ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06460922Updated May 12, 2026

3D Printing Models in Surgical Planning of Osteotomies in Kienbock´s Disease Stages II-III

An observational study in Kienbock Disease, sponsored by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau. Recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2024; still recruiting 2 years 6 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ischemic necrosis of lunate bone, osteonecrosis or Kienböck´s disease was described by Kienböck in 1910. Numerous surgical procedures for this disease had been proposed. These surgical options, that depends of the radiological stage and anatomical risk factors, can be classified into lunate unloading procedures, lunate revascularization, replacement procedures and salvage procedures. These procedures, except the salvage procedures, has been successful in reconstructing and maintaining the height of the carpus, avoiding progression of the disease and with reduction of the pain.

The lunate unloading procedures are surgical treatments that make a radial osteotomy for modify differents anatomical risk factors associated with the osteonecrosis.

Read the detailed description

The anatomical factors associated with Kienböck´s disease are morphology of the lunate type I by Antuña-Zapico, cubitus minus, radial inclination angle greater than 23º, and little coverage of the lunate by the radius.

The types of radial osteotomy for Kienböck´s disease stages II, IIIA, IIIB or IIIC, depends to the anatomy of the patient and its anatomical risk factors. For patients with cubitus minus the indication is usually a radial shortening osteotomy. For patients with zero variant and an increase in the radial inclination angle the indication is usually a closed wedge radial osteotomy. The dorsolateral biplane radial osteotomy is used for zero variant cases such as a modification of the technique proposed by Nakamura et and Miura et al. It decompresses the lunate on the frontal plane and reduces dorsal radiolunate impingement on hyperextension. Dorsolateral radial osteotomy ensures a reduction of the radial inclination angle and a corresponding lunate decompression on the anteroposterior and sagittal plane.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kienbock Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Lunatomalacia
  • Kienböck´s disease
  • Radial osteotomy
  • Biplane radial osteotomy
03

In context

Osteonecrosis

286 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteonecrosis; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 121 across 127 observational studies indexed under Osteonecrosis.

Browse Osteonecrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau is the lead sponsor of 343 studies on the registry; 65 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients affected by lunate necrosis of the wrist, lunatomalacia, or Kienböck´s disease, stages II, IIIA, IIIB or IIIC by Lichtman classification, in which a distal radial osteotomy is indicated.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Kienbock´s disease in the wrist estages II, IIIA, IIIB or IIIC by Lichtman classification

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pre-radiological stages-Lichtman stage I
  • Radiocarpal and midcarpal osteoarthrosis, Lichtman stage IV
  • Kienböck in children: less than 18 years
  • Adults years greater than 85 years old
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • ProcedureRadial osteotomy

    3D printing models and personalized guides in surgical planning in distal radius osteotomies for Kienböck´s disease. Osteosynthesis with a plate in distal radius.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical evaluation preoperative and postoperative: Mayo Wrist Score

    Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MWS). It is based on pain, range of motion, grip strength and function. Scores of 80 to 100 are considered excellent; 65 to 79, good; 50 to 64, moderate; and less than 50, poor.

    Time frame: 22 months

  2. Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score questionnaire

    Disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score (Quick DASH) questionnaire. From 0 (better outcome) to 100% (worse outcome)

    Time frame: 22 months

  3. Clinical evaluation preoperative and postoperative: Grip strength

    Grip strength mesure with a Jamar dynamometer (in Kilograms).

    Time frame: 22 months

  4. Radiological variables In the posteroanterior radiographs wrist: Lichtman classification

    Lichtman´s Stage of lunate necrosis classification: 4 stages (1977). Better stage 1, worse stage 4.

    Time frame: 22 months

  5. Radiological variables In the posteroanterior radiographs wrist: Carpal Ulnar Distance Ratio.

    Carpal Ulnar Distance Ratio (mesure in millimeters) by McMurtry-Youm (1978). Outcomes in a ratio 0.30+-0.03.

    Time frame: 22 months

  6. Radiological variables In the posteroanterior radiographs wrist. Carpal Height Ratio.

    Carpal Height Ratio (measure in millimeters) by McMurtry-Youm (1978) . Outcomes in a ratio 0.54+-0.03.

    Time frame: 22 months

  7. Radiological variables In the posteroanterior radiographs wrist: Radial Inclination Angle.

    The Radial Inclination Angle (RIA) describes the angulation of the distal radial articular surface in relationship with the long axis of the radius or ulna as seen in the posteroanterior view of the wrist. We measure RIA in relationship with the long axis of the ulna. The normal limits are 18.8° to 29.3° (measure in degrees).

    Time frame: 22 months

  8. Radiological variables In the posteroanterior radiographs wrist: Lunate covering Ratio.

    The Lunate Covering Ratio (LCR) is a measure of the lunate surface protected by the radius, obtained by dividing the width of lunate covered by radius by total lunate width in millimeters x 100.

    Time frame: 22 months

  9. Radiological variables In the posteroanterior radiographs wrist. Ulnar Variance.

    Ulnar variance was measured as described by Gelberman et al. (1980) The measurement was obtained by projecting a line from the carpal joint surface of the distal end of the radius toward the ulna and measuring the distance in millimeters between this line and the carpal surface of the ulna. Ulnar shortening values of 2 or more millimeters are described as negative ulna or cubitus minus. Zero variant or neutral ulna with ulnar variance or distal radio-ulnar index is between 0-2 mm and cubitus plus when ulnar elongation values greater than 2 mm.

    Time frame: 22 months

  10. Clinical evaluation preoperative and postoperative: Pain

    Visual Analog Score, from 0 to 10. Better outcome 0 and worse 10.

    Time frame: 22 months

  11. Clinical evaluation preoperative and postoperative: Range of motion

    Range of motion (ROM): wrist motion (flexion, extension, radial deviation, ulnar deviation, pronation, supination) mesure with a goniometer (in degrees).

    Time frame: 22 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Radiological variables in the lateral radiograph in the wrist: Palmar Tilt

    Palmar tilt (PT) measure in degrees. Palmar tilt is determined by the line drawn across the most distal points of the dorsal and ventral rims of the distal articular surface. The degree of PT is derived by the intersection of the line of PT and a line perpendicular to the long axis of the radius, as seen in the lateral view. The normal limits are 0° to 18°.

    Time frame: 22 months

  2. Radiological variables in the lateral radiograph in the wrist: Stahl´s Index

    Stahl´s index measures the degree of lunate fragmentation and collapse. The normal limits are 0.53+- 0.03. The longitudinal height of the lunate measured on the lateral view is divided by its greatest dorsopalmar dimension. The ratio of these 2 measurements gives the Stahl index.

    Time frame: 22 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Calfee RP, Van Steyn MO, Gyuricza C, Adams A, Weiland AJ, Gelberman RH. Joint leveling for advanced Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2010 Dec;35(12):1947-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.08.017. Epub 2010 Oct 25. PubMed 20971577 ↗
  • Horii E, Garcia-Elias M, Bishop AT, Cooney WP, Linscheid RL, Chao EY. Effect on force transmission across the carpus in procedures used to treat Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 1990 May;15(3):393-400. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(90)90049-w. PubMed 2348055 ↗
  • Kennedy C, Abrams R. In Brief: The Lichtman Classification for Kienbock Disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Jun;477(6):1516-1520. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000595. No abstract available. PubMed 30507834 ↗
  • Lamas C, Mir X, Llusa M, Navarro A. Dorsolateral biplane closing radial osteotomy in zero variant cases of Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2000 Jul;25(4):700-9. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.6929. PubMed 10913211 ↗
  • Lamas C, Carrera A, Proubasta I, Llusa M, Majo J, Mir X. The anatomy and vascularity of the lunate: considerations applied to Kienbock's disease. Chir Main. 2007 Feb;26(1):13-20. doi: 10.1016/j.main.2007.01.001. Epub 2007 Feb 8. PubMed 17418764 ↗
  • Nakamura R, Watanabe K, Tsunoda K, Miura T. Radial osteotomy for Kienbock's disease evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. 24 cases followed for 1-3 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1993 Apr;64(2):207-11. doi: 10.3109/17453679308994572. PubMed 8498188 ↗
  • Matsushita K, Firrell JC, Tsai TM. X-ray evaluation of radial shortening for Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 1992 May;17(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(92)90346-q. PubMed 1613218 ↗
  • Miura H, Sugioka Y. Radial closing wedge osteotomy for Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 1996 Nov;21(6):1029-34. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(96)80311-x. PubMed 8969427 ↗
  • Trumble T, Glisson RR, Seaber AV, Urbaniak JR. A biomechanical comparison of the methods for treating Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 1986 Jan;11(1):88-93. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(86)80111-3. PubMed 3944452 ↗
  • Tsuge S, Nakamura R. Anatomical risk factors for Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Br. 1993 Feb;18(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/0266-7681(93)90201-p. PubMed 8436868 ↗
  • Soejima O, Iida H, Komine S, Kikuta T, Naito M. Lateral closing wedge osteotomy of the distal radius for advanced stages of Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Jan;27(1):31-6. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2002.30906. PubMed 11810611 ↗
  • Watanabe K, Nakamura R, Horii E, Miura T. Biomechanical analysis of radial wedge osteotomy for the treatment of Kienbock's disease. J Hand Surg Am. 1993 Jul;18(4):686-90. doi: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90319-X. PubMed 8349982 ↗
  • Werner FW, Palmer AK. Biomechanical evaluation of operative procedures to treat Kienbock's disease. Hand Clin. 1993 Aug;9(3):431-43. PubMed 8408253 ↗
  • Ma ZJ, Liu ZF, Shi QS, Li T, Liu ZY, Yang ZZ, Liu YH, Xu YJ, Dai K, Yu C, Gan YK, Wang JW. Varisized 3D-Printed Lunate for Kienbock's Disease in Different Stages: Preliminary Results. Orthop Surg. 2020 Jun;12(3):792-801. doi: 10.1111/os.12681. Epub 2020 May 17. PubMed 32419366 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — No plan to share

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06460922
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 14, 2024
Start date
May 10, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 28, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 12, 2026

Study contacts

Claudia Lamas, MD, PhD
Contact
clamasg@santpau.cat
935537032 ext. 7032
Alejandra Guerrero-Espinosa, MD, Ph D
Contact
AespinosaG@santpau.cat
935537796 ext. 7796
Claudia Lamas, MD, Ph D
principal investigator · Research Institute IIB Sant Pau. Institut de Recerca de l´Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion