An interventional study of Conventional Sputum culture and BioFire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) in Pneumonia, sponsored by Ain Shams University. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-05-29.
Sponsored by Ain Shams University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
This study aimed to determine the impact value of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia panel compared to conventional sputum culture in critically ill patients with pneumonia.
the BioFire® FilmArray Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) emerges as a promising candidate for a rapid and multifaceted diagnostic approach.
This study compare the diagnostic accuracy, turnaround time, and impact on antibiotic management decisions of BFPP versus conventional sputum culture in critically ill patients admitted to the ICU with suspected pneumonia.
2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 106 across 1,247 interventional studies indexed under Pneumonia.
Browse Pneumonia studies →Ain Shams University is the lead sponsor of 1,876 studies on the registry; 423 are open to participants now.
Of its 32 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients subjected to Routine sputum culture Conventional Methods
Diagnostic Test: Conventional Sputum culture
Patients subjected to BioFire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP
Diagnostic Test: BioFire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP)
Sputum culture was done to patients and they received Antibiotics According to its results
BioFire Pneumonia Panel (BFPP) was done to patients and they received Antibiotics According to its results
the ICU length of stay
The potential correlation between the use of BFPP and its relation to the ICU length of stay
Time frame: Five days after admission
This study is completed, as verified in May 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Ain Shams University