ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06466031TYR-GLIOUpdated Apr 17, 2026

Application of FET-PET in Fusion With MRI in the Treatment of Glioblastoma Multiforme [TYR-GLIO]

An interventional study of MRI & PET fusion and MRI+T1C in Glioblastoma Multiforme, sponsored by Copernicus Memorial Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Poland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-17.

Sponsored by Copernicus Memorial Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Dec 2025; still recruiting 11 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
189
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM WHO IV) is the most common and aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, carrying a poor prognosis with a median survival of 12-16 months. The annual incidence is approximately 5 per 100,000 (roughly 600 cases annually in Poland), predominantly affecting individuals in their prime productive years. The standard of care consists of maximal safe resection followed by the Stupp protocol (60 Gy fractionated radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy).

Routine surgical management relies on contrast-enhanced MRI. Gross total resection (GTR) is defined as the complete removal of the contrast-enhancing lesion. Although GTR improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), local recurrence at the operative site occurs in up to 51% of patients within a year. This rapid regrowth is driven by glioblastoma stem cells infiltrating the surrounding non-enhancing brain tissue. Consequently, standard contrast-enhanced MRI lacks the sensitivity required to define true tumor boundaries for optimal patient outcomes.

To overcome this, positron emission tomography (PET-CT) using amino acid tracers like 18F-fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine (18F-FET) offers a promising alternative. Unlike 18-FDG, which is obscured by physiologically high glucose uptake in healthy brain tissue, 18F-FET provides high specificity and sensitivity for glial tumors. Crucially, studies show that MRI contrast enhancement overlaps with only 58% of the hypermetabolic area identified by 18F-FET. While "supramarginal" resections based on FLAIR MRI abnormalities (assumed to contain infiltrating stem cells) improve PFS by roughly 2 months, the FLAIR sequence cannot definitively distinguish active tumor infiltration from standard peritumoral edema.

This proposed experiment carries significant innovative value: it aims to use the fusion of 18F-FET PET and contrast-enhanced MRI to precisely guide both primary surgical resection and postoperative radiotherapy. By redefining the primary target volume to include the area of true biological tumor activity rather than just the MRI-enhancing mass (incorporating it into GTV, CTV, and PTV planning), the procedure directly targets residual glioblastoma stem cells. While PET has been evaluated for radiotherapy planning in recurrent GBM, high-quality data regarding its use for primary surgical planning is lacking. This study aims to fill that crucial gap in the literature.

02

Conditions studied

  • Glioblastoma Multiforme

Keywords

  • Glioblastoma Multiforme
  • Methionine
  • Positron-Emission Tomography
  • Brain neoplasms
  • Progression-free survival
  • Dose Fractionation, Radiation
  • Post-surgical radiotherapy
03

In context

Glioblastoma

2,132 studies on the registry are indexed under Glioblastoma; 464 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 189 is above the median of 36 across 1,753 interventional studies indexed under Glioblastoma.

Browse Glioblastoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Copernicus Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Single macroscopic tumor focus with the appearance of glioblastoma multiforme on MRI with contrast - contrast-enhancing lesion, completely or with central necrosis, with surrounding edema.
  • No history of cancer in other organs. No suspicious lesions on X-ray of the chest and abdomen (CT with contrast).
  • No clinical suspicion of brain abscess - no meningeal symptoms, signs of neuroinfection, fever, elevated inflammatory parameters.
  • Primary tumor, without neurosurgical, radiotherapy or oncology intervention. Prior tumor is allowed.
  • Tumor eligible for surgical treatment - craniotomy and tumor resection.
  • Age ≥ 18 years but \< 70 years old.
  • Quality of life assessment: ≥ 70.
  • Informed patient consent to the study and proposed treatment.
  • No allergy to contrast agents used in PET and MRI.
  • No medical to neurosurgery - craniotomy and resection.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multifocal brain tumor.
  • Recurrence of glioblastoma multiforme.
  • Clinical or radiological suspicion of or brain abscess.
  • Postoperative histopathological diagnosis other than WHO grade IV glioblastoma.
  • Medical to any surgery under general anesthesia.
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding.
  • Known allergy to gadolinium contrast or radiopharmaceutical tracing agent.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Brain metastases

Cancer deposits in the brain from a cancer that started elsewhere in the body (CNS metastases include the spinal cord).

Studies differ: some leave out any brain metastases, some accept ones treated and stable for some weeks. Check what this study allows.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
189 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Resection and radiotherapy according to the MRI & PET fusion

    Surgical treatment and radiotherapy planned based on FET-PET and MRI+T1C fusion.

    Other: MRI & PET fusion

  • Experimental
    Radiotherapy according to the MRI & PET fusion

    Surgical treatment planned based on MRI+T1C study, radiotherapy planned based on FET-PET and MRI+T1C fusion.

    Other: MRI & PET fusion · Other: MRI+T1C

  • Sham comparator
    Resection and radiotherapy according to the MRI

    Surgical treatment and radiotherapy planned based on MRI+T1C.

    Other: MRI+T1C

Interventions

  • OtherMRI & PET fusion

    MRI+T1C in fusion with FET-PET will be used for tumor resection and/or radiotherapy planning. Resection will be terminated after removal of PET-assigned tumor margin or in case any neuromonitoring-based indications regarding neurological damage occur.

  • OtherMRI+T1C

    MRI+T1C will be used for tumor resection and radiotherapy planning. Resection will be terminated after removal of contrast-enhancing part regardless of 5-ALA fluorescence or in case any neuromonitoring-based indications regarding neurological damage occur.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression-free survival

    Time frame: 36 months post surgery

  2. Overall survival

    Time frame: 36 months post surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Assessment of tumor volume (GTV) in MRI with contrast in relation to the tumor borders in PET-CT

    It will be assessed as the ratio of the treated tumor volume volumetrically based on MRI+T1C and FLAIR examination by software to the tumor volume estimated in a homogeneous way based on PET-CT examination. Both measurements will be verified independently by a neurosurgeon and a nuclear medicine specialist. This value will allow you to estimate how large the differences are treatment planning based on two different modalities - morphological assessment of the tumor and assessment of metabolic activity.

    Time frame: 1 day before radiotherapy

  2. Volumetric assessment of the planned radiotherapy volume based on PET-MRI and MRI planning.

    Time frame: 1 day before radiotherapy

  3. Long-term survival rate and prognostic factors (longer than 1 year from diagnosis).

    Detailed analysis of factors prognostically favorable for long-term survival, which will allow for better selection of therapeutic options and possible reoperation in this group of patients.

    Time frame: 36 months post surgery

  4. Pattern of local recurrence based on postoperative PET-MRI. Assessment of the nature and location of local recurrence based on the postoperative SUV parameter FET-PET and MRI examination.

    The purpose of this analysis is to develop risk factors for recurrence based on postoperative radiological examinations.

    Time frame: 36 months post surgery

  5. Assessment of quality of life related (SF-36 questionnaire) to the increase in the volume of the tumor undergoing treatment.

    Increasing the scope surgery and radiotherapy treatment may result in deterioration of the patient's functioning. Therefore, the above factors will be analyzed for correlation the scope of resection and the functioning of patients. The evaluation will be performed by neurosurgeons and a psychologist trained in neuropsychological assessment.

    Time frame: 7 days post surgery, 1 day before and after radiotherapy

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hutterer M, Nowosielski M, Putzer D, Jansen NL, Seiz M, Schocke M, McCoy M, Gobel G, la Fougere C, Virgolini IJ, Trinka E, Jacobs AH, Stockhammer G. [18F]-fluoro-ethyl-L-tyrosine PET: a valuable diagnostic tool in neuro-oncology, but not all that glitters is glioma. Neuro Oncol. 2013 Mar;15(3):341-51. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos300. Epub 2013 Jan 17. PubMed 23335162 ↗
  • Dunet V, Pomoni A, Hottinger A, Nicod-Lalonde M, Prior JO. Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Mar;18(3):426-34. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov148. Epub 2015 Aug 4. PubMed 26243791 ↗
  • Robert JA, Leclerc A, Ducloie M, Emery E, Agostini D, Vigne J. Contribution of [18F]FET PET in the Management of Gliomas, from Diagnosis to Follow-Up: A Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Sep 18;17(9):1228. doi: 10.3390/ph17091228. PubMed 39338390 ↗
  • Ort J, Hamou HA, Kernbach JM, Hakvoort K, Blume C, Lohmann P, Galldiks N, Heiland DH, Mottaghy FM, Clusmann H, Neuloh G, Langen KJ, Delev D. 18F-FET-PET-guided gross total resection improves overall survival in patients with WHO grade III/IV glioma: moving towards a multimodal imaging-guided resection. J Neurooncol. 2021 Oct;155(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s11060-021-03844-1. Epub 2021 Oct 1. PubMed 34599479 ↗
  • Harat M, Rakowska J, Harat M, Szylberg T, Furtak J, Miechowicz I, Malkowski B. Combining amino acid PET and MRI imaging increases accuracy to define malignant areas in adult glioma. Nat Commun. 2023 Jul 29;14(1):4572. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39731-8. PubMed 37516762 ↗
  • Herholz K, Holzer T, Bauer B, Schroder R, Voges J, Ernestus RI, Mendoza G, Weber-Luxenburger G, Lottgen J, Thiel A, Wienhard K, Heiss WD. 11C-methionine PET for differential diagnosis of low-grade gliomas. Neurology. 1998 May;50(5):1316-22. doi: 10.1212/wnl.50.5.1316. PubMed 9595980 ↗
  • Kracht LW, Miletic H, Busch S, Jacobs AH, Voges J, Hoevels M, Klein JC, Herholz K, Heiss WD. Delineation of brain tumor extent with [11C]L-methionine positron emission tomography: local comparison with stereotactic histopathology. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Nov 1;10(21):7163-70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-0262. PubMed 15534088 ↗
  • Singhal T, Narayanan TK, Jain V, Mukherjee J, Mantil J. 11C-L-methionine positron emission tomography in the clinical management of cerebral gliomas. Mol Imaging Biol. 2008 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-18. doi: 10.1007/s11307-007-0115-2. Epub 2007 Oct 24. PubMed 17957408 ↗
  • Grosu AL, Weber WA, Riedel E, Jeremic B, Nieder C, Franz M, Gumprecht H, Jaeger R, Schwaiger M, Molls M. L-(methyl-11C) methionine positron emission tomography for target delineation in resected high-grade gliomas before radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005 Sep 1;63(1):64-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.01.045. PubMed 16111573 ↗
  • Galldiks N, Niyazi M, Grosu AL, Kocher M, Langen KJ, Law I, Minniti G, Kim MM, Tsien C, Dhermain F, Soffietti R, Mehta MP, Weller M, Tonn JC. Contribution of PET imaging to radiotherapy planning and monitoring in glioma patients - a report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro Oncol. 2021 Jun 1;23(6):881-893. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab013. PubMed 33538838 ↗
  • Pirotte B, Goldman S, Dewitte O, Massager N, Wikler D, Lefranc F, Ben Taib NO, Rorive S, David P, Brotchi J, Levivier M. Integrated positron emission tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-guided resection of brain tumors: a report of 103 consecutive procedures. J Neurosurg. 2006 Feb;104(2):238-53. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.2.238. PubMed 16509498 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2030, 56 months after the start.

Of 131 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Glioblastoma, half reached primary completion within 54 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 37 and three quarters within 97. This study's planned 56 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 149 studies reached it within 54 months; a quarter within 36 and three quarters within 88.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 2, 2024
First posted
Jun 20, 2024
StartActual
Dec 8, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Aug 31, 2030
CompletionEst.
Aug 31, 2032
Last update
Apr 17, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06466031
Lead sponsor
Copernicus Memorial Hospital
Collaborators
Medical Research Agency, Poland
Responsible party
Kamil Krystkiewicz (Principal Investigator, Copernicus Memorial Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 20, 2024
Start date
Dec 8, 2025
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 31, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 17, 2026

Study contacts

Kamil Krystkiewicz, PhD
Contact
kamil.krystkiewicz@gmail.com
+48426895341
Marcin Tosik, PhD
Contact
sekretariat.neurochirurgia@kopernik.lodz.pl
+48426895341
Kamil Krystkiewicz, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Łódź, Poland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion