ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06449638CAMPSTIMUpdated Mar 2, 2026

Modified Platform Trial Assessing Multiple CAMPs and SOC vs SOC Alone in the Treatment of Hard-to-Heal DFUs

An interventional study of Standard of Care and Revita in Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Ulcer Foot and Diabetic Foot, sponsored by StimLabs. Recruiting at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-02.

Sponsored by StimLabs · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2024; still recruiting 2 years 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
272
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of four dehydrated complete human placental membrane, also defined as Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Products/skin substitutes, plus SOC versus SOC alone in achieving complete closure of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers over 12 weeks using a modified platform trial design.

Read the detailed description

The CAMPSTIM trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to evaluate four separate CAMPs (Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Products), Revita®, Relese®, Cogenex®, and Enverse®. The study utilizes a unique modified platform trial to evaluate multiple cellular and/or tissue-based products (CTPs) in a single trial.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU)
  • Ulcer Foot
  • Diabetic Foot
  • Foot Ulcer

Keywords

  • Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Product (CAMP)
  • Cellular and/or Tissue Product (CTP)
  • Dehydrated Complete Human Placental Membrane (dCHPM)
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 272 is above the median of 60 across 847 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

StimLabs is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. At least 18 years of age or older.
  2. Diagnosis of type 1 or 2 Diabetes mellitus.
  3. At enrollment, target ulcer with a minimum surface area of 1.0 cm2 and a maximum surface area of 25.0 cm2 measured post debridement with the MolecuLight® Imaging Device.
  4. The target ulcer must have been present for a minimum of 4 weeks and a maximum of 52 weeks of standard of care, prior to the initial screening visit.
  5. The target ulcer must be located on the foot with at least 50% of the ulcer below the malleolus.
  6. The target ulcer must be full thickness without exposed bone.
  7. The affected limb must have adequate perfusion confirmed by vascular assessment. Any of the following methods performed within 3 months of the first screening visit are acceptable:

    1. Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) between 0.7 and ≤ 1.3;
    2. Toe-Brachial Index (TBI) ≥ 0.6;
    3. Transcutaneous Oxygen Measurement (TCOM) ≥ 40 mmHg;
    4. Pulse Volume Resistance (PVR): biphasic.
  8. If the potential subject has two or more ulcers, they must be separated by at least 2 cm. The largest ulcer satisfying the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be designated as the target ulcer.
  9. Target ulcers located on the plantar aspect of the foot must be offloaded for at least 14 days prior to enrollment.
  10. The potential subject must consent to using the prescribed offloading method for the duration of the study.
  11. The potential subject must agree to attend the weekly study visits required by the protocol.
  12. The potential subject must be willing and able to participate in the process.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. The potential subject is known to have a of \< 6 months.
  2. The potential subject's target ulcer is not secondary to diabetes.
  3. The target ulcer is infected or there is cellulitis in the surrounding skin.
  4. The target ulcer exposes tendon or bone.
  5. There is evidence of osteomyelitis complicating the target ulcer.
  6. There is an infection in the target ulcer or in a remote location that requires systemic antibiotic therapy.
  7. The potential subject is receiving (including systemic at doses greater than 10 mg of prednisone per day or equivalent) or cytotoxic chemotherapy or is taking medications that the PI believes will interfere with wound healing (e.g., biologics).
  8. The potential subject is taking hydroxyurea.
  9. The potential subject has applied topical steroids to the ulcer surface within one month of initial screening.
  10. The potential subject with a previous partial amputation on the affected foot that results in a deformity that impedes proper offloading of the target ulcer.
  11. The potential subject has (HbA1c) greater than or equal to 12% within 3 months of the initial screening visit.
  12. The surface area of the target ulcer has reduced in size by more than 20% in the 2 weeks prior to the initial screening visit ("historical" run-in period). MolecuLight Imaging Device is not required for measurements taken during the historical run-in period (e.g., calculating surface area using length X width is acceptable).
  13. The surface area measurement of the Target ulcer decreases by 20% or more during the 2-week screening phase: the 2 weeks from the initial screening visit (S1) to the TV-1 visit during which time the potential subject received SOC.
  14. The potential subject has an acute Charcot foot, or an inactive Charcot foot, which impedes proper offloading of the target ulcer.
  15. Women who are pregnant or considering becoming pregnant within the next 6 months are excluded.
  16. The potential subject has end stage renal disease requiring dialysis.
  17. Participation in a clinical trial involving treatment with an product within the previous 30 days.
  18. A potential subject who, in the opinion of the investigator, has a medical or psychological condition that may interfere with study assessments.
  19. The target ulcer was treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) or a Cellular, Acellular, Matrix-like Product (CAMP) in the 30 days prior to the initial screening visit.
  20. The potential subject has a malnutrition indicator score \<17 as measured on the Mini Nutrition Assessment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(6)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
272 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    Standard of care will be cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, and offloading.

    Other: Standard of Care

  • Experimental
    Revita

    Revita is an opaque, lyophilized dehydrated complete human placental membrane (dCHPM) allograft.

    Other: Revita

  • Experimental
    Relese

    Relese is a fenestrated dehydrated complete human placental membrane (dCHPM) allograft.

    Other: Relese

  • Experimental
    Cogenex

    Cognenex is a fenestrated dehydrated complete human placental membrane (dCHPM) allograft.

    Other: Cogenex

  • Experimental
    Enverse

    Enverse is a translucent dehydrated complete human placental membrane (dCHPM) allograft.

    Other: Enverse

Interventions

  • OtherStandard of Care

    Beginning at the screening visit, participants will receive weekly treatment with standard of care (cleaning, debridement, ulcer moisture balance, and offloading) until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 12 weeks, whichever occurs first.

  • OtherRevita

    Participants will receive weekly applications of Revita and Standard of Care until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 12 weeks, whichever occurs first.

  • OtherRelese

    Participants will receive weekly applications of Relese and Standard of Care until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 12 weeks, whichever occurs first.

  • OtherCogenex

    Participants will receive weekly applications of Cogenex and Standard of Care until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 12 weeks, whichever occurs first.

  • OtherEnverse

    Participants will receive weekly applications of Enverse and Standard of Care until ulcer closure, or a maximum of 12 weeks, whichever occurs first.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The percentage of target ulcers achieving complete wound closure

    Determine the percent of target ulcers achieving complete wound closure at 12 weeks. In addition, a qualified third-party clinician will independently confirm wound closure.

    Time frame: 1-12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to closure for the target ulcer

    Time to closure will be determined for each treatment group and compared to SOC.

    Time frame: 1-12 weeks

  2. Percent area reduction

    Percent Area Reduction (PAR) will be calculated from Treatment Visit (TV)-1 to Treatment Visit (TV)-13.

    Time frame: 1-12 weeks

  3. Adverse events

    Incidence of adverse events will be evaluated weekly from TV-1 to the healing confirmation visit (HCV).

    Time frame: 1-14 weeks

  4. Change in pain in target ulcer

    Change in target ulcer pain assessed using the Pain, Enjoyment of Life and General Activity (PEG) scale (0 to 10 where higher score indicates more severe pain and pain-related interference with life and activities) at TV-1, TV-4, TV-7, TV-10, and TV-13.

    Time frame: 1-14 weeks

  5. Determine improvement in Quality of Life - wQOL

    Quality of Life assessed using the Wound Quality of Life (wQOL) checklist at TV-1, TV- 4, TV-7, TV- 10, and TV-13.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Determine improvement in Quality of Life - FWS

    Quality of Life assessed using the Forgotten Wound Score (FWS) at TV-1, TV- 4, TV-7, TV- 10, and TV-13.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

3 of 5 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 28 months after the start.

Of 103 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Diabetic Foot, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 28 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 343 studies reached it within 22 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 39.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 28, 2024
First posted
Jun 10, 2024
StartActual
Jul 16, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Mar 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06449638
Lead sponsor
StimLabs
Collaborators
SerenaGroup, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 10, 2024
Start date
Jul 16, 2024
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 2, 2026

Study contacts

Kristy Breisinger
Contact
kbreisinger@serenagroups.com
888-960-1343 ext. 1010
Thomas Serena, MD
Contact
serena@serenagroups.com
814-688-4000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion