CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06438640Updated Mar 12, 2026

Evaluating a Strategy to Improve Pre-Anesthesia Care Discussions (My Anesthesia Choice-Hip Fracture)

An interventional study of My Anesthesia Choice-HF Model in Hip Fractures, Femoral Neck Fractures and Intertrochanteric Fractures, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Recruiting at 6 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-12.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,881
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this study is to assess the implementation process for and the effectiveness of a quality improvement (QI) strategy to increase shared decision-making around anesthesia options for hip fracture surgery at 6 US hospitals. The QI strategy is to be facilitated by a clinician-administered 1-page bedside conversation aid designed to improve the quality of physician-patient communication, paired with brief clinician training. The evaluation will occur via a stepped wedge, cluster randomized trial to be carried out over a period of 34 months.

Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to assess the implementation process for and the effectiveness of a quality improvement (QI) strategy to increase shared decision-making around anesthesia options for hip fracture surgery at 6 US hospitals. The QI strategy is to be facilitated by a clinician-administered 1-page bedside conversation aid designed to improve the quality of physician-patient communication, paired with brief clinician training. The evaluation will occur via a stepped wedge, cluster randomized trial to be carried out over a period of 34 months.

Activities at each site will be divided into three phases: Pre-Implementation; Active Implementation; and Sustainment. Data collection will occur across all study phases at each site, although specific data elements collected will vary across phases. To facilitate evaluation, sites will be randomly assigned to one of three possible timing sequences (A, B, C) for project implementation (2 sites/sequence). The duration of the active implementation phase will be the same for each sequence (16 months); however, the duration of pre-implementation and sustainment phases will vary across sequences.

During the pre-implementation phase, data collection on selected outcome variables will occur but no interventions will be delivered. During the implementation phase, site clinicians will undergo training in use of the My Anesthesia Choice-HF tool and the tool will be made available for use in clinical areas with eligible patients. Data collection on key outcomes will continue over this period, and clinicians will receive reminders to encourage tool use. During Sustainment, the tool will remain available for use and outcomes will continue to be measured to assess sustainment of the intervention over time.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Fractures
  • Femoral Neck Fractures
  • Intertrochanteric Fractures
  • Subtrochanteric Fractures

Keywords

  • hip fracture
  • femoral neck
  • intertrochanteric
  • subtrochanteric
  • fracture
  • anesthesia
  • observational study
  • survey
  • shared decision making
  • My Anesthesia Choice
  • MAC-HF
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age 50 and older Planned surgery to treat a hip fracture

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion:

Contraindication to spinal anesthesia: current anticoagulant therapy or coagulopathy Contraindication to spinal anesthesia: critical aortic stenosis Contraindication to spinal anesthesia: skin infection over the lumbar spine

04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,881 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Usual Care

    Usual care will be delivered at each site during the pre-intervention phase. Patients treated in this arm will undergo pre-anesthesia care discussions as per existing clinical routine at each site.

  • Active comparator
    My Anesthesia Choice- HF

    During the intervention and sustainment phases, site clinicians will receive standardized in-personal or virtual training on shared decision making theory and approaches. The My Anesthesia Choice-HF tool will be made available for use during preoperative conversations. Clinicians will receive encouragement to use the tool on study-eligible patients based on their assessment of clinical appropriateness.

    Behavioral: My Anesthesia Choice-HF Model

Interventions

  • BehavioralMy Anesthesia Choice-HF Model

    Brief clinician training on shared decision making, paired with provision of a 1-page tabular format conversation aid listing answers to frequently asked questions regarding common anesthesia options for hip fracture surgery (spinal anesthesia; general anesthesia)

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intervention reach (primary implementation outcome)

    Reach of the intervention will be assessed as the rate of use of the conversation aid during the active implementation phase at each site among eligible patients during the pre-anesthesia evaluation. Data will be collected during the implementation phase at each site.

    Time frame: Day of surgery

  2. Shared Decision-Making Process scale score (SDMP; primary effectiveness outcome)

    SDMP is a 4-item measure of shared decision making; this will be assessed on eligible patients during the pre-implementation and implementation phases of the study to allow for comparison of scores among eligible patients treated in the two periods

    Time frame: Postoperative day 0-3

Secondary outcomes

  1. CollaboRATE shared decision making scale score (secondary effectiveness outcome).

    A 3-item measure of shared decision making; this will be assessed on eligible patients during the pre-implementation and implementation phases of the study to allow for comparison of scores among eligible patients treated in the two periods

    Time frame: Postoperative day 0-3

Other outcomes

  1. Decisional conflict

    The fraction of patients reporting decisional conflict about anesthesia pre-implementation versus active implementation periods will be assessed via the 4-item SURE measure.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 0-3

  2. Knowledge regarding anesthesia options

    Patient-reported knowledge about anesthesia options during the pre-implementation versus active implementation periods will be assessed by a 6-item brief knowledge evaluation

    Time frame: Postoperative day 0-3

  3. Willingness to recommend anesthesia type

    Patient satisfaction with anesthesia care during the pre-implementation versus active implementation periods will be assessed by a single-item "willingness to recommend to friends and family" satisfaction measure.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 0-3

  4. Anesthesia type received

    The fraction of patients receiving general versus spinal anesthesia will be compared during the pre-implementation versus active implementation periods.

    Time frame: Day of surgery

  5. Recovery of ambulation

    The fraction of patients who are able to ambulate independently (i.e. without human assistance) at first clinic follow up between 30 and 90 days after surgery will be compared during the pre-implementation versus implementation periods.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 30 to 90

  6. Fidelity of intervention delivery

    Fidelity of implementation to recommended best practices during active implementation and sustainment phases, assessed via the 9-item UPFRONT Fidelity Assessment. This item will be assessed on approximately 10% of patients treated in each phase

    Time frame: Day of surgery

  7. Sustainment of intervention

    The percentage of eligible patients receiving the strategy during the sustainment phase

    Time frame: Day of surgery

  8. Perceived sustainability of the intervention

    Study clinicians' perceptions regarding sustainability of the intervention will be assessed during the implementation and sustainment phases via the 23-item NoMAD sustainability assessment.

    Time frame: Study months 12-27

06

Study locations

6 of 6 sites recruiting
  • University of Florida Gainesville
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
    • Joshua Sappenfield · Contact
    • Joshua Sapenfield, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Henry Ford Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
    • Carlos Guerra Londono · Contact
    • Carlos Guerra Londono, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03766, United States
    • Stacie G Deiner · Contact
    Recruiting
  • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
    • Lynette Harris, BSN · Contact
    • Christopher Edwards, MD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
  • Cleveland Clinic-Fairview
    Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
    • Sabry Ayad · Contact
    • Sabry Ayad, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Penn Presbyterian Medical Center
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
    • James Baraldi, PhD · Contact
    • Mark Neuman, MD · Principal investigator
    • Veena Graff, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Goldstein EC, Politi MC, Baraldi JH, Elwyn G, Campos H, Feng R, Mehta S, Whatley K, Schmitz V, Neuman MD. Refining, implementing, and evaluating an anesthesia choice conversation aid for older adults with hip fracture: protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci Commun. 2024 Sep 12;5(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s43058-024-00635-3. PubMed 39267183 ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06438640
Lead sponsor
University of Pennsylvania
Collaborators
Wake Forest University Health Sciences, University of Florida, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Henry Ford Health System, The Cleveland Clinic, Dartmouth College, Washington University School of Medicine
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2024
Start date
Aug 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 15, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 12, 2026

Study contacts

Mark Neuman, MD
Contact
neumanm@pennmedicine.upenn.edu
215-746-7468
Mark Neuman, MD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion