ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06451718Updated Jan 20, 2026

First in Human Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of an Implantable Nitinol Device in the Treatment of Keratoconus

An interventional study of Nitinol net for intracorneal implant for keratoconus treatment in Keratoconus, sponsored by Recornea Srl. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-20.

Sponsored by Recornea Srl · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2024; still recruiting 2 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This Study is a First In Human clinical investigation addressed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel intra-corneal nitinol device (Investigational Medical Device: GROSSO® implant) for the treatment of advanced keratoconus disease of the eye.

Read the detailed description

The medical device under investigation is a sterile thin 8-mm diameter circular scaffold made of a nickel-titanium alloy (nitinol) that is intended as a permanent implant that is surgically inserted into the cornea in order to modify force by inducing a change in corneal shape and consequently improving vision. This study is aimed at adults with a stage 3- 4 keratoconus, a central K reading > 47.2 D and RMS of coma aberration > 2.5 μm, which are not recommended for Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments (ICRS) and are recommended for keratoplasty. Therefore, this study represents a salvage route to preserve the cornea. Envisaged worst case scenario of failure of the experimental device patients would be redirected to keratoplasty.

Study aims to treat 12 patients separated by a safety period of at least 14 days between each one allowing safety monitoring. For each patient, the following treatment strategy will be applied:

  • Unilateral KC: the affected eye meeting the eligibility criteria will be treated.
  • Bilateral KC, one eye meeting the eligibility criteria: the eligible eye will be treated.
  • Bilateral KC, both eyes meeting the eligibility criteria: the most severely compromised eye will be treated. Primary study objective is safety by identification or any local or systemic adverse events. Secondary objective will aim to evaluate efficacy that means a consequently improving of vision. Patients will be monitored at 1, 7, 21, 60, 180 and 365 days post implant surgery. Upon observance or any serious adverse event, increase in ocular pressure, device migration or discomfort, medical criteria or patient request, the patient will be offered for the device removed. The study will be early terminated if 3 patients have the experimental device removed for any reason or 4 patients withdraw from study.
02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconus

Keywords

  • GROSSO
  • Implant
  • Cornea
  • Surgery
  • Reshaper
  • keratoconus
  • keratoplasty
  • nitinol
  • corneal shape
  • remodeling
03

In context

Keratoconus

313 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconus; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 12 is below the median of 40 across 205 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconus.

Browse Keratoconus studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Recornea Srl as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Signed and dated form.
  • Male and female ≥ 18 years old.
  • Not recommended for ICRS.
  • Recommended for keratoplasty.
  • Minimum corneal thickness ≥ 350 μm.
  • Best Distance Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BDSCVA) with the ETDRS test ≥ 0.30 logMAR (\<= 0,50 decimal notation).
  • BCVA with RGP contact lens with the ETDRS test 10 letters or more than BCVA with spectacles.
  • Have stable or stabilized disease for 12 months (in case of crosslinking, it must have been done at least 12 months prior to intervention).
  • Have a KC stage 3-4 according to Investigator's judgement, with a central K readings > 47.2 D and RMS of coma aberration > 2.5 μm.
  • Have no known or suspected allergy to nickel.
  • Female subject of is eligible to participate if declaring she is not pregnant, or not breastfeeding and agree to use highly effective (defined as method which results in a failure rate of \<1% annually) and must abstain from egg donation or storage throughout the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability of patient and/or relatives to understand the clinical investigation procedures and thus inability to give .
  • Untreated progressive KC.
  • Single functioning eye.
  • Other ocular diseases (eyelids malposition, uveitis, ocular hypertension, glaucoma, cataract, retinal disorders) or corneal surgeries (refractive corneal surgery, keratoplasty), except corneal crosslinking.
  • Systemic collagenopathies and/or vasculitis, and other diseases that in the opinion of the principal Investigator, may be .
  • Suspected or known intolerance or to any of the treatments indicated in the CIP and/or to any component of the device (i.e. nickel).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study group

    All participants will undergo the planned surgical intervention for the implantation of the investigational medical device and will be monitored for up to 1 year after the procedure.

    Device: Nitinol net for intracorneal implant for keratoconus treatment

Interventions

  • DeviceNitinol net for intracorneal implant for keratoconus treatment

    The investigational corneal implant device is designed for patients with keratoconus. It is intended to be surgically implanted into the cornea as a permanent implant and is made of nitinol. The device is intended to improve corneal stability and visual outcomes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADE), Adverse Events (AE), and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

    Number and type of adverse events, serious adverse events, and serious adverse device effects observed during follow-up.

    Time frame: From enrolment up to 12 months post-procedure

  2. Changes in corneal alterations from baseline to 12 months.

    Slit Lamp corneal assessments to evaluate: * Corneal inflammation * Corneal infection * Corneal stromal lysis * Corneal melting * Corneal stromal infiltration * Corneal neo vessels * Persistent corneal epithelial defects Observations will be graded from 0 (Absence) to 3 (Severe)

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  3. Changes in total and epithelial corneal thickness (central and minimum) from baseline to 12 months.

    Measurement of total and epithelial corneal thickness (central and minimum)

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  4. Changes in IOP from baseline to 12 months

    IOP is measured with tonometer

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  5. Changes in corrected IOP (bIOP) from baseline to 12 months

    bIOP is measured using a biomechanically based tonometry method

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  6. Changes in macular central thickness from baseline to 12 months

    Central macular thickness is assessed with a posterior Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  7. Changes in Endothelial Cell Count (ECC) from baseline to 12 months

    Corneal endothelium assessment is performed with specular microscope

    Time frame: from baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  8. Subjective numeric scale related to several ocular symptoms

    Subjective numeric scale ranked from 0 (no pain at all) to 10 (the maximum pain ever felt) related to pain, foreign body sensation, tearing, photophobia, glare and halos

    Time frame: From baseline to 12 months post-procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Best Distance Spectacle Corrected Visual Acuity (BDSCVA) from baseline to 12 months

    BDSCVA is performed using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) refraction and vision testing protocol.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  2. Changes in topographic keratometry values from baseline to 12 months

    Corneal topography is performed by using the topographer. The values collected are Kmax, K steep, K flat and Km.

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  3. Changes in topographic and refractive astigmatism from baseline to 12 months

    Topographic astigmatism is measured in dioptres with the Topographer. Refractive astigmatism is measured in dioptres and axis, determined by refraction using ETDRS optotypes

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  4. Changes in Manifest Refraction Spherical Equivalent (MRSE) from baseline to 12 months

    MRSE is measured in dioptres, determined by refraction using ETDRS optotypes

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  5. Changes in Symmetry Index (SI) from baseline to 12 months

    SI index is measured in diopters with Topographer

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  6. Changes in Center-Surrounding Index (CSI) from baseline to 12 months

    CSI index is measured in diopters with Topographer

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  7. Assessment of the topographic centration of the implant

    Assessment of the coordinates of the centration of the device in the cornea (in dioptres and degrees).

    Time frame: From surgery up to 12 months post-procedure

  8. Changes in Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UNCVA) from baseline to 12 months

    UNCVA is assessed using ETDRS

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  9. Changes in Best Corrected Visual Acuity with rigid gas permeable contact lens (RGP-BCVA) from baseline to 12 months

    RGP-BCVA is assessed in LogMAR units using ETDRS

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  10. Changes in biomechanical corneal properties expressed as Corneal Hysteresis (CH) from baseline to 12 months

    Corneal Hysteresis is measured in mmHg with the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA)

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  11. Changes in biomechanical corneal properties, expressed as Deformation Amplitude Ratio (DA Ratio) from baseline to 12 months

    Deformation Amplitude Ratio (DA Ratio) is measured in mm/sd with Corvis ST

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  12. Changes in biomechanical corneal properties, expressed as Integrated Radius from baseline to 12 months

    Integrated Radius is measured in mm/sd with Corvis ST

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  13. Changes in biomechanical corneal properties, expressed as ARTH from baseline to 12 months

    ARTH is measured in μm/sd with Corvis ST

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  14. Changes in biomechanical corneal properties, expressed as Stiffness Parameter at first Applanation (SP-A1) from baseline to 12 months

    Stiffness Parameter at first Applanation (SP-A1) is measured in pr/mm/sd with Corvis ST

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  15. Changes in biomechanical corneal properties, expressed as Stress-Strain Index (SSI) from baseline to 12 months

    Stress-Strain Index (SSI) is calculated with Corvis ST

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  16. Changes in Vision Related Quality of Life (VRQoL) from baseline to 12 months

    The NEI-42 questionnaire provides a final score reflecting vision-related quality of life. All items are scored so that higher values indicate better quality of life. Each response is converted to a 0-100 scale, where 0 represents the lowest and 100 the highest possible score. The domains evaluated include: clarity of vision, expectations, near vision, distance vision, diurnal fluctuations, activity limitations, glare, symptoms, dependence on correction, worry, suboptimal correction, appearance, and satisfaction with correction.

    Time frame: At screening visit (preoperatively) and at study end (12 months post-procedure)

  17. Stability of the corneal applanation between 6 and 12 months

    Corneal curvature or applanation is measured in dioptres, measured with a topographer

    Time frame: Between 6 and 12 months post-procedure

  18. Changes in optical quality expressed as RMS from baseline to 12 months

    RMS value is measured in μm with the MS-39 topographer

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

  19. Changes in optical quality expressed as OSI value from baseline to 12 months

    OSI value is measured with the HD Analizer, if available

    Time frame: From baseline up to 12 months post-procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
    Roma, Roma 00168, Italy
    Not yet recruiting
  • Instituto de Microcirugía Ocular de Barcelona (IMO)
    Barcelona, Bar 08035, Spain
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this study will be made available upon reasonable request from qualified researchers, subject to the sponsor's discretion, in order to protect participant privacy and sponsor confidentiality.

Supporting information: Clinical study report

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 29 months after the start.

Of 68 interventional studies with no phase under Keratoconus, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 59. This study's planned 29 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 7, 2024
First posted
Jun 11, 2024
StartActual
Sep 3, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Feb 2027
CompletionEst.
Feb 2027
Last update
Jan 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06451718
Lead sponsor
Recornea Srl
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 11, 2024
Start date
Sep 3, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jan 20, 2026

Study contacts

Emiliano Lepore, Ing., PhD
Contact
el@recornea.com
+39 3209673891
Rossella Baldini, PhD
Contact
rb@recornea.com
Edoardo Grosso, MD
study director · Chief Medical Officer (CMO)
José L. Güell, MD
principal investigator · Head of the Cornea, Cataract and Refractive Surgery Department at IMO

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion