ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06454825Updated Jun 12, 2024

Effects of Antiemetic Agents in Orthognathic Surgery Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of Intravenous drug in Emesis, Postoperative and Maxillofacial Abnormalities, sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-06-12.

Sponsored by Bezmialem Vakif University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 1 month after the study started (first participant enrolled Apr 2020, registered Jun 2024).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
66
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In an effort to prevent or treat consistently high rates of PONV following maxillofacial operations, several medications, techniques and multimodal protocols have been studied. In the present study, the investigators hypothesized that combining metoclopramide with granisetron will improve PONV incidence when compared with granisetrone alone.

Read the detailed description

Despite advances in anesthetic techniques and antiemetic drugs that accompany increasing awareness of anesthesia providers, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) remains one of the most common problems after general anesthesia. PONV is one of the major problems leading to patient dissatisfaction, prolonged stay in postoperative care unit and hospital, readmissions and thus it can increase health care costs. In the studies performed in PONV prone patients and high-risk surgeries, as compared with other antiemetic medications, "setrons" provided lower nausea and vomiting incidence postoperatively, but were unable to completely prevent this "big little" problem.The blood in the stomach has been indicated as one of the major causes of PONV following maxillofacial surgery thus, using metoclopramide may relieve the complaints by evacuating this irritant. After institutional ethic committee and National Medicines, 66 consecutive patients, classified as ASA I and II physical status and aged between 18 and 60 years were included in the study. Apfel's simplified PONV risk score including female sex, history of motion sickness or PONV, smoking status and predicted use of postoperative opioids was recorded.Procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Patients in Group G received 3 mg granisetron (Neoset, Deva, Istanbul) and the patients in group GM received 3 mg granisetron + 10 mg metoclopramide (Metpamid, Sifar İlaç, Istanbul) 30 minutes before the end of operation intravenously. A nursing staff collected the data concerning PONV, VAS, systolic, diastolic and mean arterial pressures, heart rate, peripheral arterial saturation, total doses of drugs used, overall bleeding score, infused fluid volume, VAS, surgical procedure, duration of surgery and rescue antiemetics for nausea if applied for 24 hours.

02

Conditions studied

  • Emesis, Postoperative
  • Maxillofacial Abnormalities

Keywords

  • anti-emetic agent
  • orthognathic surgery
  • granisetron
  • metoclopramide
03

In context

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

638 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting; 110 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 66 is below the median of 112 across 529 interventional studies indexed under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting.

Browse Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting studies →

Lead sponsor

Bezmialem Vakif University is the lead sponsor of 354 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Undergoing orthognathic surgery
  • and II physical status
  • aged between 18 and 60 years
  • must be volunteer to take study drugs

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable or unwilling to give
  • Underwent to genioplasty
  • Documented to study drugs
  • Gastroesophageal reflux or hiatal hernia
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Renal insufficiency
  • Pregnancy
  • Electrolyte imbalance
  • Neurological disease
  • Mental retardation
  • Prolonged .
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
66 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Granisetron group

    one group received granisetron 3 mg drug

    Drug: Intravenous drug

  • Experimental
    Granisetron and Metoclopramide group

    one group received a combination of granisetron 3 mg and metoclopramide 10 mg drugs

    Drug: Intravenous drug

Interventions

  • DrugIntravenous drug

    medications were applied intravenously to the groups 30 minutes before end of the procedure

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative nausea and vomiting

    The primary outcome of interest in the present study was the incidence of PONV.

    Time frame: fully awake and on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th , 8th and 24th hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual analogue scale

    Visual analogue scale was used to record pain score. following the surgery. 0-10 point scale was used. 0 showed no pain, 10 showed worst pain status.

    Time frame: fully awake and on the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th , 8th and 24th hours postoperatively

  2. Systolic arterial pressure

    It was measured during the surgery.

    Time frame: preoperatively, at the induction, every 30 minutes interval till the end of the surgery, before extubation.

  3. Diastolic arterial pressure

    It was measured during the surgery.

    Time frame: preoperatively, at the induction, every 30 minutes interval till the end of the surgery, before extubation.

  4. Mean arterial pressure

    It was measured during the surgery.

    Time frame: preoperatively, at the induction, every 30 minutes interval till the end of the surgery, before extubation.

  5. heart rate

    It was measured during the surgery.

    Time frame: preoperatively, at the induction, every 30 minutes interval till the end of the surgery, before extubation.

  6. peripheral arterial saturation

    It was measured during the surgery.

    Time frame: preoperatively, at the induction, every 30 minutes interval till the end of the surgery, before extubation.

  7. total doses of drugs

    It was recorded during the surgery.

    Time frame: before extubation

  8. Bleeding amount

    It was recorded at the end of the surgery.

    Time frame: before extubation

  9. Infused fluid volume

    It was recorded during the surgery.

    Time frame: before extubation

  10. Duration of surgery

    It was recorded at the end of the surgery.

    Time frame: before extubation

  11. Rescue antiemetic

    It was recorded at the end of the follow-up period.

    Time frame: it was recorded until follow-up period ended and if applied it would be recorded. Between fully awake in ward and 24th hours postoperatively.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bezmialem Vakif University
    Istanbul, Fatih 34093, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Patients were anonymously recorded. Due to the data and patient's security, if it requested from the investigators, in that case we will decide.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Apr 2020 to primary completion in Apr 2021, 11 months.

Of 67 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23. This study's 11 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 67 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 1, 2024
First posted
Jun 12, 2024
StartActual
Apr 14, 2020
Primary completionActual
Apr 5, 2021
CompletionActual
Apr 5, 2021
Last update
Jun 12, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 12, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06454825
Responsible party
Özge Özyılmaz (Associate Professor, Bezmialem Vakif University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 12, 2024
Start date
Apr 14, 2020
Primary completion
Apr 5, 2021
Completion
Apr 5, 2021
Last update
Jun 12, 2024

Study contacts

ÖZGE 3 ÖZYILMAZ, DDS
principal investigator · Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Dentistry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion