ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06460519PARECHOCUpdated Sep 17, 2026

The Prevalence of the Aortic to Radial Pressure Gradient in States of Shock, Outside the Context of Cardiac Surgery, a Prospective Study

An observational study in Shock, sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon. Recruiting at 9 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Hospices Civils de Lyon · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2024; still recruiting 2 years 1 month later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
180
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

First described in cardiac surgery, the aortic to radial pressure gradient (ATRAP) is the cause of an underestimation of the aortic pressure with a measure assumed with a radial catheter, and he can concert 1 of 3rd patients. The risks factor well known are small height, previous hypertension, long and difficult surgery, radial artery diameter less than 1.8mm.

The ATRAP definition is a pressure difference between radial and femoral (same of the aortic pressure) pressure of 25mmHg on the systolic pressure, or a pressure difference on the mean pressure of 10mmHg, both measures realised by arterial canulation, and with a duration superior than 5 minutes.

If this gradient appears in pathophysiological specifics situations, there is a risk of inappropriate administration of vasopressors, with more hospitalisation days, more side effect of vasopressors like an augmentation of myocardial work.

The ATRAP is documented in septic shock with a prevalence between 21% and 27%. The ATRAP can appear in shocks, moreover with doses of equivalent norepinephrine of 0.5 µg/kg/min who is use for the definition of refractive shock, the difference between the two pressure is higher if the dose of equivalent norepinephrine is higher than 1µg/kg/min. But the prevalence and risks factors are barely unknowns in this situation.

Most of the time, a radial arterial catheter is used for hemodynamic monitoring for his simplicity of utilisation and the lows complications associated. Some medical teams in cardiac surgeries, or in intensive care unit (ICU) for the management of shocks used often radial and femoral arterial catheter. It seems there is no at risk for the utilisation of a radial and femoral arterial canulation.

Out of the situation of cardiac surgery, there is a lack of information of the ATRAP, the objective of the study is to evaluate the prevalence of the ATRAP in shock, out of the situation of cardiac surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shock

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Radial artery
  • Femoral artery
  • Norepinephrine equivalent
  • Intensive care unit
03

In context

Shock

487 studies on the registry are indexed under Shock; 107 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 100 across 247 observational studies indexed under Shock.

Browse Shock studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon is the lead sponsor of 1,866 studies on the registry; 448 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

180 patients of intensive care unit (ICU), in shock with equal or more than 0.5µg/kg/min of norepinephrine equivalent, who are not in perioperative of cardiac surgery. And who have a monitoring of arterial pressure by a radial catheter, and for who the physician decided to put in place a femoral arterial catheter.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • age superior or equal 18 years
  • Vasopressors support superior or equal 0.5 µg/kg/min of equivalent norepinephrine
  • Invasive monitoring of blood pressure with a radial arterial catheter and a femoral arterial catheter decided by de physician
  • Beginning of the shock less than 48 hours.
  • Consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • perioperative of cardiac surgery (between the beginning of the surgery and 7 days after)
  • pregnant woman or breast-feeding
  • Major person under protection
  • Person with privation of liberty by a justice decision, or an administrative decision
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Intensive care unit patient with shock, who don't be in perioperative of cardiac surgery

    Patients of age superior or equal of 18 years, with a vasopressor support superior 0.5 µg/kg/min of equivalent norepinephrine during more than 30 minutes. The patients are not in perioperative of cardiac surgery (between the beginning of the intervention and 7 days after). The patients have a monitoring of arterial pressure with a radial arterial catheter, and the physician decided to have a monitoring of arterial pressure with a femoral arterial catheter.

    Other: Non-invasive blood pressure measurements

Interventions

  • OtherNon-invasive blood pressure measurements

    Non-invasive blood pressure measurements to the tension cuff three times in a row on each side (right arm and left arm)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prevalence (percentage) of ATRAP is determined by the ratio of patients with ATRAP to total. ATRAP is defined by a 25mmHg systolic or 10mmHg mean pressure difference between radial and femoral arterial pressures during more than 5 minutes.

    The prevalence of the ATRAP will be show in percentage (%), with his confidence interval at 95%.

    Time frame: The primary outcome will be measure at the inclusion of the patient when the femoral arterial catheter will be in place.

07

Study locations

9 of 9 sites recruiting
  • Département d'anesthésie Réanimation Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel/Groupement Hospitalier Est
    Bron, 69500, France
    Recruiting
  • Département d'anesthésie-réanimation CHU de Clermont-Ferrand
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France
    Recruiting
  • Service d'Anesthésie Association hospitalière Protestante de Lyon
    Lyon, 69000, France
    Recruiting
  • Hopital Edouard heriot/Groupement hospitalier Centre, service de médecine intensive réanimation
    Lyon, 69003, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Edouard Heriot/ Groupement hospitalier Centre, service d'anesthésie réanimation
    Lyon, 69003, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse/Groupement hospitalier Nord, service d'anesthésie réanimation
    Lyon, 69004, France
    Recruiting
  • Hôpital Saint Joseph Saint Luc
    Lyon, 69007, France
    Recruiting
  • Centre hospitalier Lyon Sud/Groupement hospitalier Sud, Service d'anesthésie réanimation médecine intensive
    Lyon, 69495, France
    Recruiting
  • Service de réanimation médico-chirurgicale et traumatologique Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Guadeloupe
    Les Abymes, Guadeloupe
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06460519
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 14, 2024
Start date
Oct 3, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 3, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 3, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Matthias Jacquet-lagreze, Dr
Contact
matthias.jacquet-lagreze@chu-lyon.fr
0783426888 ext. +33
Martin Ruste, Dr
Contact
martin.ruste@chu-lyon.fr
0472118956 ext. +33

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion