An observational study in Hip Fractures and Hip Injuries, sponsored by NHS Lothian. Completed at 2 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 50 Years to 110 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-02-05.
Sponsored by NHS Lothian · Observational
Hip fractures are a major cause litigation in patients undergoing trauma surgery. Common causes of litigation in hip operations are alleged incompetent surgery and development of pressure sources, both of which are associated with poor quality of consent. One aspect of poor consent is patients not being able to retain information discussed with them prior to their operation. There are many factors attributed to this, including pain in the acute setting, administration of sedating medications and the high rate of delirium in this patient cohort. However, even in individuals deemed to have capacity during the consent process, studies have shown that many were unable to explain what type of surgery they had or express knowledge of the potential complications. Importantly, the hip fracture patient demographic is very different from patients undergoing a planned procedure, in that they have had an acute injury following physical trauma, tend to be older and medically frailer. Research into the recall of patients undergoing gynaecological or abdominal surgeries further corroborate patients' poor recall of potential complications in the acute setting.
Patients with hip fractures face a range of risks, some of which can result in a substantial mortality rate regardless of whether surgery is performed. The list of complications includes infections in the hip joint and wound, development of pressure sores, occurrence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), myocardial infarction, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, and potential procedural failures. As such, the ability of patients to remember the discussed complications is critical to their well-being and overall quality of life and remains an unmet clinical need.
Improving Consent In Trauma: Recall (ICIT Recall) will be a multicentre quality improvement project within the NHS clinical care setting. The aim of this study is to assess hip fracture patient's ability retain information regarding their injury, proposed operation, potential complications, and alternatives. following obtaining formal written consent. To that end, the project is intended to be a multicentre study, with interviews across a range of different health boards. The investigators also wish to listen to individual patients' experience of the surgical consent process through a follow-up interview once it has been over one week since their operation. Part (1), the structured face-to-face questionnaire was established to identify the extent of the problem and what patients find memorable or overlooked about the consent process. Part (2), the interview was designed to obtain qualitative data on what patients find important and to allow the participants to tell their story. The overarching objective of this project is to empower patients so that they are more involved and have a greater understanding of the operation that they have consented to. This includes simple measures such as providing a patient information leaflet or improving communication with the patient or close family members during their consent process. Sometimes, poor retention of information is unavoidable due to the significant pain and stress patients are under, and for this reason our aim is to improve the quality of consent for major procedures like hip operations.
As part of the project, the investigators also wish to engage with and capture patient-cantered experiences through a further interview. The investigators aim to like to capture their experience of the consent process entirely from the patient's perspective. Patient stories are a powerful tool to promote culture change in patient care. Unlike surveys, patient stories allow a seamless flow of thoughts and feelings that can provide insight into their journey to recovery. Here, the aim is to highlight the importance of good communication and an overall clear consent process in promoting wellbeing. This aspect of care tends to be overlooked. Addressing this issue is particularly important in delivering compassionate care within the NHS.
848 studies on the registry are indexed under Hip Fractures; 160 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 142 across 277 observational studies indexed under Hip Fractures.
Browse Hip Fractures studies →NHS Lothian is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Participants listed for hip fracture surgery, after sustaining a hip fracture surgery under the care of participating surgeons at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. Approximately 100 participants will be included in this prospective cohort study recruited through consecutive sampling.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Single-group cohort for all hip fracture patients who are candidates for an operation
Other: Semi-structured questionnaire · Other: Post-operative interview
All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured questionnaire within 36 hours of admission
All patients recruited to the study will undergo a semi-structured interview once they have reached post-operative day 7 or over
Incapacity
Proportion of individuals admitted with hip fractures that do not have capacity to consent. The measurement tool will be the 4AT.
Time frame: Within 36 hours of admission
Retention of complications
Proportion of complications discussed initially in consenting individuals that were still retained by the time of interview (within 36 hours of admission).
Time frame: Within 36 hours of admission
Thematic analysis of narrative contents
The personal experience of giving consent for hip fracture operations through semi-structured questionnaires. The measurement tool is a thematic analysis using a qualitative coding framework, whereas the unit of measure is the frequency and prevalence of themes
Time frame: Post-operative day 7 to post-operative day 28
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
NHS Lothian