateral veering and a widening of the base of support. People with many types of neurological diseases (e.g. autosomal dominant ataxias (e.g. SCAs), multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, Freidreich's ataxia) often have disabling ataxia.
In past work the investigators have shown that many individuals with ataxia from cerebellar disease can learn simple visuomotor tasks using reinforcement learning paradigms. The investigators do not know if individuals with ataxia from cerebellar disease can improve more complex motor patterns. In general, there are few rehabilitation studies on ataxia, with most focusing on balance and walking. Yet, arm ataxia is a significant problem that affects most all activities of daily living (e.g. eating, cooking, bathing, dressing, working). Many studies have assessed reaching ataxia on single days in order to try to better understand the fundamental basis for ataxic arm movements. Based on previous literary searches, there are only a couple of small studies that have tested whether training over weeks can mitigate arm ataxia. Each of these was a case series of either 3 or 4 people, and all patients had ataxia from lesions that included structures outside of the cerebellum. Both showed some positive effects but responses varied across patients. This work that the investigators propose will look at the affects of a longer training regimen of upper limb reaching in people with cerebellar ataxia.
The investigators will study cerebellar patients that have shown the ability to learn from previous work. Subjects with cerebellar ataxia will be randomized into two groups to receive either reinforcement training or standard practice training over a 12 week period. Subjects will train for 45 minutes a day, 3 times per week for two weeks for each type of training, with a two week 'rest' period in between. After training, subjects will be asked to return for two visits to test for retention. On each training day, reinforcement training (or standard practice) will be done using an Oculus Rift and Touch 3D headset. Training encompasses reaching to a 3D target with either online visual feedback or binary feedback 400 times. Motion tracking sensors will be placed on the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger, in order to track movement data in real time. These studies will provide important new information about upper limb long term training with visual feedback in individuals with Cerebellar Ataxia
72 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebellar Ataxia; 16 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 18 is below the median of 25 across 55 interventional studies indexed under Cerebellar Ataxia.
Browse Cerebellar Ataxia studies →Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 76 studies on the registry; 19 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Reach training with visual feedback. During each training session, participants will first be familiarized with the task and then will reach from a home position to 4 virtual targets that are presented in the front of the participant and within the workspace where most natural arm movements are performed. During training the participant will reach a total of 400 times. For reinforcement training, participants will not see their hand or a cursor, but instead participants will receive target-specific binary feedback after each reach (i.e. based on running average of last 10 reaches to that target). Binary feedback indicates only whether the reach was successful or unsuccessful and provides no specific information about the location of the hand.
Behavioral: Reach training with visual feedback
Reach training with visual feedback. During each training session, participants will first be familiarized with the task and then will reach from a home position to 4 virtual targets that are presented in the front of the participant and within the workspace where most natural arm movements are performed. During training the participant will reach a total of 400 times. For standard practice, participants will be able to see a cursor that represents the position of the hand at all times and try to make straight reaches to the targets. This type of feedback provided specific information about the location of the hand.
Behavioral: Reach training with visual feedback
Reach training will be accomplished using an Oculus Rift and Touch 3D headset. Active markers will be placed on the shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger in order to capture limb movement in real time. During each training session, participants will first be familiarized with the task and then will reach from a home position to 4 virtual targets that are presented in the front of the participant and within the workspace where most natural arm movements are performed.Targets will be presented in a pseudorandom order and participants will reach a total of 400 times
Hand path distance during natural reaching to the trained target locations.
Hand path distance is the percent above an ideal (straight reach) averaged over reaches to all 4 targets. To collect this measure, investigators will use motion capture equipment to record the positions of active markers that subjects will wear on their shoulder, elbow, wrist, and finger.
Time frame: Assessed every study visit week 1 to week 12
ICARS (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale)
ICARS is a standardized scale used to quantify the level of impairment in people with cerebellar ataxia. The ICARS is a 0- 100 point scale system with four subscales that include, postural and gait disturbances, limb ataxia, dysarthria, and Oculomotor disorders. Postural and gait disturbances are scaled 0 to 34 points. Limb ataxia is scaled 0 to 52 points. Dysarthria is scaled 0 to 8 points, and Oculomotor disorders is scaled 0 to 6 points. The higher the score indicates greater impairment.
Time frame: Assessed week 1 before the first training session, and week 12
ARAT ( Action Research Arm Test)
The ARAT is an assessment used to measure changes in upper limb function in people who have experienced damage or disease to the nervous system (e.g., multiple sclerosis, stroke, Parkinson's disease, cerebellar ataxia).
Time frame: Assessed week 1 before the first training session, and week 12
Started Aug 2019 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2026, 88 months after the start.
Of 30 interventional studies with no phase under Cerebellar Ataxia, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12. This study's planned 88 months is above that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.